HAVEN GREEN COURT LTD

 

MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE COMPANY HELD AT THE HAVEN GREEN BAPTIST CHURCH HALL

 

AT 7-30 PM ON 25th OCTOBER 2004

 

 

Present                        Mr. G. S. Medazoumian              Acting Chairman & Secretary

                                     

                                      Mr. J. A. Rhodes                          Director

                                      Mr. C. J. Lubbock                        Director

                                      Mr. S. E. Arnold                            Director

 

Apologies                   Mrs. P. E. Pangalos                    Director

                                      Mr. P. B. Marcopoli                      Director

                                      Mr. J. W. Hazlehurst                   Director

                                      Mr. M. F. Engineer                       Director

 

In attendance             Mr. D. R. Pearse                           Estates Manager

                                      17 members of the company

 

 

1.                    APPROVAL OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES

 

             It was proposed and seconded that the MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING held on 20th October 2003 be approved.  The motion was accepted by a show of hands with no opposition.

 

 

2.                    SERVICE CHARGE ACCOUNTS 2003/2004

 

Mr. G. S. Medazoumian reviewed the accounts and pointed out that the principal increases in expenditure were the increased cost of fuel, and additional insurance premium required to cover for acts of terrorism.

 

             It was proposed and seconded that the ANNUAL SERVICE CHARGE ACCOUNTS for the financial year 2003/2004 together with the report of the accountant be approved.  The motion was accepted by a show of hands with no opposition.

 

 

3.                    ANNUAL STATUTORY ACCOUNTS OF THE COMPANY

 

             It was proposed and seconded that the ANNUAL STATUTORY ACCOUNTS for the financial year 2003/2004 together with the report of the DIRECTORS be approved.  The motion was accepted by a show of hands with no opposition.

 

 

4.                    DIVIDEND

 

             It was agreed that no dividend would be paid for the year 2003/2004.

 

 

5.                    DIRECTORS

 

The acting chairman paid tribute to Mr. L. B. Rosenbaum, who has retired as Chairman, for his leadership and input to the Board of Directors over the past few years.  This was roundly appreciated by the meeting.

 

The acting chairman paid tribute to Mr. M. F. Engineer, who has stood down as Director, for his contribution to the Board of Directors.  This was roundly appreciated by the meeting.

 

The re-appointment of Mr. J. W. Hazlehurst as Director was proposed and seconded and duly elected.

 

The appointments of Mr. C. J. Lubbock and Mr. S. E. Arnold were proposed and seconded and they were duly elected.

 

The acting chairman stated that there will be a vacancy for the position of Secretary on the Board of Directors.

 

 

6.                    DIRECTORS REMUNERATION

 

It was generally agreed that the Directors should not receive any remuneration for their services.

            

7.                    AUDITORS

 

It was proposed and seconded that Paul Ng & Associates be re-appointed as auditor.

            

8.                    CHAIRMANS REPORT

 

The acting chairman reported that considerable improvements and maintenance has been carried out over the last 12 months. Works include the re-lining of the two DHWS boilers and replacement of two oil burners together with new pump and replacement of 46 valves on the distribution pipework.  This work was carried out at a cost of £20K.

 

New stop cocks have been fitted in flats to facilitate draining down amounting to £8K.  The remaining stop cocks will be fitted as and when convenient.

 

Air vents have been fitted where appropriate to prevent air locks in the DHWS circulating pipework.

 

A new fire alarm system has been installed amounting to £25K.

 

Water penetration through the parapets above the South facing bay windows Block 1 has been rectified.

 

Work on the redecoration of the common areas will commence on 8 November 2004 starting with Block 1 progressing through to Block 6 in numerical order.  Each Block will take approximately two weeks to complete.  This will be followed by the replacement of carpets starting with Block 2 in January 2005.  Residents were advised that flat entrance doors will have to be left ajar for a minimum of 4 hours (and longer if possible) to allow the paint to dry and avoid the door sticking to the frame.

 

Future work under consideration includes post lighting and landscaping. 

 

Renewal/ extension of the leases (originally being processed by Mr. L. B. Rosenbaum) are now being reviewed by Mr. C. J. Lubbock and Mr. S. E. Arnold in conjunction with Messrs. Prince Evans.  The question of combining the garage leases with the flat leases is proving a complex issue to resolve.  However a letter has been received from Messrs. Prince Evans setting out recommendations which are being considered by Mr. C. J. Lubbock and Mr. S. E. Arnold.  Mr. S. E. Arnold stated that it will take approximately six weeks before he can set out a proposal for residents to consider.

 

 Mr. G. S. Medazoumian stated that consideration will also be given to updating the lease to include conditions concerning sub-leasing and other matters to safeguard resident’s interests.

 

The acting chairman paid tribute to Mr. D. R. Pearse for his work in maintaining the building in good shape.  This was roundly appreciated by the meeting.

 

 

9.                    ANY OTHER BUSINESS

 

It was suggested to the Acting Chairman that the specification for the decorations was inadequate, but the questioner could not define any specific deficiencies. 

 

It was then suggested to the Acting Chairman that any additional work found necessary should not be authorized if the cost should exceed 5% of the original estimate without the resident’s approval.  The likelihood of this occurring was considered very unlikely and the suggestion was not accepted.  The difference between a “quotation” and an “estimate” were put in plain words for the benefit of the questioner.  The normal procedure for dealing with variations on building contracts will be adopted to avoid delays.  The questioner was assured that the final costs for both the decoration and carpet contracts will be publicized and could be challenged if necessary.

 

There being no other questions the meeting was closed.

 

 

 

                                     

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1