In The Name Of Allah, The Most Beneficent And Merciful
May 24th,
2002
Headlines:
· No repentance in Gujarat: Gill (Times Of India)
· When humanity won the communal
battle (Times Of India)
· Army withdrawal: Minorities tense
but supportive (Hindustan Times)
· The missing are dead, Gujarat
toll may go up (Hindustan Times)
· Normalcy propels refugees out of
camps (Deccan Herald)
· No mention of ISI in Godhra
chargesheet (Hindustan Times)
· Chargesheet filed against 101
Godhra accused (Indian Express)
· Eye-witnesses relive horror (Times Of
India)
· Wedding bells at Gujarat riot camps
(Times Of India)
· The Gujarat crime Modi referred
to CBI: ‘malicious, misleading’ e-mail (Indian Express)
Opinion:
· Gujarat’s Jobless: Idle Hands As
Devil’s Workshop (By Darryl D’Monte, Times Of India)
· Our
capacity to care (By Harsh Mander, Hindustan Times)
· Modi,
India’s Milosevic (By Gulam k. Noon, Hindustan Times)
· Farewell to Rajdharma: Centre’s
Record of Shame in Gujarat (B.G.Verghese, Times Of India)
No
repentance in Gujarat: Gill
TIMES NEWS
NETWORK
[ WEDNESDAY, MAY
22, 2002 11:54:19 PM ]
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=10699885
Gandhinagar:
Calling it a ‘Kalinga effect’, where a
remorseful Emperor
Ashok became a messiah of peace
seeing the death
and destruction caused by war,
supercop K.P.S.
Gill regrets that he has not seen such
a trend in Gujarat
after all the violence.
‘‘I do not see this
happening here. Ordinarily, this
happens in society
within 10 days. Even two and a half
months later, this
is yet to begin,’’ he told
reporters here.
Gill said in
bewilderment: ‘‘Generally, there is a
sense of repentance
after violence. Unfortunately, I
do not find that here.’’
Gill ruled out any
possibility of home-bred terrorists
emerging in
Gujarat. ‘‘There may be attacks from
outside, but not
within,’’ he said.
Even while
asserting that the Central decision to
withdraw the armed
forces from the state would not
adversely affect
efforts to restore normalcy in
Gujarat, Gill said:
‘‘The wounds are still there, they
would need to be
healed.’’ Gill claimed that communal
violence in Gujarat
had already been contained. ‘‘One
cannot now roam
about freely with a dagger in hand on
any Ahmedabad
street,’’ he remarked.
Answering a
question on whether he had come to Gujarat
under Article 355,
providing for Central intervention
in specified areas,
Gill preferred to be vague. He
said: ‘‘As an IPS
officer, I had read the
Constitution. I
will write about what it has meant to
me in my memoirs.’’
He, however, ruled out any
possibility of
Article 356 (President’s rule) being
imposed. ‘‘Do you
think it is needed any more?’’ he
asked.
With his policing
job of stopping violence more or
less achieved, he
now wishes to venture in creating
bridges among
divided communities. ‘‘Peace is a
long-term goal. The
role of the police cannot go
beyond controlling
violence. Communities must come
together for
that,’’ he said.
He brushed aside
the suggestion that he is not an
expert in this,
saying he had successfully brought
about communal
amity in worse conditions during his
tenure in Assam.
Copyright © 2002
Times Internet Limited. All rights
reserved.
When
humanity won the communal battle
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
[ THURSDAY, MAY 23,
2002 2:14:59 AM ]
Sachin Sharma
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=10709669
HALOL: Ten-year-old
Mustufa still shudders with fear
as he remembers the
night of March 1. He remained
huddled with his
brother and four cousins at a farm in
Derol after losing
his relatives and an angry mob hot
on their trail. It
was during those anxious moments
that one of the
kids cried out in hunger and thirst.
And, he thought it
would spell their doom.
But, humanity won
the battle that night when an
Adivasi woman heard
the voice and picked up all the
six children,
hungry and shivering with fear, and
provided them
shelter and warmth. When many in
Panchmahals were on
a killing spree this March, this
old Adivasi woman
and her husband risked their lives
to save the kids.
Mustufa, his
brother Siraj and four cousins had fled
their homes in
Limkheda on March 1 morning after a mob
attacked their families.
And, tragedy struck them and
a group of 20
people from his village once again when
they alighted from
a train at Derol station. They were
attacked by a mob
and Mustufa was on the run again
along with his
brother and cousins.
Presently staying
at a relief camp in Halol, these
children fondly
remember Bhailakaka and his wife for
not just saving
their lives but also the love and care
that the couple
showered on them.
According to
Mustufa, 10 of his relatives were killed
by the mob.
"Nine of our family members escaped the
carnage. My uncle,
aunt and cousin managed to survive,
but got lost amidst
the confusion. We six children,
however, managed to
stick together," he recalls.
"The couple
was very caring and looked after all our
needs. Not even
once did they make us feel that we
were outsiders.
They treated us like guests," Mustufa
said. Along with
Mustufa and Siraj, their cousins -
Ayub, Sikandar,
Farzana and Mohsin - too found a
second home till
the couple felt it was not safe
anymore for the
kids to stay with them. The children,
aged between seven
and 10 years, stayed with
Bhailakaka for a
week. And, they provided them the
best of care - from
food to milk to new clothes and "a
healing touch to
the bruised minds".
Then Bhailakaka
dressed them up as tribals and took
three brothers on
his bicycle to Pandu, several
kilometres from
Derol, to drop them at their
relative's house.
The police was then informed and the
other three were
escorted to Pandu later.
The only surviving
sister of theirs, Rehana Kaderbhai,
has come forward to
adopt the brothers. "I am the only
elder member of our
family to survive and will take
care of the
children from now on. I know it is going
to be difficult,
but I shall manage," she says.
Copyright © 2002
Times Internet Limited. All rights
reserved.
Army
withdrawal: Minorities tense but supportive
PTI
(Ahmedabad)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.hindustantimes.com/nonfram/230502
Leaders of the
minority community here on Wednesday
appreciated the
government's "compulsions" in
withdrawing army
from violence-ravaged Gujarat, though
a large number of
inmates and relief workers in
make-shift camps
say the action could affect the
confidence of the
people.
