Open Letter to the Hon. Congressman Gregory W. Meeks in Reaction to the Letter Entitled “SUPPORT E-E BORDER DEMARCATION” and Addressed to the Members of the Congress of the United States

From

The Reverend Abba Tesfamariam Baraki

An Irob-native Ethiopian-American Citizen

Washington, DC, USA

July 2, 2004

 


Mr. Congressman,


Your concern and frustration over the staled border demarcation between Ethiopia and Eritrea and the situations of displaced peoples from both sides of the two countries are quite understandable and legitimate, and definitely it is the concern and frustration of the border area peoples as well. Those of us, who have families and relatives adversely affected by the war of 1998 which lasted over two years and left so much destructions and damages upon human lives, properties, and socioeconomic fabrics of the severely poverty-stricken peoples of both countries, are very much worried about the impasse and the potential rekindling of another conflict as a military option where political solution has been failing so far. Those of us seriously concerned are praying for a durable peace for both Ethiopia and Eritrea to be achieved through a healthy and constructive dialogue, fair justice, and full respect of human rights for all the affected peoples from both sides in those contested border areas.


I’m a clergyman and definitely it is not my desire to see another bloodshed between the two brotherly peoples of Eritrea and Ethiopia. In fact, I greatly abhor all the bloodshed in Iraq, the Middle East, the Sudan, and many other places in the world. All human beings are endowed by the Almighty God inalienable rights to exist in peace and unity in their own sacred birthplaces undisturbed by outside interferences and unfair and unjust pressures. I strongly believe that what Eritrea and Ethiopia need are first and foremost, not an imposed border delimitation and demarcation through international pressures and intimidation based on economic sanctions, but rather, a sound political dialogue, reconciliation and normalization of bilateral relations of the two governments/countries and their respective citizens as a prerequisite for a true lasting peace, which would lead to a mutually accepted and respected border delimitation and demarcation, especially for the best interest of their respective populations in the border areas.


Mr. Congressman,


Whether you realize it or not, in your letter you sent to your colleagues in the Congress of the United States, you clearly sound and reflect to me nonobjective or neutral on the issue but rather you appear very much involved and dedicated to pro-Eritrean cause than to the real peace for both countries and peoples on both sides. For instance, you have said in your letter:


While the Eritrean government has from the outset submitted to the rulings of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission, Ethiopia has pushed for increased dialogue on the commission’s decision, resulting in a stalemate and setting a dangerous precedent for the Boundary commission. For instance, failure to follow through on the Algiers Accord jeopardizes adherence to the rule of law in other long-standing border disputes, some of which have been settled but could be renewed if one or another party modeled what is currently taking place in the Eritrea-Ethiopia boundary dispute and failed to comply with decisions of the Boundary Commission and attempts by the international community to mitigate the stalemate.

  

That is also OK if you are or choose to be that way and if you’ve got more Eritrean friends/allies than Ethiopians. It’s absolutely your right.  But, however, let me assure you, as a fellow naturalized American citizen and clergyman, that such kind of favoritism will neither lead to a genuine peace nor benefit both Eritrea and Ethiopia and above all the victimized peoples in the contested border areas, such as the Irob of whom I’m descendant and for whose rights I’ve been advocating for a long time. For sure, your conviction and pressure alone cannot bring about the direly needed and wanted long-lasting peace for the adversely affected peoples in the border areas.


Your letter does not address or show any concern for the adversely affected peoples, such as the Irob and many others inhabiting the 600-miles-long border between the two countries. How sad and insensitive for a black congressman of African roots to ignore the voiceless African peoples’ outcry for justice and respect of their human rights to exist as cohesive tribes in their own God-given sacrosanct birth and ancestral places! I strongly wish that the Afro-American congressmen could be heralds of justice and fairness whenever and wherever injustice had be done against African peoples anywhere. What a pity for African-American congressmen to completely ignore the desperate cries of the voiceless and defenseless African peasants (such as the Irob). What a shame to so easily forget African peoples’ mistreatments and sufferings under the bitter yokes of colonialism and slavery and now to promote a forced separation and division among African families, relatives, and communities tied by ancestral cultures, languages, and traditions, in the name of an unfair, inhuman, and unjust verdict designed and destined to disintegrate these helpless peoples against their will and political choice. Why so easily forget and disregard what the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. sacrificed for by emphatically saying, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”?


Mr. Congressman,


Injustice has been done by the unjust ruling of EEBC at The Hague on 13 April 2002, when the Court issued a verdict to heartlessly and irresponsibly disintegrate, for instance, a tiny Irob tribe, descendants of one chieftain named Summe (Soumme), which had never been colonized or administered by Italy during the colonization of Eritrea or by British after the Italians were ejected from Eritrea by the Emperor Haile-Sellassie during the World War II. The Boundary Commission, despite the outcry of the Irob people in Ethiopia and Diaspora, resolutely and mercilessly decided to divide the Irobland and its inhabitants into two hostile countries exposing them to possible ethnic cleansing or extermination. The Irob people, who have been illegally invaded, occupied, and heinously abused as well as forced to be displaced by the Eritrean forces from 1998-2000, have been passionately and resolutely rejecting and protesting the The Hague’s ruling since 2002, warning the international community and their government that they will not allow their God-given sacrosanct birth places and their people to be partitioned and given away to Eritrea. The Irob people have warned many times that such move will not bring peace and stability to the region without their participation and full referendum on the peaceful settlement and the fate of their homogeneous-tribal-family and their fatherland. The Irob people repeatedly have warned the world community that they are Ethiopians and want to remain Ethiopian citizens without any compulsory separation or division imposed upon them by any external or internal forces. They are resolutely determined to die in dignity in their native and ancestral land instead of being forced to be split in halves and be disintegrated.


