The year perhaps that the sleeping Giant will awaken

=======================================================

July 11, 2001

Sick and tired of being sick and tired of government corruption of this Republic

When this writer began his quest to understand government and politics six years ago, he had no idea of the depth of deceit and corruption that exists in every level of government, from townships to the federal government.

It is sickening as to the tyranny that now exists. The majority of articles read (have boycotted television news as it is most representative of deceit, not fact) convey the utter despair of citizens of this nation being railroaded by different government organizations. Example organizations include the IRS, BATF, FBI, police departments, highway patrol departments, sheriff�s departments, city, county, and state departments of revenue, beginning with tax assessors who know not the law. All refuse to one�s face to obey the law/statutes as written. Involve the government and one is certain to be confronted with corruption to the nth degree.

Thousands of rulings repugnant to our God-given rights are used to convict thousands more who have had charges repugnant to our God-given rights placed against them. The majority are not crimes since a citizen, a sovereign, cannot commit a crime against government. Most are, as you know, based on victimless crimes that are unlawful and against the laws of God.

If one doesn�t understand any more than this, it is a start in the right direction - Crimes cannot be committed against a government because governments haven�t any rights. The people create governments in order to protect the rights of the people, the sovereign. Therefore, without a citizen filing a complaint against another citizen, there is not a crime � except for the thousands daily by what the government does against citizens.

Courts are so corrupt that this writer just cannot believe that We, the People, have sat back for so long letting judges assume the power of God by refusing to hear defenses based on the Constitution for the United States of America.

He is also sick and tired of lawyers being given special status when the truth is that any attorney who has been accepted into the BAR has become part of a foreign organization, the British Accreditation Registry. Furthermore, no state, nor the federal government, can grant titles of nobility. In fact, Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the Constitution states this:

�No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States; And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.�

Then, in Article I, Section X, Clause 1, States are prohibited to: �... grant any Title of Nobility."

Thus, it is clear that neither the federal government nor any state may give any person any title of nobility. So, we must wonder what �nobility� means. Is it related only to kings, queens, princes, and the like? Here is the meaning according to the American Heritage English Dictionary, 4th Edition (2000):

�1. A class of persons distinguished by high birth or rank and in Great Britain including dukes and duchesses, marquises and marchionesses, earls and countesses, viscounts and viscountesses, and barons and baronesses: �The old English nobility of office made way for the Norman nobility of faith and landed wealth� (Winston S. Churchill). 2. Noble rank or status: Congress may not grant titles of nobility. 3. The state or quality of being exalted in character.�

Let�s examine this � British Accreditation Registry, the BAR to which lawyers pass a test for and seemingly are proud of. Here are this writer�s questions:

1. Why do citizens have to pass the BAR to practice law � isn�t it a British organization, not an organization authorized by the people of the United States of America?

2. Why are members of the BAR even permitted in courts that are of the people, by the people, and for the people in this union of Republics based on the rights of Man, the United States of America?

3. If titles of nobility are prohibited, shouldn�t any who are part of a foreign organization be prohibited from running for office and being judges, prosecutors, and filling other offices in the governments established by We, the People? After all, haven�t they by their acceptance into the BAR also declared themselves to be aligned with a foreign power and, therefore, acting as hidden subversive agents for the foreign power?

The writer read his copy of the Constitution again. Funny, but it does not state that one cannot practice law unless he belongs to a foreign organization. In fact, the Constitution states that the courts of the people will be common law courts. This, of course, means that reason and the rights of Man would prevail and not based on some half-witted interpretations made by lawyers. Admiralty courts would be moved to where they belong � the high seas.

The reader may notice that the writer hasn�t a very high opinion of BAR attorneys. In fact, to make it perfectly clear, the writer considers 99.9 percent of lawyers as complete waste (doo-doo) in regards to the administration of justice and not worthy to set foot in a place that is to be guided by reason and common sense. One might say their only interest is to create more money for themselves, the judges they strive to please, and the coffers of the city, county, and state they serve.

