|
|
K.Gunasegaran @ GS Tamilan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| ** | Click the link to read the articles |
Introduction
This is a very touchy subject. When you are asked this question, there are
several ways that you can go, depending on who is asking the question and the
background in which they have been raised. Basically, there is a rule, an
overlying rule, which gives the Hindu answer to this query. It is called ahimsa,
refraining from injuring-physically, mentally or emotionally-anyone or any
living creature. The Hindu who wishes to strictly follow the path of non-injury
to all creatures naturally adopts a vegetarian diet.
We have collected many scriptural quotes which counsel Hindus not to eat meat.
There are references in the Vedas and Manu Dharma Shastras to this effect, as
well. As in other matters, Hinduism has very few rigid "do's and don'ts."
Rather, its injunctions are called restraints and observances. The ultimate
authority for answers to such questions is one's own guru, or our religious
community and sampradaya and our own understanding of the spiritual benefits
from abstaining from eating meat. Let me put it this way. There are good Hindus
who eat meat, and there are bad Hindus who are vegetarians.
Today in America and Europe there are literally millions of vegetarians. This is
because they want to live a long time and be healthy. Many feel a certain moral
obligation to their own conscience which they wish to fulfill. There are some
good new books on vegetarianism, such as Diet for a New America by John Robbins.
If you want to know about vegetarianism from the American perspective, write to
us and we can refer you to some excellent books. Perhaps at your next meeting
you can invite some of these authorities to come and speak to your group. There
is also a fine magazine dedicated to the subject, "Vegetarian Times," which
comes out monthly. Now to some answers that you can memorize when asked about
vegetarianism and its relationship to Hinduism.
Answer #1:
Simply put, vegetarians are more numerous in the
south of India than in the north. This is because of climactic conditions and
the Islamic influence within the north of our country. Our religion does not lay
down rigid "do's and don'ts." There are no commandments. Our religion gives us
the wisdom to make up our own mind on what we put in our body, for it is the
only one we have, in this life at least.
Answer #2:
All of our priests and religious leaders are definitely vegetarian, because they
have to awaken the more refined areas of their nature in order to perform their
work. Our soldiers and law-enforcement people are generally not vegetarians.
This is because they have to keep alive their aggressive forces in order to
perform their work. To practice yoga and be successful in spiritual life it is
advisable to become a vegetarian. It is a matter of wisdom. Wisdom is the
application of knowledge at any given moment.
Answer #3:
Today, about twenty or thirty percent of all Hindus
are vegetarians and the rest are not.
Summary
Through my forty years of presenting the eternal Truths of Hinduism, I have
found that families who are vegetarian have fewer problems than those who are
not. This is because when we eat meat, fish, fowl and eggs, we absorb the
vibration of the instinctive creatures into our nerve system and this amplifies
our own lower nature. Our lower nature is prone to fear, anger, jealousy,
confusion, resentment and the like.
|
I. Must We Kill in order to
LIVE ?
|
Vegetarianism, known in
Sanskrit as Shakahara, was for thousands of years a principle of health and
environmental ethics throughout India. Though Muslim and Christian colonization
radically undermined and eroded this ideal, it remains to this day a cardinal
ethic of Hindu thought and practice. A subtle sense of guilt persists among
Hindus who eat meat, and there exists an ongoing controversy on this issue on
which we hope this humble booklet will shed some light.
For India's ancient thinkers, life is seen as the very stuff of the Divine, an
emanation of the Source and part of a cosmic continuum. They further hold that
each life form, even water and trees, possesses consciousness and energy.
Nonviolence, ahimsa, the primary basis of vegetarianism, has long been central
to the religious traditions of India-especially Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism.
Religion in India has consistently upheld the sanctity of life, whether human,
animal or, in the case of the Jains, elemental.
The Sanskrit for vegetarianism is Shakahara, and one following a vegetarian diet
is a shakahari. The term for meat-eating is mansahara, and the meat-eater is
called mansahari. Ahara means "to consume, or eat," shaka means "vegetable," and
mansa means "meat or flesh." The very word mansa, "meat," conveys a deep
appreciation of life's sacredness and an understanding of the law of karma by
which the consequence of each action returns to the doer. As explained in the
2,000-year-old Manu Dharma Shastra, 5.55, "The learned declare that the meaning
of mansa (flesh) is, 'he (sa) will eat me (mam) in the other world whose flesh I
eat here.' "
There developed early in India an unparalleled concern for harmony among life
forms, and this led to a common ethos based on noninjuriousness and a minimal
consumption of natural resources-in other words, to compassion and simplicity.
If homo sapiens is to survive his present predicament, he will have to
rediscover these two primary ethical virtues.
"Is vegetarianism integral to non injury?" In my book, Dancing with Siva, this
question is addressed as follows: "Hindus teach vegetarianism as a way to live
with a minimum of hurt to other beings, for to consume meat, fish, fowl or eggs
is to participate indirectly in acts of cruelty and violence against the animal
kingdom. The abhorrence of injury and killing of any kind leads quite naturally
to a vegetarian diet, shakahara. The meat-eater's desire for meat drives another
to kill and provide that meat. The act of the butcher begins with the desire of
the consumer. Meat-eating contributes to a mentality of violence, for with the
chemically complex meat ingested, one absorbs the slaughtered creature's fear,
pain and terror. These qualities are nourished within the meat-eater,
perpetuating the cycle of cruelty and confusion. When the individual's
consciousness lifts and expands, he will abhor violence and not be able to even
digest the meat, fish, fowl and eggs he was formerly consuming. India's greatest
saints have confirmed that one cannot eat meat and live a peaceful, harmonious
life. Man's appetite for meat inflicts devastating harm on the earth itself,
stripping its precious forests to make way for pastures. The Tirukural candidly
states, 'How can he practice true compassion who eats the flesh of an animal to
fatten his own flesh? Greater than a thousand ghee offerings consumed in
sacrificial fires is not to sacrifice and consume any living creature.' "
Amazingly, I have heard people define vegetarian as a diet which excludes the
meat of animals but does permit fish and eggs. But what really is vegetarianism?
