|
Anthropogenic Global
Warming: All Hot Air
JANUARY 17, 2004
By
GREGORY J. RUMMO
A WEEK AGO on Saturday morning
as the northeast was in the grip of a frigid mass of Arctic
air; my way cool weather station cheerfully announced that is
was precisely 4.3 degrees below zero at 7:00 AM. I can say
this with the utmost confidence because the weather station
has a temperature probe located outside the house in a shady
location. It sends a signal to the main base in my bedroom on
the headboard above my head. It also features a clock that is
constantly updated by a radio transmission from the atomic
clock located in Fort Collins, Colorado.
Today’s technology is capable
of accomplishing many extraordinary feats. But one thing we
will never be able to achieve is controlling the weather—a
natural segue into one of my favorite topics—global warming.
Earlier this winter as the
snow base disappeared on Mountain Creek’s slopes in the warm,
spring-like 60-degree temperatures the week after Christmas, I
was reminded how nice it would be if there really were a
little bit of global warming going on here in the Northeast.
I almost broke out the
Coppertone, especially during a ride home from work one
afternoon when it was balmy enough to drive with the top down
in my convertible.
I could learn to love a mild
December through February here in New Jersey with no
persuasion from anyone.
But that’s not about to
happen—ever.
Last week, you’d be hard
pressed to find anyone talking about global warming. They were
all too busy trying to thaw out somewhere.
Global warming continues to
be nothing more than apocalyptic-scale fear mongering by a
bunch of disgruntled, Chicken Littles. These are the same
people who protested the US’s war in Iraq, comparing President
Bush to Adolf Hitler and who lead violent street protests,
destroying American icons such as Starbucks and McDonald’s
during G-8 economic summits in Italy and Washington State.
They are motivated by an
avowed hatred of the twin pillars of democracy and capitalism.
Their cause is unfortunately often aided and abetted by a
mostly complicit media that doesn’t understand the difference
between science and junk science.
The raison d’etre of the
alarmists is to blame this alleged warming of the earth on
anthropogenic CO2 emissions (i.e. “human activity,” the
favorite target being SUV owners).
Fortunately, not everyone in
the scientific community is so easily swayed by politics or
hatred.
Take for example the editors
of CO2-Science Magazine, a publication which I frequently
read. You can find it online at CO2Science.Org.
They are opposed to the IPCC—the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—for its
“predetermined position that anthropogenic CO2 emissions have
been responsible for the lion's share of the past
half-century's purported global warming.”
The editors also point out
that they cannot “condone the strident political lobbying of
IPCC-inspired climate alarmists, which is designed to promote
massive mandatory reductions in the use of fossil fuel-derived
energy to supposedly rectify this illusory situation.”
The January 2004 issue
featured several interesting tidbits and longer articles.
The “Temperature Record of
the Week” came from Batesville, Mississippi. The writers
reported, tongue in cheek: “During the period of most
significant greenhouse gas buildup over the past century,
i.e., 1930 and onward, Batesville's mean annual temperature
has cooled by 1.06 degrees Fahrenheit. Not much global
warming here!”
There were also two lengthy
papers: “Little Ice Age,” in which evidence is presented to
disprove the claims of the “climate alarmists” that the
Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age in South America
were localized in regions about the North Atlantic Ocean and
“Roots—Trees, Deciduous,” where the effects of warmer
temperatures and higher concentrations of carbon dioxide on
tree roots “will likely help earth's woody plants to become
ever more robust and productive as atmospheric CO2
concentrations rise higher and higher.”
Speaking of global warming,
it’s now warmed up to 12.6 degrees (above zero) at 3:18 PM—the
official high for the day—at least in our backyard. That’s an
increase of almost 17 degrees since I started this column a
little over 10 hours ago. On a percentage basis, it’s an
enormous change.
But frankly, I’d still dig
some of that global warming right now. Too bad it’s all just a
bunch of hot air. n
Gregory J. Rummo is a
syndicated columnist. Read all of his columns on his homepage,
www.GregRummo.com. E-Mail Rummo at [email protected]
|