|
Simon Says
6:49pm Mon Jan 27th,
2003
I refer to R Sharif's
letter
regarding the raid o要 Malaysiakini.com. While I would applaud his
attempt to provide a viewpoint from the perspective of the police, I
cannot agree with the contents of the letter.
Firstly, I would like to make my stand clear o要 this
matter. I believe that the raid was wrong and misguided. To me, the
letter
from Petrof was the expression of an individual's opinion o要 a certain
issue and nothing more. It was meant to promote free intellectual
discussion o要 the subject matter, which until Umno Youth's police
report, it actually did.
The free flow of ideas and opinion is or should be the
aspiration of any modern nation, and Malaysia, or the Malaysian society,
should not shy away from this given the fact that Vision 2020 is a much
repeated goal of the government. We cannot even hope to say truthfully
that we are a developed society if we cannot tolerate a view that is
different and maybe even controversial. Let's not even talk about
aspiring to be a developed nation.
Against this backdrop, let's have a look at the law.
From what I can understand of the law or laws passed by men to govern
society, o要e primary purpose is to maintain order and the other is to
promote the development of society as a whole.
R Sharif has rightly pointed out the relevant
provision of the law o要 sedition which purportedly justifies the
actions of the police.
However, if we apply R Sharif's method of interpretation to, say, the
threat to burn down the Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall or to bathe the
keris in non-Malay blood, or the call to close all Chinese schools,
wouldn't that be sedition as well in the sense of "promoting feelings of
ill-will and hostility between different races and classes of
Malaysians"?
I certainly do not agree that the police have been
very efficient in their pursuit of the truth. I believe the more
appropriate word is biased.
Justice cannot live in a vacuum and be separated from
freedom and liberty. What we have seen here from Umno Youth and the
police is the attempt to suppress freedom of speech (which by the way,
is a constitutional guarantee) by perverting the law o要 sedition.
It is true that non-censorship of the Internet cannot
be absolute, but I believe the expression of a personal opinion of a
Malaysian who obviously cares and the publishing of
that opinion are miles or maybe even a universe away from child
pornography. The law of sedition was never intended to strangle free
speech, nor was it intended to be a tool of oppression.
When we try to justify an unjustifiable act, any
attempt to apply logic to the situation normally ends up in failure.
Lastly, kudos to editor-in-chief Steven Gan and the
rest of the Malaysiakini.com people for sticking to their principles. We
need more people like you around.
|