Mr. Congressman,


While the civilized western world, including our country the United States of America, had worked so hard to convince and facilitate the totalitarian world of Communism to tear down the Berlin Wall of separation and division of the German peoples, why you, as an African-American Congressman are resolutely determined to separate and disintegrate the peoples like the Irob minority tribes by building another Berlin Wall of separation among the voiceless and defenseless Irob tribe and others of African Continent? Why are you so much concerned about the passage of the controversial pending legislation (H.R. 2760) which is designed to support the unjust decision of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission destined to inhumanely and detrimentally disintegrate and divide peoples like the Irob? I am so puzzled with your true motives.


You have clearly expressed in your letter that you want the Congress to pass the pending legislation and put sanction on Ethiopia that is refusing or delaying to implement unconditionally the demarcation of the Border according to the Algiers Agreement signed by both parties on December 12, 2000 as final and binding without any appeal to it.


In your letter, you clearly indicate when you say, “While a lingering border dispute between two countries on the Horn of Africa may seem distant and parochial, it has global implications. Both Ethiopia and Eritrea are U.S. allies in the war on terrorism, and their cooperation in the region is vital to U.S. interests.”  Your concern seems very noble and commending to fight global terrorism and the interest of the United States. But you are definitely failing or ignoring the African peoples from being terrorized and threatened by unjust and inhuman rulings such as of the EEBC in The Hague designed to expose minority groups like the Irob to survival dangers in those highly contested border areas between Eritrea and Ethiopia. How can’t we realize what is happening to the voiceless and defenseless black tribes in the Sudan, who are being persecuted and exterminated through open and systematic ethnic cleansing by the Arab ethnic groups?  Does it concern you, as an African-American Congressman, what the Washington Post reported on the Sudan’s ethnic cleansing of the black tribes, particularly in Darfur? According to the Post, The U.S. government has said it is investigating the killings of an estimated 30,000 people in Darfur and the displacement of the more  than  1 million people from their tribal  lands to determine whether the violence should be classified as genocide (The Washington Post, Wednesday, June 30, 2004, p. A16).


Mr. Congressman,


This is exactly what the Irob minority tribe is afraid of can happen to them, if the Ethiopian government has to accept the unjust and erroneous decision of the EEBC (without the necessary rectification) which would expose the Irob minority and other ethnic groups long the disputed border areas to a possible sociopolitical danger of tribal disintegration or extinction. The Irob tribe which is estimated about 30,000 can be easily exterminated if they refuse to accept the verdict and submit to their lords or owners and attempt to use civil disobedience in self-defense in the demarcation process of the border. The Irob people strongly believe that Ethiopia has a sacred duty and responsibility to not expose its citizens to dangers but to protect them and safeguard their inalienable rights and historical and ancestral territorial integrity within their motherland, Ethiopia.

In your letter, Mr. Congressman, you urge your colleagues in the Congress and their staff to examine the pending legislation (H.R. 2760) and pass it as a law that would chastise (as we know it) Ethiopia for not abiding according to the Algiers Agreement, which was really drafted by the United States according to the revelation of the Eritrean government. You try to convince the members of the Congress by saying, “The U.S. Congress should be at the forefront of respect for the law, even international law, in the interest of peace, stability, and justice.” This statement contradicts the reality of the Irob tribe in particular and of those others long the border areas between the two countries in general.


In my opinion, the law must be just one designed to protect and safeguard the fundamental and inalienable God-given human rights of dwelling in own sacred birth places peacefully undisturbed by any dictatorial human laws. We believe that it is the Almighty God who gives life and a land to dwell in for human beings as inalienable inherent rights by birth. This is God-given divine right for all human beings. I am not sure what do you mean when you say that the U.S. Congress should be at the forefront of respect for the law, even international law...when the law you’re talking about is designed to harm and disintegrate families, relatives, communities of the same ancestral origin and culture, like that of Irob in northeastern Ethiopia. How can you claim “in the interest of peace” while an unjust law, such as The Hague Boundary Commission’s ruling,  is destined to lead to more conflict and cause instability in the region? How can you then say and treat such a law as fair and honorable in the interest of “stability and peace” while it is hampering and destroying the whole peace process or the same “stability and peace” you’re talking about?


In conclusion, Mr. Congressman, it should be known that the Irob people in particular are neither belligerent nor anti-peace. As a matter of fact, the only thing they want is peace and economic development for their day-to-day survival. The only thing they ask from the international community, the EEBC, the United Nations and other concerned parties is fairness and justice that can lead to a genuine lasting-peace and stability with their geographically close neighbor Eritreans. The only thing they reject is an unjust and compulsory law which is being imposed upon them and which is a serious threat that is destined to partition them into two nationalities and deprive them of Ethiopian nationality to which they are passionately attached and devoted to for centuries. The Irob people absolutely reject a military solution to the territorial dispute in the Irobland, but rather prefer a peaceful means of dialogue sponsored by the United Nations with full guarantee of referendum supervised by the same body to be given them in order to freely decide to which country or nationality to belong.


If you have an adequate knowledge and understanding about the real issues and situations of the peoples in the border areas, particularly of the Irob ethnic minority, I invite you to seriously and genuinely as well as objectively with full neutrality engage yourself and other U.S. Congressmen to facilitate a healthy and constructive dialogue (before any demarcation) that would lead to a genuine reconciliation and mutual political healing as well as a normalization of bilateral relations of the two governments and their respective peoples. Only then, the demarcation process could begin and be implemented on mutually and amicably agreed upon principles and genuine commitments for the best interest of the two countries and their respective citizens.

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1