Irminenschaft and Ancestor Worship

By: Steve Anthonijsz

 

 

It has often been pointed out in modern Heathen literature that “we honour our ancestors, but we do not worship them like we do our gods”. Many Heathens are uncomfortable with the term “ancestor worship”. Some go so far as to say “ancestral reverence” or simply “honouring our ancestors” to avoid this term. This is because it is true: we do not honour our ancestors on the same level as we worship the gods. But neither do other cultures that practice ancestor worship. There is no reason to have to apologize for our faith! Other cultures look to their ancestors for inspiration and advice, just as we do. We toast to our ancestors at Wintarnaht, Iulzît, and on any occasion in which we are especially aware of our closeness to our forefathers. This is no different from what other cultures do in their own ways. The term “ancestor worship” itself—because of its implications—is problematic for many of us, although the concept in and of itself is a comfortable one. Sadly, no other term is available in our language. Therefore it is best that we clarify what exactly we mean by this term and why it is important to us.

 

For almost 96 percent of the world's population, ritual offerings and prayers to deceased blood relatives are an integral part of everyday life. People of Eastern cultures such as the Chinese, Koreans, Indians, Japanese, and Tibetans, along with great segments of the populations of South America, Mexico, Cuba, Indonesia, Polynesia, the Eastern Baltics, Africa, and New Guinea offer respect to and seek guidance from their ancestors. This is true in Iceland and Scandinavia as well. Yet because most of us in the Western world were raised in the abrahamic tradition--which condemns ancestor worship--Western newcomers to Heathenry tend to be sceptical of it. However, ancestor worship fits perfectly into an integrated Irminic view of the physical and spiritual worlds. 

 

We have the ability to access certain wisdom and comfort through the ritual of the “minnatranc” (“memory toast”) and other methods of contact with our deceased family members. Like many other cultures, our forefathers taught us that our essence comes back to life in Mittigart through our descendents. This phenomenon is known in Old Norse as aptrburðR (“back birth” or “rebirth”). We are our altmâgâ.

 

Are the gods also our Altmâgâ? Yes and no. Whilst this is not addressed in out indigenous literature, to say that they are not our ancestors would be to ignore a wide body of literature from the Norse, English, Goths and Romans. The Anglo-Saxon kings knew themselves to be the scion of Wóden (Wodan). The Swedish kings, similarly, knew themselves to be the descendents of FreyR (Frô). The Goths referred to their ancestors as Ansis (“sovereign divinities”) who are further described as semideos (<L “half-gods”).

On the other hand the idea that any of the Ensi or Wanâ were at one time human beings who were later deified by their fanatic followers would be insolent. The Götter are forever Götter, and were never men. The gods are as real as the rocks, the sun, and the trees, as real as the passion of love, hatred, and cunning. The Götter may live in men. They may even on occasion appear as men. But they are not, and have never been men.

 

Old Norse literature is rich in sagas that involve the theme of rebirth. One of these is þórðar saga Hreðu. In this tale, Þord battles a berserk named Barek. During the fight Þord is wounded on the arm by Barek’s poisoned blade. Þord proceeds home and soon dies. A son is born to Þord’s wife, Helga, during his funeral feast. The child has a scar in precisely the same spot as his father’s fatal wound! Nine days later, at the child’s vatni ausa (water sprinkling) and nafn gefn (naming ceremony), the boy is named Þord, after his father. At 12 years of age, the boy avenges his father by killing Barek in single combat. It seemed to the younger Þord that he had grown great by this act.

 

The Anglo-Saxon kings demonstrated their belief in rebirth by their very names, successive generations being named with similar familial roots, e.g.; Swefred, Swebriht, Selred, Swithred, Sigeric, and Sigered; also Ælfrid, Ælfric, and Æþelrede.

That the Ensi themselves are subject to rebirth is evidenced by the prophesy of Godotuom (Götterdämmerung). For example, we might consider Widar, who avenges the death of his father, Wodan. This “god of vengeance” is considered by some to be the rebirth of Wodan.

 

What about all the classic conceptions of slain warriors living on in Walhalla?

It is true that our literature discusses an afterlife in Walhalla. Odin holds another hall for the dead as well, known as “Walafirst[1].” Warriors are not the only ones to attend these halls, however, as evidenced in Egil’s Saga and Ynglinga Saga. Moreover, Wodan is not the only god to hold halls for the dead. Walburga Frouwa has her own hall for half the fallen warriors called “Folcwise[2]”. And, of course, Hel’s hall, Na-Strand, is discussed in Völuspá, and is generally thought of as part of Hellaheim.

References exist to demonstrate that the folk attend the hall of the deity that best suits them. A good example is in Hárbardzljoð (St. 24-25). In this tale a mysterious ferryman (Locho), says to Thór (Donar):

 

“In Valland was I                   and waged battles,

urged on the athelings,            nor ever made peace.

