![]() |
| CUTTING EDGE 9-11 Discussion |
| CUTTING EDGE 9-11 Discussion |
| LETS BOYCOTT THE "UNFAIR BASTARD " ROOMS.... |
| IN 9-11 room: No Drama is the best drama |
| NEWS FROM AREA 6 |
| Pentagon video fraud by: IMILAC |
| On May 16th, 2006, the Pentagon released (supposedly) the entire video that 5 frames were taken from, originally released in March 2002. But as you might guess the additional frames revealed absolutely nothing new. The actual aircraft that hit the Pentagon can not be seen. There was also a Second Video, shot from a camera facing the Pentagon at roughly the same angle and distance. Yet it too does not show the aircraft in any detail. The video from whence the 5 originally released frames were taken from didn't show the craft |
| IS the Govt. Satanic>? Startling new pictures We offer no explanation for the bizarre and remarkable images which you can see right here and on a few other public domain websites. It shows Symbols and designs Pre-designed into the very street Design of Washington DC and the capitol Building... which would Suggest a much more sinister motive behind the nations Capitol.... And what exactly IS John Kerry Doing talking to Anton la Vey? the First Priest of the high Church of Satan?> Click Here and Find OUT??? |
| Pressing Issues and Burning new evidence from the world of the Supernatural (By Nephilim_70) |
| (Above Pic:) In 1982, what words would have been shared in this meeting? Anton laVey and John Kerry |
![]() |
| because, supposedly, the time lapse camera didn't snap pictures quick enough to catch the plane crossing the lawn. In the other video all that can be seen (above-left) is a blurry white smudge, apparantly the nose of the craft emerging from the right side of the picture. In the next frame, the plane should have been visible. However by a rare stroke of bad luck the frame was somehow overexposed so that nothing can be clearly seen in the frame at all. COntd. below.. |
| contd........And quite conveniently neither of these films had the date and time on them, making it easy to hide the fact that frames were removed. We've been duped again folks ... Surprised? If you wish to learn more ... A good place to start is right here in this Book:>>> |
![]() |
![]() |
| ABOVE: Most speculation abounds that the object that struck the Pentagon was similar to the Missle pictured above. The AGM-86a has ground contour technology that would have left the Penta-lawn unscathed, is the right height by comparison to the damage and emits a white cloudy trail as seen in Frame A (top pic) Read More on this link... |
| ABOVE: An artists animated impression from Infowars of what the camera SHOULD have shown had there actually been a large commercial craft hit the Pentagon Read More on this link here.. |
![]() |
| Close-UP enlargement of object |
| Pentagon video fraud |
| Q: Do you see a Boeing? |
![]() |
![]() |
| All images on this site are Public Domain images and are used for illustrative purposes only. No Copyright is intended or implied for any images used on this Site. Where an image is covered by legal copyright issue, all attempts have been made to link to appropriate owners of images. Many images used can be easily found on Public Domain google search under appropriate subject and therefore are used Primarily educational and illustrative purposes. Original Imilac written material (including) Piercing The Fog Protected under appropriate Copyright laws The Content on this Site derives no income whatsoever. This is entirely for the purposes of lumination of obvious facts. Comments/Suggestions to: WebmasterJonnyBurrito(the ButtkickerofBurwood) at: [email protected] |
| 9-11 An Inside Job (Goes On the Air LIVE ) NEXT WED NIGHT> 31st MAY 2006 "Realtime Politics With all the Showtime Gauranteed Admin fights every SHIFT!!!" All rights Rsvd.Copyright2006 |