Even the Social Welfare programs benefited businesses. (details?)
The government implemented social welfare systems because social unrest was a serious threat. “The government remained aloof from the needs of the unemployed until there was a surge of political disorder.”
Listing of the ways in which government is favored toward business. As if it's a bad thing, many of these things are not even in the same field. For example, farming subsidies.
Lists the bailing out of a dying airline industry, while no attention is given to the individual employees who lost their jobs.
The government gave the spectrum rights to broadcasting companies for high definition channels, or for interactive digital channels. These were given, rather than sold. The government lost out on money because of their love for big business.

	In his article entitled “Bias of the Political System”, D. Stanley Eitzen states that the U.S. Government is biased toward big business, rather than the individual person, or even small business. Using very strong and powerful tactics, it is clear that Eitzen takes a negative position on this bias, as his words tend to obscure the actions and intentions of the government. In his article, Eitzen assumes an inverse relationship between public wellbeing corporate prosperity. While this is not completely untrue, the two are not complete opposites. In fact, public wellbeing and corporate prosperity go hand-in-hand, it's just that the success of big business can be seen as more of a half-assed means of public wellbeing.
	The article continues to demonstrate the government's willingness to assist big business as readily as possible, with a far less degree of energy toward the public as a whole. Later described in the “trickle down” approaches to stimulating economy, even then this money was given most readily to large corporations, who had the option to spend it on counterproductive investments, including those which allow the reduction of labor. The reason this is done is because large corporations are landmarks in our economy. The government does not necessarily give to corporations simply because they greedily demand it, but rather because their power derives from their use to society. All in all, big business is favored because of an omniscient sense of power they enjoy, but because these corporations are the backbone behind many of the functions of society.

Prior to reading the article, it was already very clear to me that such a bias exists. Knowing this, however, I feel that that Eitzen did a poor job in using the resources and arguments that are available, and had much room for more solid arguments.