Sermon Prepared for Messiah Lutheran Church
8:30 & 11:00 AM traditional services – 1/06/01
by Gregory S. Kaurin
Associate Pastor for Spiritual Care and Development
Text: Matthew 2:1-12
The Sermon:
Then
Foreign Astrologers Came
Bearing
Gifts of Gold, Smells and Embalming Fluids
go to: sermon menu
- or – sermon
archive – or - home page
As far back as I can
remember I’ve always been drawn to the story of the wise men. I think I was more curious about them than I
was about Santa Claus. I’m still drawn
to them; I think it’s a great story with lots of depth and meaning.
By
now we’ve all seen enough Christmas pageants and crèches (manger scenes) to
know what to expect. There are the
shepherds, one young one with his pipe, another carrying a lamb across his
shoulders, a relaxing cow and donkey.
There is Joseph on one knee holding his staff, and Mary holding her
heart. An angel looks on with her wings
outspread. And there are those three
kingly looking wise men. Often there is
a black fellow from Africa, an Asian man, and one very European-looking guy. We’ve seen this scene and story replayed so
often that I think we know it better than the story that’s actually written in
the Bible.
I
love this story! The more I dig into
it, the more meaning I find. Some of
that meaning comes from the traditions that have grown around it, but there is
even more when I peel back the layers of tradition that sometimes blind us to
what the Scriptures actually say.
Walk
with me through this story point-by-point.
This story happens after St. Matthew wrote how Joseph obeyed the
dream. He took Mary to his home—that
would be Bethlehem—and had no intercourse with her until she’d given
birth. When she did, he named the child
Jesus, accepting him as his own.
Then,
chapter 2, verse 1 starts out:
In the time of King Herod, after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea,
wise men from the East came to Jerusalem.
“After
Jesus was born, …wise men came.”
Because of the bluntness of the original Greek, I think the New
Jerusalem Bible was right to translate it this way: “After Jesus was born,
…wise men from the east suddenly showed up in Jerusalem.” Maybe it’s no big deal, but it may be a
first clue that, sometime after Jesus was born, wise men showed up in
Jerusalem before heading to Bethlehem.
We’ll come back to this.
It
doesn’t say in the Bible how many wise men there were: 2, 3, 5, 8, 20? We don’t know. The earliest records we have are two ancient Christian drawings
from about 150 AD. One depicts two wise
men, and the other shows four. Another
later drawing has twelve.
However,
only 100 years later, in about 250 AD, one of the Church Fathers—Origen was his
name—Father Origen wrote about the wise men, and he named them. He said their names were Balthasar, Melchior
and Gaspar. Other traditions gave them
names that were even tougher to pronounce,[i]
but Father Origen’s names are the ones that have stuck all these years.
In
about 550 AD artists were showing Balthasar as a middle-aged man with a black
beard, Gaspar as an elder man with a flowing white beard, and Melchior as a
beardless youth. Then, by 850 AD the
tradition split the three into different races. Balthasar was shown as an Asian, Gaspar as a white European and
Melchior as a black man from Africa.
Finally, the idea that these men were kings was a strong tradition by
1000 AD while Christianity was spreading wider and wider into different
languages and cultures.
Even
though this took about 1000 years to develop, this is a neat tradition that
pulls together and illustrates the Old Testament ideas and prophecies about all
nations and kings bowing to the kingship and divine authority of Israel’s
Messiah, the Christ. But peel back all
these layers of tradition and look again at that first verse of chapter two;
this Bible story is already rich and powerful on its own!
They
may have been from Persia. That has
probably been the strongest Christian notion.
Perhaps they were from Arabia.
That would have fulfilled a number of Old Testament expectations. Maybe they were Babylonian. There were still strong ties and relations
to the Jewish people from their old days of exile in Babylon, and Babylonians
had a strong, religious and almost scientific interest in the stars and skies,
and a curiosity as to how such things might affect the earth and its people.
