| |
EXAMINING
THE CONTRADICTORY
TESTIMONIES BY
PAUL Paul's Confession
added at the end, on April 18, 2000
During the ministry of
Jesus, Saul (who later became Paul), was a dedicated member of a
powerful exclusive Jewish sect called Pharisees. These overbearing
vainglorious Jews were labeled as stiff necked hypocrites, for their
pretensions to sanctity. When they confronted Jesus, he called them;
the sons of a liar.
"You are of your father the devil, and
the lusts of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth
in him. When he speaketh a lie he speaketh of his own: for he is a
liar, and the father of it."
John 8:44 Saul, was a
zealous persecutor of the disciples of Christ. Later on, he became
the first Christian missionary and a Minister to the Gentiles. He
claims to have been converted to Christianity (in c.e. 35), by an
extraordinary sudden appearance of a light from the heaven which
flashed around him. (Acts 9:3). This historical "Vision" is supposed to
have came about on a road, during Saul's journey to Damascus. By his
own statement; Saul's intended mission for this journey was to
persecute more Christian men and women. After this historical
"Vision" the persecutor changed
his mission. He also changed his name to Paul. He ultimately became
the biggest contributor to the New Testament. History records that
Paul's teaching has changed the Christian beliefs. He was vehemently
opposed by other Apostles. Hence, this study is very essential for
those who call themselves Christians but in reality following the
teachings of "Saint Paul" and NOT of Christ.
A question of the fundamental
importance is; If the story of "Vision"
by Paul, who had never before met Jesus, is the Truth then; What did Jesus really say to Paul? There was
only ONE VISION, but we find contradictions of very serious nature
within the following two narration describing the single event. Both
these narrations are told by Paul himself and recorded in the "first
person". Often I hear from the evangelical Christians, in the
defense of these glaring contradictions; there must be an error on
the part of the one who wrote down these narrations (probably
Apostle Luke). Paul did not write the Book of Acts. If that defense
is to be admitted then we have also to admit that Book of Acts is
not a hundred percent trustworthy or reliable Book of the
Bible.
Narration No.
1:
<Acts 22:1ff>. While defending himself before the people of
Jerusalem, Paul narrated the first narration in the Hebrew dialect;
"Brethren and fathers, hear my defense which I now offer to
you." <Verses 6ff> "And it came about that as I was on
my way, approaching Damascus about noontime, a very bright light
suddenly flashed from heaven all around me, and I fell to the ground
and heard a voice saying to me, 'Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting
Me?' And I answered, 'Who art Thou, Lord?' And He said to me, 'I am
Jesus the Nazarene, whom you are persecuting.' And those who were
with me beheld the light, to be sure, but did not understand that
voice of the One who was speaking to me. And I said, 'What shall I
do, Lord?' And the Lord said to me, 'Arise and go into Damascus;
and there you will be told of all that has been
appointed for you to do."
Note: In this
first narration, Paul tells us that Jesus Christ simply directed him
to go to the City of Damascus and there he will receive instructions
from some one. Paul does not mention having personally received the
"instructions"
concerning his ministry and/or his mission "directly" from Jesus
Christ, which
is recorded in the Narration No. 2. The Book of Acts later confirms
that Paul DID get the instructions in the city of Damascus from one
of the disciple of Jesus Christ. A narration very similar to the above is also found in
Acts 9:5ff.
Narration No. 2:
Acts 26:12ff. While defending himself before King Agrippa Paul
narrates the incident in first person; "While thus engaged as I was
journeying to Damascus with the authority and commission of the
chief priests, at midday, O King, I saw on the way alight from
heaven, brighter than the sun, shinning all around me and those who
were journeying with me. And when we had all fallen to the ground, I
heard a voice saying to me in the Hebrew dialect, 'Saul, Saul, why
are you persecuting me? It is hard for you to kick against the
goads'. And I said, 'Who are Thou, Lord?' And the Lord said, 'I am
Jesus whom you are persecuting. But arise, and stand on your feet;
for this purpose I have appeared to you, to
appoint you a minister and a witness not only to the thing which you
have seen, but also to the things in which I will appear to you;
delivering you from the Jewish people and from the Gentiles, to whom
I am sending you, to open their eyes so that they may turn from
darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, in order
that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among
those who have been sanctified by faith in Me."
Note: In this second narration, Paul
says; Jesus Christ himself personally gave all
the instructions for his future role as a
minister. And, Jesus Christ himself
personally appointed Paul as his Minister. Paul did not mention in this narration about Jesus
telling him to take the instructions from some one else when he goes
to the City of Damascus. Similarly, in the earlier narration Paul did not
mention he was given any instruction of his Ministry directly by
Christ himself during the Vision.
This cuts down the defense that Paul was
given the "Instructions" directly, as well as told to take more
"Instructions", when in Damascus.
WHAT IS THE
TRUTH?