Vegetarian foods include grains, fruits, vegetables, legumes and dairy products.
Natural, fresh foods, locally grown without insecticides or chemical fertilizers
are preferred. A vegetarian diet does not include meat, fish, fowl or eggs. For
good health, even certain vegetarian foods are minimized: frozen and canned
foods, highly processed foods, such as white rice, white sugar and white flour;
and "junk" foods and beverages-those with abundant chemical additives, such as
artificial sweeteners, colorings, flavorings and preservatives.
In my forty years of ministry it has become quite evident that vegetarian
families have far fewer problems than those who are not vegetarian. If children
are raised as vegetarians, every day they are exposed to nonviolence as a
principle of peace and compassion. Every day they are growing up they are
remembering and being reminded to not kill. They won't even kill another
creature to eat, to feed themselves. And if they won't kill another creature to
feed themselves, they will be much less likely to do acts of violence against
people.
Satguru Sivaya
Subramuniyaswami

|
II. FIVE reasons to be a
Vegetarian
|
In the past fifty years millions of meat-eaters have made the personal decision to stop eating the flesh of other creatures. There are five major motivations for such a decision.
(1) The DHARMIC/SCRIPTURAL LAW reason
Ahimsa, the law of non injury, is the Hindu's first duty in fulfillment of his religious obligations to God and God's creation as defined by Vedic scripture.
(2) The KARMIC CONSEQUENCES reason
All of our actions including our choice of food have karmic consequences. By involving oneself in the cycle of inflicting injury, pain and death, even indirectly by eating other creatures, one must in the future experience in equal measure the suffering caused.
(3) The SPIRITUAL CONSCIOUSNESS reason
Food is the source of the body's chemistry, and what we ingest affects our consciousness, emotions and experiential patterns. If one wants to live in higher consciousness, in peace and happiness and love for all creatures, then he cannot eat meat, fish, shellfish, fowl or eggs. By ingesting the grosser chemistries of animal foods, one introduces into the body and mind anger, jealousy, fear, anxiety, suspicion and a terrible fear of death, all of which are locked into the flesh of butchered creatures. For these reasons, shakaharis live in higher consciousness and mansaharis abide in lower consciousness.
(4) The HEALTH reason
Medical studies prove that a vegetarian diet is easier to digest, provides a wider range of nutrients and imposes fewer burdens and impurities on the body. Vegetarians are less susceptible to all the major diseases that afflict contemporary humanity, and thus live longer, healthier, more productive lives. They have fewer physical complaints, less frequent visits to the doctor, fewer dental problems and smaller medical bills. Their immune system is stronger, their bodies are purer, more refined and skin more beautiful.
(5) The ECOLOGICAL reason
Planet earth is
suffering. In large measure, the escalating loss of species, destruction of
ancient rain forests to create pasture lands for livestock, loss of topsoils and
the consequent increase of water impurities and air pollution have all been
traced to the single fact of meat in the human diet. No single decision that we
can make as individuals or as a race can have such a dramatic effect on the
improvement of our planetary ecology as the decision to not eat meat. Many
seeking to save the planet for future generations have made this decision for
this reason and this reason alone.

![]() |
III.
How to WIN an argument with a MEAT - Eater ?
|
While their numbers are rapidly growing, vegetarians are still a minority, and it is not unusual to be confronted with a meat-eater who not only protects his own right to eat flesh, but argues aggressively that vegetarians should join him in his carnivorous diet. Carnivores may regard non meat-eaters as a strange lot who munch on "rabbit food," and whose diet doesn't have the substance to make them strong, productive human beings. The following presentation is designed to turn the tables on such discussions by showing the devastating effects of meat-eating both on individuals and on our planet. It is based on a richly informative poster entitled, "How to win an argument with a meat-eater," published by Earthsave, an organization based in Felton, California, giving facts from Pulitzer Prize nominee John Robbins' book Diet for a New America. Below are eight separate arguments against meat-eating and in favor of a vegetarian diet.
1. The Hunger Argument against meat-eating
Much of the world's
massive hunger problems could be solved by the reduction or elimination of
meat-eating. The reasons: 1) livestock pasture needs cut drastically into land
which could otherwise be used to grow food; 2) vast quantities of food which
could feed humans is fed to livestock raised to produce meat.
This year alone, twenty million people worldwide will die as a result of
malnutrition. One child dies of malnutrition every 2.3 seconds. One hundred
million people could be adequately fed using the land freed if Americans reduced
their intake of meat by a mere 10%.
Twenty percent of the corn grown in the U.S. is eaten by people. Eighty percent
of the corn and 95% of the oats grown in the U.S. is eaten by livestock. The
percentage of protein wasted by cycling grain through livestock is calculated by
experts as 90%.