The
point (Biblically, historically, traditionally, eternally) is that these magi
were foreigners, outsiders. From the
Jewish perspective, even from our own perspective, they were pagans. That means that of the first to bow to
Jesus’ kingship, the first to seek him out were foreigners, while the leaders
of his own people, who even knew the prophesy, were milling around this jealous
king, Herod, in Jerusalem!
Wise men from the east
came to Jerusalem asking, “Where is the child who has been born king of the
Jews? For we observed his star at its
rising and have come to pay him homage.”
These
wise men showed up at the doorstep where they expected to find a new king in
Judah, an heir to the Jewish throne.
They had seen a specific star rise.
(Notice they didn’t say that the star lead them, or that they had
followed it, to Jerusalem. A star rose
that lead them to the conclusion that an heir had been born to the Jewish
throne.) “So,” they said, “we are here
to pay our respects, our homage.”
You
will hear some people call these men astrologers and stargazers, to suggest
zodiac or fortune telling gypsies.
That’s only partially fair. For
them, it was broader than that. It was
a study, a curiosity, and a part of all that they studied as they tried to
understand their world.
They
studied and mapped the skies and assumed that there must be a connection: what
happened in the heavens must affect what happens on earth. So they would pay attention—not only to
heavenly happenings—but earthly occurrences.
Then, when they saw another similar occurrence happen in the sky, they
expected that the same or similar thing would happen on earth. For them it was a science, a science of
astronomical connections, and it was a part of their whole search for
knowledge, understanding and wisdom.
Martin
Luther, in the 1500’s spoke of the wise men, and this is what he said in one of
his sermons:
These Magi, or Wise Men,
were not kings, but learned men in the art of nature. Without a doubt they dabbled also in superstitions, for they
allowed themselves to be guided entirely by the course of the star. They were like philosophers in Greece, the priests
in Egypt, or the professors in our universities.
Every
once in a while, I like to remind my wife of what Martin Luther thought of
philosophy and professors in universities.
He went on to say:
Hidden away in their lore is something of Christ and the
way of life. These studies are no
longer being cultivated in our universities, and the peasants know more about
them than these professors who have become the devil’s mockingbirds. The Wise Men may have been called natural
scientists from the East, or professors of natural science from Arabia.[ii]
These
men came looking for an infant king.
Unfortunately, they assumed it would be the child of this very paranoid
King Herod, who by now had already killed family, friends and even wives because
of—both true and false—rumors and plots to take his throne.
When King Herod heard this, he was frightened, and all Jerusalem with
him; and calling together all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he
inquired of them where the Messiah was to be born. They told him, “In Bethlehem of Judea; for so it has been written
by the prophet: ‘And you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are by no means
least among the rulers of Judah; for from you shall come a ruler who is to
shepherd my people Israel.’”
This
infant king of Jews would sound to Herod like another dangerous rumor that
needed squashing. Worse than a rumor,
though, what if this prophecy was coming true?
So, he turned to advisors, Jewish scribes and such, “These fellows say a
star told them a Jewish king is born.
Such an event may be pointing to the coming of the great-anointed king,
the Messiah, you’ve told us about.
Where do our scriptures suggest that such an important king might be
born, if it’s not right here in my own house?”
There
are few specific suggestions in the Old Testament, especially ones that name a
specific town. If not Jerusalem, then
Micah proclaimed a great shepherding king would come from little Bethlehem.
Then Herod secretly called
for the wise men and learned from them the exact time when the star had
appeared. Then he sent them to
Bethlehem, saying, “Go and search diligently for the child; and when you have
found him, bring me word so that I may also go and pay him homage.”
This
is important in the story: Herod asked them when, exactly, the star
appeared. I think, and I think what St.
Matthew meant us to understand, was that Herod used that information to gauge
about how old this child was.
Later,
after this gospel lesson, the wise men left to their own country by another
road without sending any message back to Herod. He became enraged and used the knowledge that the wise men had
given about when the star appeared to send his soldiers into the Bethlehem
area, killing all infants who were two years and younger.[iii]
This suggests that the wise men had
seen and studied that star nearly two years before they showed up in Jerusalem.
