: 8/4 6/4 
: 8/3 6/3
for Money Game
| ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ||||||||||||||
| | | | | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
• Red to play 
• Money Game Equities
• Volatility after each play
24/21 13/9
+0.129
W: 53.6% WG: 16.6% LG: 14.4% CL: +0.096 CF: +0.129
13/9 13/10
+0.108 ( -0.021)
W: 52.4% WG: 17.8% LG: 14.5% CL: +0.080 CF: +0.108
24/21 24/20
+0.106 ( -0.023)
W: 52.5% WG: 15.1% LG: 13.9% CL: +0.065 CF: +0.106
24/20 13/10
+0.098 ( -0.031)
W: 52.5% WG: 16.0% LG: 13.8% CL: +0.074 CF: +0.098
Full cubeful rollout, 1296 games, Play: 0-ply/expert, Cube: 2-ply/33%
24/21 13/9
0.182
13/10 13/9
0.190
24/21 24/20
0.165
24/20 13/10
0.178
White's 8-point is stripped, so Red can split his back checkers with less risk, since some of White's attacking plays cost him
the 8-point. In this sort of positions, I prefer splitting to the point which my opponent least wants to make.
Also, in this position, White's 4's are duplicated, which has to be a strong argument for splitting to the 21-point.
[Build: 0.14/122604]