| AFTERMATH: | ||||||||||||||||||
| After printing and distributing our newsletter, we had some feedback. Thus, the second document is a letter received from a Reader's Digest editor. Click below to view images scanned from that letter. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Image 11 Image 12 Image 13 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Image 7 Image 8 Image 9 Image 10 |
||||||||||||||||||
| The third document is a similar letter from Science Digest. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Image 14 Image 15 |
||||||||||||||||||
| The fourth is a notarized document making reference to the first three. |
||||||||||||||||||
| Image 6 Image 6A Image 6B |
||||||||||||||||||
| All of the first three documents, and the final notarization, predate the formation of the Greenspan commission. The writer has kept these documents for more than two decades. He has grown fond of them and would hate to see them disappear or have something happen to them. And the notarized document has a raised seal on it which is impressive but which doesn not show up in the gif images. Therefore some time prior to February 27, 2004, he removed all four of the documents which he'd scanned from his apartment He placed them in a location that he hoped would be more secure and beyond the rapacious grasp of Chairman Greenspan. After completing the first writing of the above article, we thought it might deserve an expanded treatment; and so, if possible, we planned to fill out the story of athe '82 Greenspan Commission with more details at a later date. Last modified November 14, 2004. |
||||||||||||||||||