If
so, then there is a great mystery behind the study and journey of these men
that we will never know. Why was it so
long? Did they have to convince their
own leaders about this birth and its importance? Were they sent as envoys, or ambassadors, for their own country
and king? Were they sent to bring gifts
for the sake of peace and international relations, …or even to open the
possibility of a future alliance?
Perhaps. In that day—with trade routes and a huge
history of wars and exile, and with Rome now dominating all of them—this would
have been a very big deal! So, they
went to Jerusalem, with such gifts and intentions, and found …nothing. What a great disappointment and
embarrassment that was. However, from
Israel’s own scriptures, they were given a new lead, and sent to Bethlehem.
When they had heard the
king, they set out; and there, ahead of them, went the star that they had seen
at its rising, until it stopped over the place where the child was. When they saw that the star had stopped they
were overwhelmed with joy. On entering
the house, they saw the child with Mary his mother; and they knelt down and
paid him homage.
They
were given more than a lead! After they
left Jerusalem and began the short (about six miles) journey to Bethlehem, the
star finally appeared again, apparently in a new and precise place that
confirmed and centered itself over Bethlehem.
It was so precise, the scripture says, that it pointed to the very house
where Jesus was.
But
wait, where was Jesus at this time?
Verse 11 tells us that the magi entered …they entered the …what? They entered the house and found the
child and his mother, Mary.[iv]
See
how things had changed for these wise men!
Their study and experience of the star, their disappointment in
Jerusalem, the strangeness of Herod, the confirmation of the Jewish scriptures,
all of this opened their minds and hearts to a completely different possibility. The whole experience opened their eyes to a
new vision, to this common, small-town house and child. Sent to find and leave gifts for the heir of
a throne, they fell down on their knees and left majestic gifts for this common
child!
The
shepherds had probably long-since bowed and worshipped. Angel choirs had finished their
strains. But now, even these
foreigners, with science and knowledge, mystery and superstition, stars, envoys
and dignitaries on behalf of countries, peoples and outsiders…even these were
bowing to this small infant in a house in little Bethlehem. Now, that is a powerful scene! To me, this is like a fulfillment of the
great universal longing for something more than ourselves.
I
look at the new-age section in bookstores, with all its stuff on the occults,
supernatural, paranormal, extraterrestrial, witchcraft, Wiccan religion, and
magic, and I see a usually mislead longing to be a part of something bigger,
deeper and more powerful. It’s a
longing that even misleads parts of Christianity.
I
look to the sciences and see a (usually more healthy) search for a deeper,
wider, more precise understanding of our place, where we stand, in relation and
within this universe.
That’s
the longing and search I see when I look at the wise men—bowing to the
child. I see all of this pointing to
Jesus, saying, “Here! Here it is! Here is for whom all our hearts and minds
are yearning and searching. In this
child …is everything!”
Then, opening their treasure chests, they offered him gifts of gold,
frankincense, and myrrh. And having
been warned in a dream not to return to Herod, they left for their own country
by another road.
Yes, these were
gifts one would give a king. Gold. Emissaries were often sent with treasures
and gold from one king or leader’s treasury to another. It wasn’t usually just about the value or
the weight of the gold. (This wasn’t
just a lump or bar of gold they brought Jesus.) It was the artistry, the shape and decoration of whatever gold
items they brought.
Frankincense was a
kind of incense made from a tree resin.
It was, and still is, burned during worship services, or during
ceremonial coronations. It was also one
of the ingredients in the Bible for the holy oil that was used to anoint kings
and priests of Israel.[v]
And finally
myrrh. Myrrh came from the sap of a
prickly shrub called the commiphora myrra. This was another ingredient of the holy oil described in the book
of Exodus. I could say nicely that it
was a perfume. That’s a bit lofty. I would probably be more exact in saying
that it was a deodorant, used so that rich people could smell better than
common peasants. In burial, myrrh was
used on bodies so that they would smell a little less dead. It also helped preserve the skin a little,
slowed down that process.
