*****Also, so as to not bore you to death with the same thing over and over and over again, I will only show posts relevant to whatever the point is at the time. All of Brads posts are being archived to CD and DVD (not necessarily by me) as he uses the X-no-archive header to keep himself out of google.
| On October 6, 2001, Brad's first post to SPP seemed like he was testing the waters. Has his feel to it, but nothing telltale | From: Nomen
Nescio <[email protected]> X-No-Archive: No Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Subject: Is insanity hereditary? Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 23:00:08 +0200 (CEST) Just need to know |
| But then if anybody doubted Brad was back, that same day Brads "Science FAQ" was posted | Date: 6 Oct
2001 22:14:09 -0000 From: Anonymous <[email protected]> Subject: Facts on Psychotherapy (Science FAQ) Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Message-ID: [email protected] |
| Then, as if to hammer the point home with everybody, over the next few days, two of Brads socks replied, praising the "Science FAQ" | Date: Sun, 7
Oct 2001 08:40:03 -0700 From: AARG! Anonymous <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Facts on Psychotherapy (Science FAQ) Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Message-ID: [email protected] And Subject: Re: Facts on Psychotherapy
(Science FAQ) |
Brad the Troll? |
|
| On Brads second day, he begins his standard "both sides of the fence" troll. Only motive that makes any sense for something like this is to cause disruption in the group. Of course, this being Brad, the message get's posted twice, with pretty much the same messsage. | From:
Anonymous <[email protected]> X-No-Archive: Yes Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Subject: I want to be a psychologist Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 13:29:40 +0200 (CEST) And Date: 17 Oct 2001 03:36:17 -0000 I want to be a psychologist. How do I
go about becoming one? Looks |
| Later that day, he posts again. Considering Brad has been in SPP for approx 6 years, there can be no other explaination for his post other than to stir up trouble | From: Nomen
Nescio <[email protected]> Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Subject: Why all the hostility? Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 18:30:11 +0200 (CEST) Everytime I check this newsgroup it seems to be filled with hostility. What is the reason for this? |
Brad the antagonizer... |
|
| On Oct 10th, only Brads 5th day back,
he apparently decides to make an indirect but blatant
attack, obviously referring to past events in the forum. **THIS IS A PKB ALERT** |
Date: Wed,
10 Oct 2001 10:12:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Incognito Innominatus <[email protected]> Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Subject: The profession should abandon the Internet Message-ID: [email protected] I think that with the disgraceful history and behavior that has been shown by psychologists they would be best off just to leave the newsgroups altogether. They do not have even the composure to represent their business in a way that would generate business. |
| Also that day, Brad posts one of his signature "obvious to everyone..." posts without any verifiable facts to support his statement. This is just one of many of Brads logical failures. | Date: 10 Oct
2001 15:30:31 -0000 From: Anonymous <[email protected]> Subject: Psychologists can't Hack the Criticism Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Message-ID: [email protected] Obvious to everyone who has viewed this newsgroup for some time is the fact that psychologists cannot stand the scrutiny of scientific criticism. Evenmore telling is their inability to act in an appropriate manner. As"Patient of Doctor Nightmare" has said, this newsgroup does a valuable service exposing this fraudulent profession. |
Unfortunately it is time to say goodby to common sense, and hello to Brads world, aka PKB-ville