Theory of Everything
    Every generation of human beings has had a great scientific mystery to solve.  Today, the great mystery for us how to combine quantum physics with general reletivity, which so far seem to be mutually exclusive theories.  The theory of everything combines relativity with quantum physics.  It most likely will not really be the theory of everything--this is just a phrase created by the media.  There will probably be more mysteries to solve after this one is.  Although scientists with Phd's are most likely going to solve this problem, I am going to give it a shot myself anyways, just for fun.  So bear with me... 
     I think that
everything travels in waves.  Why do things travel in waves?  This is because:  in order for a reaction to occur, an action needs to occur.  In other words, there is a cause for everything.  I believe in pendulum swings.  The enitire universe is one big pendulum swing.  Space/Time bends and streches in places.  It's as simple as that.  It's sort of like one big rubber band.  That is the theory of everything. 
    
Matter and energy are interconvertable.  A certain amount of energy can be converted into matter and antimatter, and vice versa.  There is also a certain particle that is instantly connected to another particle regardless of how far away it is.  This is evidence that there is no empty space.  (I forgot what this particle is, I think it's an electron and positron, but I don't remember)  Matter attracts matter.  Energy is always being omitted and absorbed.  (Moslty omitted and diluted-Entropy) 
     If the universe were totally diluted, it would all be one substance .  It would be like a still guitar string.  However, it is made of different things.  This is like a string that has been plucked. 
Everything that exists is the result of pure subsance being acted one way then reacted in the opposite direction.  That is why things travel in waves. I think this is consistant with string theory.  I don't really know anything about it, but I think string theory says the same stuff. 
     For all we know, matter and antimatter are just desructive waves.  Then what happens when consructive waves meet? 
     Entropy can be explained by the guitar string analogy.  The string slowly goes back to being silent, consistent, and nonmoving.  But--What the hell plucked the string?  Is it a perpetual system?
     The periodic table gives all the elements.  What if the universe was suddenly pressurized?  Would the elements be altered just like chemicals are altered when the system is pressurized?
     Are quarks the way they are because the universes environment and equilibream dictate that they be the way they are now?  If some characteristic of the universe were altered, would the quarks and thus the elemants be altered also?  After all, they are all interconnected and continuous aren't they?
     Are there different universes?
     Spinoza, in the 1600's, beleived there was no empty space; that space bended and streched in places.  Matter and energy and space were the attributes of this bending and streching.
     If an object traveled the speed of light, would it become 2-dimensional?  Would it be infinitely massive?
As an object approaches the speed of light, it compresses reletive to a slower moving object.  This could be explained by the object being made of a wave, this wave compresses the faster it moves.  However, within the wave, you cannot tell you are being bent.  This tells you how things are within the wave.  This could be because of a dimension we don't know about.  It's like the point of view within the wave is a projection--a dimension is omitted in order to view the wave.  It's like a 3-dimensional object being projected onto the x-y plane.  If you were to draw a 2-d wave and see that when it compresses like a spring, the length of the string does not change, it is the overall wave (string) that compresses.  That could be why when the wave is compressed, the wave does not know it.  It only sees its length, not whether it's compressed or not.  It's compression is a dimension outside of itself.  This could explain why inertia encreases with speed.  Just as a springs stregth inreases as it is compressed, so does an object (wave) as it increases its speed.  However, at constant speed, nothing changes. 
     The reason we cannot see extra dimensions is because we have not evolved the ability to see them.  If extra dimensions exist, there is a way to see them, we just have to find it.
     Aristotle believed that a man could be confined to just a small room for his entire life and he could figure out everything with just the stuff that immediately surrounds him.  In other words, everything you need in life is surrounding you right now.  All the laws of physics can be deduced if you are creative enough with your environment.  I believe that the theory of everything can be found by studying water.  This is because
waters wave and particle properties can be easily observed.  Everything that exists has wave and particle properties.  One of the great mysteries of light is that is acts both as a wave and a particle.  Water moves in waves and it is made of molecules.  Light moves in waves and it seems to be made of photons.  Now, what about gravity? Studying how a tightened string reacts when it is plucked should also help understand waves and particles.  I think that we should stop separating waves from particles and realize they are part of the same thing.  Particles are probably just regularities in wave patterns.  They are stable patterns of waves that exert a force to create stability and thus what we consider particles - matter.
    
Does everything that exists have bothe wave properties and particle properties? If so, then why is this?  --I think this is the question that needs to be answered in order to solve our great mystery.
     I believe that
quantum physics is the particle aspect of things and relativity is the wave aspect of things.  They are the micro and the macro, respectively.
     I am going to assume that balance exists in the universe, just like a yin-yang.  Gravity can be explained if it is the reaction to an action that separated all matter.  It's like when a rubber band is stretched out, it compresses back in on itself.  What we think of as gravity is just matter returning back to its original state.  However, if this were the case, would gravity always be constant?  With a rubber band, the closer it is to the unstreched state, the lighter the contracting force.  The more streched it is, the stronger the force.  Gravity is dependent on the amount of matter.  The more matter per volume, the greater the force.
     According to string theory, extra dimensions can exist on a macro or micro level.  Matter can be explained by stating that it is made up of a micro-dimension that separates it from other particles.  (To understand an extra dimension on a micro level, imagine a hose from far away.  It looks two dimensional but up close it is 3.)Matter can be energy that folded around itself through an extra dimension.  When matter and ant-matter touch, they both unfold each other and turn into what we call energy which radiates outward in the form of a wave.  Think of matter and anti-matter as being two spheric shells.  For every matter particle created, antimatter must be created also. 

