Alimentary tract and pancreas

Alimentarni trakt i pankreas

ARCH GASTROENTEROHEPATOL 2001; 20 ( No 3 – 4 ):

 

                     

Editorial

 

The non-H pylori helicobacters in humans: New developments

 

Pripadnici porodice Helicobacter različiti od Helicobacter pylori: Novi razvoji

 

( accepted December 28th 2001)

 

 

Tomica Milosavljevic

 

Institute of Digestive Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade

 

 

Address correspondence to: Profesor Dr Tomica Milosavljević

                                             Institute of Digestive Diseases

                                             Koste Todorovica 6 St.

                                             YU-11000 Beograd, Serbia, Yugoslavia

                                              Tel/Fax + 381 11 3614744

                                              E-mail: [email protected]

 

……………….                                              ……………..

Non-Helicobacter pylori and alimentary tract       Gastroenteroloska sekcija SLD-

                                                                                    01722, 2001.

 

 

The discovery of Helicobacter pylori increased interest in the range of other spiral bacteria in the stomach, but also in the other parts of the alimentary tract (1,2). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has provided to us to define new members of Helicobacter family. Table 1.

 Today, at least 24 formally named Helicobacters have been identified and an additional 35 or more novel Helicobacters await formal naming. Helicobacter pylori is the best known and the most important in terms of global impact on human disease. However, two other gastric Helicobacters, H.heilmannii and H.felis, are associated with gastric disease in humans and are worthy of discussion.

Nineteen named species colonise the lower intestinal tract of animals, many of which also colonise humans (3,4,5,6,7).

 

Gastric disorders

In 1987, Dent et al described the presence of a novel bacterium in 3/1300 gastric biopsies (8). The initial differentiation was based on morphology, the bacterium having a larger tight helical shape compared to the S shape of H.pylori. Subsequent studies have shown that while rarely found in humans it is the dominant gastric organism in a number of animal species including primates, pigs, cats, and dogs. Although first given the name Gastrospirillum hominis this gastric bacterium has subsequently been shown to belong to the Helicobacter genus and has been given the provisional name of Helicobacter heilmannii (9,10,11,12,13).

The gastritis observed with H.heilmannii infection tends to be less severe than that due to H. pylori,  but infection has been found in association with duodenal ulceration, gastric ulceration, gastric carcinoma and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Indeed, a surprisingly high rate (3.4%) of  MALT lymphomas in H.heilmannii infected patients was noted (14). The majority of patients are asymptomatic; however, epigastric pain or discomfort, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, diarrhoea, and occasionally gastrointestinal bleeding may occur. At gastroscopy, findings range from a normal appearance to antral erythema, erosive gastritis, gastric ulceration, duodenal erosions, and ulceration.

Gastric lymphoid nodules have been reported in cases of H.heilmannii infection in children as is the case with H.pylori. The gastritis is characterised histologically by an infiltrate of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, lymphocytes, and plasma cells in the lamina propria.

Serology for H.pylori and rapid urease tests can be relatively insensitive, the later probably related to the patchy nature of H.heilmannii colonisation and low numbers of bacteria present when compared with H.pylori. Large numbers of attempts to culture this bacterium using a variety of media and growth conditions have  been unsuccessful.

            One group has reported on culture of a similar organism from humans, though molecular studies indicate this bacterium is Helicobacter bizzozeronii, an organism normally found in canine gastric mucosa. H.heilmannii can however be readily maintained by in vivo culture techniques in mice.  As it is generally easier to eradicate H.heilmannii than H.pylori the best approach would be to over a standard course of anti H.pylori therapy to any patient in which a non-H.pylori gastric helicobacter is detected. wide range of very distinct bacterial populations. Although varying in size and amplitude, all had in common a spiral shape . We reasoned that this morphology gave the bacteria a selective advantage in the viscous mucous environment. Following the discovery of H.pylori  the bacterium’s morphology led us to suggest that its natural habitat was the gastric mucous. Many of these spiral bacteria have since been classified as belonging to the Helicobacter genus, which is hardly surprising given that gut mucous is their natural habitat. These species include Helicobacter bilis, Helicobacter hepaticus,and Helicobacter muridarum that are naturally found in s.mall rodents, Helicobacter cinaedi and Helicobacter cholecystus in gerbils and hamsters (hrcak), Helicobacter pullorum and Helicobacter pametensis in chickens and birds, and Helicobacter canis in dogs.