But, here we are. We have lawyers filling roughly 40 percent of Congress writing laws, a high percentage filling state legislatures, all the Supreme Court justices, 19 of the last 28 presidents being members of the BAR, most judges in lower courts (lower than the US Supreme Court), and every government level being advised by members of the BAR.

If you have wondered about how we have come to have so many laws and rulings that are clearly repugnant to the rights given each of us by God, wonder no more. This writer has stated it before and he will state it again � and again � and maybe again until people start understanding the tragedy and utter complete distruction of the Constitution by lawyers guiding lawmaking, administration of bogus laws made by them, and being involved in �justice�, using the term very loosely. Their actions in promoting themselves and enhancing their earnings, their actions in denying the people their rights, and unlawful interpretations are acts of war against the people of this nation.

For example, the small city I live in has many unconstitutional city ordinances. In fact, most are. (By the way, it is the same in your city.) The city has a city attorney who advises the elected major and city council. Now, these elected officials are no more cognizant of the Constitution and their authority than the ordinary citizen with a 4th grade reading level or less (50 percent of the adult population, US Department of Education, 1995) sitting at a bar or watching TV while having a cold one. The city attorney, the advice giver based on his BAR affiliation, does not know the law of the land, the Constitution, nor does he know his duties and authority.

One would think that he would be well versed in the above as the primary duty of all levels of government is to uphold the Constitution and that no city (nor any state) may make any ordinance repugnant to the Constitution. One must ask, therefore, how can he properly advise the city government is he doesn�t know himself what is lawful?

One would also think that a city attorney would be well versed in state statutes but � wrong again. This lawyer did not know the rights of people as to trial by jury dictated by state statutes in support of the 6th and 7th amendments, the many statutes dictating the authority of city officials, or that he as city attorney could not � repeat � could not act as a prosecuting attorney in city ordinance cases.

So, the citizens of this city are subjected to incompetent officials who care not about the Constitution and make ordinances that are repugnant to citizen�s rights; having a city attorney who is ignorant of the law of the land but giving advice as if he is the all-knowing higher level of authority over the people; and then subjected to an Admiralty/military court in which the city attorney masquerades as a prosecutor and cares only about the ordinances he has written. He defends the unlawful ordinances rather than fulfilling his duty as a defender of rights.

And then the accused stands before a judge who is just as ignorant and guided NOT by the Constitution and the sovereign people but, instead, by laws that don�t exist. (No law repugnant to the Constitution is a law because of being null and void and man-made laws may not over ride those that are given by God.)

Well, guess what, Folks. The same situation that exists in this small city are the same situations that exist in larger cities, in counties, in states, and in the federal dealing which we are unlawfully subjected to. There is no difference � it is just on a larger scale.

What do we do about it? How about forcing the Constitution be obeyed, that no titles of nobility be granted, that any who are associated with the BAR be prevented from holding any office, from being in any court, from being an elected official, and possibly even tried for treason. Simply put, restore the justice of common law and Article III courts.

This is our country. It is a country based on (contrary to dips who do NOT believe in common law as the supreme Law of the Land) the rights of people granted by God, not by privileges created and granted by a bunch of ignorant, evil, and essentially worthless people intent on robbing us of all our rights. And to do so by coercive, often physically threatening means and incarceration � prosecute them legally, them. File complaints against them. Get them arrested for statute violations, both federal and state, and rid this nation of these enemies of liberty.

This writer in his quests against government robbing him of his rights made the decision that should these unholy, evil people go to the extreme and take his life, that it will have been a life well-spent. His conscience will be clear and he will die a free man not succumbing to unlawful government edicts. Rather that than being in servitude to a bunch of �idiots� (wish I could use the language they no doubt use on we who believe in liberty) that do not realize the benefits of freely developing nations and people.

And, then, with any justice at all, remain as a very aggressive spirit haunting the factions who have destroyed this nation.

==================================================

Having My Say
Letters And Essays
1999 Articles
2000 Articles
2001 Articles


1

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws