|
Gay Uganda
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
Gay
Lesbian
Bisexual
Transgender Inter-sex Our Health Visiting Uganda ©GayUganda
|
Gay Uganda's Blog Dealing with issues lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgender and other sexual minorities in Uganda face. A Gay Ugandan and Organised Religion 30/11/2006
Recently Elton John stunned the world with a call to ban organised religion. It was a shock. The man is considered an icon in England. He is a virtuosso, accomplished, outspoken, and listened to. A peer of the country, and of course the rest of the accomplishments that we take to be necessary to be succesful. And he was calling time out on the one institution that is taken for granted as part of modern being. It was shocking. It was stunning. And it was hilarious- that is their reaction. I have looked on too frequently, seeing my gay friends try to find meaning in their spirituality. Besieged from all sides by the un-reasoning hate of organised religion. I have seen some fall on the way, have witnessed others literally dying in the wake of the seeming contradictions. Yes, I understood Sir Elton John. And what he said does have a deep resonance, not only with me, but with gay Ugandans, and most likely most gay people in the world. I am not Elton John. I do not have his influence, his charisma, his outspokeness. I do not have his seniority, and riches to thumb my nose at the world. But I am gay, and I hurt when religion does what it seems to do best with regards to being homosexual. Give us hate and hate unreturned. I was socialised deeply into my religion. Until I grew up, I literally identified myself with the religion of my parents as a right. It defined me, and I was confortable with that. That is, until I came to grips with my sexuality. A sexuality which this religion seems to vociferously condemn. In my formative years, I was deeply religious, a leader of my group. But the contradictions of what I believed and what was in me soon took its toll. I was seeing condemnation in all that I did. I could not have absolution in anything. I could not believe in a god, of anykind, because it seemed that my god would always condemn my being. It was a shock to understand that it was not actually a problem of my belief. It was a problem of my religion. That understanding led me down a path, first of exploration, then of deeply felt anger, and now of resigned understanding. I no longer have a problem with religion. It is religion which has a problem with me. I will not now go ahead and fight it- because I do not need to fight the shadows of my mind. And to me, what is more amazing is the fact that I have received my own 'salvation' and spiritual peace when I accept myself as a gay man. So, if I look on it all with this kind of disdain, why does religion have to fight what I am? Why am I to be considered the epitome of 'sinfulness'? Why is it in the interest of organised religion to hit out, long and consistently against me? I am gay. We are homosexuals, and thus different. We are a minority, and there in lies the problem. We are the kind of minority which lends itself as the perfect hate group for any community. We have been 'condemned' down the ages- by organised religion! We exist, in all groups of people. We are always a tiny, fascinating minority that the majority know next to nothing about. They wonder how we can be so different. As a minority, distinguished by a mainly secret sexual act, we are very, very easily attacked. Put it under the guise of 'morality' and you can preach endless summons to condemn it. Few will stand up to challenge you. You will know that the vast majority, having little formed opinion about this aspect of sexuality, will collectively believe whatever you say. And talk of political organising, and you have your perfect hate group- again. In Uganda, organising around homophobia takes the usual trend- it is 'sinful', 'foreign', 'imported culture' from the 'decadent west'. Hitler saw it as a pollution- and it was necessary to purify the master race. Individual 'straight' people may see it as a matter of personal 'choice', a taste that they do not have. But they can be organised to hate and fear those who are homosexuals. That they will taint and corrupt them. That they will 'recruit' their sons and daughters into homosexuality. During the 60s and 70s when gay people started angrily asserting their pride, the world wide 'Christian' faith was into a crisis. There was a challenge to its relevance, a challenge by the all inclusive modernity to this apparently medieval teaching. The choice that knowledge gave to the masses was and still is a challenge. Even I, born, taught and grown up in Uganda, I do have the chance to acquire as much knowledge as possible. I can, and do make informed decisions, on many things. Least of all my sexuality, but crucially, on the relevancy of what is being taught in Church or Mosque. I can challenge it. No longer is the priest god's representative on earth, or the imam the final arbitor. I can also see and know when they are wrong. As gay people took