Homeless people appear and disapear randomly throughout society.
This accounts for the broad range of humanity that one can find in the "homeless" population.
In theory this happens at an even distribution,
it can happen to anybody equally... that means "good" people as well as "bad" people. It happens suddenly. The moment when all attempts at saving the situation have failed AND the person realizes they blew it. It is usualy comes as surprize to those so afflicted.
But then... after a time the "homelessness" wears off, one settles and works their way through and out, or whatever, the person "gets over it". But meanwhile "back at the ranch"... somewhere another homeless person appears. That is why there are so many different people.
A brief aside about the relativity of luck. An easy example is a broken leg that can spoil the plans of a rich man, or, finding twenty dollars when penniless and hungry and homeless. Which is the luckier of the two, the rich one or the poor one? Happiness and pain are relative and what you consider to be fortunate may not be so for the other guy, or gal. What if the broken leg got you out of a bad marriage or you spent the twenty on bad drugs and died, what then? Who's lucky?
Random events like the particles of gas contained in a balloon.
Statistically a certain number will impact on the interior surface at any given instant, then to be replaced by others an instant later... it is not indiviual atoms holding the balloon out, like little Dutch boys with a finger in the dyke. It is the random action of all of them.Homeless or not!
When dealing with real people, in real situations, this term, "homeless", is misleading and of little or no practical use. The way it is now it is constantly being redefined toward whatever is convinient. People appear as homeless suddenly. Even to themselves it is usualy comes as surprize. And then... after a time they disappear (the person "gets over it"). But meanwhile "back at the ranch"... another homeless person appears.
Random events like particles of a gas in a balloon.
Statistically a certain number will impact on the interior surface at any given instant, then to be replaced by others an instant later... it is not indiviual atoms holding the balloon out, like little Dutch boys with a finger in the dyke. It is the random action of all of them.Homeless or not!
Important for Greenfield's theory is a distinction between 'consciousness' and 'mind,' terms that she says many of her colleagues use interchangeably, but which she believes are two entirely different concepts.
"You talk about losing your mind or blowing your mind or being out of your mind, but those things don't necessarily entail a loss of consciousness," Greenfield said in a telephone interview. "Similarly, when you lose your consciousness, when you go to sleep at night or when you're anesthetized, you don't really think that you're really going to be losing your mind."
Like the wetness of water
According to Greenfield, the mind is made up of the physical connections between neurons. These connections evolve slowly and are influenced by our past experiences and therefore, everyone's brain is unique.
But whereas the mind is rooted in the physical connections between neurons, Greenfield believes that consciousness is an emergent property of the brain, similar to the 'wetness' of water or the 'transparency' of glass, both of which are properties that are the result of -- that is, they emerge from -- the actions of individual molecules.
Why Great Minds Can't Grasp Consciousness/
By Ker Than
LiveScience Staff Writer
What's HOME?eggingyouon$*******STROOP##* NYCitySITE&Not Everyones American Dream