10.
Hypothesis about mechanisms of objects interaction
in elementary system
10.1.
First hypothesis. About interaction of information quarks.
Why there are always three of them
If to proceed to
the level of interaction of two elementary quantum objects, here it is
impossible to speak about extremity of information speed between two
information quantum objects or about link speed of the information at an
elementary level. It is simply instant for the
object.
The quantum
system with final number of parameters can not change continuously. It can
change only discretely (skipping). It can not change in intervals between
changes, because in this case interval between changes would be divided again into
two or several intervals, according to amount of changes, and we again would
come to one interval, during which the changes in system do not occur (i.e.
phase of stability).
If a real
object of elementary system can be kept as quantum system with final number of
parameters, the transition of such object from one status to another occurs
instantly for this object. But for the external observer the
"instant" transition of the object in other status will be observed
as a complex process. It is possible to compare this phenomenon with a dream.
When the man sleeps deeply, it seems,
that time of the dream has flown instantly. But the external observer can
inform him, that he has overslept the certain time.
From definition
of elementary quantum objects as discrete ones, it follows, that during instant
for itself (but not for the external observer) transition the object should
exist in some other form, but not as discrete co-operating system. It is
possible to assume, that such form is the formal form of existence very similar
to that we notice at physical vacuum.
In this form
the object exists only as the information and should not cooperate with objects of elementary system
by any other way, i.e. it should not show its properties. But for this purpose
it should be written down as the passive information on any active carrier
physically existing during its transition in the informal or material form.
Hence, the
information forming quantum object, should be in an inactive status at the
moment of transition, thus object passes in a passive status and sleeps.
Generally it is natural to information formations. For example, all animals and
man use to sleep. An inactive status is usual for bacteria, viruses, software
and computers. Rather inactive status is usual for nature in winter etc.
Therefore, it would be illogical to give up quantum discretely varied objects
of elementary system in an opportunity to exist in an inactive status during
internal reorganisation. (You can find out more details about processes, which
could occur at the moment of transitions from 4-th hypothesis, see it lower)
We admit, that,
being in an inactive status, any information formation exists as information
which has been written down on any physical carrier. And the physical carrier should
be at this time an information
formation in an active status. Such property of elementary objects determines
ways of their interaction, that defines structure and properties of objects
formed in these structures and also property of these structures.
The interaction
of objects which are in the formal form has the character of information
interchange (see hypothesis 3). The system containing the transmitter and the
receiver of the information (1-st and 2 object) is necessary for high-grade
information interchange. Besides at a primary level at any moment of time there
should really be a physical carrier of the information of co-operating quanta
(3-rd object). So, for maintenance of the existence in system should be not
less than three quantum objects, and they are capable to exist only by
co-operating with each other. A chain of their interactions will be differently
disturbed and the object will be destroyed.
Let's call,
according to the well known analogy, the discrete quantum objects of elementary
system the information quarks (IQ). We shall designate them, by analogy again,
as dark blue, red and yellow (see fig. to section IX).
The existence
of system of three information quarks is possible on the following algorithm
consisting of six phases.
Let at any
moment of time the dark blue quark is in an active status and is a basis
(carrier of the information). Red and yellow quarks are in an inactive status
and are placed on it as an information (recording). Dark blue quark is active
and it shows its properties, therefore all system will be dark blue.
Let the yellow
quark be active in the next phase of process. In the system two quarks will be
active - dark blue and yellow. All the system will show the resulting colour -
i.e. becomes green.
At the next
moment dark blue quark goes to a passive status, i.e. enters an active basis of
yellow quark. In this system the yellow quark remains in active status, and all
system becomes yellow.
In the third
phase the red quark becomes active on yellow quark. The system again shows the
resulting colour - it becomes orange.
And so on. All
the system gives six colours, three of them correspond to primary quark
colours (dark blue, red, yellow), and
three give resulting colours (green, orange, violet).
The direction
of transitions causing the order of colour change, can be direct and opposite,
but not third, because it is possible to combine only two order of their
consecutive scanning. The direct order can correspond quarks, and opposite
corresponds antiquarks. (the Similar process can give spin effects on different
objects). Instant photos of such objects will allocate 12 multi-coloured
objects - 6 quarks and 6 antiquarks.
If there are
three described objects in the system, distinguished on a phase on 1/3, such
information object always will have white colour, i.e. it will be colourless.
From a combination of objects, which status differs by phases and directions of
detour, it is possible to create both colourless, and multi-coloured objects,
and also objects, which colour cyclically varies in due course depending on a
phase. Probably, on such principle the fragments of some elementary particles
are arranged. The interpretation of phase statuses of objects co-operating on
the given algorithm, will help to explain the reasons of stability and
instability of some elementary particles.