pride in what they are, and religion was in crisis, organised religion fell back on their time tested position. Get a good hate group, and affirm the values of hating it. Oh, it works. Akinola is not realy worried about the universal vice of corruption in Nigeria. But his 'leadership' in breaking apart the worldwide Anglican Communion is working- for him. Suddenly, in the face of the staleness of his religion, he is getting and affirming his position as a leader. Pastor Sempa is likewise jumping onto the bandwagon. He famously challenged all religious leaders in Uganda to join up and fight against this vice. (Besides urging us to 'embargo' South Africa because of its passage of the Civil Union Act. Madness incarnate). His is an un-ashamedly a political position. His backing is from the religious right in America, fundamentalists who are so convinced that they are right that they cannot debate the others point of view. And they are willing to fund whoever takes up arms for homophobia. When was homosexuality in Uganda a clear and present danger? (That is, except in the minds of Sempa and the Church of Uganda) It is a dilemma for the ordinary guy, me. What did I have to do with the debate in the Episcopal Church about the ordination of Robinson? It was, and remains abstract theology to me. Why should the Ugandan church see fit to be the leadership in this struggle? Why should I be the worst person on earth? In America they debate the issue. In Uganda, their is only space for one point of view- that of the homophobes. The media is not allowed to debate it at all. The 'Vagina Monologue' ban, and the fine for Radio Simba are very good examples. Both debates were not realy about homosexuality. One is about male partriachy, and the other was about HIV prevention. But both were not allowed to be presented or debated because they threatened to present a more rational debatable view of the subject. To present simple truthful information about homosexuality is not moral. To condemn it, that is what is moral. What it all boils down to is an organisation of homophobia which is currently beating our capacity to organise for our emancipation. And it is being led by religion- organised religion. So, should religion be banned? Absolutely! As long as it sees fit to propagate itself on the blood and bodies of homosexuals! I am sure Joshua of Nazareth would agree with me. He would spit and hurl the single word 'Pharisee!' in the face of Akinola, Sempa and other so called Christians. But this would be an over simplification. Organised religion has a way of throwing up real believers, who will literally take their lives into their hands on the strength of the fact of their faith. I am thinking of Desmond Tutu, literally stopping a crowd from lynching a person, single handedly. It was him against thousands, and the strength of that act resonates with me. He believes, and gives relevancy to the religion of Christianity. Dr Ssenyonjo of Uganda is another one. An elderly man, a pensioner, he has literally stuck to his guns about not condemning homosexuals. 'They are also Children of God'. Now, that is a statement worth of Joshua of Nazareth. Because Senyonjo would not endorse the Church of Uganda position condemning homosexuality, he has been literally defrocked. The only other thing they can do is to excommunicate him. Because he thinks differently on this issue; believing that love should triumph over hate. These are the people who make it worth the while believing. And of course the Episcopal Church is sticking to its guns, in the face of the backsliding of Ronan of Cantebury! That leaves me, a gay man, and an African, a Ugandan. Should I chuck organised religion? I can. Yet there are too many of my friends who are gay, and still find recourse in organised religion. They have spiritual satisfaction in the ideals it espouses, and they will stick there. They still believe, despite religions inssesant attacks on them. Gay men, and women, are also human being. We have an in-alienable right to believe and have a spiritual life. Ours is the right to believe as we should, because if we do not believe, then that would make us less than human. And we are human. We will continue to believe in what we can, in what we are. The organised religion will continue to seek to discredit us- as they fall further into the depths of irrelevancy. We will fight them, because they fight us. But as to denying us our humanity- we simply have to affirm that we are, and we are human. A hundred years from now, we will still be vindicated. We will remain gay, and human beings. Because that is something they cannot deny us. gug 2006-11-30 08:26:11 GMT
Comments (3 total)
Author:Anonymous
Gug, I am no theologian. I am not an expert on religion. But I do have religion, and so does my lover. Of the major organised religions of the world, there is none which teaches hate for others. In Chrisianity the religion with which I am most familiar, what is taught is love. Those who in the name of Christianity display hate towards homosexuals are themselves flouting the Christian ideal of love.