"Army
withdrawal may not have any adverse effect ...It
is for local police
to deliver the goods, " Maulvi
Shabir Siddiqqui,
imam of the city's Jama Masjid,
said.
He said with the
arrival of K P S Gill, security
advisor to the
Chief Minister, "things have moved in
right direction and
there hasd been no incident since
last one
week".
©Hindustan Times
Ltd. 1997.
The
missing are dead, Gujarat toll may go up
Raveen
Thukral
Hindustan Times,
(Ahmedabad, May 23)
http://www.hindustantimes.com/nonfram/240502/detNAT11.asp
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Gujarat
government is considering upgrading the
official death toll
in the recent communal riots. The
statewide toll is
currently put at around 950.
More than 400
additional deaths may be declared in
Ahmedabad alone,
said sources in the state's social
welfare and
rehabilitation department. Three hundred
of these people
were among the 850 reported missing
since the Godhra
carnage of February 27. One hundred
and two
unidentified bodies that are still lying in
morgues will be
counted too, pushing up the toll in
the city to 830
from the present figure of 427.
The official number
of deaths in police firing too, is
likely to go up,
sources said. Of the present 427
people declared
dead in Ahmedabad, 105 were killed by
the police.
Seventy-five of these were Muslims. But
the real numbers - both
of those killed by police, and
of those who were
Muslims among them - are probably
likely to be far
larger: major manipulations are
alleged to have
been done at the stage of carrying out
autopsies on the
bodies.
Commenting on the
large number of deaths in police
action, a senior
official said the policemen, in most
cases, had come
between violently clashing mobs, and
had really had
little option but to open fire.
The official,
however, had no answer when asked how it
had been that
policemen firing ostensibly in self
defence had managed
to hit and kill more Muslims than
Hindus.
Throughout the
rioting, victims and eyewitnesses had
alleged that the
police had deliberately turned their
guns on Muslims.
Officials said that
the government's decision to
declare additional
deaths had been taken to facilitate
compensation and
insurance payments to victim's
families.
"Without declaration of their death, the
families would not
even get insurance and other PF
payments from their
personal accounts," said an
official. He added
that similar methods had been
adopted during the
devastating quake as well.
©Hindustan Times
Ltd. 1997.
Normalcy
propels refugees out of camps
AHMEDABAD, May 23 (PTI)
Deccan Herald
http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/may24/n5.htm
A large number of
battered minority inmates have
started moving out
of relief camps, with hardly any
incident of
violence reported during the last one week
and normalcy
returning fast in riot-hit Gujarat.
According to camp
inmates and relief workers, the
confidence building
measures taken by Chief Minister's
Security Advisor
KPS Gill have brought in “sea change”
in policing and
also given confidence to them.
“From a
staggeringly high 7,600 number of inmates, the
figure during the
last week has dropped to 3,602 in
Dariyakhan Ghummat
camp,” Ataullah Pathan, camp
coordinator, told
PTI.
“Gill's arrival and
subsequent decisions like transfer
of erring officials
have given minority people the
confidence that the
Super Cop means business,” he
says.
During the last one
week people have left for their
“old and new
shelters” in Mahakali Mandir, Dharmi
Society, Devjipura,
Kazi Mia Ke Chhapre and Mirwali
Chawli and in
Shahibaugh and adjoining areas, he said.
“Bas ab toh jo
biswas Gill ne jagaya hai, woh rahena
chahiye (The
confidence Gill has created should
continue),” says
Pathan.
Similar mood was
evident even in Bakarshaka Roza camp
in Gomtipur, which
faced the communal carnage during
the second phase of
violence.
According to
Lalabhai, coordinator of the Bakarshaka
Roza camp, “the
process has begun to help inmates
shift to place they
think are safer”.
“If they have
confidence and there are one or two CRPF
units in the area
that the minorities are moving, we
do not mind,” he
says adding, a list will be prepared
within “two days”
for those who move out of the camps.
Other voluntary
agencies like the apex Gujarat
Sarvajanik Relief
Committee, which has undertaken
relief and
rehabilitation work on war footing, also
has now shifted
priortities “more to rehabilitation
than relief works”.
Shakeel Ahmed, a
senior member of the Committee, says
on the outskirts of
Ahmedabad city, shelterless
minority people are
“moving in large numbers to
Guptanagar area
adjacent to minority-stronghold
Juhapura”.
“At least 400
families have moved in and we are also
giving priority to
reconstruct the Guptanagar colony,”
he says adding,
similar movement of people have been
reported from
various camps in Sabarkantha and
Panchmahal districts
and the now infamous Godhra town
also.
However, he says
“there should not be any forced
movement of the
inmates. If they do not have
confidence about
security, they should not move out”.
Agrees Ataullah
Khan Pathan of Dariyakhan Ghummat
relief camp. He
alleged that in Mahakali Mandir area
“though 38 minority
houses as against only three
others were burnt
during the carnage, police have
launched a
witchhunt against us and 17 cases filed
against minorities
while no single majority community
arsonist has been
charged”.
The general refrain
of minority people is that they do
not have faith in
state police.
Similar mood was
found even among those who returned
to Saraspur area.
Here, minority community leaders say
they were returning
because of “BSF and other central
forces”.
In this context,
Maulvi Shabir Sidiqqui, Imam of
city-based Jama
Masjid, says “in fact, from the very
beginning our
demand has been that CRPF, RAF and BSF
should be given
free hand. We do not have any faith in
state police”.
Sidiqqui and other
minority leaders say the role of
central forces have
become “all the more important
because army has
been withdrawn”.
In fact, some
inmates in Dariyakhan camp proposing to
move out from the
shelter have “postponed” their
decision by a day
or two.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© Copyright, 1999
The Printers (Mysore)Ltd.
No
mention of ISI in Godhra chargesheet
Rathin Das
Hindustan Times,
(Gandhinagar, May
23)
http://www.hindustantimes.com/nonfram/240502/detNAT13.asp
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The chargesheet
filed in the Sabarmati Express
torching case make
no mention of the involvement of
Pakistan or the
ISI. The Government Railway Police
(GRP) filed the
chargesheet before first class
judicial magistrate
P.C. Joshi at the Godhra railway
court on Wednesday
evening.
