|
Dr Peter
Jesudason
3:28pm Wed Feb 5th,
2003
A basic tenet of Islam
and other great moral traditions is the equality of man before God.
This poses a serious conflict of interest for Umno Youth who want to
preserve what I believe is a constitutional relic of the past, "Malay
special rights" and to be ardent defenders of the Islamic faith. It is
clearly illogical to practise a supremacist , racist policy and at the
same time claim to adhere fervently to Islam.
Just because "Malay special rights" is constitutional does not give
it moral legitimacy. Surely, Umno Youth will accept that a Malay
Malaysian millionaire's 'special right' to receive a 7-10 percent
discount for a purchase of a house is morally abhorrent. If this is so,
why aren't there calls to 'means test' the eligibilty for a discount?
This should apply to all other privileges.
Unlike the 10 commandments, the Malaysian constitution is not written
on a tablet of stone. Indeed the founding fathers of our constitution
would be hard pressed to recognise much of our constitution as it has
been amended on numerous occasions.
The "Malay special rights" as entrenched in the constitution needs to
be seriously debated by society as to whether it will actually lead to
the advancement of a particular race. It is my contention that "Malay
special rights" has been abused in its implementation and has created
division within the Malay community and caused unnecessary racial
tension.
What is wrong with "Special rights of the underprivileged" as a new
constitutional clause to replace "Malay special rights"? |