This somewhat morbid
and earthy myrrh was a great oil for anointing kings and priests. Besides smelling pleasant, myrrh was a
humbling reminder of mortality, “You may be king, but you’re human. You’ll die like the rest of us.” When given to Jesus, it was even more
significant.
Did you really
listen to our opening carol as you sang—“We Three Kings of Orient”—especially
that fourth stanza? It says:
Myrrh is mine; its bitter perfume
Breathes a life of gathering gloom
Sorrowing, sighing, bleeding, dying,
Sealed in the stone-cold tomb.
In this carol, myrrh
points to Jesus’ mortality, his death.
It makes the fifth stanza powerful:
Glorious now, behold him arise:
King and God and Sacrifice!
“Alleluia,” heaven and earth call out to each other, “Alleluia!” That is a great carol!
I’ve been on a
journey of a kind with these three kings, a journey of faith and learning. This story, among other things, has taught me
about faith and truth, real truth. Real
truth and faith do not depend on facts, at least not on human facts, as you and
I tend to call them. The magi were
probably not kings, but that does not diminish the carol of the Three Kings of
Orient; it does not make it any less true!
The carol sings Truth. It points
to Truth.
Let me put it this
way: Santa Claus and I have a very different relationship now that I am an
adult. But—especially after learning
all the rich stories and traditions that have grown around him—Santa is
probably more important, more real, true and valuable to me than ever
before. I sometimes miss my innocent
childhood acceptance, but I wouldn’t trade it for the deeply spiritual and
beautiful truths that Santa brings to me as an adult.
In the same way, we
can sing about the three kings with more zest and understanding, more truth,
than ever before. We have learned that
the Biblical magi did, truly, represent much more than just three kings bowing
at Jesus’ feet. They were all people, all
knowledge; they were us and all our longings mislead or otherwise; they were
all creation, stars, galaxies, stories, myths, philosophies, and sciences; they
were all this, and they were bowing to Jesus as the King.
I’m not saying that
the wise men necessarily converted from Zoroastrianism, or whatever their faith
was, into good Christian men from that day forward. I am saying that their witness in that moment to Jesus as the
Messiah, their witness to us, is bigger and more True than they could have ever
known.
It is a witness that
should drive us Christians to our knees every time it is told. If these pagans who began by looking for an
earthly king because of their science, superstition and a star could be lead to
fall to their knees, paying homage to that child in Bethlehem, then none of us
should be left standing!
If
even these pagans could see it, then there can be no doubt. This Child, Jesus of Nazareth, is the
King of kings! …We happen know that this Child is God. All knees bow. Amen.
go to: sermon menu
- or – sermon
archive – or - home page
[i] Like: Hormazdah, Yazdegerd, and Perozdl; or: Basanater, Hor, and Karsudand.
[ii] Martin Luther. “Herod,” in Martin Luther’s Christmas Book, ed. Roland H. Bainton, © 1948 by W.L. Jenkins.
[iii] Archaeologists’ estimates of the population in and around Bethlehem at this time range from 300-1000. Based on that, and the probable birth rate, some have guessed that the number of infants two years and younger may have ranged from 7 to 20+. Some have wondered why there are no other records of such a ‘massacre.’ After all the ‘important’ people that Herod had killed, sadly it is not be surprising that the killing of a number of small-town peasant infants would only be recorded in our scriptures.
[iv] It is possible that Joseph and Mary had by now found and were staying in a house. If so, then they may have already been to Jerusalem’s Temple for Mary’s purification and for Jesus’ presentation as described by Luke. And this would be shortly before the family’s move to Egypt. Depending upon when Jesus was born in relation to the star’s appearing, Jesus’ age may have been anything from newborn to two years.
[v] Exodus 30:22-38.