One acre of land can produce 40,000 pounds of potatoes, or 250 pounds of beef.
Fifty-six percent of all U.S. farmland is devoted to beef production, and to
produce each pound of beef requires 16 pounds of edible grain and soybeans,
which could be used to feed the hungry.
2. The Environmental Argument against meat-eating
Many of the world's
massive environmental problems could be solved by the reduction or elimination
of meat-eating, including global warming, loss of topsoil, loss of rain forests
and species extinction.
The temperature of the earth is rising. This global warming, known as "the
greenhouse effect," results primarily from carbon dioxide emissions from burning
fossil fuels, such as oil and natural gas. Three times more fossil fuels must be
burned to produce a meat-centered diet than for a meat-free diet. If people
stopped eating meat, the threat of higher world temperatures would be vastly
diminished.
Trees, and especially the old-growth forests, are essential to the survival of
the planet. Their destruction is a major cause of global warming and top soil
loss. Both of these effects lead to diminished food production. Meat-eating is
the number one driving force for the destruction of these forests. Two-hundred
and sixty million acres of U.S. forest land has been cleared for cropland to
produce the meat-centered diet. Fifty-five square feet of tropical rain forest
is consumed to produce every quarter-pound of rain forest beef. An alarming 75%
of all U.S. topsoil has been lost to date. Eighty-five percent of this loss is
directly related to livestock raising.
Another devastating result of deforestation is the loss of plant and animal
species. Each year 1,000 species are eliminated due to destruction of tropical
rain forests for meat grazing and other uses. The rate is growing yearly.
To keep up with U.S. consumption, 300 million pounds of meat are imported
annually from Central and South America. This economic incentive impels these
nations to cut down their forests to make more pasture land. The short-term gain
ignores the long-term, irreparable harm to the earth's ecosystem. In effect
these countries are being drained of their resources to put meat on the table of
Americans while 75% of all Central American children under the age of five are
undernourished.
3. The Cancer Argument against meat-eating
Those who eat flesh are
far more likely to contract cancer than those following a vegetarian diet.
The risk of contracting breast cancer is 3.8 times greater for women who eat
meat daily compared to less than once a week; 2.8 times greater for women who
eat eggs daily compared to once a week; and 3.25 greater for women who eat
butter and cheese 2 to 4 times a week as compared to once a week.
The risk of fatal ovarian cancer is three times greater for women who eat eggs 3
or more times a week as compared with less than once a week.
The risk of fatal prostate cancer is 3.6 times greater for men who consume meat,
cheese, eggs and milk daily as compared with sparingly or not at all.
4. The Cholesterol Argument against meat-eating
Here are facts showing
that: 1) U.S. physicians are not sufficiently trained in the importance of the
relation of diet to health; 2) meat-eaters ingest excessive amounts of
cholesterol, making them dangerously susceptible to heart attacks.
It is strange, but true that U.S. physicians are as a rule ill-educated in the
single most important factor of health, namely diet and nutrition. Of the 125
medical schools in the U.S., only 30 require their students to take a course in
nutrition. The average nutrition training received by the average U.S. physician
during four years in school is only 2.5 hours. Thus doctors in the U.S. are
ill-equipped to advise their patients in minimizing foods, such as meat, that
contain excessive amounts of cholesterol and are known causes of heart attack.
Heart attack is the most common cause of death in the U.S., killing one person
every 45 seconds. The male meat-eater's risk of death from heart attack is 50%.
The risk to men who eats no meat is 15%. Reducing one's consumption of meat,
dairy and eggs by 10% reduces the risk of heart attack by 10%. Completely
eliminating these products from one's diet reduces the risk of heart attack by
90%.
The average cholesterol consumption of a meat-centered diet is 210 milligrams
per day. The chance of dying from heart disease if you are male and your blood
cholesterol is 210 milligrams daily is greater than 50%.
5. The Natural Resources Argument against meat-eating
The world's natural
resources are being rapidly depleted as a result of meat-eating.
Raising livestock for their meat is a very inefficient way of generating food.
Pound for pound, far more resources must be expended to produce meat than to
produce grains, fruits and vegetables. For example, more than half of all water
used for all purposes in the U.S. is consumed in livestock production. The
amount of water used in production of the average cow is sufficient to float a
destroyer (a large naval ship). While 25 gallons of water are needed to produce
a pound of wheat, 5,000 gallons are needed to produce a pound of California
beef. That same 5,000 gallons of water can produce 200 pounds of wheat. If this
water cost were not subsidized by the government, the cheapest hamburger meat
would cost more than $35 per pound.
Meat-eating is devouring oil reserves at an alarming rate. It takes nearly 78
calories of fossil fuel (oil, natural gas, etc.) energy to produce one calory of
beef protein and only 2 calories of fossil fuel energy to produce one calory of
soybean. If every human ate a meat-centered diet, the world's known oil reserves
would last a mere 13 years. They would last 260 years if humans stopped eating
meat altogether. That is 20 times longer, giving humanity ample time to develop
alternative energy sources.
Thirty-three percent of all raw materials (base products of farming, forestry
and mining, including fossil fuels) consumed by the U.S. are devoted to the
production of livestock, as compared with 2% to produce a complete vegetarian
diet.
6. The Antibiotic Argument against meat-eating
Here are facts showing
the dangers of eating meat because of the large amounts of antibiotics fed to
livestock to control staphylococci (commonly called staph infections), which are
becoming immune to these drugs at an alarming rate.