Eight
step-by-step algorithms of interaction of four information quarks is also
probable. Formations which don't have their own weight of rest and carrying
some interactions can be arranged on a such principle. At such algorithm,
fixing an object status by the manner similar " to an instant photo
", it is possible to register eight various statuses of the same object.
Probably, it will help to solve a riddle of eight registered types of neutrino.
The example of functioning of such formation will be shown at the description
of hypothesis 2.
10.2.
Second hypothesis. Cube of statuses - alphabet of the microworld
Let's look at
the model of information system, which can be constructed of three letters and
their three statuses. Let's call each letter L, M, G, for example. Let each
letter can have three statuses "+1", "0", and
"-1". Then from 3 letters and them 3 statuses we can create twenty
seven words - 3*3*3=27. (Possible combinations from the letters E, M and G we
shall not consider).
The evident
performance of this system can be received as follows. If in three-dimensional
rectangular system of co-ordinates
three statuses of parameter Å, i.e. "-Å", "Å0" and
"+Å" are placed on one axis, three statuses of parameter Ì,
"-Ì", "Ì0" and "+Ì" on the second, and three
statuses of parameter G, i.e. "-G", "G0" and "+G"
on the third axis, as a result of crossing these parameters we shall receive
space of probable statuses. If each word-status can be presented as a cube and
combined in the same order, we shall receive a cube from 3 lines of cubes on 3
in width and 3 in height. There will be 27 words (statuses) in all, 26 of them
are settled down on cube's surface, and one in a status (E0, M0, G0) is at the
centre. We admit, that each word of this cube is a letter (quantum) for other,
younger system of interaction. In this system of 27 primary words, as in usual
alphabet, it is possible to create tens thousand secondary words and millions
of long works. There is quite enough material to create the most complex
objects.
To give
physical interpretation of properties of these "words", we shall
admit, that parameter Å - is shown as a component which forms electrical
effects, parameter Ì is a component which forms magnetic effects, and parameter
G is shown as gravitational effects.
Strong and weak
interaction can't be referred as basic, because they have a non-comparably
small radius of interaction and, hence, there is a probability that they can be
a consequence of some effects caused by spatial structure of co-operating
elementary objects.
For example,
the strong interaction of two particles is very similar to interaction of two
common charged indefinitely thin rings threaded in each other, as parts of the
chain.
They will
always aspire to settle down so that a body of each ring was threaded precisely
through the centre of the ring, connected to it. The distance equal to the sum
of radiuses of both rings will be established between their centres. At
rapprochement of rings on a smaller radius or stretching of objects on the same
distance they will render resistance to action, rendered on them. At a
stretching of such object on the large size, rings will pass through each other
and the force of resistance to that stretching will be replaced by force of
pushing away of two common charged rings. The size of this force will
correspond the size of charges of these rings. If during the passing the one's
charge will be changed, force of attraction will appear between two rings, as
between differently charged objects.
Let's return to
the cube of states formed by interaction of parameters Å, Ì, and G, and shown
on the figure. If we arrange objects in the same manner they are settled down
on the cube of states, then on each side of the cube we shall see the following
picture.
Table1:
Sides of States
Cube
1 side: G –
positive (G+)]
|
(E0,M-,G+) |
(E0,M0,G+) |
(E0,M+,G+) |
|
(E-,M-, G+) |
(Å-,M0,G+) |
(E-,M+,G+) |
|
(E+,M-,G+) |
(E+,M0,G+) |
(E+,M+,G+) |
2 side: Ì – positive (M+)
|
(E-,M+,G+) |
(Å-M+,G0) |
(E-,M+,G-) |
|
(E0,M+,G+) |
(E0,M+,G0) |
(E0,M+,G-) |
|
(E+,M+,G+) |
(E+,M+,G0) |
(E+,M+,G-) |
3 side: G - negative (G-)
|
(E-,M+,G-) |
(Å-,M0,G-) |
(E-,M-,G-) |
|
(E0,M+,G-) |
(E0,M0,G-) |
(E0,M-G-) |
|
(E+,M+,G-) |
(E+,M0,G-) |
(E+,M-,G-) |
4 side: Ì - negative (M-)
|
(E-,M-,G-) |
(Å-,M-,G0) |
(E-,M-,G+) |
|
(E0,M-,G-) |
(E0,M-,G0) |
(E0,M-,G+) |
|
(E+,M-,G-) |
(E+,M-,G0) |
(E+,M-,G+) |
5 side: Å – negative (E-)
|
(E-,M+,G-) |
(Å-,M+,G0) |
(E-,M+,G+) |
|
(E-,M0,G-) |
(E-,M0,G0) |
(E-,M0,G+) |
|
(E-,M-,G-) |
(E-,M-,G0) |
(E-,M-,G+) |
6 side: Å – positive (E+)
|
(E+,M-,G-) |
(Å+,M-,G0) |
(E+,M-,G+) |
|
(E+,M0,G-) |
(Å+,M0,G0) |
(E+,M0,G) |
|
(E+,M+,G-) |
(E+,M+,G0) |
(E+,M+,G+) |
Once again we
shall note, that the received system " of primary words " is not
equivalent to objects of the microworld. It describes only a set of fragments, of
which they consist, i.e. it is "alphabet", in which the primary words
play a role of letters-states. From this alphabet, probably, all
"secondary words" and "sentences" are constructed. They
show themselves as real quantum objects of the microworld.