On the absence of
the "ISI angle" in the chargesheet,
an officer
connected with the investigation said no
proof of a foreign
hand could be immediately found.
"It (the ISI
conspiracy theory) needs further
investigation."
Within hours of the
gruesome murders of 58 kar sevaks
on board the
Ahmedabad-bound Sabarmati Express on
February 27,
several Sangh parivar leaders had accused
the ISI of hatching
a terrorist plot.
The chargesheet has
named 101 people, who have been
accused of arson,
rioting, murder and conspiracy.
Fifty-four of these
people are already in custody,
including former
Godhra Municipality chief Mohammed
Hussain Kalota, and
independent councillor Haji Bilal.
They were arrested
in March following a joint
operation by the
Anti-Terrorist Squad, Godhra district
police and GRP.
Forty-four accused
are absconding. Three minors named
in the chargesheet
were earlier released on bail.
In a related
chargesheet, 11 people were accused of
throwing stones at
the police near Godhra station on
February 27, a few
hours after the torching of the
train. Ten of them
are in custody; the eleventh, a
minor, is out on
bail, GRP sources said.
©Hindustan Times
Ltd. 1997.
Chargesheet
filed against 101 Godhra accused
Express News Service
http://www.indian-express.com/full_story.php?content_id=3225
Ahmedabad, May 23:
CID (Crime) on Wednesday evening
filed an interim
chargesheet against 101 people for
Godhra’s Sabarmati
Express attack, in which 58
passengers were
burnt alive on February 27.
Another interim
chargesheet was filed against 11
people for
attacking the police after the incident.
Both chargesheets
were filed at Godhra’s Railway
Court.
Contrary to initial
theories of terrorist or ISI hand
— which many BJP
leaders had propagated — the
chargesheet hints
at a local conspiracy behind the
train attack.
Former municipality chief Mohammad
Kalota and member
Haji Bilal have been named the main
accused.
ADGP (CID-Crime)
A.K. Bhargav said: ‘‘These are
interim
chargesheets; investigations are still under
way. As the
deadline of 90 days was about to get over,
we filed the
chargesheets.’’
According to
Special Public Prosecutor J.M. Panchal,
57 of the accused
in the main case have been arrested
though 44 others
are absconding. All 11 accused in the
attack on policemen
have been arrested and booked for
criminal conspiracy
to kill, murder, arson and
rioting, Panchal
said.
According to the
chargesheet, the accused attacked S-6
coach of Sabarmati
Express on February 27 morning with
prior knowledge and
planning and with the intention to
kill. It says the
manner in which the coach was
attacked and set
ablaze could not be done at short
notice; the accused
had made prior preparations.
The attack on
policemen at the railway station after
the coach was set
on fire intended to harm them and
get the accused
freed from police custody. The police
had opened fire,
killing two.
An investigating
police officer said the chargesheet
provides
circumstantial and forensic evidence to
support the charge
of conspiracy. He said the use of
over 100 litres of
‘‘petrol-like inflammable liquid’’
to burn the coach
and the presence of a 2,000-strong
mob early in the
morning point to a conspiracy.
According to him,
the conspiracy was hatched to ‘‘give
a reply’’ to the
alleged harassment of Muslims by kar
sevaks at the
station and on the train.
The investigators
recorded statements of the accused —
many of whom
confessed their involvement in the crime
— and of about 200
witnesses, who included survivors,
he said.
Apart from Panchal,
three more lawyers — S.G. Thakur,
J.G. Pathak and
Bhaskar Trivedi — have been appointed
to assist the
prosecution in the case.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 main accused
granted bail
AHMEDABAD: Before
the chargesheets were filed, one of
the accused in the
main case, Anwar Rashid Abdul
Rashid Ansari, was
granted bail by the Railway Court
at Godhra on
Tuesday. Ansari was set free on a
personal surety of
Rs 25,000 after the investigating
agency failed to
prove his prima facie involvement,
Special Public
Prosecutor J.M. Panchal said.
Ansari was arrested
from his UP village after a
statement by Hasib
Raza, who was caught at the Howrah
railway station in
a case under the Explosives Act and
lodged in Kanpur
jail. Raza said that Ansari had on
February 27 called
his (Raza’s) sister and told her
that ‘‘a happy
incident’’ had occurred at Godhra, and
she should read the
next day’s newspaper.
When Raza’s sister
asked for the details, Ansari said
a train had been
burnt in Godhra, Raza said in his
statement to the
police. Based on this, the police
arrested Ansari on
April 11 but failed to find any
evidence of his
involvement. He was an active SIMI
member. When
Ansari’s bail application came up for
hearing, Panchal
said as there was no evidence to
connect the accused
to the incident, he could be
granted bail, but
on strict conditions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
70,000 have gone
home, claims Modi
AHMEDABAD: Gujarat
CM Narendra Modi said on Thursday
that about 70,000
people in relief camps have left for
their homes after
riots abated. Modi was speaking at a
seminar here. He
said Rs 32 lakh was being spent on an
average daily on
relief camps. The monetary assistance
for household kits
to violence-hit families has been
revised to Rs 2,500
from Rs 1,250, an official release
said. According to
Modi, all those who suffered,
including trade and
industry, would be provided
economic support
without discrimination.
(PTI)
© 2002: Indian
Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All
rights reserved
throughout the world.
Eye-witnesses
relive horror
TIMES NEWS
NETWORK
[ THURSDAY, MAY 23,
2002 2:25:56 AM ]
Sourav Mukherjee
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=10710428
AHMEDABAD: An aged
Jehana Bibi, relying heavily on her
walking stick, was
the last to climb on to a truck
that waited outside
the Shah-e-Alam Roza relief camp.
The truck, flanked
by police escorts of the crime
branch, consisted
of riot victims headed for
Naroda-Patia.
Passers-by and locals scarcely spared a
glance at these
riot-victims who were, very
reluctantly, going
back to their destroyed homes.