The animals that are being raised for meat in the United States are diseased.
The livestock industry attempts to control this disease by feeding the animals
antibiotics. Huge quantities of drugs go for this purpose. Of all antibiotics
used in the U.S., 55% are fed to livestock.
But this is only partially effective because the bacteria that cause disease are
becoming immune to the antibiotics. The percentage of staphylococci infections
resistant to penicillin, for example, has grown from 13% in 1960 to 91% in 1988.
These antibiotics and-or the bacteria they are intended to destroy reside in the
meat that goes to market.
It is not healthy for humans to consume this meat. The response of the European
Economic Community to the routine feeding of antibiotics to U.S. livestock was
to ban the importation of U.S. meat. European buyers do not want to expose
consumers to this serious health hazard. By comparison, U.S. meat and
pharmaceutical industries gave their full and complete support to the routine
feeding of antibiotics to livestock, turning a blind eye to the threat of
disease to the consumer.
7. The Pesticide Argument against meat-eating
Unknown to most
meat-eaters, U.S.-produced meat contains dangerously high quantities of deadly
pesticides.
The common belief is that the U.S. Department of Agriculture protects consumers'
health through regular and thorough meat inspection. In reality, fewer than one
out of every 250,000 slaughtered animals is tested for toxic chemical residues.
That these chemicals are indeed ingested by the meat-eater is proven by the
following facts:
A. Ninety-nine percent of U.S. mother's milk contains significant levels of DDT.
In stark contrast, only 8% of U.S. vegetarian mother's milk containing
significant levels of DDT. This shows that the primary source of DDT is the meat
ingested by the mothers.
B. Contamination of breast milk due to chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides in
animal products found in meat-eating mothers versus non meat-eating mothers is
35 times higher.
C. The amount of the pesticide Dieldrin ingested by the average breast-fed
American infant is 9 times the permissible level.
8. The Ethical Argument against meat-eating
Many of those who
have adopted a vegetarian diet have done so because of the ethical argument,
either from reading about or personally experiencing what goes on daily at any
one of the thousands of slaughterhouses in the U.S. and other countries, where
animals suffer the cruel process of forced confinement, manipulation and violent
death. Their pain and terror is beyond calculation.
The slaughterhouse is the final stop for animals raised for their flesh. These
ghastly places, while little known to most meat-eaters, process enormous numbers
of animals each years. In the U.S. alone, 660,000 animals are killed for meat
every hour. A surprising quantity of meat is consumed by the meat-eater. The
average per capita consumption of meat in the U.S., Canada and Australia is 200
pounds per year! The average American consumes in a 72-year lifetime
approximately 11 cattle, 3 lambs and sheep, 23 hogs, 45 turkeys, 1,100 chickens
and 862 pounds of fish! Bon appetite!
People who come in contact with slaughterhouses cannot help but be affected by
what they see and hear. Those living nearby must daily experience the screams of
terror and anger of the animals led to slaughter. Those working inside must also
see and participate in the crimes of mayhem and murder. Most who choose this
line of work are not on the job for long. Of all occupations in the U.S.,
slaughterhouse worker has the highest turnover rate. It also has the highest
rate of on-the-job injury.

![]() |
IV. Humans Have neither Fangs nor
Claws
|
A ninth and most
compelling argument against meat-eating is that humans are physiologically not
suited for a carnivorous diet. The book Food for the Spirit, Vegetarianism in
the World Religions, summarizes this point of view as follows. "Many
nutritionists, biologists and physiologists offer convincing evidence that
humans are in fact not meant to eat flesh._" Here are seven facts in support of
this view:
"Physiologically, people are more akin to plant-eaters, foragers and grazers,
such as monkeys, elephants and cows, than to carnivora such as dogs, tigers and
leopards.
"For example, carnivora do not sweat through their skin; body heat is controlled
by rapid breathing and extrusion of the tongue. Vegetarian animals, on the other
hand, have sweat pores for heat control and the elimination of impurities.
"Carnivora have long teeth and claws for holding and killing prey; vegetarian
animals have short teeth and no claws.
"The saliva of carnivora contains no ptyalin and cannot predigest starches; that
of vegetarian animals contains ptyalin for the predigestion of starches.
"Flesh-eating animals secrete large quantities of hydrochloric acid to help
dissolve bones; vegetarian animals secrete little hydrochloric acid.
"The jaws of carnivora only open in an up and down motion; those of vegetarian
animals also move sideways for additional kinds of chewing.
"Carnivora must lap liquids (like a cat); vegetarian animals take liquids in by
suction through the teeth.
"There are many such comparisons, and in each case humans fit the vegetarian
physiognomy. From a strictly physiological perspective, then, there are strong
arguments that humans are not suited to a fleshy diet."

![]() |
V.
The Health Benefits of Vegetarianism
|
It was only
recently that smoking only recently became recognized as a health and
environmental hazard. As a result of research and education on a habit once
believed to be not only harmless but stylish, most major U.S. cities have banned
smoking of cigarettes, cigars or pipes in all public places. Smoking has also
been outlawed in government offices and completely eliminated from all domestic
U.S. air flights. Now, another, even more devastating problem is under scrutiny.
