: 13/7 8/7
: 24/15
for Money Game
![]() | ||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
• Red to play
• Money Game Equities
• Volatility after each play
8/3(2) 6/1*(2)
+0.513
W: 59.8% WG: 27.0% LG: 7.9% CL: +0.388 CF: +0.513
7/2(2) 6/1*(2)
+0.502 ( -0.011)
W: 58.7% WG: 27.7% LG: 8.6% CL: +0.365 CF: +0.502
Full cubeful rollout, 1296 games, Play: 0-ply/expert, Cube: 2-ply/33%
8/3(2) 6/1*(2)
0.213
7/2(2) 6/1*(2)
0.193
7/2(2) is probably a bit better for the blitz, since it will be easier for Red's outfield checkers to reach the 3-point than the 2-point.
Also, the 8-point leaves Red a bit more flexibility than the bar-point.
On the other hand, if the blitz fails and White gets an anchor (assuming Red sends back White's blot on the 10-point in the process), then the "3-bar" structure will be better than the "2-8" since the 3-point isn't as deep and "3-bar" structure will provide
a more compact position than the "2-8".
[122804/Build: 0.14]