Dozens of rulings and jurisprudence states that we don�t have to take it. We are a Republic and as citizens of a Republic, it is not only our right but our duty to take every conceivable action to protect the rights of the individual. One of the duties is to ignore unconstitutional and other laws made null and void based on vagueness.

A main problem is that courts are violating their oaths of office and ruling against citizens where it is clear the citizen should be ruled in favor of. That is the demands made on judges by the Article VI of the Constitution for the United States of America. Somehow, courts have taken on the flavor of Admiralty/maritime/military law in which the judge becomes a captain of a ship under maritime law.

The writer didn�t realize how extreme the problem was with courts until he had to go to court. In the first session, basically just set up to determine a hearing date (does away with a speedy trial automatically), neither the judge nor the attorney masquerading as a prosecuting attorney knew that in any municipal ordinance violation, the individual has the right to �demand� a trial by jury. And, further, that unless all parties agree otherwise, that the jury will be made up of 12 peers of the citizen.

As if this wasn�t enough, Class 3 cities in Missouri have authority to hire a city attorney to advise. If an oath is not signed, his office is deemed vacated.

In regards to laws being made, we citizens in what could once again be the greatest Republic to exist on Earth. Here are the basics. Before any law is made, whether by the federal, state, or political subdivision of a state, the first concern of the officials involved, including any advisory attorneys, is whether or not the proposed law (bill) violates the rights of any one individual.

The fact is no level of government has the constitutional authority to make laws �for the good of the people� except to protect the rights of each individual. The majority may think they know what is best but that simply isn�t true and, in a Republic, it means absolutely nothing since the majority may not vote away the rights of the minority, even if the minority is only one individual.

Once it was thought by the majority that is was okay for women to be treated as second class citizens. In fact, it was commonly figured that it was okay for men to beat their wives with the recommendation to do so regularly. But, this despicable behavior isn�t true regardless of what the majority thought, is it?

Public policy or administrative rule making means nothing if the policy violates the rights of one individual. All that matters in a constitutional Republic in which all God-given rights of the individual are protected is that all God-given rights of each and every individual are protected by the governments created to do just that - AND NO MORE.

The Constitution for the United States establishes common law courts in Article III of the document. Article IV, Section 2, guarantees a republican form of government (which binds all to the rights of the individual, not of the majority). Article VI, Clause 2, dictates that the Constitution is the supreme Law of the Land and that all judges are bound to the Constitution including those in the states and, to assure states against presuming authority when it does not exist, that no state law withstands if contrary to the Constitution Article VI, Clause 3.

Thus, all judges and states are bound by the Constitution to obey the Constitution. Furthermore, all other officials of the federal, state, and political subdivisions by taking or affirming an oath of office are bound to obey the Constitution and never allow an unconstitutional law to be enforced.

These are the limitations placed by the people. It is also the authority given by the people to the different levels of government. No where, nor in any way imaginable, are states and the federal government given any authority to arbitrarily (depending on what they or the majority might think) make laws.

With this, we have recourse that can destroy the myths that have been created not only by the federal government, but all other levels. We people have power that supercedes all power of government. And, we can do it without a shot, excepting those, of course, that are taken by the government and its enforcers of unconstitutional laws.

We can avoid bloodshed excepting that done by American citizens hired for law enforcement and the like. These are government employees who attack American citizens on American soil, who when doing so violate the rights and all common decencies of the People by attacking them in their homes, in their automobiles, in churches, businesses, and other places. They do so without any authority, not even a valid constitutionally harmonious law.

See, all laws which are unconstitutional are null and void (16 American Jurisprudence). Any law which is unconstitutional should be ignored by citizens, and any prosecutions based on, or that have been based on, such laws should be thrown out or overturned by the judicial system with all properties taken, or proper financial redress given, to those who have been so victimized by government entities.

The fact is, no law enforcement officer, nor any other government agency or official, should allow any arrests and prosecutions for violation of these fictitious laws which are against the common laws of Man and against the Constitution.

There must never be any additional compromise and compromises made, done away with. Laws based on the thinking of men which conflicts with the Creator, are null and void. Being null and void, it should be as if the laws never existed in the first place.

But, what we have are officials who know not their responsibility to the Constitution for the United States of America, and, hence, their responsibilities to the people who elected them to office. Each who acts contrary to constitutional provisions should, at a minimum, be removed immediately from office for violating the oath of office. Two or more should be treated as committing conspiracy to commit treason, or, at the minimum, be taken to task for Title 18 violations which are codified in 42 USC, specifically, Section 1985 for conspiracy and Section 1983 for an individual acting on his own, such as a judge, prosecutor, or law enforcement person.

As every individual knows, in unity there is strength. Recently, which the writer presumes most are aware of, 5500 people filed a class action lawsuit against the IRS, the most dreaded band of thieves that has ever existed. Why not use the same procedure against other officials and/or organizations that deprive us unconstitutionally of our rights. This, of course, includes Supreme Court justices who do NOT what their duty requires, the defense of each person�s rights by defending the Constitution for the United States. They, instead, are now interpreting constitutional provisions in favor of government.

The truth is the justices haven�t any power to directly interpret any law, including the Constitution, except unofficially as a citizen - that is, IF they are a citizen of the United States of America and not just the United States. All the justices may do is determine whether or not a law falls within constitutional provisions. Rights are not rights because these people deem them so. Rights are rights because they are God-given and well beyond the judgment realm of men.

