Remnants of the Contributions of
"DeltaOscarNovember"
on the (Not-so-)FreeRepublic.com
(and which are Monuments to the pathetic, cowardly Self-Censorship endemic to that Site)


[Note: The identity "DeltaOscarNovember," which posted from early Oct. 2001 until its banishment c. 15 Dec. '01, was the second reincarnation of "The Hyperbolic Observer (GLB)," which had posted from Oct. 2000 until its banishment c. 15 Aug. 2001. (The first reincarnation, "Wehrwolf_33," ( c. Sept. '01), was summarily banished without having had the opportunity to post.) Also see: The Hyperbolic Observer Website.]

Not-so-FreeRepublic .com "A Pseudo-Conservative News Forum"


[ Threads | Comments | Self-Search | Search | Topics / Post | Bookmark |Abuse | Settings | Help! ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Not-so-Free Republic  are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily representthe opinion of Not-so-FreeRepublic or its management.All materials postedherein ought not be protected by copyright law and the exemption for fairuse of copyrighted works; Not-so-FreeRepublic  rips-off published works everyday, so why shouldn't you?


[ http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3bcf5c9d6819.htm#6]

Check Our My Civil War Website

To: The Anti-Democrat; the irate magistrate; catfish1957

I'm glad to see the renewed interest in the history of the detention of Southerners by Federal authorities during the Civil War! The Federal dictatorship seems always to have detained a disproportionately high proportion of Southern and Appalachian folk, both then and now, but never more so than during the conflict of 1861-65. Hopefully, the history of the travail faced by Southern prisoners, in that most tragic of American conflicts, shall not be entirely eclipsed.
The prison at Johnson's Island was right on the lake, in a situation which afforded no natural protection against winds blowing in right off the ice, in a climate that can get down to -20oF. There, ill-dressed, ill-fed Southern prisoners performed slave labor in the limestone quarries (which were connected to the Federal war effort).

In the corner of the Cemetery right by the road, you will find the resting-place of one Lt. William Lash, of Florida. Now, I am sure that a  Floridian, having little more than a regulation uniform to wear under such climatic conditions,must have found -20oF somewhat insupportable. It would have been as though an Ohioan had been sent to a gulag in the Yukon.

As the Johnson's Island Confederate Cemetery is a Federal site, permission to the raise an appropriate flag on Confederate Memorial Day would probably be declined. Or, I should say, I haven't heard of any such commemorative  ceremonies being conducted. Given the current climate of "PC," in which communist-collaborationist organizations such as the NAACP are hell-bent on lobotomizing our nation's memory, such an appropriately dignified recognition seems as remote as ever. Given the absence of the appropriate dignities, and in defiance of "PC," Ishall take this opportunity to raise a banner which(unlike the famous but unfortunate battle standard of the Armyof Northern Virginia) has not been surrendered – that of Nathan Bedford Forrest:


Deo vindice.

— An Ohio "Copperhead,"
    D.O.N.
    (a Yankee who's come to his senses, and now realizes which side (CSA)
    was fighting to preserve traditional conceptions  ofAmerican liberty,
    as such were recognized by the Founders)

5 Posted on 10/18/200121:57:08 PDT by DeltaOscarNovember
[ Reply
| Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
[ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/554448/posts?page=26#26]  

Apocalypse now? "Dozens of Russia's nuclear weapons are missing"

To: DrTEJ; Dan Day

Cesium-137 is the isotope which contaminates the ground of the "Alienated Zone" just north of Chornobyl'. [FYI: This Zone is centered on where the  Pripet' crosses the Belarussian-Ukrainian frontier, and extends to a dozen-or-so kilometers on either side of the Pripet' (north of Chornobyl').] Clearly, cesium-137 is a prime candidate for use in a "dirty bomb." Such a bomb operates on the same priciple  as a stink-bomb, except that it uses a radioactive isotope, rather than a odoriferous chemical; the explosive with which it is packed serves mainly  as a propellant. As Dan Day suggests, the primary effect of such a cesium bomb would be that of rendering property useless, though it would have some long-term health effects on some.

Even more dangerous that a dirty bomb using cesium-137, however, would be a bomb of this sort made utilizing the much more dangerous isotopes of plutonium. A plutonium stinkbomb would have longer-lasting deleterious effects on property, plus catastrophic long- and short-term health effects for those exposed. A bomb using plutonium, or any other toxic radioactive isotope, doesn't have to be "nuclear" in the classical (mushroom-cloud-creating) sense, in order to be dangerous. Hence we see the concern with the "lost" plutonium stocks.

— D.O.N., Kiev

27 posted on 10/23/2001 04:32:06 PDT by DeltaOscarNovember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
[ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/560854/posts?page=49#49]

Route to riches: Afghanistan has huge strategic importance for the west

To: Black Jade; DainBramage; rebdov

Mountainous, landlocked, unpacified, and with a poor transportation infrastructure, Afghanistan is well worth circumventing. The author as much as admits that there are better routes for the Kazakh oil: through Russia, China, and Iran. To route oil through Afghan would imply that that oil is in transit to ports in Iran, China, or Pakistan. Yet if our relations with Iran were patched-up sufficiently (a good idea in and of itself) to be able to consider using that route, then the route may as well go directly to Iran – still circumventing Afghanistan. A similar case can be made in the case of China. Thus, talk of an "Afghan" route really boils down to the consideration of an "Afghan-Pakistani" route, that is, a route which would unnecessarily go through two unstable countries.

