Splitter, Screen and Tray Brush | Aluminum Black Foram Packing Tray |
Foram Type Slides | The Slide Pusher And Block With Glass Picking Tray |
Double Clip Holder | Green's Slides |
The hard to find item - and at such a reasonable price, better buy two today. These come on the market and then are not available for years. Next time we would like one of you to go through the development costs, manufacturing and marketing hassles but here it is in all its glory designed especially for the micropaleontologist but useful to other specialist as well e.g. isotope geologist, biologists sedimentologists and other small parts workers.
Most
Foraminifera are 1 mm in diameter or less so that the chutes were designed
for a safety
factor
of "3" .125 inches - 3.175 mm. Larger material will need to be looked
at separately. There are six
chutes on each side, three pans accompany the splitter for the purchase
price. Additional pans are
available.
A
brush designed especially for the micropaleontologist but also for the
sedimentologist. The
brass
end is designed for cleaning 3" dry screens. The adjustable sleeve
controls the stiffness of the brass
bristles so that all loose sand grains and forams stuck in the screen can
be easily brushed out. The nylon bristle
is useful in cleaning the picking tray, and the splitter receiving pans.
This is a convenient sized picking tray for the working area provided by most biological binocular microscopes. Trays are designed to increase work speed with small objects from cursory exam to detailed quantitative studies. These trays are constructed of aluminum and have been anodized black. There are 2 size grid trays available. A l cm x 1 cm grid (5 rows, 9 columns) and a 0.5cm x 0.5cm grid (10 rows, 18 columns) are imprinted on the tray used for quantitative counting.
Overall Dimensions 4.38" x 2.75" x 0.5"
Two additional aids for the professional micropaleontologist and hobbyist are the slide pusher (for' opening and closing slide holders and wood block with a glass picking tray. In industry it has been found by many paleontologists that the prepared sample can be examined more readily by laying the sample in a mound or in rows on the glass picking tray and pushing the grains and fossils across the glass slide with a disecting pick. This works well when the number of forams or micromount materialis low compared to the number of sand grains.
By brushing the sample material across the glass slide many otherwise unrecognized specimens can be observed by rolling and turning. The sand grains can be cast aside. When a specimen is deemedworth saving it can often be touched with the end of the dissecting needle. The static electricity on theneedle is generally enough to remove the specimen to the 1 x 3 cardboard slide. If the specimen does not adhere to the needle, the needle can be passed through the hair on the head (assuming the paleontologist is not bald). This increases the static electricity on the needle to the point where the specimen can conveniently be removed to the cardboard slide for later identification. If this still does not transfer the specimen from the sample to the slide, a dampened "OO" camels hair brush willgenerally do the trick. The platform for the cardboard 1 x 3 slide is so elevated that racking the microscope up and down to focus is not necessary.
The slide pusher is used to open and close the completed slide. The completed slide is composed of a 1 x 3 glass slide, an aluminum slide holder and the cardboard fossil slide sandwiched between the aluminum and glass. By gently pushing down on the aluminum slide clip on both bottom and topedges, the cardboard slide will be held firmly in place. The fossils can be held in the slide loose orglued down as preferred.
To open the slide for re-examination the fiat end of the slide pusher is inserted between the glass and aluminum and pushed sideways far enough so that the paleontologist can grasp the cardboard with a thumb and index finger. With loose unmounted material care must be taken to insure that the slide is not jarred and specimens lost.
Some
thoughts by a slightly used, balding, overstuffed paleontologist. Taxonomy
has been the
nemesis
of paleontologist for 2.5 centuries. Linneus certainly never saw
the advent of computers or the need
to keep straight more than a few hundred thousand species of living and
dead animals. The 10th edition
of Systema Naturae, 1758, a voluminous volume yielded only
a small percentage of the known species
of today. Even Linneus probably realized that the system would need
to be upgraded within a few decades.
Now, a quarter of a millennia later, we as professionals need to review
where we are in trying to handle the
multitude of data we have generated. We need to correct if we can,
the mental pain of organizing plant
and animal life as well as over 70,000 (+,-) species of the order Foraminifera.
Is this unthinkable? Why would anyone imagine that a better system might be possible? My experience as an economic paleontologist suggests to me that adjustments to the old system would be of value. The opportunity to take advantage of the modern computer, with its available software systems, is essential.
With 10 species per slide, room is available for more specimens than with the Curtin sixty square slide with twelve squares across the top.
The
utility of this system is that it is an open ended, accession number system
with each slide
containing
room for 10 species and four varieties each from four stratigraphic horizons
or geographic areas. For instance,
Elphidium
fax s.l. would be put in the Elphidium slide in square 3; Elphidium
fax ss. in square 3A; Elphidium
concinnum in 3B; Elphidium fax barbarense in 3C; Elphidium fax pingue 3D,
Elphidium excubitor 3E, ad infinitum.
The Bolivina H slide would carry species numbered from 11-20
and varieties of these species. Bolivina
Ill species would be 21-30, with variations and subspecies, in
the A, B, C ... rows. Note: Generic &
specific name changes can be logged into the computer and cross
indexed. But, the location of the species remains
unchanged either correctly or incorrectly, but you know where
you put it in your types. Each species square is divided into four
quadrants as illustrated below:
If more than four stratigraphic or geographic variants are needed to properly define all the speciesan Elphidiurn fax pingue a second Elphidium slide with a prime after the Elpkidium I [Elpkidium I' ] slideadds room for four more specimens of Elphidium fax pingue.
This system keeps all species, varieties, subspecies, age, and geographic
variants easily
accessible
and the taxonomy up to date. Perhaps there won't be a need for "The
New Taxonomy" after all. It may have
just arrived on your desk today. Type sheets are illustrated on the
next page. Record environmental, stratigraphic,
taxonomic, and nomenclatual information. These can be usedconveniently
with the new type slides.
GREEN'S
SLIDES
We now offer several types of slides as below:
(1)
18 ply 1-Hole - thickness 0.07511', 0.07508-0.07513**, 0.0005'**
(2)
18 ply 4-Hole - as above
(3)
28 ply 1-Hole - thickness 0.13200*
(4)
28 ply 4-Hole - as above
(5)
38 ply l-Hole - thickness 0.18900*
(6)
38 ply 4-Hole - as above
(7)
48 olv I Hole thickness 0.24600*
(8)
Type slides as described in our flyer
(9)
60 square assemblage slide [under development, two thicknesses planned
Note:
The
double clip is used to transfer specimens for comparison for placing specimens
in types
slides.
It is designed to hold only 18 ply slides. The spring under each slide
holds the examination surface at the
same elevation to reduce racking up and down.