Endoscopy

 

David Irabor

 

University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria

 

Surgical gastrointestinal

endoscopy in a tropical low

socio-economic population.

 

Key words:

Surgeon, Flexible endoscopy, Third world.

 

ABSTRACT

 

Introduction: Flexible fiberoptic endoscopy in this institution (University

College Hospital Ibadan Nigeria) had traditionally been performed by the

gastroenterologists of the internal medicine department. Thus surgical patients are

referred to the physicians to have endoscopy done. This situation was felt not to be

ideal by the author who believed that surgeons should be able to scope their own

patients for diagnostic and even therapeutic purposes.

Objectives: To demonstrate that surgeons are in a better position to scope their own

patients expediently, safely and satisfactorily. Also to share with others the scope

of indications for endoscopy that the average general surgeon in a developing

country may handle.

Methods: A prospective study noting the indications for endoscopy, the findings

at endoscopy and the demographic indices of the scoped patients by the single

surgeon-endoscopist over a period of 26 months.

Results: Roughly 2 patients per month were scoped. Mean age of 54 years. The

Male: Female ratio was 1.6: 1. Twenty-three gastroscopies were performed during

that period with carcinoma of the stomach, duodenitis and chronic duodenal ulcer

being most common findings. The 18 sigmoidoscopies yielded hemorrhoids, rectal

cancer and sigmoid colon cancer commonly while the colonoscopies yielded varied

conditions like carcinoma of the colon, diverticulosis, colonic Kaposi sarcoma and

studies that were grossly normal in 4 patients.

Conclusion: It is expedient and appropriate for surgeons to perform flexible

fiberoptic endoscopy. Formal or informal training can always be arranged for

interested residents.

Reduction of costs for scoping may encourage greater patient load.


 

INTRODUCTION

 

    Fiberoptic colonoscopy is about 43 years old now.

Improvement in instruments led rapidly to wide acceptance

of colonoscopy in diagnosis and therapy of colorectal

diseases1. The diagnosis of benign and malignant neoplasms

was revolutionized by colonoscopy. Flexible fiberoptic

endoscopes have now replaced rigid endoscopes because of

the enhanced safety, ease of application and ability to link to

a monitor (videoscopes) so that the patient may even follow

the procedure. The use of these flexible fiberoptic endoscopes

for both upper and lower gastrointestinal tract examinations

started in the University College Hospital Ibadan as far back

as 1986; however most of these examinations were carried

out by the physicians of the gastroenterology unit2. Some

sporadic endoscopies were done by one surgeon from 1989

to 1990, but when he left the service for another appointment

requests for endoscopy on surgical patients were sent to the

medical gastroenterologists. Recently, the hospital purchased

new scopes for the use of all stakeholders (gastrointestinal

surgeons, medical gastroenterologists, pulmonologists,

otorhinolaryngologists and thoracic surgeons). Now the surgical

gastroenterology division does its own endoscopy. Each unit

has its own day for doing endoscopy. The gastrointestinal

surgical unit has Friday morning and afternoon allocated for

endoscopy.

    This is the first report of the experience of a surgeon

performing both upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopies

in the University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria.

   

     MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

    The city of Ibadan has a population of about 2.5 million

inhabitants and the University College Hospital serves as

the only tertiary center in this city where flexible fiberoptic

endoscopy is performed. The surgical gastrointestinal diseases

commonly encountered in this locality that are appropriate

for endoscopy include bleeding duodenal or gastric ulcers,

carcinoma of the stomach, carcinoma of the esophagus,

haemorrhoids, fistula-in-ano and colorectal carcinoma.

      The endoscopy suite has Olympus gastrofiberscopes,

sigmoidoscopes and colonoscopes. Recently the Federal

Government of Nigeria through VAMED Consult purchased

some Pentax scopes (gastrofiberscope and sigmoidoscope) for

the endoscopy unit. All the scopes require an adaptor head to

convert them to videoscopes.

    Preparation of patients: About 75% of the patients are

scoped on outpatient basis. These patients present to the

surgical outpatients clinic on a Thursday and are scheduled for

endoscopy on a Friday one week from then. For the patients

requiring lower gastrointestinal endoscopy we usually prefer

the 5-day bowel preparation consisting of semisolid or liquid

diet, oral liquid paraffin 30 ml at night, bisacodyl (Dulcolax)

tablets; 2 at night for 2 days. For those patients on admission

we add daily enema saponis. During this period also, the

retroviral and hepatitis screenings are usually done. When the

patient is on the couch, an intravenous line is set up while

the nurses manually record the vital signs. We usually sedate

the patients with a cocktail of intravenous diazepam and

pentazocine. Patients for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

have additional atropine and buscopan injections.

 

     RESULTS.

 

     In the 26 month period (3-10-2003 to 31-12-2006) we

scoped 55 patients. This averages about 2 patients a month.

Their ages ranged from 19 to 85 years with a mean age of

54 years. The male: female ratio was 1.6: 1.Twenty-three

gastroscopies, 18 sigmoidoscopies and 14 colonoscopies were

performed during this period. For the gastroscopies, the age

range was from 30 to 85 years, with a mean of 56.4 years and

a male: female ratio of 1.5:1. The sigmoidoscopies showed

an age range of 33 to 78 years, a mean age of 51.6 years and

a male: female ratio of 1.6:1.Colonoscopy records showed an

age range of 19 to 72 years, a mean of 52.4 years and a male:

female ratio of 2.5:1.

     The outcomes of the various examinations are as follows:

     Upper GI endoscopy: Carcinoma of the stomach (7),

duodenitis (6), chronic duodenal ulcer (5), atrophic gastritis

(2), achalasia (1), reflux esophagitis (1) and carcinoma of the

first part of the duodenum (1). The patient with the achalasia

had to be abandoned as she regurgitated almost 600ml of

esophageal contents as soon as the scope was in her pharynx.