Personally, I would suggest a Russian (or Russian-Ukrainian) route. Such a route: (1) circumvents major mountain ranges, (2) actually goes directly west, towards Europe, (3) goes through states capable of providing heavy  security,and (4) goes through regions which have a workable transportation infrastructure (albeit somewhat rough by Western standards).

The author's logic in this piece, appearing in the lefty Guardian , is an obviously forced application of Marxian paradigmatic thinking. This particular piece of reductionism artlessly begs the issue of a primacy of economic (i.e. corporate) considerations. Given the context of the US intervention, in this instance (pursuant to 9-11), the Guardian 's formulistic attempt at economic reductionism is particularly maladroit.

— D.O.N., Kiev

50 posted on 10/31/01 17:50:40 PST by DeltaOscarNovember
[ Post Reply  | Private Reply  | To 1 | View Replies  | Report Abuse ]


[ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/562068/posts?page=5#5]

'Dirty bombs' could be potent terror tool

To: Theresa; TN4Liberty; DrTEJ; Dan Day; Publius6961

... the precise calibration that goes into making the material detonate properly is beyond all but the most sophisticated laboratories.

As I have previously pointed out (to "DrTEJ" and "Dan Day," and to "Publius6961"),a "dirty bomb" does not entail nuclear detonation. Given the necessary materials,a "dirty bomb" would be as easy to make as a Molotov  cocktail.As with that device, the main problem would be to avoid injuring  oneself whilemaking and deploying the device. As far as getting the device to operate inthe manner reasonably expected, that would not be a problem. Those who believe thatsubcritical-mass  concentrations of nuclear materials pose only a marginal danger, due to the near-impossibility of inducing an archetypical nuclear detonation from those materials, are living ina Fool's Paradise. The author of theself-contradictory article (above) as much as admits to the destructive potential of nuclear waste materials, in and of themselves:

... Goiania, the Brazilian city that in 1987 was contaminated by thieves who inadvertently stole a 20-gram capsule of highly radioactive cesium-137. ... In all, four persons died, 85 houses had to be destroyed and more than 125,000 drums of contaminated soil, clothing and other effects had to be  cartedaway.

Oh! Was that all? A glorified stink-bomb which would do by design  what those theives did inadvertantly, would be pretty damned destructive!  This is particularly so, considering the fact that deployment need only be a one-man operation.

6 posted on 11/2/016:22 AM Pacific by DeltaOscarNovember
[ Post Reply
| Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]  
[ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/564495/posts?page=249#249]

This thread is for preposterous comments NEVER BEFORE POSTED on FreeRepublic

To: Cai Della

This most desultory thread has provided me with a rare opportunity. As anAmerican who is partly of French ancestry, I'd like to express my appreciation for the profound respect which FReepers have always shown for the Gallic  race,the powerful state of France, its profound civilization, and its hospitable denizens. Truly, the French are exemplars worthy of imitation by all other peoples – including semi-barbarous Americans.

But FReepers ought not be so afraid, in their awe of all things French, to bring just criticism to bear upon the French, and to take them to task, on those rare occasions when French behavior may conceivably so warrant. I'm sure that the French, on their part, will bend a collective ear, and earnestly harken unto American criticism. Has a little constructive criticism ever hurt anyone? Learn to expect the humble gratitude of the French.

Finally, allow me to take up a collection to sponsor some of my distant cousins, in their endeavor to come here to advise us, on how we can  fix-up America's decadent and antiquated civilization. Yes, by golly,  what this country needs is French advisors to help turn things around! I'm sure that my fellow FReepers will enjoy the refreshing changes.Our first act will be to designate bleu d'Auvergne as the national cheese. And, of course, the proverbial cuisses will  be designatedthe national dish. Our new national motto: "Ils ne passeront pas!"

Please send your generous donations to: [email protected]. Be sure to mention "The French Tutelage Fund" as recipient. Thank you.

250 posted on 11/5/01 7:23 PM Pacific by DeltaOscarNovember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/566013/posts?page=25#25 ]

Israel Calls Iran 'Biggest Threat'...

To: Askel5; Mind-numbed Robot

Are you guys sure that you know anything, really, about that part  of the world of which you speak? You're barely even coherent! Between rants, you might try boning-up on the canons of rational, linear thought. Your hard-peddling of an outdated russophobia puts you in the same league with the often hilarious "Spirit of Truth." Get a grip.

— D.O.N., Kiev

24 posted on 11/07/01 21:42:05PST by DeltaOscarNovember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

[ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/567699/posts?page=60#60]

FreeRepublic: All Talk and No Action

To: harbinger of doom; EarlyBird

Ever think about letting freepers know there will be free cheese at the roundups?