Its threat to health and the environment is being realized based on overwhelming
evidence amassed by recognized authorities over the past fifty years. Recently a
group of eminent doctors called the Physicians Committee for Responsible
Medicine (PCRM), themselves members of the American Medical Association (AMA),
have gathered to change the U.S. consciousness on human nutrition, particularly
among the medical community. The PCRM is a nonprofit organization based in
Washington, D.C., consisting of doctors and lay persons working together for
compassionate and effective medical practice, research and health promotion.
Founded in 1985, the PCRM is supported by over 3,000 physicians and 50,000 lay
persons PCRM president Newal D. Barnard, M.D., is a popular speaker and the
author of The Power of Your Plate.
As stated by the PCRM in their 1991 literature, "A vegetarian diet has been
advocated by everyone from philosophers, such as Plato and Nietzsche, to
political leaders, such as Benjamin Franklin and Gandhi, to modern pop icons
such as Paul McCartney and Bob Marley. Science is also on the side of vegetarian
foods. A multitude of studies have proven the health benefits of a vegetarian
diet to be remarkable.
"Vegetarian is defined as avoiding all animal flesh, including fish and poultry.
Vegetarians who avoid flesh, but do eat animal products such as cheese, milk and
eggs are ovo-lacto-vegetarians (ovo = egg; lacto = milk, cheese, etc.). The
ranks of those who eschew all animal products are rapidly growing; these people
are referred to as pure vegetarians or vegans (vee'guns). Scientific research
shows that ovo-lacto-vegetarians are healthier than meat-eaters, and vegans are
healthier than ovo-lacto-vegetarians." It should be noted that the Indian Hindu
tradition has always been lacto-vegetarian, permitting the consumption of milk
products.
The PCRM literature lists a host of health benefits of a vegetarian diet,
including the following:
Preventing cancer: "Numerous epidemiological and clinical studies have shown
that vegetarians are nearly 50% less likely to die from cancer than non
vegetarians."
Preventing heart disease and lowering blood pressure.
Preventing and reversing diabetes.
Preventing and alleviating gallstones, kidney stones and osteoporosis.
Preventing and alleviating asthma.

![]() |
|
In 1991 the
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine submitted a proposal to change the
official "four food groups" which have been promoted by U.S. nutritionists in
the U.S. for the past 35 years. Their proposal reflects the fact that the
long-held belief in meat as an essential dietary element is being displaced with
new findings on the harmful effects of a meat-centered diet. The PCRM Update,
May-June 1991, explains, "On April 8, 1991, PCRM unveiled a proposal to replace
the Four Basic Food Groups. The Four Food Groups have been part of U.S.
government recommendations since 1956, but promote dietary habits which are
largely responsible for the epidemics of heart disease, cancer, stroke and other
serious illnesses in this country._The old four groups were meat, dairy, grains
and fruits/vegetables. The 'New Four Food Groups' are grains, legumes,
vegetables and fruits. Meat and dairy will lose their food group status [by this
proposal]. The 'New Four Food Groups' represents a nutrition plan that is based
on healthy, fiber-rich plant foods rather than the former emphasis on
cholesterol-and-fat-laden foods. 'The meat and dairy groups were the principal
sources of cholesterol and saturated fat, which is the biggest culprit in
raising blood cholesterol,' says PCRM Nutritionist Virginia Messina, M.P.H.,
R.D. 'These foods are simply not necessary in the human diet.' " PCRM poster
offers the following description of the four new food groups.
1. Whole
grains includes breads, pastas, rice, corn and all other grains. Note the
emphasis on whole grains rather than refined grains. Build each of your meals
around a hearty grain dish-grains are rich in fiber and other complex
carbohydrates, as well as protein, B vitamins and zinc.
2.
Vegetables are packed with nutrients; they provide vitamin C, beta-carotene,
riboflavin and other vitamins, iron, calcium and fiber. Dark green, leafy
vegetables such as broccoli, collards, kale, mustard and turnip greens, chicory
or bok choy are especially good sources of these important nutrients. Dark
yellow and orange vegetables such as carrots, winter squash, sweet potatoes and
pumpkin provide extra beta-carotene. Include generous portions of a variety of
vegetables in your diet.
3.
Legumes, which is another name for beans, peas and lentils, are all good sources
of fiber, protein, iron, calcium, zinc and B vitamins. This group also includes
chickpeas, baked and refried beans, soy milk, tofu, tempeh and texturized
vegetable protein.
4. Fruits
are rich in fiber, vitamin C and beta-carotene. Be sure to include at least one
serving each day of fruits that are high in vitamin C-citrus fruits, melons and
strawberries are all good choices. Choose whole fruit over fruit juices, which
don't contain as much healthy fiber.

![]() |
VII.
Common Dietary Concerns
|
Those considering
a vegetarian diet generally worry about getting enough nutrients, since the
belief that meat is a necessary part of keeping strong and healthy is still
extremely widespread. Armed with decades of nutritional research data, the PCRM
addresses this issue head-on:
"The fact is, it is very easy to have a well-balanced diet with vegetarian
foods. Vegetarian foods provide plenty of protein. Careful combining of foods is
not necessary. Any normal variety of plant foods provides more than enough
protein for the body's needs. Although there is somewhat less protein in a
vegetarian diet than a meat-eater's diet, this actually an advantage. Excess
protein has been linked to kidney stones, osteoporosis, and possibly heart
disease and some cancers. A diet focused on beans, whole grains and vegetables
contains adequate amounts of protein without the 'overdose' most meat-eaters
get."
