Machine Imprint Varieties & 
Paper Type Varieties

Topics

     Introduction: Machine Imprint Varieties
        Information Display Varieties
                Variety A: Without and With Time
                Variety B: Without and With Greshayim
                Variety C: Text Alignment
                Combinations of Varieties A, B and C
        Locality Name Varieties
       
        Variety D1: Tel Aviv
                Variety D2: Beer Sheva
                Variety D3: Petah Tiqwa
                Variety D4: Rishon Leziyyon

        Printer Characteristic Varieties
                Variety E: Font and Spacing
                Variety F: Ink Varieties
        Other Varieties
               Variety G: "Strange Numbers"
    Paper Type Varieties

Introduction: Machine Imprint Varieties

        The study of Massad Label Machine Imprint Varieties uncovers a large domain of possibilities. The machine imprint is practically a postmark, bearing a locality identification (Place, Branch number & Terminal number), as well as a date and time of imprint. Thus from a postal history perspective, each of the imprint varieties can be considered as a different postmark, and it is therefore interesting to study and record the difference between these postmarks, and when each of these postmarks was in actual use. The fact that the postmark was computer-printer generated and not as a result of stamping of a type-set or rubber-cast postmark bears no significance.  On the contrary, it is a reflection of the introduction of new technology, into an existing system of postal services. 

        The varieties presented in the following paragraphs are classified into four sub-categories. The first category is titled "Information Display Varieties" and displays the difference in imprinting, irrespective of the place where the imprint took place. In a sense it can be considered as a tutorial to the domain of Massad Imprints. The second category, titled "Locality Varieties" presents the study of the different imprints of the locality names. The third category, titled "Printer Characteristic Varieties" includes font and ink color varieties. The fourth and last category "other Varieties" includes the "oddities".

 

Information Display Varieties

 

Variety A: Without and With Time

            During the early stage of the Massad System operation, the date was imprinted only on EMS and "Mahir" (i.e. Express) labels. The regular and registered labels had no date imprint. Time imprint on other types of labels are observed as early as September 16th, 1994, from a Jerusalem Post Office Branch (figure 1). It should be noted that all new changes to software printing format, were tested by the Massad System Team first in Jerusalem, and only after a trial period were released to other localities in Israel. This created an overlap period during which certain terminals were using the new format and printing with date (Figure 2a) whereas other terminals were still using the old format without the date (Figure 2b).

Figure 1: Variety A2 "With Time" - September 16th 1994: Earliest observed date with time imprint on regular and registered labels. 
Note: Characters printed at the top of the label are a printing error. See also Variety G
Figure 2a: Variety A2 "With Time" - Overlap period: Label from Jerusalem with "Time" printing Figure 2b: Variety A1 "Without Time" - Overlap period: Label from Tel-Aviv without "Time" printing (also latest observed date of A1 Variety)

 

Variety B: Without and With Gershayim

            During the early stage of the Massad System operation, imprinting of the Hebrew date was without Gershayim (Hebrew for quotes). The system was changed to incorporate Gershayim into the Hebrew text, sometimes during the the month of July 1995. The first observation of this change is on a label imprinted in Jerusalem on 4 Jul 95 (Figure 3). The earliest observed example from Tel-Aviv dates from 30 Jul 95 (Figure 4). A pair of labels from Naharriya terminal 910035 display the difference in the appearance of the text before incorporation of Greshayim (30/7/95) and after (20/8/95; Figure 5). The fact that the the terminal in Naharriya continued to print without Gershayim after the terminals in Jerusalem and Tel-Aviv already transitioned to this new form of imprint, is another example of the gradual process used to introduce new software versions and printing formats in the Massad System.

Figure 3: 04/07/95 Earliest observed date of incorporation of Gershayim (Variety B2)
Figure 5: Gershayim Transition - Two samples from Terminal 910035 in Nahariyya - Variety B1 without Gershayim and Variety B2 with Gershayim
Figure 4: 04/07/95 Earliest observed date of incorporation of Gershayim (Variety B2)

           There exist three possible combinations of Variety A (Without & With Time) and Variety B (Without & With  Gershayim) as depicted in the following table:

  Time Variety Gershayim Variety Earliest Observation Latest Observation
1 A1 Without Time B1 Without Gershayim 17 Dec 91 (FD) 5 Oct 94
2 A2 With Time B1 Without Gershayim 16 Sep 94 30 Jul 95
3 A2 With Time B2 With Gershayim 4 Jul 95  

            The observed transition period of introduction of the A2 With Time Variety is from 16 Sep 94 until 5 Oct 94. The observed transition period of introduction of the B2 With Gershayim Variety is from 4 Jul until 30 Jul 95. Thus from the data presented in the table above it is possible to make an approximation of the duration of the system software change process, which was probably around one month. It is important to note that these are only observed dates, and that the actual dates might be different (i.e. the transition period could have been longer).