Faaar out! What a great idea. I'm French (partly), so I'll bring the cheese, plus some baguettes and a dozen-or-so bottles of inexpensive cabernet. If one of you guys will bring the frog legs (plus maybe the beer and some chicks (I can't pick up chicks worth a damn, so you'll have to do that for me)), I'llsupply the cheese paraphernalia, and then we'll party! If that'll help FReeper activism, I'll do it. So help me I will!

So, what do you have going in NW/Central Ohio, or in Kiev (Ukraine), in the near future?

(P.S. Make mine either a Canadian or a Dutch beer, and either a French or a Ukrainian chick. You can do that for me, can't ya'? I hope you ain't just poopin' me on this.)

61 posted on 11/9/01 8:25 PM Pacific by DeltaOscarNovember
[ Post Reply
| Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
[Deleted thread?]

[On a thread pertaining to the course of US military action in Afghanistan:]

To this American observing events from afar*, there appear to be  three
[text absent]
Amongst these three schools, I believe that Powell's small-war/focused-war scenario represents the doable option.

There exists an ever-so-fine line, between earning the reputation  of a do-nothing, and earning the reputation of a "Hitlerian" madman. The U.S. shouldnot want to appear as either the worthless "punk" or the bully. Powell knows how to follow that fine line between the two extreme responses, more so than do the leaders of the other factions. The "nuke-the-entire-Mideast" crowd, which includes a "this-is-the-beginning-of-Armageddon" contingent, propose a course of action which, if actually carried-out, the U.S. would come later only to regret. Such a course of action would be no better than its opposite: that of simply "taking the hit" (of 11 September). In fact,I would just as soon take the hit, as to end the world on account of it. Fortunately,unlike most FReepers, I regard neither of these extreme coursesofaction asbeing necessary. As in so many human endeavors, the middlecourseisthe mostpromising (or, the least unpromising). Also, pertinent  to human endeavor: itisallowable to let whatever hatred and anger to inform your resolve,but not toallow it to cloud your thinking.

As for the reputed "94%-of-America-expand-the-war faction," I am not unused to the taking of a minority position, and becoming a member of a minority faction. If I am a "Menshevik" on this issue, well, then so be it. I'll learn to live with it. I will continue to criticize national policies which (I  feel) will prove to be counterproductive – so long as I retain the right to do so.

[*Note: I arrived in Kiev on 10 September, and have been following events from afar via the Internet.]

?? posted on 10/??/01 ?:?? ? M Pacific by DeltaOscarNovember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To ? | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
[Deleted thread?]

[On a thread pertaining to Stock Market recovery:]

To: Liberals are EvilSocialists!

...this is what Greenspan ahs been paranoid about for a long time. Treating the market like Vegas is a recipe for disaster...

If you're a friend of the central banksters, then I suggest that you change your handle. One of the central features of "socialism," and of its Fabian recension, contemporary "liberalism," lies in central bankers laying their mains morts over the free workings of the market, and over the discretion of independent bankers. 

Greenspan is an Establishment apparatchik who sold out  his supposed Randian roots long ago. His deliberate induction of a financial  holocaust, in what had been a vibrant economic sector (high tech), was a piece of Insider jobbery of the highest order. Millions of stock-holders  were robbed, in order to redirect
[text absent]

Basically, Greenspan's fetishistic strong dollar cannibalized billions of dollars' worth of capital off the market. The only people who stood to  gain from this was the vampire, Schlemiel ethno-caste who live off of their ownership of most of the debt, both public and private.

As for the argument that the Fed is necessary to prevent a replay  of the Great Depression: we've had the Fed since 1913. It wasn't worth a  Schtick then, in terms of preventing depressions, and it remains counterproductive even now.

Abolish the Federal Reserve Bank. Return control over the financial establishment to independent (i.e. without the Fed's official monopoly) private institutions, which, despite their reputation for cupidity, have  infinitely more integrity than central banks. Allow your hometown banker  the discretion to allow credit (and thus create new money) as he sees fit. Not only can you trust his judgement more than you can trust the Fed's, butalso, the creationof new money would be returned to a completely interpersonal level. Make those cowards in Congress do their Constitutional duty, to assign the dollar a value relative to an objective standard (such as a precious metal). Let the stock-holders (such as myself) run wild — it's good for the economy! Do you actually have some lurking fear of "capitalist" Liberty, "Liberals are EvilSocialists!"? You seem to fear all of Liberty's financial implications.

?? posted on 11/??/01 ?:?? ?M by DeltaOscarNovember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To ? | View Replies | Report Abuse ]


Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Not-so-Free Republic  are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily representthe opinion of Not-so-FreeRepublic or its management.All materials posted herein ought not be protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted  works; Not-so-FreeRepublic rips-off published works every day, so why shouldn'tyou?

[Threads | Comments | Self-Search |Search | Topics / Post | Bookmark | Abuse | Settings |Help!]


Not-so-FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
Poweredby Fuggus Forum (working name), Copyright2000-2001 Robinson-Douchebag Consulting, LLC; this istechnical preview 4.
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1