Heat-Loving
Microbes Offer Clues to Life's Origins
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/05/0526_040526_geobacter3.html
John Roach
for National Geographic News
Over the past 20 years scientists have warmed
up to the idea that the majority of life on our planet lives not on Earth's
surface but beneath its crust. The theory has spurred new ideas about life's
origins on Earth and where to look for life on other planets.
Earth's crust gets warmer the closer it is to
the molten iron-nickel believed to be at our planet's core. One question that
scientists who study life beneath Earth's crust face is, at what temperature is
it too hot for life to survive?
Since scientists believe Earth at one point
was mostly molten, the answer to the question may shed light on how early life
could have first evolved on our planet.
"If Earth had to cool to a certain temperature at which life was
possible, maybe the high-temperature life could have existed that much
sooner," said Derek Lovley, a microbiologist at the University of
Massachusetts, Amherst.
Much of this life beneath the crust, which
scientists refer to as biomass, are microbes that use hydrogen and minerals
like iron to get energy from food sources in the same way that humans use
oxygen to obtain energy from our food.
Lovley is at the forefront of research into
such microbes. He has discovered dozens of different species, including Strain
121, a microbe that grows at 121𨰫
Celsius (250𨰫 Fahrenheit)—the highest temperature currently
known for life.
The ability to grow at 121𨰫 Celsius is significant because for over a century it has been the
temperature used to sterilize medical equipment. Scientists thought that such
temperatures would kill all life-forms.
"It's kind of a benchmark," Lovley
said. "This is like breaking the four-minute mile."
Strain 121, which goes dormant at temperatures
below 80𨰫 Celsius (176𨰫
Fahrenheit), lives in environments known as hydrothermal vents on the ocean
floor. The vents spew hydrogen- and mineral-rich hot water from deep in the
Earth's crust to the surface.
For several years scientists have known that
other microbes survive in and around hydrothermal vents at temperatures above
100𨰫 Celsius (212𨰫
Fahrenheit). Strain 121 just "opens that window where life can exist a
little bit wider," Lovley said.
Jack Farmer, an astrobiologist at Arizona
State University in Tempe, said that opening this window for life on Earth
expands the potential for life to develop and persist elsewhere in the solar
system and beyond.
"As the upper temperature limit for life
has increased, new opportunities for habitable environments have opened up, and
subsurface hydrothermal environments are among the most important," Farmer
said.
John Delaney, a marine geologist at the
University of Washington in Seattle, led the expedition that brought to the
surface the chunk of hydrothermal vent from which Strain 121 was isolated.
Delaney said that examining such environments
gives researchers a snapshot of what life is like deeper in the Earth's crust,
where temperatures are higher. "Our way of doing it was a 'poor man's
drilling program,'" he said.
The expedition team used a remotely operated
submarine to cut out and bring to the surface a chunk of hydrothermal vent from
the Juan de Fuca Ridge, which lies about 200 miles (322 kilometers) offshore
from Washington's Puget Sound and nearly 1.5 miles (2.4 kilometers) deep in the
Pacific Ocean.
The seafloor at the Juan de Fuca Ridge is
cold, about 2𨰫 Celsius (36𨰫
Fahrenheit). But down beneath the seafloor the temperature warms gradually
until, eventually, it is scalding hot.
"If you telescope those conditions by
having hot water coming out along a fissure it will build a sulfide
chimney," Delaney said. "And this sulfide chimney is very cold on the
outside—two or three degrees—but on the inside it might be as much as 300𨰫 centigrade."
A chunk of one of these chimneys, or
hydrothermal vents, is what Delaney and his team brought to the surface.
"We figured we would see different kinds
of microbes in the wall as it got to hotter and hotter temperatures, and [that]
pretty soon microbes wouldn't be there 鞱
[which would] indicate a limit to life under those conditions," he said.