As in any
language for designation of some concepts the separate letters are used, and in
the "alphabet" there should be
letters, which have a direct equivalent in real elementary physical
system of interaction (i.e. in the microworld).
The first
letter as a combination (E0, M0, G0) we can identify as vacuum.
These two
letters (E-, M0, G0) and (E +, M0, G0) should work as an electrical field of
positive and negative polarity.
There are two
letters (E0, M +, G0) and (E0, M-, G0), which can be identified with magnetic
fields of opposite polarity.
The third set
of two letters (E0, M0, G +) and (E0, M0, G-) can correspond gravitational
fields of opposite polarity.
The states of a
kind (E-, M +, G0), (E +, M-, G0), (E +, M +, G0) and (E-, M-, G0) can correspond
separate phases of electromagnetic fields, which are carriers of
electromagnetic interaction. As these words do not have third
"dimension" (in this case they appeared as a gravitational
component), they are capable to exist only in movement, i.e. co-operating with
the neighbours located on a direction of process' movement. The interaction is
carried out on algorithm of interaction between four information quarks.
Schematically it is possible to represent this algorithm as the table (see tab.
2). Graphically diagram 6-step and 8-step interaction are shown in the figure.
The graphic
diagrams of algorithms of 6-steps and 8-steps interaction
It should be
noticed, that algorithms offered here, apparently are not unique. Considerably more
difficult algorithms with participation of several co-operating information
quarks must exist. These algorithms should derivate objects with large and rich
properties and effects. The set of algorithms of interaction is an original
grammar of the microworld. According to this grammar letters form words, words compose sentences, and they form
different complex concepts.
The table 2
Eight-stepped
algorithms of interaction between information quarks, which form
electromagnetic fluctuation
|
Number of the state |
State of information quarks |
Total display of object1 |
|
1 |
1) E -, M+,G0 |
E(-1),M(+1),G0 |
|
2 |
E -, M+,G0 E+,M+,G0
|
E(-0),M(+2),G0 |
|
3 |
1) E +,M+,G0 |
E(+1)M(+1),G0 |
|
4 |
E +, M+,G0 E +, M-,G0 |
E(+2),M(0),G0 |
|
5 |
1) E +, M-,G0 |
E(+1),M(-1),G0 |
|
6 |
E +, M-,G0 E -, M-,G0 |
E(-0),M(-2),G0 |
|
7 |
1) E -, M-,G0 |
E(-1),M(-1),G0 |
|
8 |
E -, M-,G0 E -, M+,G0 |
E(-2),M(0),G0 |
From the table 2 we can see, that during
the interaction of gravitationally neutral quarks on 8-steps algorithm,
information, as well as the energy of a wave, passes from components of an
electrical field to a component of a magnetic field, and then on the contrary,
as it is observed in experiment too. Imposing the set of such quantum states
against each other with small phase deviations, we shall get observable in
practice, an electromagnetic wave in the form of three-dimensional wave of
harmonic fluctuation.
Coming back to
interpretations of components of states' cube, we shall notice, that the
similar states of this kind: (E-, M0, G-), (E +, M0, G-), (E +, M0, G +) and
(E-, M0, G +) can correspond separate phases of electrogravitational fields.
The opportunity
of existence of phases which carry the gravimagnetic interaction in the form of
words (E0, M-, G-), (E0, M-, G +), (E0, M +, G +) and (E0, M +, G-) follows
from the cube of states. It is quite possible, that these words correspond
neutrino and cooperate on eight-steps algorithm, and in experiment we notice
them as 8 various kinds of neutrino.
All primary
words (or letter - status) mentioned here, have their own energy which is not
exceeding 3 bits, therefore the weight of rest of appropriate fields and
elementary particles, are considered by
modern researchers to be either zero, or vaguely small.
