It's beauty is in it's completeness and simplicity. What could be simpler than an egg?
An infant may try to suck the egg, a child may roll or otherwise play with it. Untill it breaks. This is of interest too. If an infant manages to break the egg it will continue to prod it on, a child might try to fix it. But when you come down to it, what have you got?
This is the meaning of Heisenbergs' Principle when applied to social dynamics. Who is making the measurement will affect the outcome of the tally.
It goes nowhere. Does nothing. If all you know is what you see, it's pointless. In and of it's self, it is useless.
This is what happens when you isolate, or "select out", a "homeless person". They go nowhere, and they do nothing.
Now why is that?
Yet, if you put the egg into a context, suddenly...
...you have an uderstanding. If you are a farmer, it's next years chicken. For me it's breakfast.
And so we see the homeless problem. For the City it is to move them out of "public" areas that they can legally occupy. They are next years butter for this years bread.
For me it's understanding why, if you are going to have homeless people, why won't you let them be clean? Perhaps give them a place to rest? A little peace, a little Time to think.
As objectified and particularized, homeless people are a problem because there is no contextual understanding.
Given the Schrodinger/Heisenberg! "spin" they are part of a social wave, and ongoing and active work of public developement and social improvement, or not.
sO WHAT CAN YOU SAY ABOUT AN EGG?
|
Home
Where one begins... where
one ends. What one has...
what one seeks.
Behavior can be the applied use of free will, or a cage.
What we have so far. April, 2005.
This we need to know. If, "Less is more.", then how much more is less? What does Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle have to do with the homeless in New york City?
AS TO ANSWERS WE ONLY HAVE ONE. iF YOU LIVED HERE, YOU WOULD BE HOME BY NOW.
tHANK-YOU.