IF Jesus had already given the needed
guidance to Paul and also made him
the Minister then why the story of a
disciple of Jesus named Ananias breaking
the news of appointment to Paul, three or
four days later in the city of Damascus, who already knew it? (see
Acts 22:14)
Defense from the readers:
The common defense that I
have so far heard from the readers is that the first narration is a shorter version of the
encounter and the second is a longer version. To this I say; please read carefully the above
"Notes" and the
"Question" with an open mind and
then "honestly" and "truthfully" reflect, if you are indeed a Seeker
of The Truth, Does NOT
the Second Narration contradict and repudiate the First
Narration? If it does, then would an
appointee of Christ make TWO self
contradictory statements and then go
against the teachings of Christ?
Remember Jesus said:
"..and the
truth shall make you free". Jn 8:32.
Fundamental Question:
Did Jesus Christ
personally speak of the sanctification by faith
in Jesus, as narrated in the second narration by "Saint
Paul"?
If
your answer is YES: Then the text which reads, "And the Lord
said to me, "Arise and go on into Damascus; and there you will be
told of all that has
been appointed for you to do" should be the
UNTRUTH.
If your
answer is NO: Then the rest of the writings of Paul and
Paul's theory of Justification by Faith,
should be the UNTRUTH.
Finally, if you are at a Cross Road; Which path should you
take? A path shown by a so called "Minister" of Jesus, or a path shown by the
"Messiah" of God, if they both differ in
the fundamental teachings? Please read Mt. 5:19
and 19:17.
A Recent Christian Criticism
on the subject:
Under the heading; "Responses to
Akbarally Meherally's site", Section A, Part 4, sub-heading "Paul's
Authority" and under the URL
http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Meherally/
the
Christian Critic responds to the above question of Cross Road as
under:
"Amen! I choose to
follow Jesus and His servant Paul."
My Comments to the Critic's
reply:
I have read that the
Almighty God, under the Trinitarian Concept,
could exist simultaneously as "Three Persons". And, could
supposedly take THREE different paths simultaneously living in Three
different forms. But, I have not read that a Believer of Trinity
could also exist simultaneously as "Two Persons" and could take Two
different paths, one going to the Right and the other going to the
Left!!! I wonder, where would "he" go to sleep, at the end of the
day?
THE CONTRADICTORY
RECORDS...
On this fundamentally vital subject of the discourse between
Jesus and Paul, it is recorded as under, in the Book of Acts:
That the men traveling with
Paul, stood speechless, hearing the
voice, but seeing no one. (9
:7)
That the men traveling with
Paul, saw the light but did not hear
the voice of the one who was speaking to Paul. (22 : 9) Can the above discordant records be
defended as the longer and the shorter
records? Surprisingly, in chapter 26
there is no mention of men seeing or hearing anything, although the
discourse recorded here is much longer than those recorded in
chapters 9 and 22 !!!
YOU BE THE
JUDGE...
I am repeating the story that I tell my audience:
Say, you went to a Sermon and heard a Minister saying that
last month while he was sitting on a bench in a park an elderly man
came and set next to him. The elderly gentleman identified himself
as a Professor of Theology. The Minister asked the Professor: "How
to have an eternal life?" The Professor suggested that he should go
to the public library get a particular book by the famous author so
and so and read the relevant chapter on the subject. The Minister
thereupon borrowed that book from the library and read the suggested
chapter. He added; It was an enlightening material on the subject of
Eternal Life and he was fortunate to have met that Professor of
Theology.
Say, the next Sunday you went to another Church and happen to
hear the same Minister saying the same story and asking the same
question to the Professor. But, this time the Professor of Theology
opens his brief case, takes out the book by the famous author and
the Professor himself reads the entire chapter on the subject
of Eternal Life to the Minister.
Say, if you raise your hand and ask the Minister; "How many
times have you met this Professor of Theology in a park or outside?"
And, if the Minister tells you: "My son, I have met this Professor
only once."
Please tell me honestly; Would you hear the rest of his Sermon?
Paul's Confession to his
Falsehood!!!
Please read below what Paul has questioned
to the readers of his Epistle, and then you be the Judge of Paul's
Confession to Falsehood.
Paul interrogates:
"But if through my falsehood ("lie" in
K.J.V.), God's truthfulness abounds to his glory, why am I still
being condemned ("judged" in K.J.V.), as a sinner?"
Romans 3:7
(N.R.S.V.) Would you
knowingly and consciously encourage your own children to resort to
"Falsehood" so that they may Glorify the God before
others? Does your God seek
such "False Glory" from you or your children??
Jesus claimed he was "the Truth" (Jn.
14:6); and he preached "the Truth shall make you free" (Jn. 8:32);
and he also declared that the "another Advocate" that was to come
after him would be "the Spirit of Truth" (Jn. 14: 16/17), under the
circumstances it is most unlikely that he would personally appoint
anyone to carry forward his mission that would "through his
falsehood" try to Glorify the truthfulness of God.
Author:
Akbarally Meherally
|