Other concerns are allayed as follows:
"Calcium is easy to find in a vegetarian diet. Many dark, green leafy vegetables
and beans are loaded with calcium, and some orange juices and cereals are
calcium-fortified. Iron is plentiful in whole grains, beans and fruits."
Vitamin B12: There is a misconception that without eating meat one cannot obtain
sufficient v. B12, which is an essential nutrient. This simply not true. The
PCRM advises: "Although cases of B12 deficiency are very uncommon, it is
important to make sure that one has a reliable source of the vitamin. Good
sources include all common multiple vitamins (including vegetarian vitamins),
fortified cereals and fortified soy milk."
"During pregnancy one's nutritional needs increase. The American Dietetic
Association has found vegan diets adequate for fulfilling nutritional needs
during pregnancy, but pregnant women and nursing mothers should supplement their
diets with vitamins B12 and D.
"vegetarian children also have high nutritional needs, but these, too, are met
within a vegetarian diet. A vegetarian menu is 'life-extending.' As young
children, vegetarians may grow more gradually, reach puberty somewhat later, and
live substantially longer than do meat-eaters. Do be sure to include a reliable
source of vitamin B12."
Besides the fortified cereals and soy milk mentioned above vitamin B12 sources
that are widely available are multiple vitamins, brewers yeast and other potent
dietary supplements.
Those interested in supporting or learning more about the work of the PCRM
should write to PCRM, P.O. Box 6322, Washington, D.C., 20015.

![]() |
VIII. Vegetarianism in Hinduism
|
Food for the
Spirit, Vegetarianism and the World Religions, observes, "Despite popular
knowledge of meat-eating's adverse effects, the non vegetarian diet became
increasingly widespread among Hindus after the two major invasions by foreign
powers, first the Muslims and later the British. With them came the desire to be
'civilized,' to eat as did the saheeb. Those actually trained in Vedic
knowledge, however, never adopted a meat-oriented diet, and the pious Hindu
still observes vegetarian principles as a matter of religious duty.
"That vegetarianism has always been widespread in India is clear from the
earliest Vedic texts. This was observed by the ancient traveler Megasthenes and
also by Fa-hsien, a Chinese Buddhist monk who, in the fifth century, traveled to
India in order to obtain authentic copies of the scriptures.
"These scriptures unambiguously support the meatless way of life. In the
Mahabharata, for instance, the great warrior Bhishma explains to Yudhishtira,
eldest of the Pandava princes, that the meat of animals is like the flesh of
one's own son, and that the foolish person who eats meat must be considered the
vilest of human beings [Anu. 114.11]. The eating of 'dirty' food, it warns, is
not as terrible as the eating of flesh [Shanti. 141.88] (it must be remembered
that the brahmanas of ancient India exalted cleanliness to a divine principle).
"Similarly, the Manusmriti declares that one should 'refrain from eating all
kinds of meat,' for such eating involves killing and leads to karmic bondage (bandha)
[5.49]. Elsewhere in the Vedic literature, the last of the great Vedic kings,
Maharajah Parikshit, is quoted as saying that 'only the animal-killer cannot
relish the message of the Absolute Truth [Shrimad Bhagavatam 10.1.4].' "

![]() |
IX.Scriptures Against Killing and Meat-Eating
|
Hindu scripture speaks clearly and forcefully on non killing and vegetarianism. In the ancient Rig Veda, we read: "O vegetable, be succulent, wholesome, strengthening; and thus, body, be fully grown." The Yajur Veda summarily dictates: "Do not injure the beings living on the earth, in the air and in the water." The beautiful Tirukural, a widely-read 2,000-year-old masterpiece of ethics, speaks of conscience: "When a man realizes that meat is the butchered flesh of another creature, he must abstain from eating it." The Manu Samhita advises: "Having well considered the origin of flesh and the cruelty of fettering and slaying of corporeal beings, let one entirely abstain from eating flesh." In the yoga-infused verses of the Tirumantiram, warning is given of how meat-eating holds the mind in gross, adharmic states: "The ignoble ones who eat flesh, death's agents bind them fast and push them quick into the fiery jaws of hell (Naraka, lower consciousness)." The roots of non injury non killing and nonconsumption of meat are found in the Vedas, agamas, Upanishads, Dharma Shastras, Tirumurai, Yoga Sutras and dozens of other sacred texts of Hinduism. Here is a select collection.
Vedas and agamas, Hinduism's Revealed Scriptures
LET YOUR AIMS BE
COMMON, and your hearts be of one accord, and all of you be of one mind, so you
may live well together. Rig Veda Samhita 10.191
Protect both our species, two-legged and four-legged. Both food and water for
their needs supply. May they with us increase in stature and strength. Save us
from hurt all our days, O Powers! Rig Veda Samhita 10.37.11. VE, 319
One who partakes of human flesh, the flesh of a horse or of another animal, and
deprives others of milk by slaughtering cows, O King, if such a fiend does not
desist by other means, then you should not hesitate to cut off his head. Rig
Veda Samhita, 10.87.16, FS 90
Peaceful be the earth, peaceful the ether, peaceful heaven, peaceful the waters,
peaceful the herbs, peaceful the trees. May all Gods bring me peace. May there
be peace through these invocations of peace. With these invocations of
peace which appease everything, I render peaceful whatever here is terrible,
whatever here is cruel, whatever here is sinful. Let it become auspicious, let
everything be beneficial to us. Atharva Veda Samhita 10. 191. 4
Those noble souls who practice meditation and other yogic ways, who are ever
careful about all beings, who protect all animals, are the ones who are actually
serious about spiritual practices. Atharva Veda Samhita 19.48.5. FS, 90
If we have injured space, the earth or heaven, or if we have offended mother or
father, from that may Agni, fire of the house, absolve us and guide us safely to
the world of goodness. Atharva Veda Samhita 6.120.1. VE, 636
You must not use your God-given body for killing God's creatures, whether they
are human, animal or whatever. Yajur Veda Samhita 12.32. FS, 90
May all beings look at me with a friendly eye. May I do likewise, and may we all
look on each other with the eyes of a friend. Yajur Veda 36.18.