Variety C: Alignment Varieties

            Various varieties of text alignment exist, and that is common to many localities. In the following study of labels that were imprinted in Tel-Aviv one can observe six different left alignment varieties. The identification and classification of the alignment variety is executed by examining the left edge of the imprint. In the fully aligned variety (Variety C0, Figure 5) all lines are aligned to the right of the insertion stop mark (Note: This is the 3mm black bar that is printed 9mm down of the top-left corner. Its purpose is to indicate to the postal clerk the strip insertion limit, that will result in centered imprinting on the label area). 

Figure 6 - C0 Variety

In Variety C1a (Figure 6), one line (the second from the top) is offset a single character to the left. In a similar fashion, in Variety C1b (Figure 7) the fourth line is offset one character to the left. 

Figure 7 - C1a Variety Figure 8 - C1b Variety

Variety C2a (Figure 8) has two lines which are offset (the second and the fourth) and in Variety C2b the second and the third lines are offset (Figure 9). 

Figure 9 - C2a Variety Figure 10 - C2b Variety

In Variety C3 (Figure 10) three lines are offset to the left.  

Figure 11 - C3 Variety

            Since the alignment is a system setting that is controlled by software, it is interesting to know the time period during which these varieties were available. In a study of over 200 labels imprinted in Tel-Aviv, the author observed that varieties C1a and C2a appear till January-April 1993. Varieties C2B and C3 appear till June- July 95. Varieties C1b and C0 appear only as of 4 Jul 95 and onward. These earliest and latest know dates of these varieties are summarized in the following table:

Alignment
Variety

 Earliest Known Date Latest Known Date
C1a 17 Dec 91  
C2a 17 Dec 91  
C2b 11 Jan 93 (1) 30 Jul 95
C3 14 Feb 93 (1) 18 Jul 95 (1)
C1b 12 Sep 95 (1)  
C0 4 Jul 95  

Notes:
(1) Observed date. The real date is probably later.

            The conclusion derived from this data is that there were probably two system software updates, each resulting with a new pair of varieties. The first was probably in early January 1993. The second was as of early Jul 95. Additional supporting evidence corresponding to the second update comes from the fact that the terminals which were imprinting variety C1b were found to have imprinted variety C3 prior to the change, and similarly, terminals which were imprinting variety C0, were found to have imprinted C2b prior to the change.  

Combinations of Varieties A, B & C

        There are a total of twelve known combinations of the varieties of A (Time), B (Gershayim) and C (Alignment), as summarized in the table below. The various images of these variations are included in different sections of this page, and can be viewed by means of the hyperlink provided in the "Sample" column.         

No Time Variety Gershayim Variety Alignment Variety Availability Sample
1 A1 Without Time B1 Without Gershayim C1a Line 2 offset 17.Dec.91 - 25.Feb.93 (1) Figure 7
2 A1 Without Time B1 Without Gershayim C2a Lines 2 & 4 offset 17.Dec.91 - 21.Jan.93 (1) Figure 9
3 A1 Without Time B1 Without Gershayim C2b Lines 2 & 3 offset 11.Jan.93 (2)- 5.Oct.94 Figure 13
4 A1 Without Time B1 Without Gershayim C3 Lines 2,3 & 4 offset 10.Feb.93 (2) - 5.Oct.94 Figure 11
5 A2 With Time B1 Without Gershayim C1a Line 2 offset 17.Dec.91 - ??? EMS
6 A2 With Time B1 Without Gershayim C2a Lines 2 & 4 offset 17.Dec.91 - 1.Mar.93 (1) (3)
7 A2 With Time B1 Without Gershayim C2b Lines 2 & 3 offset 8.Mar.93 (2) - 5.Oct.94 Mahir
8 A2 With Time B1 Without Gershayim C3 Lines 2,3 & 4 offset ??? - 5.Oct.94 (4)
9 A2 With Time B1 Without Gershayim C2b Lines 2 & 3 offset 5.Oct.94 - 30.Jul.95 Figure 10
10 A2 With Time B1 Without Gershayim C3 Lines 2,3 & 4 offset 5.Oct.94 - 30.Jul.95 Figure 12
11 A2 With Time B2 With Gershayim C0 Zero lines left offset 30.Jul.95 - 21.Oct.96 Figure 6
12 A2 With Time B2 With Gershayim C1b Line 4 offset 30.Jul.95 - 21.Oct.96 Figure 8

 Notes:
(1) Observed date. Actual date could be later.
(2) Observed date. Actual date could be earlier.
(3) These varieties were possible for EMS & Mahir frankings only. Observed.
(4) These varieties were possible for EMS & Mahir frankings only. Assumed, but not yet observed. 