Other
words-states, apparently, are formations or fragments of formations, from which
different elementary particles with their own weight of rest are constructed.
So, analysing
the sets of words-states, where not a component is equal to zero, i.e. (Åi, Mj, Gk) ® i, j, k ¹ 0, it is possible to
allocate only two words, at which all components either are positive, or are
negative. On all probability such objects can exist independently and to form
objects developed as electron and positron. The process of information
interchange in them goes directly between primary letters-components of one
word. Other 6 words-states, where two components of one symbol, and third
opposite, can exist only in a combination of three words. This rule can be
explained by condition of an admissibility of the information exchange between
components with identical symbols. Positive with positive, and negative with
negative. Then, for realisation of high-grade interaction, there should be not
less than three one-sigh components in stable object. Probably, the fields of
one mark are capable to pass to other fields of the same mark, but not
opposite. Therefore, such objects form triplets of three primary words to
exist. These triplets, probably, are developed as quarks. By the way, combining
words and antiwords, it is possible to create nine quarks and nine
antiquarks from six words-states. And
if take into account their phase states (which can be registered at instant
fixing), it will be possible to fix set of various states of quarks.
According to
rest weight, the information contained in structure of electron, corresponding
the information of the unit 5, can be defined by size of the order
Ie=me∙I1kg=9,109534∙10-31∙2,712741643859∙1050=24,71181223795∙1019 bite,
it is more than
the own weight of any primary word (or "letter - state").
Let's admit,
that objects such as (Ei, Mj, Gk), where all indexes are of common sign, i.e.
(E +, M +, G +) and (E-, M-, G-), are capable to form objects cooperating on
six-steps algorithm, described in a hypothesis 1, they will be capable to carry
additional information about the interaction energy, and their total weight of
rest will be determined by energy of internal interaction. During each
interaction inside the word such as (Ei, Mi, Gi), i=j=k≠0 on algorithm of a hypothesis 1, 1 bit of the
information is transferred inside the object. Making the weight of such object,
consisting three primary letters, comparable to weight of electron, the total
frequency of interaction of letters in this object should help the energy from
six interactions of three letters, to form the basic weight of object, i.e. the
frequency of their internal interactions should be equal to
Fwz=Ie/6
= 24,71181223795∙1019/3=8,237270745983∙1019 hertz.
Calculation of
electron radius on this frequency of internal interaction and speed of light
re=c/2Fwz=2.99792458∙108/(2∙8,237270745983∙1019)=0,1819731∙10-11ì,
gives the
quantity about 0.18∙10-11ì,
that is smaller then radius of electron (on Bohr) (a0=5.2917706∙10-11ì), but is bigger the classical radius
of electron ro=2.8179380∙10-15ì.
It is possible
to explain weight and information structure of quarks similarly, with the only difference, that three words-states of
three primary letters cooperate in each of them, and two letters should carry
common sign, and the third - an opposite. Then, if the hypothesis that proton
consists of three quarks is correct, his structure will be formed by nine
co-operating words.
One more
confirmation of capacity of an offered hypothesis is provided by the
phenomenon, which testifies an existence of electrogravitational interaction.
It can be observed in experience, which plan is similar to the famous circuit
of Ampere studying the action of a motionless constant magnet on the moving
coil. But instead of a constant magnet the constant gravitational field of the
Earth is used. The idea of experiment certifies that if a gravitational field
is similar to magnetic field, the varied gravitational field should cooperate
with an electrical field of free electrons. These electrons placed in the metal
of conductor which is curtailed in the coil, thus the electromotive force
should be raised. It is easy to create a varied gravitational field effecting a
conductor, at reciprocating movement of the coil in a constant gravitational
field of the Earth. At the accelerated movement of the coil upwards, the
gravitational field of the Earth will develop with acceleration of the coil,
and at the accelerated movement downwards, it will be subtracted from it.
Connecting the coil (approximately 2000-4000 windings of a copper wire by diameter of 0.3 - 0.8 mm) to sensitive
recording instrument (for example, C-114, switched on the maximal sensitivity)
and quickly moving it by hand upwards and downwards (with approximate speed of
1-2 meters per one second, the amplitude: 10-30 sm.), makes possible to notice
clear reaction of the circuit to a gravitational field of the Earth.
The deviation
of the beam upwards and downwards approximately on 10-15 Mb can be seen at
vertical reciprocating movement of the coil. (Vector of acceleration and axis
of the coil should be perpendicular to terrestrial surface.)