               
The meaning of E = mc2:
    
Every amount of mass has an amount of potential energy in it.  A mass of one pound is equivalent of the amount of energy in the atomic bomb dropped on hiroshima.  (I saw this on the Discovery Channel)  It is also essential to know that two types of matter exist in the universe - matter and antimatter.  When matter and antimatter come into contact with one another, they both combine to form energy.  (For every particle of matter that is created, a particle of antimatter must be created.  Each will have the same amount of mass but an opposite charge.  For example, every element of matter is made up of protons, neutrons, and electrons, with positive, neutral, and negative charges, respectively.  In antimatter, there are opposites-the opposite of a proton has the same mass but a negative charge, the opposite of an electron is called a positron, with the same mass but a positive charge.)  Matter and antimatter are created from energy and energy is created from matter and antimatter; both are interchangeable.  It is probably more correct to break these down into mass and energy.  If energy is to be converted into mass, it must be split exactly in half so as to produce matter and antimatter.  If mass is to be converted into energy, both matter and antimatter must be combined or simultaneously form 1/2 of an energy unit each.  There is probabley a balance in the universe between matter and antimatter. 
     It is important to note that antimatter was discovered by someone in the 1920's who was playing around with math equations for atoms looking for "funny mathematics" when he discovered that for every proton and electron produced, there are objects produced with the same mass but opposite charges.
    
The meaning of the above equation is that when you increase the energy, you increase the mass.  When you decrease the energy, you decrease the mass.


    Can an oscillation move forever?  If not, the reason could be explained by the theory that energy is quantized.  It will decrease in quantum amounts until it eventually reaches zero.  This could explain why any observable oscillation always seems to stop.  If the universe behaves the same on humans observable level that it does on a macro level, than no infinite oscillation can exist anywhere, ever.
     Why are things quantized?  Are dimensions related to quantization?  Is structure the result of stuff being quantized, or vice versa?
     If you were to pluck a string, then cut in in half and pluck it again, you will the same sound, only higher.  That is, you will hear the same note on a higher octave.  What if this is related to the quantization of things.  This could be the origin of structure in the universe.
3/25/04 - The reason that there are probabilities that a rubber ball can pass through a wall that it is thrown against (no human being will ever probably do this because humans won't be around as long as the probabilities require.  These "absurd" probabilities can be explained by the fact that every action occurs as waves. 
The reason that there are probabilities that a rubber ball can pass through a wall that it is thrown against (no human being will ever probably do this because humans won�t be around as long as the probabilities require.  These �absurd� probabilities can be explained by the fact that every action occurs as waves.  According to quantum physics, when an object on is dropped downwards on earth from a building, there is a probability that the object will move upwards (or will at least not just fall downwards toward the center of gravity � what if objects on their way �down� stop being forced toward the center of gravity for a brief moment in time, we just don�t pick up the data to record this event?)  (or it just happens too fast for people to pick up these effects.  It could be that gravity acts away and towards, it's just the towards in more dominant than away.  This could be explained by the fact that everything in the universe acts as waves � even gravity.  Sometimes gravity needs to act in the opposite direction in order to act in the direction that it does now.
    Here is a table with which I am trying to compare and contrast the two ideas with the eventual goal of combining the two theories:
Quantum Physics VS.
Relativaty
Wave
Particle
Analog
Digital
Micro Macro
Entire thing, continuous, oneness, whole,one
Small, indivisible, separate, many
Area found by summing area of individual rectangles (Calculus)
Contiuous Integral (area under a curve)
(Calculus)
Matter
Energy
Exact
Approximation
Ideal
Practical
Small indivisible parts cannot by broken down any further, they are then assumed to be unbreakable.  Induvidual parts can be separated form each other, however.
Entire system can be bent and stretched, but it is probably assumed that entire sysem as a whole cannot be divided.
Confined to and part of a system.  Cannot exist outside of system.
The system
Combination of all dimensions
Less dimensions needed
Continuous as far as dimensions go.
Sum of indivudual demensions
Country
City
very fast
very small
Theory of Everything Links
String Theory:
Theory of Everything:
Galactic Guide - TOE String Theory
First Science on TOE
Superstring Theory
Ultimate TOE
Superstringtheory.com
CalTech - TOE
The ineffable 10 Dimensions
Quantum Mechanics and a TOE
whatis.com- Superstringtheory
The Final TOE
University of London String Theory Group
Outlines of a Theory of Everything
Other:
Quest for a Theory of Everything
Mathematical Structure
Theoryof everything.org
Chaos into Structure
Pbs TOE
Chaos, quantum mechanics, and gravity
The Universe is One Pure Substance:
Flux Theory
Quantum Aether Dynamics
The Shrinking Theory
Is the universe a hologram?
The Particle Adventure Home Page
Worlds Larges Particle Physics Lab
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
non locality, turbulent shear flows
Bell's Theorem:
Is faster than light travel or communication possible?
Bell's Interconnectedness Theorem (seamless whole)
Usenet Physics FAQ
Book: Mysticism and the New Physics
Subject: QM
Non locality and the interp. of QM
Connections between numbers and geometry
Subtle Connection
Some French University
Non locality in nature and cognition
The EPR Paradox and Bell's Inequality
Bell's inequality and the case for entanglement interactions
Parity Invariance
Bell's inequalities and non locality
Phys.Web - best of atomic, molecular, quant. phys
Counter factuals and nonlocality of QM
non locality and theories of causation
Online Science Magazines:
PhysicsWeb
New tests of quantum non locality
Objective Science
Bell experiment
Plus Magazine (Math Stuff)
locality or non locality in QM
arxive.org
Relativity: Quantum Physics:
Intro to Quantum Mechanics
Relativity on the WWW
Quantum Physics Online
QM - Stanford Enyclopedia
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1