Microbes like Strain 121 that live in
environments lacking organic carbon are known as archaea, which literally means
"ancient." Archaea are genetically different from seemingly similar
bacteria, which need organic matter and photosynthesis to survive.
The discovery of Strain 121 bolsters the
theory held by some scientists that Earth's first life-forms were archaea that
could thrive at high temperature via chemical reactions with hydrogen and iron.
"They appear to be the branches closest
to what is the last common ancestor of existing life," Lovley said.
"All are hyperthermophiles that live at high temperatures."
Early in Earth's history, according to
Delaney, volcanic eruptions occurred on the ocean floor as the planet's core
separated from its crust. These eruptions could have allowed the mixing of
hydrogen and minerals like iron and sulfur, upon which microbes could thrive.
"That may be one of the paths the origins
of life takes," Delaney said. If that's the case, he added, then studying
hydrothermal vents is a step in the process of understanding how the dynamics
of such a system might work.
And understanding how such a system works on
Earth may help in the search for life on other planets.
Farmer, the Arizona State University
astrobiologist, said, "At the bottom line, hydrothermal systems were
widespread in the early solar system and are thought to still be present in the
subsurface of many other solar system objects, like Mars, Europa, and even the
interiors of large asteroids."
So
perhaps the question for scientists isn't is there life on other planets, but
is there life inside them.
I
choose to include this article in my journal because it relates to current
events and issues. Not a while ago, there was a space exhibition to Mars. They
did not find life on the planet. However, if live was possible IN the planet,
it would be a great leap in science.
This
article is basically talking about the microbe known as Strain 121 and how it
can survive in temperatures near 121。Celsius. They are found in hydrothermal vents
on the ocean floor, where hot water filled with mineral are released. If these
microorganisms can strive in these conditions, its possible that they can
nearer to the core of the Earth, where it is much hotter.
From
this article, I learned many things and found many things interesting. How this
microbe relates to early life on Earth intrigued me, if the Earth started out
as mostly molten, the first life forms are likely to be able to live in high
temperatures. I think that if scientists do more research on the interior the
Earth, it might contribute to finding life on other planets.
Hillary Mayell
for National Geographic News
April 28, 2004
Neandertals may have matured much earlier than
modern humans—perhaps by as young as 15 years old, as opposed to 18 to 20 for
modern humans, a team of scientists reports.
Researchers Fernando V. Ramirez Rozzi and José Maria Bermudez de Castro compared fossil teeth of Neandertals,
anatomically modern humans, and two earlier species in the Homo genus (Homo
antecessor and Homo heidelbergensis).
The researchers' results indicate that
Neandertal growth patterns differed significantly from that of modern humans.
"Surprisingly, Neandertals were characterized by having the
shortest period of dental growth," they write in the April 29 issue of the
science journal Nature.
The difference in maturation rates is
further evidence that Neandertals were a distinct species and that they were
not our forefathers, the authors conclude.
"It's another piece of evidence that
Neandertals were biologically very different than modern Homo sapiens,
different enough to be a different species," said Gary T. Schwartz, a
paleoanthropologist at Northern Illinois University. "Because they're
growing so fast in a fundamentally different way, it essentially precludes them
from being our ancestor."
Others disagree. Erik Trinkaus is a
paleoanthropologist at Washington University in St. Louis. He argues that there
are no established criteria or data for determining at what point different
growth rates indicate different species.
The authors also do not take into account
normal variation in growth rates, which are influenced by both genetic makeup
and environmental factors, Trinkaus said.
"I think they grossly overinterpret the
data," Trinkaus said. "A 10 or 15 percent difference in the rate of
maturation is well within the normal variation of modern population."
"Even if Neandertals are growing a
little faster, in terms of behavior, age of reproduction, and demography, I'm
not convinced it would make a big difference," he said.
A surprising amount of information can be
gleaned from teeth. The rate at which teeth grow is linked to diet, brain size,
gestation length, age of reproduction, and longevity.
