Useless Sleepers
It is legal for public administrators to kill the poor in Canada - as long as they do it in a politically correct way.
To Hitler we must credit the expression "useless eaters" but David Johnston of Victoria has has put a spin on the rhetoric with his "right to sleep" campaign. His constitutional challenges have gone before the courts and links to the considerable media coverage can be found in the archives of

                               
[email protected]

Do we call his arguments obo the useless sleepers of Canada, "arguments under humanitarian law"? Examine them in the archives of C_C and decide for yourself.

How do Canadian public administrators get away with legally killing the poor in Canada? The basic procedure was well documented in the Frank Paul case:

http://www.frankpaulinquiry.ca

BLP

This procedure and variations on it are sometimes called breaching or "breaching-like procedure" (BLP). To date police departments in BC have not proscribed such procedures. Here are the FACTS on how BLP works as a method of corporal punishment and extra-judicial execution:

(1) The victim is located or relocated in a public place where it is illegal to sleep (alley, park etc).

(2) If the victim tries to use tents or awnings to ward off the elements, they are removed by authorities. In other words, the homeless who are enterprising enough to build homes to ward off the elements and protect their health and lives have those homes destroyed.

(3) Sleep is disrupted by police in various ways, which futher damages health.

(4) Eventually the predictable outcome is achieved, ie destruction of health if not death from sleep deprivation and exposure to the elements.

Thus BLP is prima facie, a method of corporal and capital punishment.

THE CONSTITUTION ... so what?

The victims of such extra-judicial executions are denied various constitutional rights. They are not the beneficiaries of the constitutionally-guaranteed
rule of law since the instrument of execution (the alley etc) is an illegal place to sleep. It is not legal for police to place people there. The procedure is cruel and unusual. It is a denial of the constitutional commitment (s36) to essential services, ie those necessary to prevent harm to a sub-population which numbers several thousand in BC and expectedly 10x that across Canada. They are denied a fair and public hearing before extreme punishment. What does this do to their life and security under rights to life, liberty and security? All of the underlined expressions refer to explicit sections of the Canadian Constitution, so what do we say about BLP in Canada and fundamental justice?

It is simply a murderous practice used daily by public administrators in Canada for criminally illegal corporal and capital punishment.

If BLP were applied to an ethnic sub-population like "Walking People" (capital letters) it would be deemed criminal under Criminal Code of Canada sections 318 and 319.
How might tens of thousands of Canadian "walking people" accelerate the formation of a new ethnicity to protect themselves from loopholes in the law which subject them to such atrocities daily?

Ask the Stanley Park Tribe: [email protected]
BLP allow public administrators to turn Charter/Constitution s36 human rights upside down. They have usurped the "right" to take away essentials which serve to sustain  health and lives for the humblest and poorest Canadians who have resourcefully fashioned homes for themselves. This deprival/removal of essential services is a cowardly, thuggish, immoral, unjust, illegal, murderous atrocity.
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1