|
7.3 Women have their say: On financial
circumstances
Woman,
aged 51-60: "As
a freelance worker, without [my] partner's work [income]
away from home I would not be able to live here"
Mother of two: "Because of huge medical bills this
month, [I'm just about managing]" Married woman,
aged 41-50: "Since
the euro conversion, money doesn't go far"
Mother, aged 41-50: "With teenaged girls living at home
[there] are extra expenses"
Separated
mother: "Brand
names [are] a luxury for Christmas and birthdays"
7.4
Perceived Income Balance
While the research
was still in the planning stages, the issue of how best
to approach asking for specific details of income was
a matter of much debate. It was felt that attempting
to ascertain the exact level of household income might
prove problematic; some women might not know exactly
how much money was involved, so an alternative approach
was suggested. Aside from this point alone, according
to Gordon et al (2000), data from income and employment
are insufficient substitutes for measuring poverty and
that income below an arbitrary percentage 'does not
relate to the needs of individuals, or to any agreed
definition of what it is to be poor' (p.8-9).
The concept of relative poverty is one that has also
been adopted by the Irish Government through the National
Anti-Poverty Strategy (NAPS, 1997), where people are
living in poverty 'if their income and resources (material,
cultural and social) are so inadequate as to preclude
them from having a standard of living, which is regarded
as acceptable by Irish society generally'. Such
an approach 'broadens the focus from a purely monetary-based
definition' and underlines the 'comparative element'
in poverty assessment (National Women's Council of Ireland,
2000b). Investigating the gender dimension of
poverty, as the NWCI advocates, was felt by IWIN to
require a more creative approach than even relative
poverty definitions allow; this is another good reason
why the current research adopts a more subjective approach
In Question 28, participants were asked to estimate
how much they believed to be necessary per week to run
a household such as theirs - a chart ranging from €61-€80
through to €361-€380 and then to 'more than this' was
provided. Following on from this selection, Question
29 asked the participants to use the same chart to estimate
their actual household income.
While not entirely scientific in its approach, this
subjective measure was felt to be a worthwhile substitute
- it also fitted in with the general ethos of allowing
the participants to be their own experts.
|
|