But they were not
here to salvage goods that had
survived the
unchecked looting and arson. This visit
was to help the
police reconstruct the scene of
massacre, that had
claimed 86 lives, down to the
minutest detail.
And all this,
because justice, in the aftermath of the
recent communal
riots, hangs in balance on the
eye-witness account
of those who had managed to escape
the communal
carnage.
The city crime
branch, since May 1, is relying heavily
on 'reconstruction'
of the 44 'sensitive' riot-cases
that include
Naroda-Patia (death toll: 86) and Gulbarg
society (death
toll: 41) massacres for getting to the
bottom of the
truth.
A senior official
told TNN, "Reconstructing the scenes
of crime through
eye-witness accounts will help
prepare air-tight
cases against the accused named in
the half-baked FIRs
that have been handed over to us
more than two
months after the violence. This exercise
may be time-taking
but is crucial for our
investigations, as
any laxity at this juncture would
ensure that the
culprits go free."
Tears ran down
their cheeks, as the victims lamented
their tryst with
death and threw fearful glances
around, half
expecting a 'tola' (mob) to reappear at
the horizon as they
relived, for the sake of
investigations,
those painful moments of February 28 .
Walking past their
looted and burnt homes and
especially those
sites where their friends and dear
ones were cut to
pieces and then set ablaze, the
victims'
descriptions became more and more graphic and
life-like.
Fingers pointed
towards the empty expanse of farmland
beyond
Naroda-Patia. One of the victims narrated:
"That's where
the mob was waiting for us. We were
driven out of our
homes by the deafening roar let out
by another
15,000-strong mob menacingly approaching us
from the
Naroda-Narol highway. We hid into the homes
of our Hindu
neighbours but were soon driven out under
pressure. Some ran
towards the highway while others
tried to escape
through the farmland..."
"There are
mismatches even between these eye-witness
accounts. We have
to hammer out the discrepancies and
arrive at what had
truly happened at these sites
between February 28
and March 3. Once the 'real'
eye-witnesses are
established and correlated with the
clues and evidences
that we have gathered, only then
we can go for more
arrests," affirmed a police source.
The crime branch
has arrested 45 persons in connection
with the 44 cases
that it is handling.
Newly-appointed
additional commissioner of police
(crime) PP Pande
said, "Arrests will be made but at
the right time when
we have concrete evidence against
the accused.
Overnight developments cannot be expected
as investigations
have to be meticulous and evidence
have to be such
that they can bear the scrutiny of any
court of law."
Copyright © 2002
Times Internet Limited. All rights
reserved.
Wedding
bells at Gujarat riot camps
TIMES NEWS
NETWORK
[ THURSDAY, MAY 23,
2002 2:17:42 AM ]
Prerna Shah
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=10709857
AHMEDABAD: On
Monday morning, the Dariakhan and
Juhapura riot
refugee camps came alive with wedding
songs. Soon enough,
a groom from Juhapura with his
barat landed at the
Dariakhan relief camp and all the
people present
there broke into cheers. The 25 baratis
sang and danced
while curious children swarmed around
the groom’s
flower-bedecked car.
This was an
occasion for celebration as Sonal Yusuf of
the Dariakhan camp
got married to Raju Babubhai
Mansuri of the
Juhapura relief camp under rather
unusual
circumstances. Sonal and Raju were engaged
about five years
ago and were planning to get married
next year. Both had
started saving up for their
marriage but the
riots almost dashed their plans.
Rajubhai said: ‘‘I
had not imagined that something
like this would
happen. I have to look after my two
younger sisters and
a brother. To add to my woes I
lost everything, my
savings, my job, and my house too
has been burnt
down. I had to bring my bride to a
relief camp. The
only silver lining is that we are
together today.’’
Yusufbhai Ibrahim,
the bride’s father said: ‘‘I was
not prepared to
arrange the wedding under these
circumstances. But
I think my daughter will be safe
with her husband.
However, I am sad that she is going
from one relief
camp to another.’’ His wife could only
muster: ‘‘I hope
Allah keeps her happy.’’
Sharifa is now
surrounded by women and children at the
Juhapura camp which
is now her new ‘home’. Young girls
want to see the
henna designs on her hands and feet.
The women are eager
to see her wedding gifts. Sharifa
smiles shyly as she
talks about her wedding. She says:
‘‘The riots have
instilled a sense of fear in me. I am
happy to be here
with my husband and his family.
Besides, my parents
have to marry two of my sisters.
At least I am safe
and secure with my husband.’’
She adds:
‘‘Although we have lost everything, my
parents, friends
and Iraqibhai (the camp manager)
managed to arrange
for my wedding dress.’’ She proudly
shows off her red
wedding sari, her new sandals,
make-up kit and
jewellery.
Copyright © 2002
Times Internet Limited. All rights
reserved.
The
Gujarat crime Modi referred to CBI: ‘malicious,
misleading’
e-mail
Dalip
Singh
Indian Express
http://www.indian-express.com/full_story.php?content_id=3238
New Delhi, May 23:
Chief Minister Narendra Modi did
not think it
necessary to let CBI probe the darkest
moments in
Gujarat’s orgy of death. But the contents
of an
unauthenticated internet report, attributed to
two Godhra scribes,
left Modi so upset that he
promptly approached
the Centre with a request for a
CBI investigation
under new cyber laws. It is another
matter though that
the CBI saw no merit in the case.
It all began when
someone posted on the internet an
e-mail report — its
supposed authors have denied
putting out any
such story — under the headline ‘What
triggered
the Orgy of Death in Gujarat!! A hard fact.’
The provocative
story was attributed to two
freelancers based
in Godhra, Anil Soni and Neelam
Soni.
Outraged by its
contents, Modi filed a written
complaint with Home
Minister L K Advani when he came
visiting New Delhi
in March. A senior Home Ministry
official said that
Modi, in a signed letter to Advani,
stated that ‘‘there
is a deliberate attempt to malign
the image of the
state government’’ by circulating
such a report.
Calling it a a
cyber crime, Modi asked Advani for
‘‘appropriate
action to avoid recurrence of such
misleading and
objectionable messages through the
internet media.’’
