|
Wednesday,
August 28, 2002
Nontenure faculty still seek
union
By Kelly Josephsen
Pantagraph staff
NORMAL -- Nontenure-track faculty at Illinois State
University still believe a union is the best way to improve pay and
benefits, despite a plan to study their working conditions.
Nontenure-Track Faculty Association head Sharon MacDonald fears the
study won't guarantee action. "Previous studies show
administration-led efforts to improve working conditions don't
stick," she said. "We want a binding contract so we can work
out solutions and be sure they're permanent."
Interim provost Al Bowman last week asked a committee to suggest
ways to improve treatment of ISU's 456 nontenured faculty, who are
full- and part-timers working on one-semester or one-year contracts.
The Nontenure-Track Faculty Association had announced plans in April
to seek representation from the Illinois Education Association.
MacDonald said the campaign is going well, with her group refocusing on
gathering authorization cards now that the fall semester is under way.
Authorization cards indicate how many nontenure-track faculty are
interested in a union. Thirty percent -- 137 people in this case --
must return cards to take the issue to a binding vote.
MacDonald did not say how many cards are in, but said the group will
collect cards until they get enough to ensure an election. A majority
"yes" vote is needed to form a union.
"We got off to a great start last spring, and cards have kept
coming in since then," she said. "As word of our efforts has
spread, more and more nontenure-track faculty are asking to help."
MacDonald thinks job insecurity at the start of this semester --
some nontenured faculty weren't rehired and others got pay cuts --
contributed to increasing interest, especially because unionized
employees got mandatory cost-of-living raises.
Campaign leaders are teaching nontenured faculty about benefits of
unionization and telling the campus about their goals, MacDonald said,
adding the group is getting support from tenured faculty.
She has several concerns about the administration's study.
First, she said, the committee is not addressing benefits or late
contracts. Many nontenure-track faculty don't know if they'll get
insurance from year to year, and late contracts delay pay, benefits and
privileges such as parking.
She added parts of the report are misleading: Minimum pay, grievance
procedures, teaching load rules and evaluations only helped
full-timers, who make up less than half the nontenured faculty at ISU.
But MacDonald hopes some good can come out of the study: "We
welcome the attention, and we hope the committee can help prepare the
administration for post-election contract negotiations."
|