2006-11-30 10:22:00 GMT
Recently one Mr John Allen of the "All Things Catholic" a Roman Catholic publication published an interview with John Mary Waliggo of Uganda, whom Allen describes as "a widely influential African theologian and currently a member of his country's Human Rights Commission, an enormously appealing figure, with a ready smile, an infectious laugh, and a salty tongue. We need more theologians like him." This is an excerpt from that interview. Allen: "Is it true that Africans are more traditional on sexual morality?" Waliggo: "Yes, it is true. There's a basic cultural value in our heritage in which sexuality is sacred and respected. We talk about it in very clear terms. Things such as homosexuality are not just seen as sins, but as perversions. They're seen as hideous, they make you an outcast from your clan and village. If a man impregnates his sister, or if he has sex with another man, this is a kind of social sin which people believe will bring misery on the entire village, so he'd better just go away. This is what the people believe, and as a theologian you can't isolate yourself from society. The presence of Muslims is also very important. If you're a homosexual, they come to stone you. Those who practice traditional African religions would stone you too. The Catholics isolate you. If everyone agrees to that, who are we to reject it? We've had too much armchair theology in the church. We want to be synthesizers and prophets of the people." As a Christian I find it deplorable that a leader within the faith to which I belong should go public with comments of this kind. I cannot accept the Christian Bible's Old Testament as a reliable source for determining human interaction. It condones slavery, the suppression of women, and atrocities such as stoning for inane things like women entering the temple within a week of menstruation. I believe that the New Testament is what God wrote to correct the debasement of His divine laws that were manipulated over the years to suit greedy needs of individuals. Not all religious men were literate and not all scribes were saintly. Our faith comes from God, but our religion is human and is thus given to the failings of humanity. For the benefit of those gay men who believe, I say this: We had strayed so far from God's plan for us that He gave us His son, to clarify His plan with teachings like the Sermon on the Mount and the Parables by the Sea. Did Jesus cast any stones? As one without sin, He was most certainly in the position to do God's will, and yet he chose forgiveness and teaching. And to demonstrate God's commitment to us and love for us, Jesus gave himself up in the ultimate act of forgiveness.His greatest lesson. Hate and alienation have been slipping back into our religious beliefs and into our churches, and there will be no hope for us if we can't forgive each other and work together to help our neighbour. For none of us are without sin and everyone deserves a chance at forgiveness, otherwise we will not be living up to the example that Jesus set for us. Our continent is in dire need of help from poverty, from intolerance. The Church should be a respite from that, a safe haven where it does not matter if you are rich or poor or HIV+ or homosexual. Where mankind can come together with the common cause of doing no harm and saving humanity. Indeed, what Jesus would do. No, I do not support the scrapping of organised religion because I believe that there is a place for it in our lives even as gay men and women. The change should come from within organised religion itself. --Bunjo
Author:gug
Oh yes, and with the likes of John Mary Waligo to lead the way, that may not happen too soon. Religion, in my view does have a social function. Many social functions, that is why the likes of Tutu, Senyonjo and others are truly relevant. But they do not hide the likes of Ratsinger and Akinola and others, who are very much in the hatred mode. And it is a hatred mode, whatever they term it.
2006-11-30 12:21:03 GMT
Me, I will straddle the fence. I support your right to spirituality. Because you are a human being who happens to be homosexual. Your partner too. But on the other hand I hate it when the likes of Ratsinger and Sempa spout hatred in the name of their religion. I am fairly sure (from my own study of the book) that Joshua of Nazareth would not condone them. He would throw them out of the temple, with a whip. But, today, it is Ratzinger who lays claim to be God's Vicor on earth. And it is him who says what goes. It is him who for a billion catholics, is the interpreter of what is in the book. Whatever you think, whatever you say! Religion is relevant. To many; but its also very annoyingly subverted. gug gug
Author:Anonymous
In Nigeria, Akinola has been ranting about how un-African homosexuality is. Maybe he needs to be reminded that there is nothing African about his own fancy bishop's robes!
2006-11-30 15:33:21 GMT
Gug, you and I share the same aspiration. Where we differ is on the preferred solution, because I do not believe that abolishing organised religion will eliminate hatred and prejudice. The beauty of the Christian faith is that the likes of John Mary Waliggo and others do not have to take the lead in bringing about the change that is desired. You and I can take the lead. The Word of God applies equally to the hater as it does to the hated. The call to forgive applies equally to me who had been wronged as it does to those who do me wrong. I pray for forgiveness for those who hate me. I know that Jesus did not hate homosexuals. In fact He did not make any mention of homosexuals, not even once through out the Gospels. As I said before, religion is human and it is thus given to the failings of men. Hate, intolerance and prejudice do not come from religion itself. They are occasioned by the failings and insecurities of men. --Bunjo
|