FOR THE DEFENCE OF LIBERTY
The unanswered questions
September 11th 2001
Please read the following and watch the videos.
Make up your own mind.
People who are willing to trade their liberty for security, will soon find that they have neither. -Benjamin Franklin In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is truly revolutionary. -George Orwell
FACT: There was an act of terrorism on September 11th 2001 which included: PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO
PLEASE WATCH ALL OF THE FOLLOWING VIDEOS & READ THE ASSOCIATED TEXT.Radio Talk Show Host Alex Jones Warns of Globalist Plan to Use Bin Laden to Attack America - Wednesday July 25th 2001 On Wednesday July 25th 2001, during a taping of Alex's local cable access TV show in Austin, Texas, he elaborated on how the Globalists were set to use their operative Osama bin Laden and that the preparations for a terror attack were in their final stages. Alex didn't have a crystal ball, he merely studied the elite's propaganda and was able to connect the dots and make a prediction that would materialize on September 11, 2001. PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO OF THAT 25th July 2001 BROADCAST (click play below).
1. Where is the wreckage of Flight 77, a 60 ton aircraft that struck the Pentagon on September 11th 2001? There is no wreckage consistent with a Boeing 767, such as engines, fuselage, wings, tail, landing gear, seats, luggage, dead bodies, etc seen in the any of the pictures taken from the scene of the accident on that day. This includes live "rolling camera" footage of the crash site at the time of the crash. The wreckage that is seen is consistent with a smaller aircraft or larger missile. The official explanation is that - the plane vaporised - in the fireball. This sounds incredible and unbelievable, and it is! If the plane had vaporised, it would have been the first one to have done so in the entire history of aviation. The temperatures reached in the fireball wouldn't have been high enough to vaporise the plane. If the plane had vaporised (which is impossible), then how is it that the temperatures reached were high enough to melt the steel, aluminium and titanium of the plane, but yet all of the body parts of the passengers were not only found, but identified? There is a complete absence of any Arab names on the published list of passengers - a glaring discrepancy in the official reports. A sceptic (Thomas Olmsted) filed, under the Freedom of Information act, a request of all the DNA & autopsy reports made at the Pentagon. Fourteen months later he received the reports and published them in the online Sierra Times; THE TITLE IS: "AUTOPSY: NO ARABS ON FLIGHT 77" 2. Why did building 7, which was 47 storey high building (half the height of the twin towers), of the world trade center complex collapse at 5.30pm? How did the fires in that building actually start? There was no debris that struck building 7 that could have caused a fire or that weakened it's structure to such an extent as to precipitate it's collapse. Several other buildings on that day in the World Trade Center complex were struck with more debris than building 7, and these buildings had more significant fires in them, however they did not collapse. Why did Mr. Silverstein, who is the lease holder of the Twin Towers and building 7 & the principal beneficiary of the insurance policy of the World Trade Center Complex, say on a PBS documentary (Rebuilding America) that he told the fire department to "PULL IT" when discussing building 7? "PULL IT" is a colloquial expression used in building demolition circles, the term is used to describe the act of bringing down a building in a controlled manner (i.e. through the use to explosions, bulldozers etc). The fire department is not trained to "PULL" buildings. The fire service puts out fires, conducts an investigation into the cause of those fires, secures buildings once fires are extinguished. Demolition of buildings deemed unsafe through fire damage is a skilled procedure undertaken after consulting with expert engineers and takes many days and weeks to prepare. In a building such as Building 7 of the World Trade Centre Complex, a 47 storey sky-scrapper it would have taken months to organize a demolition. If we are to believe that Mr. Silverstein meant by the term "PULL IT" when talking to the chief of the fire department: "To stop all efforts at putting out the fire in building 7". Then this begs the question; under what authority can Mr. Silverstein inform the chief of the fire service to cease the efforts of putting out fires in a building? How is it that building collapsed in a typical fine dust implosion, neatly falling into a pile of rubble - exactly how it would have collapsed if the building had been laced with explosive charges. Buildings that collapse from fires fall in a random and haphazard fashion. Was this purely a chance event? 