At the same
moving of the coil parallel to terrestrial surface, irrespective to orientation
of its axis, not a reaction is observed. Results of an experiment do not depend
on shielding the coil with armoured shells and can not be explained by
orientation of electromagnetic fields. Varying the sizes of coils and
parameters of their moving it is possible to ascertain, that the ÝÄÑ size
depends on quantity of coils and size of acceleration. The experts, most
experienced in similar measurements, can lead more exact experiments, and the
amateurs who are fond of experiments can
find out this electrogravitational interaction, realising this
elementary experiment.
The circuit of
experiment for determination of electrogravitational interaction
Coming back to
the cube hypothesis, we shall make a conclusion. Using the stated principles of
construction the information systems, it is possible to construct system of the
interaction which forms all elementary particles and combined fields. Three
fields-letters (gravitational, electrical and magnetic) will serve as quanta of
this system. The vacuum can be formed by addition of all 26 letters-states or
each of two letters of opposite state. But it would be more correct to
consider, that this state is formed by the sum of six letters appropriate to
fundamental fields of opposite intensity and unstable balance. The slightest
infringement of this balance at the expense of information interaction,
transfers quantum of vacuum in this or that condition, which we notice as various
states or fragments of elementary objects.
It can be said,
that three kinds of fundamental field can be born from physical vacuum. The
circuit of construction of this system associates with image of triple-headed
Snake from ancient Russian fairy tales. Whether this concurrence is casual?
Taking into account a duality of interaction systems (see section IV), we can
assume that vacuum is that substation, through which the interrelation of
imaginary and valid structures is carried out. It's like the interaction
between visible crone and invisible roots is carried out through the trunk of a
tree. Is this association casual too?
10.3
Third hypothesis.
The
information interaction derivates energy and information
The information
interchange during the interaction of two various objects and systems, results
in increase of the information in each co-operating object. As in an old
saying, if you have an idea and I have an idea, we shall exchange our ideas,
and we both will get two ideas. It is
possible, that at a quantum level the information interchange at interaction of
objects results in increase of the information contained in each of
co-operating objects. If the object
does not change the structure from this interaction, the surpluses of
the information, during interaction, can derivate energy, which is used for
realisation of subsequent interactions. Thus, the interaction of elementary
quantum objects gives them energy necessary for their existence and
interaction.
On the
universal scale, such mechanism is capable to supply each her element with necessary energy and to ensure her long
development, as a way of existence.
The mechanism
of realisation of such interaction must be studied attentively. But its
existence is proved by the fact of existence of the universe, that all objects
of the material world are capable to exist and to change without an obviously
seen external source of energy. Hence, it is necessary to search for an
inexhaustible source of energy in mechanisms of interaction of quantum objects,
specially in mechanisms of information interchange.
If the mankind
can open and use this mechanism, it will ensure the general abundance forever.
Sources of energy are around us. We shall just learn to project the machines so
that they did not require external sources of energy, and carried out their
functions, using the energy of internal
interaction of quantum objects.
It is necessary
to concentrate and to direct efforts of the modern researchers on creation of
computer facilities, with processors constructed from molecular objects of
chemical system and quantum objects of elementary system. These processors will
function at the expense of energy of internal interaction. When this level of
development will be achieved, the mankind will forget the problem of energy for
ever.
The hypothesis
about information interaction helps us to find the answer to question about the
essence of information. It is possible to understand her deep essence from the
following reasonings.
The information
which appears during the interaction of information objects, is an effect or
result of interaction of information objects or information systems.
Set of examples
in different spheres proves this fact.
As it was
mentioned above, amount of the information increase as a result of interaction
of elementary objects in each of co-operating objects. It derivates energy
necessary for their further interactions, and for their existence too.
The interaction
of various information systems derivates new information systems, which can be
called " the new information".
The Human brain
, as an information system, is capable to create completely new, unknown
information, - new works of art, inventions, mathematical models and whole
information systems. But they appear as a result of interaction with other
information systems, as their reflection in some other information system. i.e.
the information systems are always a product of interaction of other previous
information systems.
Incomprehensible
nature of additional cost, on which Karl Marx had worked much, is a reflection
of this rule in the sphere of interaction of social economic information
systems created by mankind. As a result
of interaction of some components of human society and materials and means of
manufacture, with significant participation of financial, economic and
scientific - engineering information systems, additional cost appear, as an
effect of interaction, as the additional information, as an additional
financial and material product.
Hence, the
information is an effect of interaction of information systems. For this reason
the information systems can exist always cooperating, developing and
continuously changing.
The information
systems provide continuous occurrence and existence of new generations of
information systems. It provides indissolubility and continuity of development
of numerous generations of information systems in space and time.