"The really wonderful property of teeth
is the fact that how they grow mirrors how organisms grow. You're able to
reconstruct whole aspects of life history," Schwartz said.
Paleontologists define adulthood by when the
last permanent tooth—the wisdom tooth—emerges.
"When you look at the modern human
growth profile, humans are uniquely long-lived for apes," Schwartz said.
"It takes us a long time to reach adulthood, and then we live for a long
time."
Scientists consider modern humans' prolonged
pattern of growth and maturation a major step forward in human evolution,
because it allows extra time for learning.
In Neandertals the entire process was
fast-forwarded. Their wisdom teeth emerged at around 15 years of age, according
to Ramirez Rozzi, a researcher with Dynamique de l'Evolution Humaine (Dynamics
of Human Evolution) in Paris, and Bermudez de Castro, of the Museo Nacional de
Ciencias Naturales (National Museum of Natural Sciences) in Madrid.
Jay Kelley, a paleoanthropologist at the
College of Dentistry at the University of Illinois in Chicago, wrote an
accompanying commentary to the Nature article. He thinks the conclusion that
Neandertals reached adulthood by 15 might be a bit of a stretch.
"I think the study shows a clear
pattern difference that probably does have some implications for how
Neandertals grew up," Kelley said. "I'm much more cautious about the
specific conclusions about just how fast Neandertals grew up. Relationships
between traits like brain size and teeth growth rate are fairly broad and have
a lot of variation to them."
The authors say the results were somewhat
surprising, because the growth and development of teeth and brains are very
tightly correlated, and on average, Neandertals had larger brains than modern
humans.
Earlier studies suggested that larger brain
size drove the prolonged growth pattern. The authors suggest that the
accelerated maturation rate resulted from high adult mortality rates. They also
suggest Neandertals must have had a high-calorie diet and a fast metabolism to
fuel such rapid growth.
"That conclusion is probably not far
off in terms of life-history theory," Schwartz said. "Earlier
maturation means earlier reproduction, and if you're a population at risk, then
it behooves you to reproduce earlier."
The issue of whether Neandertals were direct
ancestors of modern humans has basically reached a consensus, Trinkaus said.
Neandertals evolved in Europe and were a
highly successful species, surviving in harsh environments for a quarter of a
million years. Modern humans evolved in Africa around 130,000 years ago. They
spread out of Africa to populate the rest of the world around 50,000 years ago.
"Beyond that, I don't think we're going to get much further,"
Trinkaus said. "The degree to which the two different groups interacted in
the Pleistocene [epoch], whether and how much they interbred, and what the
social and behavioral interactions were when they met remain unknown."
I
found this article interesting because it relates to the evolution of humans.
It is interesting how different scientists' opinion differ. While one side
believes that Neanderthals are not ancestors of modern humans, another side
disagrees.
This
article mainly shows that the Neanderthals develop at a faster rate than other
species of "man". Neanderthals finish growing their teeth [wisdom
teeth] at the age of 15, which means they are adults. This shows that their
live span was much shorter, and they had more danger of the species dying out.
This also gives some clues about their bodies and feeing habits [high-calorie
diet and high metabolism]. Using this discovery, some scientists say that this
is just another evidence to prove that Neanderthals are a separate species from
the Homo Sapiens. Others say that just because Neanderthals mature at a fast
rate doesn't disprove that they are our ancestors.
Overall,
no direct evidence has found that Neanderthals are related to Homo Sapiens.
Neanderthals originated from Europe while modern humans originated from Africa
much later. Interactions between the species are still unknown.
Jennifer Hile
National Geographic Channel
June 1, 2004
Preliminary research shows a natural compound
in some snake venoms may prevent the growth of cancerous tumors, potentially
transforming one of nature's deadliest toxins into a curative agent.
"Snakes use venom to alter biological
functions, and that's what medicine does too," explained John Perez,
director of the Natural Toxins Research Center at Texas A&M
University-Kingsville. "This is why venoms have always been of interest to
medical researchers."
