In what concerns to my practice, I supported the presidential program of the Social Solidarity net6. My work consisted in coordinating the departmental table of solidarity and the sector tables of health, education, housing and employment. I also made surveillance to the projects of the following programs:
- Integral improvement of urban housing and its environment
- To live better (rural housing)
- Generation of urban employment program (PGE)
- Generation of rural employment program (rural PGE)
At the arriving moment, the departmento planning secretary carried out these activities, by governor's responsibility. According to the operative regulation of the net, the members of the collegiate management body (the governor, the mayors of the municipalities, representatives from the community, the NGOs, the executing entities, the churches and other civil organizations) they were those in charge of the administration of each program. However, as all those people had the whole time almost saturated with activities, the normal thing was that it was delegated in an institution that had a general vision of the departamento's problems. In most country's departments it corresponded to the PNRe11 delegation, but in the Guainía it didn't exist. Only until March 95 the delegate's appointment was official, and it corresponded us, to my Option partner and me, to collaborate with the organization of the new delegation and to work like secretary and messenger, while the corresponding ones were named.
Anyway, the work of the net is an interdisciplinary work, in which all the state institutions intervene, so much the departmental and municipal secretaries as the decentralized institutes (as the ICBF, the Agrarian Box, etc.e12); with all things related to them. In each sector table each institution technicians sat down with representatives of the community (or the same community), to make decisions about the resources used in some programs and/or which communities or people were benefited. For example, in the housing sector table they met one representative of each neighborhood of the municipality, representatives of the communities of the rivers, one representative of the Mayor's office, one of the departmental planning secretary and at least one of the Solidarity net. Representatives of the public infrastructure secretary were present in some occasions, the PNR, the Caja Agraria and the INURBE. Among all them they decided which neighborhood has more poverty concentration in Inírida's urban helmet and which departmental micro-region has more unsatisfied basic needs. None could have been cover by previous governments' rural housing programs.
The resources that would feed the programs came from the co financing funds, some of them: Solidarity and Social emergency Fund (FOSES), Integrated Rural Development Fund (DRI), Infrastructure vial (FIV), Social Infrastructure Fund (FIS), Urban Infrastructure Fund (FIU) and Financial Territorial Development Fund (FINDETER), besides the institutes of Urban reform (INURBE) and Family Welfare (ICBF) and the education and health departmental and municipal secretaries.
NOTESClick for go back to the note mark.