Thankfully she did not aspirate the contents and went on to do

barium swallow which showed a grossly dilated esophagus

with narrowing at the cardia.

     Sigmoidoscopy: Hemorrhoids (6), rectal cancer (2),

colon cancer (2), normal study (8) – the indications for these

were suspected rectovaginal fistula post-radiotherapy in a

patient with cervical cancer, fistula-in-ano, tenesmus, painful

defecation, rectosigmoid mass, left iliac fossa mass, bleeding

per rectum and 1 year follow-up after anterior resection for

rectosigmoid cancer.

     Colonoscopy: Carcinoma of the colon (4), post-excision

of a malignant rectal polyp (1), colonic diverticulosis (1),

nodular Kaposi sarcoma in transverse colon (1), hemorrhoids

(1), ulcerative colitis (2) and 4 normal studies of which 3 were

for constipation ?cause and 1 for a left flank mass. In one

patient the scope could not traverse the hepatic flexure of the

colon because of pain. The other patient in whom the scope

did not reach the caecum was the patient with Kaposi sarcoma

who had stenosis of the transverse colon lumen because of the

tumor.

     There were no complications in this series. Many of the

patients complained about abdominal bloating and cramps

after colonoscopy which were temporary. This was attributed

to the distension of the bowel by the insufflated gas during the

procedure.

 

    DISCUSSION.

 

    Tertiary hospitals all over the world have different

arrangements for ensuring endoscopic examination on their

patients. Some may have specialist endoscopists who are

neither physicians nor surgeons; others may have either

surgeons or physicians doing their own endoscopies. The

latter group seems to do a lot more of upper gastrointestinal

endoscopy3,4,5 while the surgeons who scope refer more to

the lower gastrointestinal tract6,7,8.

    While we have welcomed and enjoyed the use of these

flexible fiberoptic scopes, one has to admit that there have

been a lot of limitations. These limitations at present seem to

be outweighing the expected gains of these instruments.

    Limitations:

    Costs. The hospital fee for upper GI endoscopy is N15, 000

($115) while that of lower GI is N17, 500 ($135). In a country

where majority earn about $50-100 per month, it is difficult to

convince such patients to part with a month’s salary just for an

investigative procedure which may or may not lead to surgery

subsequently. This may also discourage population screening

for colorectal cancer. This is the main reason for the low yield

of patients.

    Biopsy forceps, size of specimen, interpretation by

pathologists. We have often had situations in which biopsies

are taken from obvious malignant-looking lesions only to

receive a pathology report saying acute inflammation. This

may be due to insufficient experience or technique in taking

biopsies via an endoscope but I also believe that some of the

biopsy forceps cups provided are too small to get deeper and

more meaningful bites. This experience has been noted by

other colonoscopists who suggest that adequate care should be

taken to obtain multiple biopsies from appropriate sites within

the lesion observed6.

    Poor bowel preparation. Occasionally we have had to

abandon the study because of impairment of the view by faeces.

This is not common and interestingly the 2 patients that were

abandoned were actually in-patients. Their bowel preparations

were re-ordered and they were scoped the subsequent week.

    Equipment factors. When there is breakdown of equipment

like a faulty monitor, we may face a long period (bureaucratic

red-tape) before such equipment is fixed or replaced. (I suppose

this happens in many government institutions). The added

weight of the adaptor-head on the scopes reduces their ease of

handling but this is still better than direct-viewing through the

eyepiece and allows teaching of medical students and resident

doctors. We are yet to be provided with pulse oximeters and

vital signs monitors but there is hope that sooner than later

these will be provided.

 

REFERENCES

 

    Training of personnel. At present there are only 2 doctors

performing the gastrointestinal endoscopies; a consultant

gastroenterologist and a consultant gastrointestinal surgeon.

We receive consults from all the other specialties in the

hospital. In order to avoid overtaxing the few endoscopists

available it is advisable that the hospital sponsors resident

doctors and interested consultants for training workshops.

(The author had to sponsor himself for training abroad after

his applications to the hospital and the College of Medicine

were turned down due to ‘lack of funds’). The nursing

staff in the endoscopy suite should also be sent for regular

workshops which should be sponsored by the suppliers of

these equipments. The practice of moving nurses to different

sections every year should be frowned upon as skilled staff

are moved on while ‘green’ staff are brought in. By the time

the greenhorns have acquired the endoscopy suite experience

they are moved again and the cycle begins. Where the author

was privileged to train they had dedicated endoscopy nurses

who were stationed there permanently. The author believes

that surgeons have the skills to scope safely and adequately7

and with training should be doing their own examinations and

also training their residents.

    Utility. The author believes the scopes are not utilized to

their full capacity. For instance these scopes are not yet used

for emergency cases for therapeutic purposes e.g. clipping or

cauterization of a bleeding duodenal ulcer and rubber-band

ligation of bleeding esophageal varices with the gastroscope.

The lower gastrointestinal scopes are yet to snare colonic

polyps or be used in reducing early volvulus of the colon.

In some other teaching hospitals in Nigeria where a lot of

experience has been gained, emergency uses of flexible scopes

have been reported8. There are also no paediatric scopes

available although some authors have reported that adult

scopes can be used safely in children9,10.

    In conclusion, the benefits of flexible fiberoptic

gastrointestinal endoscopy can be really enormous and

rewarding to both the patients and the surgeon-endoscopist

if many more doctors are trained in this discipline, dedicated

nurses are allowed to stay permanently in this discipline

and make a career of it and lastly administrative delays are

minimized when equipment needs to be repaired or changed

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1