Additional DRAFT figures for Paper 1b from primitive lateral-scattering tests

Name of file:lat_scat_test_083109.html
Names of associated files:lat_scat_test_082409.html
Created on:8/31/09 (5:46 AM),
Revised on:9/3/09 (2:26 AM) , 9/5/09 (2:36 AM), 9/6/09 (4:00 AM)
Structure:
Reference:

Key Reference email(s):
1) L.A., Friday night the 21st of August
2) Los Angeles, 9:47 PM Wednesday, August 26, 2009
3) Los Angeles, 7:37 PM Tuesday, August 25, 2009
4) Los Angeles, 4:26 PM Sunday, Auguse 30, 2009

A. Additional Figures for Paper 1b

A.1      Figure 7 (a)    of paper 1b.

These results come from program     funda_fig_13.for      

A.2      Figure 8    . Since its difficult to see the 3 curves near 1, they have been plotted separately below in Section B.

 

B. Close-up of plots for alpha = 0.995

B.1   Figure 7 (b)    of paper 1b

  TLFRH1  (Blue)    and     TLFRHN (Red)      . The red curve (TLFRHN) was computed with low-precision and can be improved to remove those spikes, whereas the blue curve (TLFRH1) did not improve despite using higher precision. The error between your formula and Knopoff's get worse at higher frequencies.

and in the right plot, we have   TRHLF1  (Blue)    and     TRHLFN (Red)      . The red curve (TRHLFN) was computed with low-precision and can be improved to remove those spikes, whereas the blue curve (TRHLF1) did not improve despite using higher precision. The error between your formula and Knopoff's get worse at higher frequencies.

B.2    RLFRHN    and    RLFRHL    Reflection coefficients for forward propagation. and on the right, we have    RRHLFN    and    RRHLFL    Reflection coefficients for backward propagation

C. Figure 6

C.1   Final "paper 1b" figure for Fig. 6

C.2   Variant 1 for Fig. 6

C.3   Variant 2 for Fig. 6

C.4   Variant 3 for Fig. 6

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1