 

 

 

Enteric disorders

It is possible that Helicobacter species are under recognized causes of infective diarrhoea in humans today due to the specialised methods required for their isolation. Helicobacters cultured from human diarrhoeal samples include H. cinaedi, H.canis, H.pullorum, H.fennelliae, H.canadensis, H.rappini and other unclassified but related organisms. The presence of Helicobacter species in a diarrhoeal specimen is not proof of causality.

Helicobacter cinaedi and Helicobacter fennelliae   Initially these bacteria were isolated from faeces of HIV infected homosexual man suffering from colitis and proctitis. The sigmoidoscopic and histopathologic findings were similar to those with Campylobacter jejuni infection. Although most additional bacteria have since been isolated from immunocompromised patients, H.cinaedi and H. fennelliae were also recovered from stools of immunocompetent heterosexual men, women, and children. It is likely that this cluster of H cinaedi and H fennelliae cases was first recognised in homosexual men because of sexual behaviours that increase the risk of faecal–oral and mucosa– mucosa transmission. As the natural hosts for H cinaedi are thought to be gerbils (rodent, vrsta glodara) and hamsters (hrcak), the authors speculate that a zoonosis resulting from contact with these animals may have been the initial source.

             Helicobacter pullorum  This campylobacter-like organism is originally isolated from intestinal content of asymptomatic poultry, and from the livers and faeces of hens (zivine) presented with hepatic lesions. Later on H.pullorum was discovered from the carcasses ( telo zaklane zivine) with a prevalence of 60%. This bacteria is isolated from patients suffering from mild to severe diarrhoea suggesting a possible zoonosis. Recent detailed analysis of four H.pullorum isolates from Canadian patients presenting with diarrhoea showed they possessed atypical biochemical features and could be differentiated from H.pullorum on the basis of 16S rRNA sequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Based on this data the name Helicobacter canadensis has been proposed for this group of organisms.

Helicobacter rappini  This bacterium ( originally named: Flexispira rappini)  was originally isolated from aborted sheep foetuses.  H.rappini was later shown to be part of the faecal flora of dogs, cats, and rabbits. In humans, is has been isolated from patients suffering from either mild chronic diarrhoea, bacteriemia, or pneumonia involving both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals.

In summary, H.cinaedi and H.fennelliae are helicobacters species most frequently isolated from human colonic samples and for which there is definite evidence of pathogenicity. The role of the four other Helicobacter species in human disease has to be determined.

A substantial body of evidence suggests that bacterial antigens are key contributors to the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a genetically or immunologically predisposed host. Recently, murine models have clearly shown that if the normal immune balances are altered then mucosa associated Helicobacter species induce  a pathology similar to human IBD. This is possibly due to their location in mucous, the microbial niche closest to the susceptible mucosa. Whether an analogous process occurs  in humans is unclear. Helicobacter species have not consistently been isolated from IBD patients.

 

Hepatobilary infections and their significance

In recent years, new Helicobacter species have been islolated from the livers of wide variety of animals and have been associated with hepatic disease.  It is possible that intestinal Helicobacter species can enter the bloodstream, particularly in immunocompromised individuals, and thus it would be expected that these organisms could end up in the liver (18,19).

