Read the Times' story!


If only for economic reasons an accurate count of "homeless" people is an issue of consequence. Each and every year hundreds of millions of tax dollars — $642,000,000 in 2005 — are spent to maintain and run the New York City "shelter" system. A large, if unknown, number of lives depend on the truth of this measurement.

Does this story need dilegent journalistic treatment, or is it a passing pie eating contest out on Coney Island?

gossip sheet?

revealed



In any case

...
why leave us hanging with piece-meal gossip?

If the reporters were thinking up "fallback story angles",

then...

  1. Why were the reporters "falling back"?
  2. What is an acceptable angle for "fallback story"?

    Is there not something fishy about reporters angling for stories. Is there a story in the FIRST official homeless census or not?

  3. Where were the "homeless"?

    And how were they beating these professional big-time New York reporters back?

  4. When was the new seawall in Marine Park constructed?

    A photo of the sea wall would have helped. Perhaps they only had
    room for the "important" stuff. Still I missed it.


  5. What happened to Mr. Yearwood's "implanted electronic transmitter"?

    Shouldn't someone look into that?
    It was reported in the "NEW YORK TIMES", was it not?

  6. And of course

    Who was reporting the news ?








The New York Times' revealed, though did not report on,
the cavalier attitude of city officials and the "establishment" press toward "homeless" people. That is, people without shelter, seeking to survive in in a town they call "home", rather than move to New Jersey... humans on a street in New York City enduring a frigid night in February 2003.

And along comes the Mayors media circus to make sure they are there. And... and... report on this fact...?

"Then there was the human-sized lump draped with blankets under a ramp of the Brooklyn Bridge. The lump did not respond to a wake-up call. Add another."

"Paper of record" or a high-school gossip sheet?
Read the Times' story!
Paper of Record?





Down for the count.

Homeless win 5 to 0!

For the first official census to ascertain. the number of people seeking "shelter" in the "streets", the mighty New York Times helps to count five and record one: a Mr Yearwood. Sad but true. Some paper, some record.

Is It Science or Is It News"

The feckless search for the "homeless",  touted as the "Homeless Outreach Population Survey", is a fine example of a "seemingly benign operation that promotes purposes other than those openly declared".

Read this "Bureaucracy
 ...is a tool that legitimizes control 
 of the many by the few"

Subtracting the "spin"...

As covered by the daily papers, there were no surprizes... ... the establishment New York Times sent a reporter out with the city troops; while the New York Post parked their reporter on a discarded sofa, along with one of the hunted homeless.

homelessINK
homelessINK takes a look at 
Mindless knee-jerk stupidity

"Only a handful of attempts to count the homeless have been made at both local and national levels in Canada. These attempts have failed for a lack of a consistent definition of who the homeless are, as well as the elusiveness of the population.

"Absolute homelessness refers to people living on the streets with no physical shelter, while relative homelessness refers to those who live in spaces that do not meet basic health and safety standards.

"The broad definition of homelessness includes those who live in sub-standard housing, or in overcrowded or undesirable conditions. For instance, a woman may live with an abusive man as the lesser of two evils, thereby avoiding being on the streets." read more

Authors King and Carley suggest that living in a shelter, while little is done to address the lack of low-cost housing, is often demoralizing.
"Many people have said that shelters are a true example of Christian charity. People who say this have never visited a shelter. It isn't wonderful to sleep in a cot in a makeshift dormitory; to line up with strangers for a shower and have to undress in front of them; to be afraid to fall asleep while listening to coughing, crying, and angry muttering around you; to have to leave in the morning, no matter what the weather, even if you are sick. Above all, it isn't wonderful to be alone."

Beyond basic economics, there are political causes as well. Because the poor often do not carry much political weight, a government may not feel the political pressure to improve its housing and anti-poverty policies. Many governments are elected because a small number of wealthy people pay to have them elected. They want things a certain way. They want to maintain the status quo and do not want to lose their privileges. The government will not put much energy into eradicating poverty because that is not what the wealthy people want.

*
*
*
*

Truth: "Use it  like Water."

STROOP
You can help homelessINK pay for
start-up costs and expenses by using
Your help is both needed and appreciated.

dictionary

WORD RESOURCES.

An encyclopedia of current events
 with news feeds and research links 
...connecting the dots...
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1