It fell on Joint
Secretary (Centre-State) R K Singh to
forward Modi’s
complaint to the CBI on March 28. But
two months later,
the MHA has been told there is no
case.
‘‘The CBI has
informed us that they cannot probe this
episode because the
complaint is devoid of specifics.
The name of the
person to whom it was forwarded is
missing as are the
internet protocol address and the
header which helps
identify the source of the mail,’’
an MHA official
said.
Anil Soni, who had
been named as one of the authors of
the report, told
The Indian Express he had never
scripted any such
report.
‘‘I’m tired of the
same reply. I’m in no way connected
with the story. I
have received so many calls, all
inquiring whether
the story was true. Someone known to
me has done it.
Otherwise, how could anyone put out my
mobile and land
phone numbers. It has to be someone
from Godhra,’’ he
said.
He has already
lodged a complaint with the
Superintendent of
Police and District Magistrate,
seeking a thorough
probe. Soni said he was not aware
of Modi’s complaint
to Advani in the matter.
The CBI, he said,
never contacted him.
© 2002: Indian
Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All
rights reserved
throughout the world.
Gujarat’s
Jobless: Idle Hands As Devil’s Workshop
Times News Network
[THURSDAY, MAY 23,
2002 11:49:57 PM ]
DARRYL D’MONTE
http://www1.timesofindia.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=13799647
The appeal in
newspapers by prominent Gujarat
citizens, calling
for an end to the communal
conflagration,
betrays anguish that such terrible
events could be
taking place in a state known for its
zest for business.
However, Gujarat
has become increasingly communalised
in the last two
decades and Ahmedabad is a riot-prone
city. There was
even greater shock when “cosmopolitan”
Mumbai erupted in
the wake of the destruction of the
Babri masjid 10
years ago.
Surprising though
it may seem, there is at least one
common thread that
links the violence in these two
cities (which once
belonged to an undivided Bombay
state).
This is the rapid
decline of formal employment. It is
not common
knowledge that it was Ahmedabad, rather
than Mumbai, which
was the “Manchester of the East”.
The cotton mills played
an even more important part in
this city’s life
than in Mumbai, which had the port
and related
activities. According to the Dutch
sociologist Jan
Breman, who has been studying Gujarat
for years, there
were some 1,60,000 workers engaged in
64 textile mills in
the late 1970s. In the first wave
of closures in the
early 1980s, 40,000 labourers lost
their jobs.
The new industrial
policy of 1985 claimed even more
jobs. By 1997, the
workforce had shrunk to 25,000;
towards the end of
the 20th century, as many as 52
mills had closed.
Breman records that while the first
wave of
deindustrialisation aroused indignation in the
Capital,
politicians and the media lost interest in
subsequent rounds.
The irony is all
the greater because unlike Mumbai,
Ahmedabad had a
pliant mill union, which was prepared
to cooperate with
owners in selling their land, but
this never happened
for complex reasons.
These workers have
now joined the “informal” economy,
which means that
they pick up casual jobs, work longer
hours for less pay
with no security. Breman cites how
such workers have
employment for hardly 15 or 20 days
a month and most of
them have been forced to engage
their families,
including young children, in
supplementing
incomes.
The story has been
repeated in Mumbai, except that
there are more
informal jobs in the industrial and
commercial capital
of the country.
While this has
resulted in pauperisation of the
working class, the
unseen impact has been the rampant
communalisation. In
economic distress, when entire
sections of the
society lose their security, young men
demonise “the
other” and imagine them to be the source
of their
misfortunes.
It was no accident
that in Mumbai in 1992, it was
youth from both
communities that came out on to the
streets. In
Ahmedabad, it is clear that there was a
well-oiled
machinery with which the pogrom against
Muslims has been
conducted and this betrays more
insidious forces at
work. But there is no question
that the closure of
the mills has been at least one of
the sparks that have
set off the attacks.
The media has
reported that half the Ahmedabad mill
workers were
Muslims and Dalits, which sounds
difficult to
believe, given the antagonism towards
both. At best, this
may have been the proportion among
badli workers: even
at the peak, 30 per cent of the
labourers were
temporary.
Interestingly,
Breman records how the first-ever
strike in the
city’s mills took place late in the 19th
century when Dalit
workers started tea stalls. As a
rule, nothing does
more to promote communal harmony
than people working
cheek by jowl; close down mass
workplaces and you
have a sure scenario for conflict.
What the closures
have achieved in these last two
decades is to
ghettoise Ahmedabad. During the first
round, the ghettos
were formed within the
neighbourhood
itself. A Muslim former jobber in a
textile mill who
lived in Gomtipur told Breman that he
had been tipped off
by a Hindu friend about the
impending trouble
this time.
In the second wave,
Muslims were hounded out of areas
where they had lived
for generations. He cites how
Juhapara, on the
right bank of the river, has emerged
as a huge enclave
and now come to be known as ‘mini
Pakistan’. Due to
such ghettoisation, Muslims have
come to be
identified as “an anti-social, criminal
underclass”. Only
the other day, newspapers mentioned
how flats in a
Muslim neighbourhood, which had
otherwise lain
empty, were now in great demand and
their prices have
risen sharply.
There was less
ghettoisation in Mumbai nine years ago.
It was the Shiv
Sena which was then on the rampage,
wreaking violence
for imagined wrongs inflicted by the
‘other’. The Sena
also draws in youth from the
Parel-Lalbaug
industrial area and from former mill
families, who now
face a bleak future.
Its MP, Mohan
Rawale, hails from such a family himself
and has been
elected from Mumbai South-Central, like
Datta Samant before
him. The deindustrialisation of
Mumbai has also led
to its criminalisation, with gang
leader Arun Gawli’s
den virtually in the shadow of a
mill chimney.
These are all
indications of the price that society
has paid, and will
continue to pay, for the decline in
jobs in the
organised sector.
Copyright © 2002
Times Internet Limited. All rights
reserved.
Our
capacity to care
Harsh
Mander
Hindustan Times,
may 23, 2002.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/nonfram/230502/detide01.asp
The carnage that
has convulsed Gujarat since February
27, 2002 has left
in its wake a profound human tragedy
that does not heal
or abate, only mounts with every
passing day. The
unremitting agony of the survivors of
the mass violence
can be assuaged only by a colossal
national enterprise
of caring and healing, in which
the governments and
people of our land resolutely join
hands. Tragically,
there is little evidence so far of
this happening.