Today roughly a dozen diagnostic tests and drugs are derived from snake
venom, according to Zoltan Takacs, a toxinologist (natural-toxins scientist)
and herpetologist based at the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven,
Connecticut.
ACE inhibitors, a class of drugs used to treat
high blood pressure and other cardiovascular disorders, were developed from the
venom of a Brazilian snake. Scientists anticipate that this is just the
beginning.
Of the nearly 3,000 species of snakes in the
world, about 650 are venomous. Ten of the most deadly live in Australia, making
it a logical base for new experiments.
"We knew Australia could be a rich source
of drugs because there are so many venomous creatures here," said Tony
Woods, a biologist at the University of South Australia in Adelaide. Woods is
co-leader of a project to investigate whether the toxins in venom can be used
to destroy blood vessels that feed cancerous tumors.
Venoms are exquisitely complex, composed of as
many as a hundred different peptides, enzymes, and toxins. Not only are the
venoms of every snake species different, there are also subtle variations
within each species.
"There are differences between [venoms
of] juveniles and adults, and even among different geographic regions,"
Takacs said. "These differences may be due to different evolutionary
pressures, like different ancestry, prey, and environments."
The variations between venom types and the
number of venomous snakes worldwide create a rich molecular hunting ground for
researchers, like Woods, seeking to design new drugs.
"A tumor is made of tissue," Woods
said. "Like tissue in any part of the body, if you can prevent it from
developing a blood supply, or interfere with that supply, then you will have an
effect on the growth of that tissue."
Woods is working with Michael Venning, a
pharmacologist at the University of South Australia, and graduate student Emma
Bateman. Peter Mirtschin, a toxinologist at Venom Supplies in Tanunda, South
Australia, is providing the venom directly from the snakes.
Woods's group has found a compound in snake
venom that disrupts endothelial cells, which line the inner surface of blood
vessels. "It causes the cells to separate from one another, which kills
them," Woods said. "When that happens, the function of the blood
vessel is inhibited, preventing or at least interfering with blood flow to the
tumor [effectively starving it of nutrients]."
Woods will not specify which snake venoms his
team is studying, because the compounds have not yet been patented.
The advantage of these venom-derived toxins is
that they seem to act only on certain types of cells.
Chemotherapy and many other drug treatments do
not distinguish between tumor cells and other healthy cells, causing
debilitating side effects. But natural toxins have evolved to impact very
specific targets.
"We believe the cells that line blood
vessels in tumors are different in subtle ways from similar cells elsewhere in
the body, because they are exposed to different stimulation and
chemicals," Woods said. That means toxins inhibiting tumor blood vessels
may not effect surrounding healthy cells, which would theoretically leave
patients using these toxins feeling better than those who go through
chemotherapy.
Woods anticipates that he will begin testing
the venom-derived toxin in animals within the year. Those results will reveal
whether the drug is suitable for human clinical trials.
"I
don't actually like snakes, they scare me to death, but I'm fascinated by their
venom," Woods said. "So long as it's provided to me in nice plastic
tubes, I'm very comfortable with handling it."
After
reading this article, I felt very uplifted. In modern medication, cancer is
still a serious disease that causes death. Right now, there are technologies
like chemotherapy to be treat tumors, it is not a direct cure and it also
causes many side effects to the patient.
The
focus of this article is on snake demons. Snake venoms are very diverse, each
species develop different venoms and within species there are slight
variations. Venoms contain natural toxins and some have already been used
medically. "Snakes use venom to alter biological functions, and that's
what medicine does too. This is why venoms have always been of interest to
medical researchers." as John Perez put it. In particular, the scientists
are working on developing a toxin that treats cancer. They explain that blood
vessels in tumors are slightly different than other healthy ones. Because of
this and how venoms differentiate so much, it is possible to develop a toxin
that targets only blood vessels of tumor tissue. If successful, blood flow to
the tumor would be interfered or cut off which would starve the tissue of
nutrients.