3. How & Why Did The Twin Towers Collapse? No steel sky scrapper structure has ever collapsed as a result of fire prior to September 11th 2001, when on one day 3 steel structures (the Twin Towers and Building 7) are said to have collapsed - all from the result of fires. It is recognized and accepted that the force of the airplane impact itself would not have been enough to cause either of buildings to collapse. The buildings took many times the force of a single airplane impact during high winds. After the impact of the airplanes, the buildings did not sway or creek, or show signs of imminent collapse. Witnesses inside the buildings on lower floors, at the time of impact, state that they hardly felt the impact. How can a fire that was burning black smoke (indicating that it was oxygen starved) have generated the continuous heat of 2500°F required to melt or weaken the steel that triggered the so called 'Pancake phenomenon' of the floors collapsing one on-top of the other that caused the Twin Towers to collapse? The maximum temperature triggered by Hydrocarbon combustion is 1600-1800°F - in optimal circumstances. Most of the jett fuel was consumed in the initial fire ball when the planes struck the buildings. Were the people standing in the windows of the towers at the site of the airplane impact & signalling for help in the "white hot inferno of 2500°F that was melting the steel", in some way indestructible? Why did fire-fighters at the scene, a television crew in a helicopter circling the smoking buildings, and numerous people inside the building state clearly on live-television on the day that: " they clearly heard a series of secondary explosions?" How is it that two buildings struck by airplanes in two different physical areas collapse symmetrically, in an almost identical manner? How is it all buildings collapsed at free fall speed, near to or at the speed of gravity? For example, if you had dropped a "grand-piano" from the top of the twin towers, the piano would have taken the same time to fall to the ground, (through air), as it took for the buildings to collapse. The towers collapsed as if the tons of concrete and steel, that would have offered resistance in the fall, was blown away in synchronicity and symmetry. Why was the concrete pulverized into small particles of dust, blown out at high velocity travelling hundreds of feet. Surely in a random and haphazard collapse the concrete would have remained in large chunks or blocks attached to the steel cross beams of the building. Why was everything pulverized into small particles producing a fine ash. This includes the people trapped in the building, the furniture, computers, telephones, fire resistant carpets and ceramic utility equipment etc? Surely most of this would have remained relatively intact unless it was blown to smithereens by numerous high power explosives. The energy required to produce this ash is far in excess of the energy generated from hydrocarbon combustion, or the collapsing building. NOTE: I wouldn't expect to find a working telephone, but at least part of a telephone or computer - no such item was found. Everything was in small component pieces or fine ash. 4. Why did FIRE ENGINEERING (http://fe.pennnet.com/) an internationally respected journal of the fire fighting service (quote: For over 122 years, Fire Engineering magazine has provided training, education, and management information for fire and emergency services personnel worldwide. Articles are written by experts in the fire service and focus on lessons-learned.) call the WTC investigation conducted by FEMA a 'HALF BAKED FARCE'? Why did FIRE ENGINEERING declare openly that 'NO STEEL STRUCTURE HAS EVER COLLAPSED FROM FIRE'? If that is the case then what happened on the world trade center complex would have been a first, not on one, but on three separate occasions!! Why did FIRE ENGINEERING declare "THE REMOVAL OF DEBRIS FROM THE WORLD TRADE CENTER MUST STOP, AS THIS CONSTITUTES A CRIMINAL OFFENCE WITHOUT A PROPER AND COMPLETE INVESTIGATION BEING COMPLETED OR EVEN STARTED!!"? Why was public testimony from NYC fire-fighters excluded at the 9-11 commission enquiry report?
