KCard : Activity evaluation
|
Orienting efforts
A first step in deciding on strategy is to decide
what the objective is. In other words a strategy to do what. A good start to this
is deciding for a given activity (this is also valid for a sector or a
market) if you wish to progress in it or regress from it, that is for a given
activity what should be the goals of your strategy. This is very important, because for example if you
judge an activity to have big potential maybe you'll decide you want to gain
market shares even if you don't make any profit (probably hoping to make
profit later). On the other hand, a dying activity might not be worth any
investment to even maintain market shares, you might be better of making as
much profit as possible and retiring from the activity. To help making these decisions three classical
matrices and methods are presented below. All these are meant to help guiding
the reflection and mustn't replace personal in depth analysis. BCG1
This matrix suggests an activity traverses four
phases as follows: dilemma (shall we go or not), star (low profit and gain
market share), profit (maintain position and high profit), weight
(retire and low profit). By determining your position relative to this matrix
you can decide what your goal should be, and elaborate a strategy
accordingly. BCG2
This matrix suggests classifying activities
following two dimensions: the importance of competitive advantage and the
differentiation possibilities. This leads to a four cell matrix with
different kinds of topologies in each cell for the four combinations:
McKinsey
The McKinsey matrix is a nine cell square matrix
which puts the activity's attractiveness against the company's relevant
strengths. At each intersection there is a corresponding generic strategy to
adopt regarding the activity. For a given activity you decide on positioning along
the two axis and in the intersecting cell you can read the strategy to adopt |
Ideas to develop
|