Even two months
after the catastrophe began to unfold,
the conditions of
more than two lakh people who
continue in relief
camps, condemned to live as
internal refugees
in their own land, remain abysmal.
It is indeed tragic
that such large numbers of
citizens are forced
to subsist in camps, reminiscent
of Partition, for
extended periods.
The residents are
forced to live without work or
personal spaces, in
very austere physical conditions,
and long to return
to normalcy. But they can be
expected to do so,
only if they feel secure and have
the resources for
rebuilding their lives. The neglect
of these will
prolong their agony, but to force the
pace of their exit
from the camps without this will
threaten their very
survival. Disturbing reports that
relief camps are
already being disbanded in the
Gujarat countryside
have created a mood of uncertainty
and panic.
In any natural and
human-made disaster, including
riots, the state
government is the primary agency
responsible to
provide relief, succour, security and
rehabilitation to
the victims of such disasters. It
may seek the
assistance of NGOs, but it cannot be
allowed to abdicate
its own central responsibility.
State authorities
maintain that it is the culture of
Gujarat that NGOs
establish and run relief efforts. It
is euphemistic to
describe the support for most relief
camps as coming
from NGOs, because like the
government, the
majority of mainstream NGOs which were
so active in the
relief and reconstruction work after
the killer
earthquake in 2001, have chosen to distance
themselves from
this far more politically volatile
human tragedy. The
result is that in practice, camps
are running
substantially on the strength of valiant
self-help efforts
of the affected communities.
Around ten days
after the violence, state authorities
commenced the
supply of basic rations to camps. The
food is prepared
and served in orderly shifts by
volunteers from
among the camp residents. However,
resources are
required for much more than just food,
in running such
populous relief camps of devastated
people. The State
is responsible for the safety,
shelter protection
from the extremes of climate,
health,
psycho-social support, drinking water,
sanitation, education
and rehabilitation of all the
women, men and
children housed in the camps. Tomorrow,
for instance, if
epidemics break out in the camps,
state authorities
rather than the camp managers, would
be liable.
Camps, temporary
homes to several thousand children,
women and men, are
organised mainly in dargahs,
schools or even
graveyards. The majority of residents
have lived for over
10 weeks in open shamianas with
tattered canvas
covers, often amidst graves. In most
camps, the number
of available toilets and bathing
places is
negligible. The Shah-e-Alam Camp, housing
some 1,200 people,
has no more than 18 toilets and
baths. Whereas this
compromises the privacy of the
residents,
especially women, an even far more serious
worry is that
failures in sanitation, particularly
after the rains
break out, have the potential of
causing epidemics.
With the onset of
scorching summer temperatures which
push beyond 45°C,
the most immediate need is of
semi-temporary
structures to house the camps. This
must be the direct
responsibility of state
authorities, not of
camp managers. The residents,
especially
children, need to be protected from the hot
summer sun,
otherwise we may have deaths due to
sun-stroke.
There seems little
prospect that most camps can be
humanely disbanded prior
to the monsoons, therefore,
there is a special
urgency that state authorities
immediately plan
for rain-proof structures. There must
also be toilets and
baths for every 50 residents.
State authorities
need also to take direct
responsibility for
ensuring health services including
mental health
services for all camp residents.
The payment of
compensation is also terminally tangled
so far in red tape
and apathy. A major problem with
the payment of
death compensations is that the
majority of the
victims were so badly burned that they
could not be
identified. The unidentified dead are
being legally
treated only as ‘missing persons’, which
would mean in
effect that the survivors would be
eligible for
compensations after the lapse of maybe
seven years. Another
problem is that unlike in the
past, medical
expenses for survivors battling with
burn injuries are
not being reimbursed on the grounds
that only permanent
disabilities will be compensated.
The underlying
principle of rehabilitation must be
that it is the
state government’s responsibility to
ensure that victims
of riots are restored to a
situation that is
as close as possible to that which
obtained prior to
the mass violence.
Once again, the
fine print in government circulars is
denying affected
persons any real succour. For
instance, new state
government instructions provide
for assistance up
to Rs 10,000 based on actual damage
of moveable and
immovable earning properties, but for
the first time, the
relief explicitly debars the riot
victim from seeking
loans and subsidies under other
schemes. Similarly,
the prime minister announced a
relief of Rs 50,000
for each damaged house. The state
government
instructions provide instead for assistance
up to Rs 50,000,
and sample surveys by the
Ahmedabad-based organisation,
Citizens Initiative,
have revealed that
even fully damaged houses have
received niggardly
compensation of Rs 2,000 to 5,000.
The reconstruction
of homes and livelihoods would be
possible only if
there is a massive mobilisation of
resources of the
central and state governments,
international and
national financial institutions and
donor agencies, and
a single-widow access to their
soft loans
organised within the camps themselves; but
there are no
significant efforts in such a direction.
In major disasters
of the past, ordinary people have
raised funds, in
high profile drives organised by
schools, offices,
celebrities and the media. Our
failure to do so
for the devastated survivors of
Gujarat only
heightens their sense of isolation.
Collectively, we
seem to have drawn borders even on
ordinary human
compassion.
Is it that we are
too busy, or frightened, or
prejudiced to reach
out and heal? In this vast land,
can the governments
and the people not find the moral
and financial
resources to assuage the agony of tens
of thousands of
innocent women and men, girls and
boys, utterly
traumatised and rendered destitute? Can
we together rebuild
not only their shelters and
livelihoods but
also their trust, spirit and hope? Is
the suffering of
some people less important because
they are children
of a lesser god? Or is it that we
have lost our
capacity to care? If so, the crisis in
our country is even
deeper than we imagined.
©Hindustan Times
Ltd. 1997.
Modi,
India’s Milosevic
Gulam K. Noon
Hindustan times,
May 23, 2002.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/nonfram/240502/detide01.asp
It was nothing but
a pogrom in Mahatma Gandhi’s home
state of Gujarat.