Well, and how
can we cope with the laws of preservation, which the human science had developed for centuries of its existence?
The answer is simple. The mankind learnt and learns the world not all at once.
Knowledge and understanding came on small portions of the information, which
are called the laws of a nature, and which represent knowledge of the certain
laws of an observable reality. These "laws", were displayed, as a
rule, with the help of abstract mathematical models. In order to select a
concrete reality correctly, they should be connected to all infinite and
co-operating world, as by common information system. This function also is
carried out by all "laws" of preservation. If their essence is
understandable, their value does not decrease, and they are not cancelled at
all. The laws of preservation will always carry out their function in many
applications, accepted by practice, if they give results with accuracy
sufficient for practice.
But there are
no absolute laws in the form of established rules of interaction in objective
nature. There are only usual laws, known by the people. These laws
"display in some conditions, and by all means should change with amendment
of these conditions". People constantly prove this genius assumption made
by David Um, creating and, if it is
necessary, changing their own laws of social interaction (legal, for example),
creating devices, which successfully bypass the action of well known "laws
of nature".
10.4.
Fourth hypothesis.
Hyperinteraction
creates effects of fields and effect of
fortuity
Let's name the set
of information systems which form our validity, as a concept "the
world". There are many reasons to
admit, that our world is not an exception in nature. In our nature everything
indefinitely repeats, therefore some similar worlds distinguished from our
world should exist paralelly. These worlds are unknown for us, and for some
uncertain reasons can not form the common space of objects, and are not capable
to cooperate by usual ways, i.e. by direct interaction. Discrepancy of
dimensions in space and time or discrepancy of systems of quanta' construction
are among these reasons. Probably there are some other parameters, unknown for
us.
But, if these
worlds do not cooperate directly, they can and should cooperate by the way of
hyperinteraction through any common formal sphere. An information vacuum can be
such a formal sphere. Its formal properties will be identical in any possible
information system. Therefore information vacuum can be considered as a common
information sphere.
Hyperinteraction
is an interaction, when each world included in this set, exists at the expense
of interaction of all set of the worlds. Thus each element of any separate set
also is formed and functions at the expense of interaction of all set of the
critically distinguished worlds.
Let's look at
the set of the parallel worlds critically distinguished by the fact that their
objects can not form common physical space. Interaction of these worlds is
carried out at the expense of mechanisms of hyperinteraction. We can assume,
that the process of existence of any elementary object of our world (and the
world itself) is caused by hyperinteracting reflection of all set, including
critically distinguished worlds.
Hyperinteraction
differs from simple interaction, which can be characterised by mathematical
concept of reflection, when one object of the interaction system receives the
image in the other system of interaction. The simple interaction takes place
also, when the set of objects consisting of an identical set of quanta, is
transformed to other set of the same objects, which differs from initial set,
for example, spatial arrangement of these objects comparatively each other.
Recalling the
example with the computer, we shall notice, that the point of the image on the
screen appears as a result of simple
interaction of set of electronic systems in the computer. Despite the
fact that the display is one of the systems of computer, the image itself has
no any attitude to the computer. It is the reflection of completely other
object and completely other system of interaction.
For example, if
a beautiful flower appears on the display, we perceive the image of this
flower, but not the image of parts of the computer. Due to the power of our
imagination we live in and cooperate
with plots of a virtual reality. Hyperinteraction of a brain and computer gives
birth to unreal objects in our imagination. Such interaction is capable to
create, and creates the unusual virtual worlds, which never and did not exist
anywhere.
But we shall
return to set of the parallel worlds, where each world exists at the expense of
other set of the worlds. Let's admit, that in the instant phase of transition
any elementary quantum object of any world ceases to exist physically in its
system of interactions in the form of the active information and passes to the
formal state in this system. In this state it exists as a concrete volume of
the information distributed in some set of objects (even in areas of space) in
different parallel worlds. As a result of simple interaction of these objects,
the initial information contained in the element, changes, and it reflects the
changes in "its" world.
Quantum of
vacuum in a formal state can be determined as the indefinitely large set of the
information in a passive equilibrium state, no part of which is never shown in
our space. Quantum of vacuum turns to physical object of our space in a special
case, when this balance is broken by information influence. According to the
hypothesis about "cube of statuses", one up to three bites of
information is enough for this purpose. But other set of the information can't
be reflected. Nevertheless, it is enough volumetric and undergoes the certain
changes.