In murine models, the intestinal Helicobacters have been observed to translocate to the liver where viable infection may be associated with inflammation and/or neoplastic change. The hypothesis that Helicobacters infect the human intestine, liver, or biliary tree and may be responsible for previously unexplained human pathology is certainly very attractive. However, despite detection of helicobacter 16s ribosomal DNA (16s rDNA) by multiple investigators in human hepatic and biliary tissue by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) there have been no published accounts of the culture or consistent ultrastructural identification of Helicobacters from these tissues. This is in contrast to the relative ease with which Helicobacters have been cultured from animal liver tissue. In the absence of the direct isolation of bacteria there are several reasons to be cautious in the interpretation of these PCR based studies. Firstly, the results of these studies have often been conflicting. For example, Fox et al detected Helicobacter 16s rDNA in 13 of 23 bile samples and 9 of 23 resected gall bladder tissues from Chilean women with chronic cholecystitis (20). In contrast, Rudi et al were not able to detect any helicobacter DNA in bile samples from 73 Germans with biliary disease (21). Nilsson et al reported positive Helicobacter PCR in 11 of 12 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis whereas Tanaka et al demonstrated Helicobacter DNA in only 1 of 29 PBC cases and Harada et al in 0 of 5 cases using a PCR cloning methodology (23,24). The main exception to this criticism has been the detection of helicobacter DNA in a majority of primary hepatic and biliary cancers. Some of these anomalies may be explained by geographic and clinical differences in the populations studied. In addition, many of these studies do not report the results of PCR for other bacterial species and, when they do so, a plethora of other (possibly contaminating) bacterial species is discovered. Interestingly, the gene sequence obtained from positive Helicobacter species specific 16s rDNA PCRs is usually most analogous to H.pylori. This raises the possibility that the presence of helicobacter DNA in human liver tissue is a reflection of the transport of H.pylori of gastric origin or its DNA to the liver. At present this hypothesis is speculative. It  is important to note that this region of the 16S rRNA gene is not highly variable amongst different Helicobacter species and so the evidence to date does not preclude the presence of another human gut Helicobacter species. Two studies did however indicate that intestinal Helicobacters may be implicated in hepatobiliary disease.  Accurate species determination was only reported in the study by Fox et al where they were able to identify H.bilis, H.pullorum, and H.rappini with no detection of H.pylori.  To make further progress, future studies should include an attempt to culture and directly identify Helicobacters ultrastructurally in the hepatobiliary system, in addition to assessing gastric Helicobacter status.

 

            Conclusion

Over the past 20 years, the genus Helicobacter has evolved rapidly due to isolation of novel species from a wide range of animals and humans. The genus now includes at least 24 formally named species as well as numerous other Helicobacters not formally named. Nineteen of these formally named Helicobacters are found in the intestinal mucus of animals, eight in humans, and two in birds.

The situation in the stomach is clear. Like H.pylori in the human, animals have highly specialised populations of Helicobacters that have evolved to inhabit the ecological niche of gastric mucous. These animal organisms can transmit to humans and it is likely they cause symptomatic disease. There is strong evidence that pet (kucni ljubimci) carnivores are possible sourse for this infection.

The recent recovery of different Helicobacter  species from both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients suffering from enteric and hepatic disease raises the question about the origin and the impact of these infections. Most animals also have highly adapted populations of Helicobacter species inhabiting their intestinal mucous. In some circumstances, if these bacteria move outside their natural niche they can cause disease—for example, hepatitis in the mouse. If normal homeostasis is altered they can cause severe pathology within their natural niche—for example, inflammatory bowel disease in immunocompromised mice. Yet the intestinal Helicobacters of animals have been found in humans where they are able to induce gastrointestinal symptoms and translocate into the bloodstream. The implication is that these bacteria are transmitted to humans from animals. Systematic study of these bacteria using appropriate isolation and identification methods is needed in both health and disease. Only then will we know whether the discovery of these bacteria will influence the management of intestinal and systemic disease in the dramatic way that the discovery of H.pylori impacted on the management of gastroduodenal disease.

Many of the Helicobacters can also colonise the biliary tract of the liver and induce hepatitis (and in some cases hepatic cancer) or cause bacteraemia and systemic disease in immunocompromised hosts. Discovery of these Helicobacters provides the scientific community with an excellent opportunity to study and better understand the finely balanced ecological relationship between these bacteria which persistently colonise the gastrointestinal tract and their effect on the host. Infection with Helicobacter species and their associated diseases in numerous hosts allow us the means to assess pathogenic mechanisms. In vivo models are also being used to develop various therapeutic and prophylactic modalities to eradicate or prevent Helicobacter induced gastrointestinal disease in humans. In addition, it is important to study the epidemiology of Helicobacters and their zoonotic potential as well as to identify novel Helicobacter species and their possible associations.

 

       REFERENCES:

 

  1. Warren JR. Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis. Lancet 1983;1:1273.
  2. Marshall B. Unidentified curved bacillus on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis/Lancet 1983;1:1273-5.
  3.  Andersen LP, Norgaard A, Holck S, et al. Isolation of a Helicobacter

heilmanii-like organism from the human stomach. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect

Dis 1996;15:95–96.

  1. Michaud L, Ategbo S, Gottrand F, et al. Nodular gastritis associated with

Helicobacter helmannii infection. Lancet 1995;346:1499.

 

5. Zhang YL, Yamada N,Wen M, et al. Gastrospirillum hominis and Helicobacter pylori infection in Thai individuals—comparison of histopathological changes of gastric mucosa. Pathol Int 1998;48:507–11.