Hindu-Muslim riots are not new to
India but what is
new is State-sponsored terrorism.
Narendra Modi’s
government is guilty of ethnic
cleansing. Modi is
India's Milosevic.
It is no longer
merely a breakdown of law and order
but the total
absence of law.
An 11-year-old boy
testified to the National Human
Rights Commission
how his family ran to the State
Reserve Police post
to escape the mob but were told to
go back or be shot
(by the police). He then saw his
mother and sister
being stabbed to death.
A mother who had
given birth to a baby at 10 pm was
forced to run with
her baby at 11 am the next morning
when the mobs came.
She escaped but her husband was
killed and their
house burnt down.
A nine-year-old boy
watched a mob rape and kill his
20-year-old sister.
There are several
similar cases of abject savagery.
There are hundreds
of traumatised orphans in the
refugee camps.
About 100,000 people languish in those
camps, mainly women
and children. Their breadwinners
are dead. Their
homes have been burnt to discourage
them from going back.
In one incident in Ahmedabad, 50
abandoned Muslim
homes were burnt down. The
calculation is that
they will leave Gujarat.
The massacre was
sparked off by the horrific incident
on February 28 when
kar sewaks were returning by train
from the disputed mosque/temple
site at Ayodhya. The
struggle over
Ayodhya has raged for 10 years and Hindu
militants,
including politicians now in power, have
built their
political fortunes on it; but in the
process they have
polarised the country.
On February 28,
rabid Muslims surrounded a bogey and
burnt it in Godhra.
Nothing can justify this killing
of 58 people. Their
murderers should be brought to
justice and dealt
with severely. Such criminals cannot
call themselves
either Hindu or Muslim. God does not
condone murder.
Retribution was
swift and deadly. Muslims were
systematically
hunted down and killed. These were not
spontaneous revenge
killings. The mobs were provided
copies of electoral
rolls to help them identify Muslim
localities and
businesses. Modi’s ministers were
sitting in police
stations to direct operations. All
this has been well
documented by the Indian press.
The police turned
partisan and refused to register
cases of rape and
murder of Muslims. Decent officers,
who did their duty
and protected the people, were
promptly
transferred. The administrative service
abdicated its
responsibility — it takes only one
district magistrate
to bring a riot under control in a
few hours if he
does his job. Sixty-three days later,
the killings were
going on.
Modi took over as
Gujarat chief minister at a time
when the BJP’s
electoral fortune was waning. Modi
appears to have
seized upon the Godhra incident as an
excuse to massacre
Muslims in order to swing the
majority Hindu
votes in his favour. State elections
are not due in
Gujarat for another year but Modi
wishes to bring the
date forward and go to the polls
now. His
disgraceful move to gain political capital
from the carnage
was supported by Atal Bihari Vajpayee
and L.K. Advani.
Only the hue and cry raised by the
press has
temporarily stalled the plan.
One of the biggest
disappointments has been Vajpayee.
He was given credit
for being a secular, liberal man
who believed in a
pluralistic, democratic society. No
longer. That mask
was torn off in Goa on April 12 when
his rhetoric was
that of an RSS pracharak rather than
of a responsible
leader of a mixed electorate.
Vajpayee has lost
the moral authority to govern. The
BJP can no longer
pretend to be a political party that
believes in
pluralism and democracy.
Politicians have
meddled for so long with the
judiciary, the
administrative services and the police
force that the
steel framework of which India was once
so proud has turned
to straw in Gujarat. Veteran
police chief Julio
Riberio said
that Gujarat has
made him feel ashamed of having once
belonged to the
police force. He also recommended that
the police and
Indian Administrative Service in
Gujarat be
abolished because Modi and his ministers
have taken all
powers into their own hands.
Indian Muslims must
take their share of the blame for
the conflict. They
remain amongst the most
ill-educated, poor
and unemployed. Self-styled leaders
such as Imam
Bukhari of Delhi — whose claim to
represent all
Indian Muslims is as bogus as the claim
of the Hindu
militants to represent all Hindus — have
encouraged the
community to remain backward. It is a
type of
colonialism. The Babri mosque dispute is a
good case in point.
The mosque was a
disused building in 1991 and had been
locked up for over
50 years. Some Hindus claim that
site as the
birthplace of Lord Rama. Since the mosque
was a disused one,
the question should have been
peacefully resolved
with Muslims accommodating the
demands of the
majority community. A sensible Muslim
leadership would
have done that and not make an issue
out of it.
The Saudi
government, for example, has destroyed
dozens of mosques
to build roads. In Britain, a
disused church has
been turned into a Hindu cultural
centre, the
Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. During the Bosnia
conflict, 1,242
mosques were destroyed by the Serbs.
Instead, the
Ayodhya conflict has raged for 10 years.
Militant Hindus
politicised the issue and rode to
power on it.
Thousands of poor people have died (it is
always the poor who
die). How many more innocent lives
must be lost before
there is a sensible resolution?
Muslims, who chose
to live in the country after 1947,
as did my family,
owe their first allegiance to India.
It is the Prophet’s
command that a good Muslim obeys
the laws of the
country where he lives.
The Congress has
done virtually nothing in Gujarat. We
have seen no mass
mobilisation of people, no sustained
opposition to Modi
on the streets. There was a
similar, shameful
incident in 1984 when
the Congress under
Rajiv Gandhi presided over the
massacre of Sikhs
in Delhi that went un-checked for
three days. Then,
as now, Congressmen led mobs armed
with electoral
lists and burnt and looted Sikh homes.
None of them has
been brought to justice.
The naked pursuit
of power in India has stripped
politics of any
meaningful issues. Education,
employment, housing
or medical benefits are not on the
agenda. Instead,
the issues are caste, religion and
money. Votes are
counted in blocks — the Hindu/Muslim
block vote, the
Dalit vote, the Sikh vote etc.
Organised conflict
is often the method of scaring the
votes into your
corner. The greatest disservice the
BJP has done is to
misrepresent the catholic nature of
Hinduism and try
turn it into a dogmatic body
of beliefs. The
politics of hate is threatening to
tear India apart.
What message has
Gujarat given to the rest of the
world?