Nonviolence is all the offerings. Renunciation is the priestly honorarium. The
final purification is death. Thus all the Divinities are established in this
body. Krishna Yajur Veda, Prana Upanishad 46-8. VE, 413-14
To the heavens be peace, to the sky and the earth; to the waters be peace, to
plants and all trees; to the Gods be peace, to Brahman be peace, to all men be
peace, again and again-peace also to me! O earthen vessel, strengthen me. May
all beings regard me with friendly eyes! May I look upon all creatures with
friendly eyes! With a friend's eye may we regard each other! Shukla Yajur Veda
Samhita 36.17-18. VE, 306; 342
No pain should be caused to any created being or thing. Devikalottara agama, JAV
69-79. RM, 116
The Mahabharata and Bhagavad Gita, Epic History
The very name of the cows is aghnya,
indicating that they should never be slaughtered. Who, then could slay them?
Surely, one who kills a cow or a bull commits the most heinous crime.
Mahabharata, Shantiparva 262.47. FS,pg. 94
The purchaser of flesh performs himsa (violence) by his wealth; he who eats
flesh does so by enjoying its taste; the killer does himsa by actually tying and
killing the animal. Thus, there are three forms of killing: he who brings flesh
or sends for it, he who cuts off the limbs of an animal, and he who purchases,
sells or cooks flesh and eats it -all of these are to be considered meat-eaters.
Mahabharata, Anu. 115.40. FS, pg 90
He who desires to augment his own flesh by eating the flesh of other creatures
lives in misery in whatever species he may take his birth. Mahabharata, Anu.
115.47. FS, pg. 90
One should never do that to another which one regards as injurious to one's own
self. This, in brief, is the rule of dharma. Yielding to desire and acting
differently, one becomes guilty of adharma. Mahabharata 18.113.8.
Those high-souled persons who desire beauty, faultlessness of limbs, long life,
understanding, mental and physical strength and memory should abstain from acts
of injury. Mahabharata 18.115.8.
Ahimsa is the highest dharma. Ahimsa is the best tapas. Ahimsa is the greatest
gift. Ahimsa is the highest self-control. Ahimsa is the highest sacrifice.
Ahimsa is the highest power. Ahimsa is the highest friend. Ahimsa is the highest
truth. Ahimsa is the highest teaching. Mahabharata 18.116.37-41.
He who sees that the Lord of all is ever the same in all that is-immortal in the
field of mortality-he sees the truth. And when a man sees that the God in
himself is the same God in all that is, he hurts not himself by hurting others.
Then he goes, indeed, to the highest path.
Bhagavad Gita
13. 27-28. BgM, pg. 101
Nonviolence, truth, freedom from anger, renunciation, serenity, aversion to
fault-finding, sympathy for all beings, peace from greedy cravings, gentleness,
modesty, steadiness, energy, forgiveness, fortitude, purity, a good will,
freedom from pride-these belong to a man who is born for heaven. Bhagavad Gita
16.2-3. BGM, pg. 109
Tirumantiram and other Scriptures
Many are the lovely
flowers of worship offered to the Guru, but none lovelier than non-killing.
Respect for life is the highest worship, the bright lamp, the sweet garland and
unwavering devotion. Tirumantiram 197
SPIRITUAL MERIT and sin are our own making. The killer of other lives is an
outcast. Match your words with your conduct. Steal not, kill not, indulge not in
self-praise, condemn not others to their face. Lingayat Vachanas
AHIMSA IS NOT CAUSING pain to any living being at any time through the actions
of one's mind, speech or body. Sandilya Upanishad When mind stuff is firmly
based in waves of ahimsa, all living beings cease their enmity in the presence
of such a person. Yoga Sutras 2.35. YP, pg. 205
Those who are ignorant of real dharma and, though wicked and haughty, account
themselves virtuous, kill animals without any feeling of remorse or fear of
punishment. Further, in their next lives, such sinful persons will be eaten by
the same creatures they have killed in this world. Shrimad Bhagavatam 11.5.4.
FS, pg, 90
The Thirukkural, Preeminent Ethical Scripture
Perhaps nowhere is the principle of
non meat-eating so fully and eloquently expressed as in the Tirukural, written
in the Tamil language by a simple weaver saint in a village near Madras over
2,000 years ago. Considered the world's greatest ethical scripture, it is sworn
on in South Indian courts of law.
