Behind  the Scenes of Saint Peter’s  Desecration

On December 8, in a bad show, the St. Peter's Basilica and the Dome, heart of Christianity, have been degraded to a giant screen (or better "giant scorn") on which to project images relating to climate and environment, new dogmas of the dominant ideology. "A show inconceivable in St Peter's Square, an affront to basilica symbol of Catholicism, "wrote Riccardo Cascioli, director of the Catholic newspaper online "Nuova Bussola Quotidiana". The show was presented by the Vatican, as a kind of praise to set that recalled the encyclical "Laudato sii" and the Conference of Paris climate and already so fed many doubts, since there It had nothing to do with the Feast of the Immaculate which was celebrated Tuesday, as well as with the opening of the Jubilee and the imminence of Christmas.

In fact the show then was much worse than feared. No Christian symbol, in case the allusion to some Islamic mosque that projected the Basilica of St. Peter, it does something disturbing. It 'was one slide boring and sometimes dismal (for sound effects)  of images of animals, typical of a certain deification and Gnostic neopagan Earth. Thus, in Saint Peter's, on the feast of the Immaculate Conception, the celebration of the Mother of God was the favorite celebration of Mother Earth, to propagate the dominant ideology, that "religion climatist and ecologist ", neo-pagan and neo-Malthusian which is supported by the powers of the world.  A spiritual desecration (because that place - let us remember – is a place of Christian martyrdom). And a cultural desecration. In fact, the concentration of solemnity Christian (the Immaculate, the Jubilee, Christmas), in a scenario such as the Catholic Basilica, the Bernini's colonnade and Michelangelo's dome, on holy ground bathed in the blood of Peter and many other Christians, would justified - if anything - a large projection on a large screen located streets (not the Basilica) of beautiful images of our sacred art, perhaps accompanied by great Christian music tradition.

The message was summed up in the title of the show, "Fiat Lux", which It sounds like mocking challenge and as a parody of the Holy Scripture in which the expression "Fiat Lux" is the creative act of God and then the Light that is Christ, came to illuminate the darkness of the world (as it says the prologue of the Gospel of St. John).  In fact this show was the opposite: the "world" sheds light on the Church in darkness. And 'the Church in the show receives light from the world.   So a symbolic and humiliating overthrow of the Catholic faith. That precisely this is the interpretation to be given to the event confirms a step of the interview of Pope Bergoglio to Antonio Spadaro in About the Council, for whose anniversary - falling just 8 December - was called the Jubilee.  
The Pope in fact said: "Vatican II was a re-reading of the Gospel in the light of contemporary culture. "  So Bergoglio would the world (contemporary culture) that enlightens and judges the Gospel. Instead the Church has always affirmed contrary: Christ is the true light that shines on the face of the Church and
so lights up the world.  No coincidence that one of the fundamental documents of the Council, "Lumen Gentium ", begins with these precise words:" Christ is the light of people: this Sacred Synod gathered together in the Holy Spirit, want so ardently proclaiming the Gospel to every creature (cf.. Mc 16,15), to enlighten all people with the light of Christ that shines on the face of the Church. "
In the metaphor of light there is a whole view of things which highlights the opposite direction of the pontificate bergogliano compared to the Council Vatican II and the Magisterium of the Church's constant.
Besides, there is also a sign language that is very telling.
In fact, the evening of December 8, in addition to the Basilica, also large Nativity of St. Peter's Square for the occasion, was off: it never that the light of the Child Jesus disturbs the ritual staging of the new neo-pagan religion.

There would then be observed that - applying the Bergoglio’s  criteria of judgment – that show should be considered by the Church a unacceptable waste of money that could more appropriately be spent on the poor. It means nothing that the cost of the show is paid by external private companies, because the Holy See should have refused the "gift" and ask to donate that amount to the poor. However, it raises many doubts even the identity of those who offered This "package" to the Holy See who then uncritically put scene all by providing the Basilica and the square.

Cascioli writes: "It was indeed a 'gift' of the World Bank (and of its program Connect4Climate) and a number of associations and foundations particularly interested in environmentalism, of the Vulcan Inc. co-founder of Microsoft Paul Allen and the Okeanos Foundation-for sea, institutions which not coincidentally named two pagan gods. To perform the installation was the study Obscura, a name that is a program. The aim of 'Fiat Lux', as stated in a press release sponsors, is  to educate and inspire changes around the crisis climate across generations, cultures, languages, religions and the classes. So "educate religions". That's why they " brightened " the darkness in St. Peter's: a confirmation of the ideological character of the show. Cascioli also notes that “The World Bank is also the institution that since the 70s is one of the main culprits of those policies to poor countries (loans in exchange for programs for birth control)  that Bergoglio repeatedly denounced. And on the same wavelength it is the other  associations that environmentalism and birth control are two sides of the same coin ".

Unfortunately insisted and uncritical support of Bergoglio to the Conference  of  Paris (which does not compete in a pope), ends up identifying the message of Jubilee mercy on with the battle on "Climate change" for human causes, whose scientific however, it is quite questionable.
So Richard Lindzen (climate scientist" in 2007, one of the most important scholar of physical of the atmosphere, ") said:  "Future generations will wonder, with amazement puzzled as ever the developed world of the early twenty-first century fell into a panic hysterical because of an increase in global average temperature of a few tenths of a degree. Will wonder how, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain projections of mathematical models, combined with unlikely chains of interference, it has been taken into consider the possibility of returning to pre-industrial ". It's amazing that Bergoglio - always detached and critical of the Catholic doctrine and dogmas of the Church - then go to marry uncritically these dogmas that environmentalists do not even have basics sound scientific knowledge.  And it is puzzling that a pope as indicates that the emergency climate.  The apostasy of entire peoples from faith in the true God is not a drama that deserves most heartfelt appeals? The war to the family and to life? The forgetfulness of Christ and the persecution and massacre Christian communities? There was no need to dedicate to them the first encyclical, written in his own hand? Because he preferred to deal with reptiles
rubbish and waste? Bergoglio is an enigma. He says he does not believe in the existence of a "God
Catholic ", but believes the dogma of political correctness. Alain Finkielkraut has called "Supreme Pontiff journalistic ideology world".

Antonio Socci

Published by  “Libero”, 10 dicembre 2015

http://www.antoniosocci.com/i-retroscena-della-profanazione-di-san-pietro-2/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LoStraniero+%28Lo+Straniero+-+Il+blog+di+Antonio+Socci%29