Oct 26, 2005
1.
Halal
and Haram Speech at JihadWatch.org
Halal means that which is allowed
by Islamic law. http://www.answering-islam.org/Index/H/halal.html
Haram means that which is prohibited
by Islamic law http://www.answering-islam.org/Index/H/haram.html
I wrote the following (see belowe) at JihadWatch.org today but it
got deleted.
Do you think what I wrote needs to be deleted? Can you think of any
reason why they might have done this? Do you agree with their action?
Email me at [email protected]
or post a message at my blog http://informedchristiannews.blogspot.com/
The message thread Title: Fitzgerald: Countering Da'wa in prisons
The message thread URL: http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/008716.php
Here is what I wrote that was so "Haram"
to the Censors
at JihadWatch.org
Yes, Hugh
Islam and muslims are racist.
http://www.prophetofdoom.net/quotes5.html#racism
Tabari II:11 “Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the
Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and
Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were
cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would
be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that
the African’s color would change so that their descendants would be
slaves to the Arabs and Turks.”
Simply telling those in and out of prison these facts might not be
enough. As you acknowledged ( "(and sometimes with justification)"
)there is real racism in America and this problem should be dealt with
as well.
Your strategy seems to be only to tell these real or imagined victims
of racism that the Islamic alternative is just as bad or worst.
How about giving them better alternatives? Where are the positives on
the side of good?
Instead of what seems like you saying "put up with the existing milder
racism because it is not as bad as Islamic racism."
I am sure this is not what you meant but it does sound like it.
--------------------------------------------------
Briefly on Iraq.
I think you are wrong for calling for too early a withdrawl.
You seem to want to leave Iraqi to themselves and let them tear each
other apart so that they will be too occupied to bother the rest of us.
There is a major flaw in this line of reasoning. Some historical facts
indicate that things might not go as you wished.
I give you two examples. Afghanistan after the Soviet withdrawl and the
Iran-Iraq Gulf war.
During the Iran-Iraq war, they were fighting quite savagely but terror
attacks were going on even then. Both Iran and Iraq were able to work
on acquiring WMDs (Weapons of mass distruction) while slaughtering each
other. Both countries also supported global terror while at it
(Hizbullah by Iran and PLO by Saddam).
The same is true of Afghanistan. When the Soviets left there was a
bloody civil war but that didn't make the world safer. Instad Osama and
co took advantage of the chaos and build basees there that training
thousands of terrrorists who are now all over the world.
My point is that lettting them tear each other apart is not going to
make us any safer as you can see from this.
I think it would make it even worst for US.
Look back to Afghanistan. When the world left it to itself it became
the al Qaida head quarters from where they launched the 9-11 and other
attacks.
To stop them the US end up having to go into Afghanistan. So much for
leaving them to themselves.
The same will also happen in Iraq if the US leave too soon. It will
became a launch pad for terror attacks and the US will have to go back
into Iraq again to stop them. So why leave? We are just going to have
to go back in anyway if we leave.
I don't think any cent or drop of sweat or blood should be shed for
those who are forever ungrateful. Those with eternal hatred for us
deserve no help. But to preserve ourselves somethimes we might have to
stabilize or try to make it as best as we can instead of letting it get
out of control and then have to deal with a worst problem later.
The old "Domino Theory" is really true. We can't just wait like sitting
ducks while the rest falls down one by one. "Paleo-con" ideas of
"isolationism" didn't work as Pearl Harbour and WWII followed. Fortress
America mentality might lead to WWIII.
I have said something like this before but I don't think I have had any
replies from you yet.
--------------------------------------------------
IC
Entries for Oct 26, 2005 are archived at http://www.geocities.com/Iinformed_Christian/2005/10/26/index.html