"Skull Fossil from Chad Forces Rethinking of
Human Origins," an article that appeared July 10 on National
Geographic's website, begins with this statement: "For decades
scientists have worked to connect the dots between dozens of
fossil discoveries in East and southern Africa in hopes of
constructing an accurate picture of human origins. Now, a new
find in western Central Africa suggests the picture may be
radically different than widely assumed."
Daniel Lieberman of Harvard University is
quoted as saying, "The new find will have the impact of a small
nuclear bomb…One of the most important things this skull tells
us is how much we don't know."
In sections of the article titled "Many
Contradictions," and "No Certainty," paleontologists admit they
are not sure if the skull is from a female chimp or our missing
ancestor. "Is it actually a new hominid, or a variation of some
other previously identified species, or perhaps even an ape?"
Links to other articles dealing with similar
subjects appeared below the main story. Most of them also cast
doubt on currently embraced theories of the origin of man. For
example:
"A large set of specialized bone tools found
recently in a South African cave is forcing archaeologists to
rethink their ideas about when 'modern' human behavior emerged."
"An exquisitely preserved skull of a
tiny-brained human ancestor…calls into question a widely held
hypothesis that the evolution of big brains propelled the exodus
of early humans out of Africa."
Which raises an important question: How can
evolutionists have any credibility when all they do is change
their story?
The correct answer to that question is
simple: They can't.
The theory of evolution has become a
religious orthodoxy among its adherents, most of whom are
willing to commit intellectual martyrdom to champion the cause.
Evolution posits that man's origins can be
traced to bubbling ooze in a prehistoric swamp. Over hundreds of
millions of years, this ooze morphed into the complex life
forms, which now cover the earth while somehow managing to avoid
violating the laws of thermodynamics.
This is science fiction at its best.
Its proponents attempt to convince the
scientifically illiterate masses with what amounts to scientific
sleight of hand.
By using circular reasoning based on index
fossils found in the rock strata or employing suspect
radiometric dating methods such as potassium-argon or
rubidium-strontium, the multi-million year ages of fossils are
reported as fact. Anomalous results are often ignored or
unreported.
Dating methods that show the earth to be
relatively young -- the decay of the earth's magnetic field
yields an age for the earth of only 10,000 years -- are scoffed
at because a young earth doesn't fit their theory.
A few evolutionists have even gone so far as
to perpetrate frauds so they can demonstrate 'proof' that our
ancestors were all once knuckle-dragging simians.
Piltdown Man and Nebraska Man are two classic
examples from the early part of the 20th century.
Both were touted as missing links. Piltdown
Man turned out to be based on a fossil of a skull from modern
man and a jawbone from an orangutan. Nebraska Man was fabricated
from a pig's tooth.
Recently in 2000, evolutionists were duped by
what they thought was a half-bird half-dinosaur fossil
discovered in China. It turned out to be precisely that: half
bird and half dinosaur. A farmer had dug up two separate fossils
in a field and glued the two halves together.
When listening to the Darwinist's
ever-changing claims, I am reminded of Fox Mulder, the FBI agent
who was obsessed with solving "The X-Files." He too had a
deep-seated bias; only his was predicated upon belief in the
existence of extraterrestrial life.
"The Truth is Out There," was the mantra that
propelled him on his weekly quests into the realm of what
viewers knew was nothing more than science fiction.
Mulder was right about two things: the truth
is indeed out there if one knows where to look for it, and
"extraterrestrial" life does exist.
The Bible declares: "God said, 'Let Us make
man in Our image, according to Our likeness'."
And there's nothing phony about that.