The number one rule is if there is vagueness in a law and such vagueness results in a conflict of interpretation, the ruling must be in favor of the citizen, not of the government. If lawmakers can�t write clear laws, then we need new lawmakers. If lawmakers can�t determine whether or not rights are being violated, then we also need new lawmakers. After all, what is the purpose of government other than to write laws defending the rights of each individual and to protect those rights by defending our shores against invasion, both foreign and domestic.

Courts, from the Supreme Court to municipal, have made thousands upon thousands of rulings based on laws which are repugnant to the Constitution for the United States of America. So, how can we attack back without ever lifting a firearm. As the writer has stated before, we use the tools we have.

Officials depend on getting elected in order to get and retain their offices. For some, it is the wealth that eventually comes and, for others, the prestige and power assumed or perceived by being an elected official. Controlling these officials is not impossible. Of course, it is impossible if no one is willing to take the time and effort to take action. What action can be taken?

Any official violating his oath of office by voting for an unconstitutional law, or acts so as to maintain the unconstitutional law, can be sued by any individual. Or, as has been done by the group against the IRS, a class action lawsuit can be filed against the official.

Likely is the possibility that courts will throw it out. But, then the judges making this determination can have a class action lawsuit filed against them.

Or, if a court because of public knowledge of the lawsuit and the ramifications of it cause the public to take notice, allows the suit to proceed and then a judge rules against the people, then that judge has violated the Constitution and all that is justice. He may then be impeached for violating his oath of office.

Demand such actions by legislators and, if they wish to retain their offices, they will act in favor of the people. If they do not, then they, too, may be impeached and/or a lawsuit filed against them.

Why do we not use impeachment? All executives and judges are subject to impeachment for violating their oaths of office. It is a form of treason in that an enemy to our freedoms is being aided by their violating their oaths. It is just the same as aiding another country in overcoming our freedoms. And, those that are not are subject to impeachment are subject to other lawful means of being removed from office.

Many people have heard of �immunity� of officials based on the �clean hands doctrine.� Basically, this means that if an official acts based on his belief that he is acting properly, then any actions taken by him are taken as being done in good faith, that his hands are clean of any wrongdoing.

Therefore, to assure he loses his immunity, make sure he knows the provisions of the Constitution for the United States, the applicable state constitution, and any applicable state statutes. How can this be accomplished?

Do so through a commercial affidavit of truth with signatures notarized. In an affidavit, what is stated as truth by an individual is truth unless rebutted by facts to the contrary. Simple statements of disbelief or �I think it is like this� won�t suffice. What will be accomplished is the official is now set up to enable the group to offset the �clean hands� immunity defense. Remember, no state statute (or city ordinance) may be repugnant to the Constitution for the United States of America, nor may any state constitution have an unconstitutional provision in it.

Lawsuits are not hard to file, nor are they hard to write if one has guides to go by. Since it appears that public officials do not have any concept of what this Republic really is nor of their duties to the individual, compose any correspondence in simple language in order to avoid any misunderstanding. You see, if the official doesn�t know his obligations and responsibilities, it must be because he can�t read well or can�t interpret the English language. And, never forget the old adage - �keep it simple, stupid� or, KISS, in the world of effective sales.

There is this we must also consider. If the official can�t read at - say, a college or graduate level - should he be in office since the documents he must read are written by attorneys in a manner to confuse the people or to hide true intents of the bill or law?

The writer has read in many different sources that members of Congress have stated that the bills aren�t read prior to voting, that statements are added into bills later, and all sorts of manipulations to create unconstitutional laws.

First, are they not read because lawmakers can�t read them and understand them? Or, since they apparently have allowed amendments (changes) to bills AFTER being passed into law, is it because they can�t read the laws concerning this, that they don�t know it is illegal to do so?

Or, is the truth concerning this that there are far too many bills (and laws), that the bills are written so complicated and of such volume that it is physically impossible to read them in their entirety, both before the vote and after, in order to assure content and accurateness. Either way, and regardless of the reason, officials not reading the bills or proposed laws are failing in their duty. How can they determine the constitutionality if they don�t know what is in the bill? And, for that matter, if they don�t know what the Constitution states in fact?

When officials violate the law that protects our rights, the Constitution for the United States of America which is the constitution FOR the people of the many states making up this union of states (countries), then they deserve any actions that may conceivably and lawfully taken against them. It is our duty as citizens of this Republic to take those actions if we wish any semblance of a Republic to remain.

We currently have from lowly peace officers to legislators violating every thing dear to the reasons this nation was founded. We do not have to take it - we can do something about it. One assurance if class action lawsuits against officials, or criminal charges based on treason, are filed and made public, is that sooner or later, they are going to begin to notice that they have overstepped the bounds of what is lawful, ethical, moral, and just as determined by the only authority who can interpret, the People, and will whip themselves into shape. Or take a hike out of choice (Nixon�s resignation) or no choice.

Either way, We, the People, will have started making our demands and expectations clear, that our rights will be protected by the people elected or appointed into governments created only for that purpose, and that we will accept no less.

That is the power we have. But, as with any power, if the switch isn�t turned on releasing the power, it remains dormant and effectively does not serve the purpose it was created for. In the case of this nation, the power of the people over government left inactive does absolutely nothing in salvaging the purpose this country was created for.

So, for the sake of liberty, for future generations, someone please hit the switch and release the most awesome power known, the power of belief attracting the energy of the universe. Let this power supplied by our creator convert frustrations of those fed up with oppression and tyrants into positive energy of action. It cannot be defeated when focused. The evil of those assuming god-like powers will be destroyed.

So, if you are sick and tired of being sick and tired of government intervening where it hasn�t any authority to intervene, start giving yourself therapy, spelled ~ ~ ~