: 8/4 6/4 
: 24/13
for Money Game
| ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ||||||||||||||
| | | | | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
• Red to play 
• Money Game Equities
• Volatility after each play
24/23 13/11
+0.064
W: 50.9% WG: 15.7% LG: 10.5% CL: +0.069 CF: +0.064
13/11 6/5
+0.055 ( -0.009)
W: 51.2% WG: 15.7% LG: 12.2% CL: +0.057 CF: +0.055
24/21
+0.004 ( -0.060)
W: 49.5% WG: 13.5% LG: 10.0% CL: +0.025 CF: +0.004
13/10
- 0.014 ( -0.078)
W: 48.9% WG: 14.3% LG: 11.4% CL: +0.007 CF: - 0.014
Full cubeful rollout, 1296 games, Play: 0-ply/expert, Cube: 2-ply/33%
24/23 13/11
0.115
13/11 6/5
0.158
24/21
0.114
13/10
0.103
White has only one checker back, and Red would like to attack this checker. Slotting the 5-point with 13/11 6/5 is the direct way to do this, so the play makes good thematic sense and is certainly worth thinking about.
The downside to this play is that Red loses a lot of ground if the slot is hit, and if missed, White will probably bring builders down from the mid-point, and if Red is fortunate enough to hit an indirect shot, the blot on the 5-point will be exposed to a double-shot.
24/23 13/11 looks most natural. This puts pressure on all parts of the board with relative safety.
Preventing White from unstacking the heavy mid-point safely seems to be a number one priority.
[Build: 0.14/122004]