An Introduction to a new form of Socioeconomic thought, government and society:Ilanism
The definition for Ilanism should be the first thing discussed. Ilanism
is a word created to explain this form of socioeconomic thought because the
word Ílanism' had no meaning before it was used here. This is similar to the
word 'kodak' which now is associated with cameras, but meant nothing before
Eastman used the word.
Ilanism bring together government
society and business for the advancement of the country. This is a stark
contrast to every other form of socioeconomic theory and the reason for the
need for a new name.
Ilanism will be the strongest if
used in Latin America. It was a dream of Simon Bolivar to have Latin America
working as one. In my opinion, Latin America is being used by the modern
industrial countries of Europe, Canada and the United States. The countries of
Latin America must unite to confront this abuse and make it work to the
advantage of Latin America.
In all current socioeconomic
theories society is just moving with the flow. Socialism, capitalism and
communism all have conflicts at times between labor (society), companies and
the government. Ilanism attempts to minimize these conflicts as much as
possible. Since this is a non-utopian world, some conflict will still exist.
After you finished reading this introduction, you shall get a sense of
what to expect in the coming weeks. Parts of Ilanism were first introduced at
the Russian National Economic Conference at Vladimir State Technical University,
Russia. This introduction is a purely economic rationale behind the Ilanism
concept. This series will look at each facet, which all together, makes up the
Ilanistic thought.
The
world of yesterday and today is rough and teemed with hatred of the minority.
Some examples are:
·
The
United States to the American Indians in the 1800's
·
El
Salvador to the Indians in the 1920s
·
NAZI
Germany to the Jews, Blacks, and homosexuals in the 1930's and 40's
·
Iraq
to the Kurds in the 1980's and 90's
·
Yugoslavia
in the 1980's and 90's to territories that make up the country after Gen.
Tito's death
The
world must unite as a common civilization and the United Nations is not
accomplishing this. The United Nations was created to prevent what the League
of Nations failed to do to, end all war after World War I. (also known as the
“Great War” and the “War to end all wars”)
Since
the creation of the United Nations, there have been many lives lost needlessly
in civil wars or skirmishes. The following list is just a start. I am sure you
can think of many more illustrations.
·
Argentina
·
Nicaragua
·
El
Salvador
·
Colombia
·
The
former Republic of Yugoslavia
·
Korea
·
Viet
Nam
·
China
·
Russia
·
Czechoslovakia
·
Hungary
·
Tiebet
·
Nepal
·
Afghanistan
·
Iran/Iraq
·
Kuwait/Iraq
·
Angola
The first article of the series
will focus on discussing the Rights that every human being deserves in life.
The creator gives these Rights to every person. This is his intention. However,
in reality, the government has infringed on these Rights. I have listed all the
Rights below, along with a brief description. They are all equal and so the
order, in which they appear below, is of no importance. All rights must be
upheld; otherwise a state of despotism will result.
The Rights
·
The
Right of Life
·
The
Right of Liberty/Free Speech
·
The
Right of Health
·
The
Right of Property
·
The
Right of Education
·
The
Right to Pursue Happiness
·
The
Right to Justice
The
Right of Life
Every human being has the right to
have free and unhindered travel. Every person has the right to live life as
he/she sees fit.
The
Right of Liberty/Free Speech
Every human being has the right to
present his/her own opinion without the fear of retribution from the government
or society.
The
Right of Health
Each person in the society has the
right to guaranteed health care regardless of the ability to pay.
The
Right of Property
Every human being has the right to
own his/her own belongings exclusively.
The
Right to Pursue Happiness
Every human being must be allowed to
pursue his happiness however he/she sees fit, without restrictions from the
government.
The
Right of Justice
If a person is exercising his/her
own rights, but is at the same time, infringing upon another person’s rights,
this person must be stopped. It is the society or the government’s
responsibility to prevent such happenings.
The second article of the series
will discuss the Ilanistic form of economy. It is the economy that runs the
world. Ethnocentrism and the politicians do not rule the world. However, they
both can affect how a country proceeds by infringing upon the right of its
citizens and creating a minority.
The third article of the series will look at the
structure of businesses within the Ilanistic society, while the fourth article
will discuss the structure of the people’s government of Ilanism. I will
present those from various angles: city, sub state, state, and
Democratic-Republic. The final article will be how a country in Latin America
can become an Ilanistic country in a non-utopian world.
This was a very brief overview of
how the discussions will proceed. If at any time you feel that something is
missing or you disagree with what was stated, please feel free to contact me.
It is your right and duty to disagree with me. I do not only tolerate dissent,
but I actually encourage it.
All emails should be directed to me at
[email protected] and mail sent to the Bolivian Times (attn. Chuck Newman) OR
you could go to http:www.geocities.com/ilanistic and read more on this subject
not printed here. For your convenience,
this contact information will be listed at the end of each article.
Charles R. Newman is a graduate of the Fort Wayne, Indiana Campus of Purdue University, USA. His degree is in mechanical engineering technology, but has taken many additional courses in business and economics. He is the author of two articles published for the Russian National Economic Conference, held in Vladimir Russia, entitled “A Possible Solution to Loans in Post-Soviet Russia” (Feb. 1999) and “Ilanism, a New Form of Socioeconomic Thought” (Feb. 2000).
Ó 2000 Charles R. Newman