5. Flight United 93 crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. At 10.06AM around the time of the crash of flight 93, CBS reported that two F-16s were on the tail of "United 93" (AP, September 13 2001; Nashua Telegraph, Sep 13th 2001). Before the blanket reporting ban and gag-orders were imposed on FAA officials, an FAA air traffic controller stated "an F-16 had closely followed United 93, even making 350-degree turns to stay in close range of the airliner. The F-16 was in hot-pursit, he must have seen the whole thing." (The Independent UK, August 13, 2002; CBS News). Reuters, 13 September 2001 "Pennsylvania state police state that wreckage of Flight 93 was found 8 miles away from the crash site, where local residents report burning debris falling from the sky and a second plane in the sky at that time". "Finding debris so far from the ground is indicative that the plane was disintegrating well before it hit the ground, as would be the case if it has been shot shown, this is consistent with reports of secondary aircraft being in the area." The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette September 12, 2001. Why despite numerous eye-witness testimonies and obvious physical findings at the crash site did Rumsfeld-Cheny-Bush Co. , FBI and NORAD state the common line: "United 93 had not been shot down." The Bush administration was transparently eager to avoid the evidence of having shot down an airliner carrying American citizens. WHY? The official story evolved over time. The "Let's roll story" - Todd Beamer (who to this day does not appear on the Social Security Death Index Database http://ssdi.rootsweb.com/ ) made a call, and spoke to to Lisa Jefferson an operator. He declined to speak to his wife (Lisa Beamer who was subsequently serenaded in Congress), despite the operator (Lisa Jefferson) offering to put him through to his wife! Despite evidence pointing to the fact that cell-phone calls were impossible over 3,000 ft, on September 11th there seemed to be no problems on making cell phone calls for prolonged periods of time on airlines!! ( http://www.physics911.net ) If the "Let's Roll" story is true then it certainly would mean that passengers were about to re-take the plane. The pilot and co-pilot were dead (reportedly). On board United 93 was passenger Donald F. Greene, an experienced pilot and passenger Andrew Garcia a former Air-Traffic Controller. With assistance (from air traffic control) these two could have landed the aircraft. BUT WOULD THIS HAVE POSED IMMENSE PROBLEMS FOR THE 'OFFICIAL 9/11' STORY??? A safely landed aircraft meant 'living hijackers' if there were any. What would their story have been? What might have they said about their intentions (most observers think "the hijackers" thought they were taking part in the drills that were being simultaneously conducted on 9/11)? And what if there were no hijackers onboard, there had been the release of a deadly gas in the cockpit, killing the pilots and the plane then taken under remote control, using AWACS Airborne Warning and Control Systems that are known to exist. An AWACS system can knock out on-board flight controls and remotely choreograph the airplane. The official version of events would have fallen to the ground. It is possible to fly a plane from the ground. (Unmanned Global Hawk Flies from Edwards Air Force Base California to Royal Australian Air Force Base, Edinburgh, South Australia -ITN April 24 2001). It would suggest then that along with physical evidence, eye witness testimony and compelling circumstantial evidence that Flight 93 was shot down to destroy evidence and silence suspects and witnesses forever. Finally why did the FBI assume control of the accident investigation from the National Transport Safety Board (NTSB)? The FBI continues to refuse to make public the complete data from either the of the black boxes (the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder). The pretext is always alleged to be national security and the war on terrorist. It is worth recalling that in the case of American Airlines Flight 587, which crashed in Queens on November 2001, the NTSB conducted an investigation and made public detailed information about the cockpit voice recorder within 36 hours (Philadelphia Daily News, November 15 2001; UK Daily Mirror, 2002). Why did the FBI obliterate the crime scene in Shanksville? The FBI filled the crater, cut down and shredded all the trees and covered all burnt ground with a layer of topsoil? All this was done within days. LOOSE CHANGE is a 9-11 Truth Video which has been downloaded/watched more than 10 million times on the internet! PLEASE CLICK THE LINK TO WATCH THIS
VIDEO FOR YOURSELF.
PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO WITH AN OPEN & ENQUIRING MIND.
LINKS:
www.911truth.org
www.nineeleven.co.uk
http://www.physics911.net/ RELEVANT 9-11 TRUTH NEWS ARTICLES: |