It is possible
to compare structure of vacuum quantum with structure of complex software,
which is capable to work in several completely different operational systems
(for example, in UNIX, DOS, WINDOWS etc.) and in which simultaneously there are
some working files with various expansions, for example, such as
"åõå", "com", "dll" etc. Each of these files
works only in "its" operational structure, but can cooperate with all
other datafiles , changing them during the work and packing data in its own
way. Thus in each operational system, this program structure can create
essentially various objects. It is important that as a result of its reflection
in this or that information system, some part of datafiles changes. And, after
its reflection in one system, this software will be changed in other
operational system. Moreover, all set of information structures, in which this
software is able to work, can be divided into three groups. The first group
presents information systems, which can change in a result of functioning of
the object. The second group represent information systems, which do not
change, but participate in the process of functioning of the object. Systems
that do not participate and do not change (i.e. do not cooperate with the
object directly) can be related to the third group. It does not exclude the
fact, that they will be capable to hyperinteract indirectly through other
groups of information systems.
Such plan
allows to explain the process of formation of fields around of their carriers.
We admit, that some elementary objects arising in our space, in a phase of
instant transition (I'd like to pay
attention of my readers on the fact that the we are talking about the
moments of transitions) cease to exist physically in our system of interactions
in the form of the active information. They pass in a formal status in our
system. But the information which forms these objects remains. At this moment
it exists as a concrete volume of other information allocated in concrete set
of objects in different parallel worlds which are hyperinteracting with our
world.
As a result of
information transition of objects in our world in a formal state, the
information in those objects of hyperinteracting worlds, changes which have formed these objects of our world.
Hence, they at the expense of it will change. The result of their usual
interaction will change also. Means, when the objects of our world again will
proceed(pass) in a material status from formal, they will be shown in our world
changed.
If this
formation is a complex three-bit object, for example, electron or positron,
then, as a result of changes, local coordinates of the centre of this formation
can change. It can be reflected as other modifications, for example, as two-bit
or one-bit objects, for example, as quantum of electromagnetic fluctuation or
some fundamental field. As there are multitude of parallel worlds, the
distributions of all changes will submit to the normal law. If these changes
influence the coordinates of the object, they will be allocated in space
according to the normal law, its centre of coordinates’ distribution will
coincide with the centre of object. The centre of distribution the properties
of this object will coincide with a
centre of properties distribution of the object itself too. It means, that
object at long period of supervision will be observed as the initial formation,
smeared in space, which is surrounded by normally distributed multitude of
changed differently, related to it and caused by it, objects, for example,
quanta of fields, carried by this object. These quanta of a field are this
object itself, but of different form. At the same time they will cooperate with
other objects on the same way as these formations should cooperate with them.
For example,
the interaction of electron with a field occurs only at those moments, when as
a result of hyperinteraction electron will appear in our space as the similar
field. After interaction of these fields changed electron will pass to a formal
phase again. Than it will change a state of objects interacting with it, and
will appear in our world again, but in a state which takes into account its
previous interaction with a field in our world and interaction with multitude
of the parallel worlds. Such mechanism of interaction can explain moving of
co-operating formations in space, as a result of coordinates' change in new
reflection of cooperating objects.
The model of
such interaction is shown in the program "Field"
MC = 5
MD = 10
PI2 =
3.1415926# * 2
RZ = 3
DDX = 1'.5 '
DZX = 0