I
think this is technology very worthwhile to study. This would greatly help
cancer patients and could prevent them from going through chemotherapy, which
causes harm. The snake toxin would be very beneficial to mankind (ironically,
the snake's toxin is original purpose is to harm, or kill.)
During
my volunteering in Science World, I got a change to take a look at the films in
the IMAX theater. The film Jane Goodall and the Chimpanzees was very
well done. As the title suggests, it is about chimpanzees. I found it very
interesting because normally, I would not have a chance to see and learn about
these animals and their behaviour from a first-person narrator. It was a good
documentary while grabbing the audiences’ attention without making them feel
bored; the film is enjoyable to children and adults. Although a lot of the film
captured the playfulness of the chimps, there were serious facts that I did not
know before. I found the behaviour of them to be most exciting, some resembles
primitive humans.
Chimpanzees
live in groups and form societies. There is always a male [usually the stronger
one] that dominates and leads the group. Tools, the chimpanzees were smart
enough to use tools to obtain their food. The one portrayed in the film was
using a thin branch to obtain ants inside of logs. What's more interesting is
that the use of tools is passed down to later generations. This is proven by
the variety of tools used by the same species of chimps located in different
areas. Although the same resource is available in other areas, the chimps have
not learned to use that technology. What I was most surprised at was how these
creatures were capable of "war". To defend their territory, they
would fight to the death with other species and even their own. This is
different from a couple of animals fighting; this was a large group and
somewhat organized battle between the chimpanzees and the invaders that are
threatening their family and home. After watching that part, I couldn't help
but to think how that resembles human beings.
Ultimately,
I found this film to be very education yet enjoyable at the same time.
Yahoo! News Fri May 7, 5:25 PM ET
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1408&e=20&u=/nm/20040507/hl_nm/flu_pregnancy_dc&sid=95862975
By Anthony J. Brown, MD
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Children born to
women who contract the flu during pregnancy appear to have an increased risk
for schizophrenia later in life, new research suggests.
Prenatal influenza exposure may account for
about 14 percent of schizophrenia cases, according to the findings presented
here this week at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association.
"This is the first time that this
association has been shown using" blood tests that confirmed influenza
infection during pregnancy, lead author Dr. Alan S. Brown, from Columbia
University in New York, told Reuters Health. "It provides what I think is
the strongest evidence to date linking (prenatal) influenza exposure with
schizophrenia."
Previous studies investigating this topic have
either relied on maternal surveys to determine prenatal influenza exposure or
have simply correlated an earlier influenza outbreak with schizophrenia risk in
a defined population, Brown noted.
In the present study, stored maternal blood
samples from 64 patients with schizophrenia and 125 subjects without the
disease were tested for antibodies to determine if flu exposure had occurred
during pregnancy.
First trimester exposure to influenza raised
the risk of schizophrenia by sevenfold, the authors report. Exposure at any
time during the first half of pregnancy increased the risk threefold.
"I was a little surprised that we
observed an effect during both middle and early pregnancy," Brown said. In
previous studies, the effect has largely been confined to the middle period, he
explained.
Exactly how prenatal influenza exposure may
lead to schizophrenia is unclear, but it could involve direct effects from the
virus or indirect effects involving chemicals that are released in response to
the virus, Brown noted.
The
findings reinforce recommendations that women of childbearing age be vaccinated
against influenza, Brown continued. However, because the mechanism underlying
the schizophrenia connection is unknown, "we may not want to give the
vaccine during pregnancy," he said. Until more is known, "it's
possible that vaccination (during pregnancy) could have a harmful effect."
When
I first read this article, I was quite shocked. Who would have thought prenatal
influenza would be linked to schizophrenia? Although I do not know much about schizophrenia, I do know
that it is a mental disorder relating to the distortion of reality. I never
would have thought a flu virus affecting a mother would increase the chance of
a mental disorder of her child.