Figure 12 - Combination no. 8 (A2,B2,C3) Figure 13 - Combination no. 3 (A1,B1,C2b)

 

Locality Name Varieties

 

Variety D1: Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv-Yafo

             The correct imprinting of the name of the city should be "Tel Aviv-Yafo". There are 3 known varieties in this domain, as summarized in the following Table:

Table 1: Varieties of the Tel Aviv-Yafo Imprint

Note: The third column presents the known timeframe that the variety was "active" in the specific branch, according to investigation of various lots and collections. This is by no means an official and exact figure, and the author encourages correspondence with additional data, that will help map the phenomenon with greater precision.

ID Inscription / 
Observed terminals (dates)
Sample
D1a Missing Yafo 
(Hebrew and English)


Observed appearances:
403 Geula (18 Aug 92 - 31 Aug 92 (Note no. 1))
  Figure 14: Variety D1a - Missing Yafo (Hebrew & English)
 
D1b Missing Yafo (in Hebrew)

Observed appearances:
404 King George (14 Jan 93 - 24 Jun 93)
429 University (22 Jan 93 - 4 May 93)
430 Even Gvirol (18 Jan 96 - 22 Apr 96)

  Figure 15: Variety D1b - Missing Yafo (Hebrew)
 
D1c Missing Yafo (in English)

Observed appearances:
403 Geula (8 Feb 93 - 20 Dec 93 (Note No. 2))

  Figure 16: Variety D1b - Missing Yafo (English)

Notes:
(1) According to a collector's report the lack of "Yafo" in the inscription was remedied on 31 Aug 92. However, examining variety D1c, it seems that the error was corrected only in Hebrew.
(2) "Yafo" in English was probably added sometime during 1993. Exact date unknown.

Variety D2: Beer Sheva

The observed varieties from Beer Sheva are without hyphen (Variety D2a) or with hyphen (Variety D2b).

Figure 17: Variety D2a - Without hyphen Figure 18: Variety D2b - With hyphen

 

Variety D3: Petah Tiqwa

The observed varieties from Beer Sheva are without hyphen (Variety D3a) or with hyphen (Variety D3b).

Figure 19: Variety D3a - Without hyphen Figure 20: Variety D3b - With hyphen

 

Variety D4: Rishon Leziyyon

The observed varieties from Rishon Leziyyon are one which the Hebrew locality name is written in full (Variety D4a) and one in which the locality name is written in short-hand "Rashlatz" (Variety D4b).

Figure 21: Variety D4a - "Rishon Leziyyon" Figure 22: Variety D4b - "Rashlatz"

 

Printer Characteristics Varieties

 

Variety E: Font and Spacing Varieties

            Two font types are known: a wide font (Figure 23) and a narrow font (Figure 24). The wide font exists since the system introduction, whereas the narrow font was observed on labels as early as 28 Nov 93. Notice that in the wide font there is a line of spacing between the fourth and fifth lines of text. A third font was observed as early as 28 Sep 96, just a short time before the introduction of the new type of label (light blue background). The difference between the second type font and the third type font is noticeable by comparing characters such as "Mem-Sofit" and "Tav".  

Figure 23 - Wide Font: Earliest observed date - system introduction 17/12/91 Figure 24 - Narrow Font: Earliest observed date 28/11/93

Figure 25 - 3rd Font Type: Earliest observed date 29/08/96

 

Variety F: Ink Color

        Two known types of ink color are known. The common and more popular one is violet-blue. The other type is more blackish in tone. The differences can be observed by comparing Figures 24 & 26.

Figure 26 - Black Tone Ink Type

 

Other Varieties

 

Variety G: "Strange Numbers"

        Several instances of the imprint depicted in Figure 27 have been observed. The is no clear explanation to this phenomenon at this time. It could be a result of a software bug, or printing of a control sequence from the printer mechanism. This is still under investigation.

Figure 27: "Strange Numbers"

 

Paper Type Varieties

            Throughout the period of service of the Second Definitive Series, there were several printings of Massad label strips. The differences are noticeable by examining the color shade and the presence (or lack of) cyclometer numbering. The brown printing has two sub-varieties: without and with cyclometeric numbering. The red shade has been observed only with cyclometeric numbering. Another characteristic of the red printing is that the adhesive-supporting paper was yellow, whereas for the earlier brown printing it was white.

Figure 3: Three paper type varieties - Regular labels

            For the registered labels there exist similar paper type varieties. However, one noticeable difference for the brown registered is that the cyclometric numbering is different than that of the regular label (the letters "No" are missing).

Figure 3: Three paper type varieties - Registered labels
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1