It is the principle of the pure in heart never to injure others, even when they
themselves have been hatefully injured. What is virtuous conduct? It is never
destroying life, for killing leads to every other sin. 312; 321, TW
Harming others, even enemies who harmed you unprovoked, assures incessant
sorrow. The supreme principle is this: never knowingly harm any one at any time
in any way. 313; 317, TW
What is the good way? It is the path that reflects on how it may avoid killing
any living creature. Refrain from taking precious life from any living being,
even to save your own life. 324; 327, TW
How can he practice true compassion Who eats the flesh of an animal to fatten
his own flesh? TK 251, TW
Riches cannot be found in the hands of the thriftless. Nor can compassion be
found in the hearts of those who eat meat. TK 252, TW
Goodness is never one with the minds of these two: one who wields a weapon and
one who feasts on a creature's flesh. TK 253, TW
If you ask, "What is kindness and what is unkind?" it is not killing and
killing. Thus, eating flesh is never virtuous. TK 254, TW
Life is perpetuated by not eating meat. The.The clenched jaws of hell hold those
who do. TK 255, TW
If the world did not purchase and consume meat, there would be none to slaughter
and offer meat for sale. TK 256, TW
When a man realizes that meat is the butchered flesh of another creature, he
must abstain from eating it. TK 257, TW
Perceptive souls who have abandoned passion will not feed on flesh abandoned by
life. TK 258, TW
Greater than a thousand ghee offerings consumed in sacrificial fires is to not
sacrifice and consume any living creature. TK 259, TW
All that lives will press palms together in prayerful adoration of those who
refuse to slaughter and savor meat. TK 260, TW

![]() |
X. Hindu Religious Leaders on Non
Injury
|
The greatness of a nation and its
moral progress can be measured by the way in which its animals are treated.
Mahatma Gandhi
As long as human society continues to allow cows to be regularly killed in
slaughterhouses, there cannot be any question of peace and prosperity. A.C.
Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Refrain from killing knowingly even the trifling insects like a louse, a bug or
a mosquito. Use no violence even to gain possession of a woman, wealth or
kingdom. Never kill any animals even for the purpose of sacrifice. Non-violence
is the greatest of all religions. Swami Sahajanand, Divine Life Society
O lover of meditation, become pure and clean. Observe nonviolence in mind,
speech and body. Never break another's heart. Avoid wounding another's feelings.
Harm no one. Help all. Neither be afraid nor frighten others. Swami Muktananda
Someone who believes in violence and continues causing injury to others can
never be peaceful himself. Swami Satchidananda
To be free from violence is the duty of every man. No thought of revenge, hatred
or ill will should arise in our minds. Injuring others gives rise to hatred.
Swami Sivananda
By ahimsa, Patanjali meant the removal of the desire to kill. All forms of life
have an equal right to the air of maya. The saint who uncovers the secret of
creation will be in harmony with Nature's countless bewildering expressions. All
men may understand this truth by overcoming the passion for destruction. Sri
Yukteswar to Paramahansa Yogananda
If you plant eggplant, you can pluck eggplants. If you sow goodness, you can
reap goodness. If you sow evil, you will reap evil. Do good to all. God is
there, within you. Don't kill. Don't harbor anger. Sage Yogaswami
We are all of the same race and religion. We are holy beings established in
Divinity itself. This truth can be understood only by those who have grasped it
through the magical charm of a life of dharma-not by other means. Because of
that, sages have emphatically proclaimed again and again that it is necessary to
love all existing lives as one's own. Sage Yogaswami
The test of ahimsa is the absence of jealousy. The man whose heart never
cherishes even the thought of injury to anyone, who rejoices at the prosperity
of even his greatest enemy, that man is the bhakta, he is the yogi, he is the
guru of all. Swami Vivekananda
Strictly speaking, no activity and no industry is possible without a certain
amount of violence, no matter how little. Even the very process of living is
impossible without a certain amount of violence. What we have to do is to
minimize it to the greatest extent possible.
Mahatma Gandhi,
My Socialism, 34-35.
You do not like to suffer yourself. How can you inflict suffering on others?
Every killing is a suicide. The eternal, blissful and natural state has been
smothered by this life of ignorance. In this way the present life is due to the
killing of the eternal, pristine Being. Is it not a case of suicide? Ramana
Maharshi, June 1935
![]() |
Bibliography |
BgM: Juan Mascaro, The Bhagavad Gita (Baltimore, Penguin Books, 1966).
VE: Raimundo Panikkar, The Vedic Experience (New Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass,
1989).
RM: Arthur Osborne, ed., The Collected Works of Ramana Maharshi (London, Rider,
1959).
YP: Rammurti S. Mishra, The Textbook of Yoga Psychology (New York, Julian Press,
1963).
TW: Tiruvalluvar, Tirukural: The Weaver (English translation by Himalayan
Academy, Concord, California, manuscript).
FS: Steven Rosen, Food for the Spirit, Vegetarianism and the World Religions
(New York, 1990). Bala Books Inc. 74 Old Westbury Road, Old Westbury, N.Y, 11568
John Robbins, Diet For a New America (Walpole, New Hampshire, 1987). Stillpoint
Publishing, Box 640, Walpole, NH 03608
![]() |
Ellements are also taken from other websites. It is intended for reference use only, NOT for profit or gain. If you believe any of the above informations are false or untrue and so you wish them to be taken out please kindly inform me so and I will look into the problem ! Also if you think some of your belongings are here inform me and I will remove them ! |
Launched on 1st Jun 2004 -
Developed and Maintained
by
© Gunasegaran Kulanthy Velu ,Seremban, N.Sembilan.