Although
how prenatal influenza links to schizophrenia is unclear, it is proven that is
does increase the chance of the mental disorder. An experiment was executed
with maternal blood samples of patients with schizophrenia and samples of those
without. The results show that influenza increased the risk of schizophrenia by
three times during the beginning of pregnancy and seven times during the middle
of pregnancy. Expert says it might be the effect from the virus or chemicals in
response to the virus.
For
now, the reason for this is unknown, but I think it is wise for women to
protect themselves against this. It seems vaccination of influenza may be the
logical solution; however, more studies towards this matter is still needed in
order to prevent the virus from affecting schizophrenia all together.
Yahoo! News Thu Jun 3, 7:18 AM ET
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=541&ncid=751&e=6&u=/ap/20040603/ap_on_he_me/fit_obesity_children
By STEPHANIE NANO, Associated Press Writer
A study of very obese children suggests half
may have a worrisome cluster of health conditions that increase their risk of
developing diabetes and heart disease at an early age.
Researchers at Yale University School of
Medicine said their findings suggest that this combination of health ills, a
condition called metabolic syndrome, is more common among children and
adolescents than previously thought and increases with the level of obesity.
"Obesity is not just a cosmetic issue.
It's a big problem because you open the door for serious, chronic
complications," said Dr. Sonia Caprio, who runs the pediatric obesity
clinic at Yale.
Caprio said metabolic syndrome increases these
youngsters' risk of early development of type 2 diabetes and heart disease —
problems usually associated with middle age.
Within two years, eight of 34 children with
metabolic syndrome developed type 2 diabetes, according to the study in
Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine (news - web sites).
"This is a yellow flag and a warning for
public health officials and education systems to focus on reducing childhood
obesity," said Dr. Sethu Reddy, an endocrinologist at The Cleveland
Clinic.
The conditions generally used to define
metabolic syndrome are obesity, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high
triglycerides and low HDL, the good form of cholesterol. Anyone with three of
the five conditions is considered to have metabolic syndrome, and about a
quarter of adults have it.
The researchers tested 439 children and
adolescents — 244 who were moderately obese and 195 severely obese. Also tested
were 51 of their siblings who were overweight or lean.
Metabolic syndrome was found in 50 percent of
the severely obese and 39 percent of the moderately obese but not in any of
their siblings. After obesity, high blood pressure was the most common
condition.
An earlier study, based on a 1988-94 national
health survey, found that 29 percent of obese adolescents had metabolic
syndrome. Since then, the number of overweight children has increased from 11
percent to 15 percent of those 6 to 18 years old.
Seventy-seven of the Yale participants were
checked again about two years later. Twenty-four of 34 still had metabolic
syndrome, and eight had developed type 2 diabetes. The syndrome developed in 16
of the 43 children who did not initially have it.
"I've been in the field for 20 years.
What I'm seeing now, I've never seen before," said Caprio, adding that it
is not uncommon for a teen to weigh 200 or 300 pounds.
Losing
weight through diet and increased activity should help reverse or reduce the
conditions and ward off complications, she said.
Obesity
seems to have become a serious problem in our modern society. With all the fast
food, candy and sugary beverages available, obesity has become more common.
These tasty but not nutritional foods are usually the cause. Obesity is not
healthy and often causes diseases.
This
article talks about how obesity affects children and teens. These obese
children are in danger of developing heart diseases and diabetes in an early
age. These are usually problems of middle-aged people, but these are problems
of overweight children too. Many obese children have developed metabolic
syndrome (obesity, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high triglycerides
and low HDL, the good form of cholesterol.), which results in serious health
issues.
I
think that obesity in children is mainly the fault of their parents. Parents
should not spoil children with food and candy. Parents should provide children
with a healthy, balanced diet. Children should also be encouraged to do
exercise regularly to stay fit. With a healthy lifestyle, obesity in children
would greatly decrease.