I'm writing to humbly offer my services as copyeditor. I've just
"gotten a load" of the HIA News #6 and the lack of proofreading is a
crime to behold. One would think you were typing with that famed ass
of yours, instead of your hands. For instance, what the hell does this
sentence mean?:

"Later when queried about when exactly these trays would appear,
found that Myers, who had previously "fiddled" about the husbands car
- claiming he was 'just trying to shut the door' when questioned
politely by the husband, was actually considering keeping the trays."


The context does not make the above statement any clearer. I see one
headline was corrected with a pen, which is one way to do it, I guess.
Also, I've spoken to one of your authors and he has informed me that
the articles you claim were lost, were actually censored. I would
encourage you, in the name of responsible journalism, to maintain in
your pages a free and open discussion of the issues and not to hide
from controversy like a startled rabbit.

Of course, the portions of the publication that I could understand
(i.e. the parts with the least number of grammatical errors) were
hilarious and I thank you for the laughs. I especially liked "Current
Trends: Fear of El Serpiente," although I'm not familiar with the
name. And I enjoyed Mr. Wordbutt's angry rant.

Please let me know if I can be of help.

GFMC
BUT WE WILL ALSO PRINT SCATHING  DIATRIBES LIKE THIS ONE!
(From our good friend, Mary Connor)
Return to H.I.A. homepager
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1