           

 6. Stolte M, Kroher G,Meining A, et al. Comparison of Helicobacter pylori and H. heilmannii gastritis—matched control study involving 404 patients.

Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:28–33.

 

7. Akin OY, Tsou VM, Werner AL. Gastrospirillum hominis-associated chronic active gastritis. Pediat Pathol Lab Med 1995;15:429–35.

 

8. Dent JC, McNulty CAM, UV JC, et al. Spiral organisms in the gastric

antrum. Lancet 1987;2:96.

 

9.  Morgner A, BayerdorVer E, Meining A, et al. Helicobacter heilmannii and gastric cancer. Lancet 1995;346:511–12.

 

10. Andersen LP, Norgaard A, Holck S, et al. Isolation of a Helicobacter

heilmanii-like organism from the human stomach. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect

Dis 1996;15:95–96.

 

11. Fox JD, Schauer DB, Wadstrom T. Enterohepatic Helicobacter spp.     Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 2001; 17(Suppl 1): S28-S31.

 

12. O’Rourke JL, Grehan M, Lee A. Non-pylori helicobacter species in humans.Gut 2001; 49:601-606.

 

13.Lee A, O’RourkeJ. Gastric bacteria other than Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 1993;22:21-42.

 

14. Morgner A, Lehn N, Andersen LP, et al. Helicobacter helmannii –associated primary gastric low-grade MALT lymphoma:Complete remission after curing the infection. Gastroenterology 2000;118:821-8.

 

15. SolnickJV, Schauer DB. Emergence of diverse Helicobacter species in the pathogenesis of gastric and enterohepatic diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001;14:59-97.

 

16.Dewirst FE, Fox JG, Mendes EN, et al. Flexipira rappini strains represent at least 10 Helicobacter taxa. Int J Syst Bacteriol 2000;50:1781-1787.

 

17. Fox JG, Chien CC, Dewhirst FE, et al. Helicobacter canadiensis sp.nov. isolated from humans with diarrhea: an example of an emerging pathogen. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:2546-2549.

 

18. Mendez-Sanchez N, Pichardo R, Gonzales J, et al. Lack of association between Helicobacter sp. Colonization and gallstone disease J Clin Gastroenterol 2001;32:138-141.

 

19. Saunders KE, Shen Z, Dewhirst FE, et al. Novel intestinal Helicobacter species isolated from cotton-tap tammarins ( Sanguinus Oedipus) with chronic colitis. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:146-151.

 

20. Fox JG, Yan LL, Dewhirst FE, et al. Helicobacter bilis sp.nov., a novel Helicobacter isolated from bile, livers, and intestines of aged, inbred mice. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:445-454.

 

21. Rudi J, Rudy A, Maiwald M, et al. Helicobacter sp are not detectable in

bile from German patients with biliary disease. Gastroenterology 1999;116:1016–17.

 

22. Nilsson HO, Taneera J, Castedal M , et al. Identification of Helicobacter

pylori and other Helicobacter species by PCR, hybridization, and partial DNA sequencing in human liver samples from patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis or primary biliary cirrhosis. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:1072–6.

 

23. Tanaka MA, Saitoh T, Narita T , et al. Gastrospirillum

hominis-associated gastritis: the first reported case in Japan. J Gastroenterol 1994;29:199–202.

 

24. Harada K, Ozaki  S, Kono N, et al. Frequent molecular identification of Campylobacter but not Helicobacter genus in bile and biliary epithelium in hepaticolithiasis. J Pathol 2001; 193:218-223.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1.

Non- Helicobacter pylori helicobacters isolated from humans (as of 2001)

 

 

 “H. rappini”* Sheep, dog, mice intestine, blood (humans); liver (sheep); stomach (dogs)

 

H.canis* Dog, cat intestine, blood (humans); liver (dog)

 

H.cinaedi* Hamster, rhesus monkey, dog intestine, blood, soft tissue, joints (humans); liver (monkey)

 

H.fennelliae Dog, macaque intestine, blood

 

H.pullorum* Chicken intestine, liver (chicken)

 

H.canadensis NR** Intestine NR

 

H.westmeadii NR NR Blood

 

H.winghamensis NR Intestine NR

 

“H.heilmannii”* Dogs, cats, monkeys, cheetahs, wild rats, swine stomach NR

 

H.felis* Dogs, cats, cheetahs stomach, NR

 

 

*Potentially zoonosis

  NR, not recorded.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1