That India is
unsafe. Who would want to invest in a
country that cannot
guarantee security of life and
property? India
will miss out on opportunities thrown
up by the
globalisation of the economy. London-based
industries that
could have located their auxiliary
factories in India
have chosen to go to China where
labour is equally
cheap but security is guaranteed.
Overseas Indians
are an emotional lot and would like
to invest in India
— but who can risk having their
business burnt down
one fine day? Such blatant
lawlessness as
witnessed in Gujarat will deter all
except the most
foolhardy.
Deepak Parekh,
chairman of India’s leading housing
finance firm, HDFC,
said: “What is a government
elected for? If they
cannot protect innocent lives,
they should go.
What kind of government allows the
killing of women
and children?”
At the very least,
Narendra Modi should be asked to
resign or be
dismissed.
The writer is an
industrialist and President of the
London Chamber of
Commerce & Industry. These are his
personal views
©Hindustan Times
Ltd. 1997.
Farewell
to Rajdharma: Centre’s Record of Shame in
Gujarat
Times Of
India
B G VERGHESE
[ WEDNESDAY, MAY
22, 2002 11:44:23 PM ]
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=10699777
L K Advani has
hailed the twin debates on Gujarat in
Parliament as a
“victory”. For whom? Not for India.
For if there is one
statement that stands out above
all the
self-serving and hideously justificatory
rhetoric from the
treasury benches, it was a remark
made by the Prime
Minister in reply to the debate in
the Rajya Sabha on
May 6.
Atal Behari
Vajpayee confessed that he went to Goa
determined to
remove Narendra Modi. But once there, he
reversed his
decision.
The Prime Minister
implicitly told the Rajya Sabha
that if the chief
minister, hailed by many as a
conquering hero,
was removed, there would be a strong
backlash in
Gujarat. From whom? Not from the battered
minority community
but presumably from disciplined
party and parivar
advocates of the action-reaction,
provoker-provoked
school of vicarious liability.
Not long ago, Shiv
Sena leader Bal Thackeray had
warned anyone
listening that Mumbai would burn if he
was so much as
touched. The Prime Minister, no less,
has now announced
that he has decided to place the
diktat of the mob
above his oath of office.
Every Union
minister on assuming office is pledged to
“faithfully and
conscientiously discharge (his/her)
duties ... and do
right to all manner of people in
accordance with the
Constitution’’. But here the prime
minister
pathetically tells Parliament, trustee of the
sovereign Indian
people, that he is unable and
unwilling to act against
the mob.
Farewell to
Rajdharma. The country is up for blackmail
by every fascist
thug or criminal. And the emperor has
no clothes,
stripped of the last shred of moral
authority.
Much subtlety has
been displayed by many in debating
whether it is Article
356 or 355 that should apply to
Gujarat. The
governor, exhausted by his strenuous
exertions in favour
of Article 356 in Bihar not so
long ago, has
maintained a stoic silence. While
Article 356 speaks
of “failure of the constitutional
machinery” in a
state, Article 355 enjoins on Union...
‘‘to ensure that
the governance of every state is
carried on in
accordance with the provisions of this
Constitution”.
But was the
Constitution violated in Gujarat? Examine
the evidence. FIRs
regarding murder, arson and rape
were systematically
rejected. Specific names and
details were
replaced by vague non-actionable
references to “mob”
violence.
Mr Modi,
broadcasting over Doordarshan, said, “If
raising issues
related to justice or injustice adds
fuel to the fire,
we will have to observe restraint
and invoke peace”.
So victims were being advised not
to add fuel to the
fire and peace was “invoked” to
prevent filing of
“provocative” FIRs.
According to
Ahmedabad’s police commissioner, curfew
was openly and
blatantly violated by armed mobs, who
also sparked fresh
violence by spreading rumours. Two
Muslim sitting high
court judges were forced to flee
their homes, one of
which was torched. Hindu judges
who sheltered them
were threatened.
Ahmedabad’s IG
police and other Muslim officers were
attacked and had
themselves to seek protection.
Dargahs, mosques
and other shrines were systematically
desecrated and
destroyed, as were Muslim homes,
mohallas, shops,
establishments and factories; these
were selectively
targeted.
Unsourced posters,
pamphlets and handbills inciting
hatred, violence
and economic and social boycott of
Muslims were freely
distributed at street corners;
other poisonous
material, including inflammatory
photographs, was
circulated by the VHP. Ministers
repeatedly pressed
the administration to shut down
relief camps in
which over 100,000 hapless victims of
violence had taken
shelter in Ahmedabad alone.
Certain local
newspapers that wantonly published
totally unfounded
and incendiary reports and hate
stories were
honoured with personal letters of
appreciation from
the chief minister.
The Baroda police
commissioner’s plea for action
against these
papers went unheeded. The NHRC and
minorities
commissions found themselves against a
wall. Mr Modi said
at one stage that peace would not
return as long as
Parliament was in session. But the
Union government,
ostrich-like, buried its head in the
sand, citing
dubious statistics for dubious ends.
What happened in
Godhra was certainly outrageous.
Whatever the cause
or alleged provocation, the
criminals
responsible must be punished.
One expected the
prime minister, any prime minister,
to show leadership
and statesmanship. I wrote to Mr
Vajpayee on March 4
stating that like countless other
Indians, I had been
“deeply shocked, saddened, shamed
and troubled by the
appalling holocaust in Gujarat”.
It’s not enough, I
added, that the guilty be
discovered and
punished after due inquiry. More than
that, if we are to
hold together and move into the
21st century as a
civilised nation, “we will have to
restore confidence,
trust and amity in our plural yet
obviously fractured
society whose genius has been
accommodation and
tolerance”.
What we see today
is the bitter fruit of the
dragon-seed of hate
assiduously sown and nurtured by
the party and
parivar over the past decade. The enemy
is within. It will
not succeed. India’s silent
majority, now
awakening, will prevail. But in the end
there has to be
reconciliation, not strife. For this,
truth and justice
are a necessary precondition. Now.
(The author toured
Gujarat as a member of the Editors’
Guild)
Copyright © 2002
Times Internet Limited. All rights
reserved.