~HARQALYA~ Author Topic: Princeton's EGG project? Parsifal posted 1/20/01 9:32 PM This is obviously an offshoot of PEAR. while officially called the Global Consciousness Project, it is also known as the EGG project which apparently stands for "Electrogaiagram". http://noosphere.princeton.edu/story.html http://noosphere.princeton.edu/ Harla Quinn posted 1/22/01 5:49 PM CIA-Initiated Remote Viewing At Stanford Research Institute In July 1995 the CIA declassified, and approved for release, documents revealing its sponsorship in the 1970s of a program at Stanford Research Institute in Menlo Park, CA, to determine whether such phenomena as remote viewing "might have any utility for intelligence collection" [1]. Thus began disclosure to the public of a two-decade-plus involvement of the intelligence community in the investigation of so-called parapsychological or psi phenomena. Presented here by the program's Founder and first Director (1972 - 1985) is the early history of the program, including discussion of some of the first, now declassified, results that drove early interest. PEAR'S *initial* link to SRI See linking page to PEAR's initial meeting with the SRI staff in 1977 from which the framework for their own continued studies was constructed. "That winter, I happened to be on leave at Stanford, where more interest is shown in this field than at most universities. Carol was able to join me there for a few weeks, and together we talked with faculty and staff, and worked with a small research group at the nearby SRI International laboratory." Dr. Jahn http://www.irva.org/papers/Academic2.shtml ...more linking material to follow... http://www.irva.org/papers/CIA_RV_SRI.shtml Harla Quinn posted 1/22/01 6:11 PM More confirmed connections between Esalen & SRI and ....... After acknowledging that RV experiments were performed at Esalen and that "Russell Targ's group at SRI International was supported by CIA and defense contracts for most of its existence", Dean Radin comments on the first Esalen meetings on this subject more than twenty years ago. ".. we know that feedback is not necessary to do remote viewing. They did experiments with Marilyn and Hella in the Big House where they would describe pictures shown on a slide projector in a sealed-up bedroom that neither they nor the experimenters would ever know what they were. This was triple-blind study: the eventual judge would only get four slides and a description, in a randomized order, and asked to chronicle hits. The researchers and subjects only got back the statistics, which were quite good, 4 out of 6 matched for first place. Another experiment suggested by an Esalen meeting involved six targets, one of which had a 50% probability of being shown (#1-5) versus the other five with only 10% probability each (#6, #7, etc.). Would the presence of a highly-likely target interfere with describing a low-probability target when it was chosen? The answer was negative. Psychically, what you see is what you get and is not affected by what is probable. (Dean Radin, though, did an experiment on his computer with precisely the opposite results, showing that the precognition was heavily biased towards the more probable future rather than the actual). Finally, the silver futures experiment also came out of Esalen meetings. Ed May & Stephan Schwartz first conceived of the associative remote viewing, but Keith Harary & Russell performed the experiment." For more papers see: http://www.irva.org/papers.shtml http://www.esalenctr.org/display/confpage.cfm?confid=2&pageid=5&pgtype=1 Post New Topic