ZNA1 = -1
ZNA2 = -1
WZA = ZNA1 *
ZNA2 * DDX'
CLS
SCREEN 12'3
P1 = 0: R1 = 14
M3 = 4: N3 = 4
M4 = 4: N4 = 4
5
VIEW (1,
50)-(635, 475), P1, R1
X0 = 100: Y0 =
100:
WINDOW (0,
0)-(X0, Y0)
1
CLS
T = TIMER
RANDOMIZE T
CL21 = RND * 11
+ 2
CL22 = RND * 11
+ 2
X1 = X0 / N4 +
RND * X0 / M4
Y1 = Y0 / N4 +
RND * Y0 / M4
CL1 = 14
COLOR CL1
PSET (X1, Y1):
' BEEP
X2 = X0 / N3 +
RND * X0 / M3
Y2 = Y0 / N3 +
RND * Y0 / M3
CL2 = 15'
COLOR CL2
PSET (X2, Y2):
' BEEP: BEEP
3
DO
GOSUB 100
COLOR CL1:
CIRCLE (X1, Y1), R1: CIRCLE (X1, Y1), R3, 0, B
2
COLOR CL2:
CIRCLE (X2, Y2), R2: CIRCLE (X2, Y2), R4, 0, B
LOOP WHILE
INKEY$ = ""
END
100
GOSUB 400'
X31 = X1 + DX
Y31 = Y1 + DY
CL31 =
POINT(X31, Y31)': LOCATE 2, 1: PRINT CL3
IF CL31 = CL2
THEN GOSUB 301: GOTO 104:
N1 = N1 + 1
IF N1 = 1 THEN
COLOR CL21: R1 = .1 * RZ: R3 = .3 * RZ
IF N1 = 2 THEN
COLOR CL21 + 1: R1 = .2 * RZ: R3 = .1 * RZ
IF N1 = 3 THEN
COLOR CL21 - 1: N1 = 0: R1 = .3 * RZ: R3 = .2 * RZ PSET (X31, Y31)
104
RETURN
200
GOSUB 400
X32 = X2 + DX
Y32 = Y2 + DY
CL32 =
POINT(X32, Y32)
IF CL32 = CL1
THEN GOSUB 302: GOTO 204:
N2 = N2 + 1
IF N2 = 1 THEN
COLOR CL22: R2 = .1 * RZ: R4 = .3 * RZ
IF N2 = 2 THEN
COLOR CL22 + 1: R2 = .2 * RZ: R4 = .1 * RZ
IF N2 = 3 THEN
COLOR CL22 - 1: N2 = 0: R2 = .3 * RZ: R4 = .2 * RZ PSET (X32, Y32)
204
RETURN
301
IF NW1 = 0 THEN
LOCATE 1, 29: COLOR 12: PRINT " "; INT(RW) NW1 = NW1 +1
LOCATE 2, 7:
COLOR 10: PRINT " "; NW1
LOCATE 3, 33:
COLOR 10: PRINT " "; INT(RW)
CIRCLE (X1,
Y1), R1, 0, B
CIRCLE (X1,
Y1), R3, 0, B
X1 = X1 - WZA *
U1
Y1 = Y1 - WZA *
U2
RETURN
302
IF NW2 = 0 THEN
LOCATE 1, 29: COLOR 12: PRINT " "; INT(RW) NW2 = NW2 + 1
IF NW2 = 0 THEN
LOCATE 1, 33: COLOR 12: PRINT " RW0"; INT(RW) LOCATE 2, 58: COLOR 11:
PRINT " "; NW2
LOCATE 3, 33:
COLOR 11: PRINT " "; INT(RW)
CIRCLE (X2,
Y2), R2, 0, B
CIRCLE (X2,
Y2), R4, 0, B
X2 = X2 - WZA *
U1 '
Y2 = Y2 - WZA *
U2
RETURN
400
PX11 = RND:
PX21 = RND
PX31 = 2 *
ABS(LOG(PX11 + .000000000000001#)):
RW = ABS((PX31)
^ .5 * COS(EXP(9) * (PX21)) * X0) / MC
FI = RND * PI2
U1 = SIN(FI):
U2 = COS(FI)
DX = RW * U1
DY = RW * U2
RETURN
Start the program
pole2.exe to see its work.
As a result of
casual interaction on the algorithm of the program, distance between the same
objects is increasing. And the distance
between objects with different sign is decreasing at each step of interaction.
The object "wanders" in space, appearing in its different points for
a moment, and here disappears in a subspace, passing in a formal state for us.
If, appearing in our space again, it "will come across" with some
existing object, it co-operates with it. Their components, summarised at this
moment, form a new word. Such interaction will be periodic, i.e. it will
repeat in time. For long (relatively)
time interval it will appear regularly enough and regardless of the fact that
the second co-operating object makes the same divings into subspace. The more
probability of such concurrences will occur more strong interaction. And the
probability of interactions will be determined by difference of distances
between distribution centres of properties of these objects. These centres are
closer, - the interaction is stronger and on the contrary.
Probably,
phenomenon of distance and length arises from dependence on intensity of object
interaction. If the intensity of interactions is bigger, the objects are closer
to each other and on the contrary. Not co-operating objects can be considered
as indefinitely far from each other.
The fields, as
one-bit objects, are the dead form of temporary existence of objects in our
space, but they are explorers of partial interactions. Interaction of
elementary objects occurs for the expense of superinteraction of all volume of
the information, including both information on coordinates and objects'
situation. It is necessary to search for a key to travels through hyperspace!
The answer to
the question "how an fortuity is born in nature" can be found here. The
fortuity is theoretical and physical impossibility of a prediction of exact
result of event until it happened. No process of the microworld is possible
without superinteraction, and, for a prediction of exact result of the concrete
phenomenon based on it, it is necessary to have the absolutely exact
information on all elements and event in all superinteracting worlds, first of
all. It is natural, that it will need an information capacity comparable to
volume of these worlds. Therefore mankind (even in the periods of flourishing
of the intellectual power) will never be capable to predict result of truly
casual events precisely, but always will be near the truth.