Begets Odin all earls   slain by edge of swords,

But [Donar], the breed of thrælar.”

 

To which Donar replies:

 

“Uneven would’st thou                      deal to [Ensi] their followers,

                        if too great might were given to thee.”

 

Does this not contradict the idea of rebirth? Not necessarily.

Whilst a variety of opinions exist to explain the coexistence of these afterlife beliefs (as well as others mentioned in the sagas), one has gained favour in many modern Heathen circles. There may be various aspects of the mind/soul complex that are separated at death. Some of these—particularly the atum (luck, spiritual energy); lichamo (physical appearance), and the folga (totem spirit) are passed down the tribal line.

Another way to view this might be to borrow from other tribal traditions. For example, the Yòrubá people of Nigeria--whose convictions have spawned such religions as Santería, Macumba, and Candomblé--believe that when a person dies their emí (soul) goes to Ikole Orun (the Realm of the Ancestors). Later, the emí may return to Ikole Are (Mittigart) in the body of one of the descendants of the deceased. The Celts hold to a similar belief in souls that live in the Færy Mounds--much like our howes in which the Alpâ reside--only to return in the bodies of their progeny. So perhaps our time in the halls of the Götter is temporary, lasting only until our rebirth.

 

I leave it to the reader to decide his own belief in this area.

 

One would imagine that everybody would be thrilled to have "proof," or a way to authenticate knowledge, of an afterlife. If one were to ask a hundred "average" people if they believe in life after death, one or two might say “yes”. Five or ten will say “absolutely not.” But about 90% would say, "Well, I'd like to, but I really don't know." Yet when Irminenschaft offers them a way to "know," they still resist.

What is meant in this case by Knowledge? Knowledge is what someone really realizes in his heart and gut. It's not always logical, but it is totally real and true. A mother, for example, knows that she loves her child. If a person or thing starts to hurt that child, she will instantly, automatically, and without analysing the situation do anything in her power to protect him. Even if the child misbehaves, or grows up and ignores her, that love will not waver. Knowledge is derived from feeling and experience. It is not quantifiable. One knows when one loves another person.  An individual knows when a book, music, or a sunset moves him, knows when he feels peaceful or angry. Not because somebody has listed all the good characteristics of the person loved or explained the sentence structure in the book, the mathematical precision of the music, or the light waves of the sunset, but because when experienced, it is felt. Logic has nothing to do with it. In fact, knowing something in this manner is much more powerful, accurate, and trustworthy than linear processes of "learning" or "understanding."

Ancestor worship provides the knowledge that life is a continuum by enabling the individual to actually communicate with one’s departed family members and feel the profound feelings that it engenders. This may not happen in a familiar form--you may not find your Opa sitting on the edge of your bed--but it will nonetheless be real and true. It is not a product of wish fulfilment or hysteria; it will come through as irrefutable knowledge of the non-linear side of reality.

 

Why are we so afraid of this knowledge? When we actually experience this access to other worlds, we are forced to question the very foundations and premises upon which we have built our lives--questions that invite change. And people are naturally resistant to change.

Try to imagine the kinds of decisions you would make if you knew you would continue to live after your apparent death. Think about the number of short-term choices you make now. After all, if you believe that this is your only time around, than it makes sense to cram it with gratification and sensation. Growth and development would seem less important than acquisition and indulgence. Environmental destruction, pollution, the elimination of plant and animal species, fast cars and fast food--all are products of our culture's fixation on the current moment. But if you knew that you’d come back through your descendents, you would be far less likely to cut down the rain forest, use non-renewable resources, or poison the rivers and oceans with lethal waste. Laws won't stop you from tossing a junk food bag out of your car window, but understanding that you need a healthy Earth (Nirda) for your own long-term survival might stop you from tossing the bag! Wouldn’t you also be more interested in child education and youth activity programmes?

An obvious question would be, then, how do we go about honouring our altmâgâ? The Eddas and sagas tell us little. Beowulf mentions the rite of the mimmi (minnatranc). And there are scattered references to individuals sitting on burial mounds—but this is more for magical work than for ancestor worship. Irminen must rediscover much of this, as the ways of worshipping our ancestors (except for the minnatranc) has been lost. Some may wish to borrow from foreign traditions, while others may wish to devise their own. Which is better? The one that works, of course! If nothing else, our line has always been a practical one. We need today to maintain this tradition of “whatever works” just as our own ancestors did ages ago.

 

Through the honouring of our ancestors—whether or not we prefer to use the term “ancestor worship”--one is able to experience life as a continuum. And once one has, nothing will ever be the same again. One does not have to die and be brought back to experience it; ancestor worship is our connection to the past and our road map to a better future.

 

 

Return to Mittigart folder

Return to Irminenschaft hopepage



[1] “Outcrop of the Slain”

[2] “Folk Medow”

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1