|
Engels |
|
I |
|
Florida
I
Three hundred years have rolled by since
the hour
II
Peace to my brethren I shall not proclaim;
III
Well, then! And so for the last time I
will
Letter of Engels to Friedrich Graeber, 01.20.1839. Text
extracted of http://marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1839/letters/39_01_20.htm
|
|
II |
|
"Justice", "humanity", "freedom",
"equality", "fraternity", "independence" --
so far we have found nothing in the pan-Slavist manifesto but these more
or less ehtical categories, whcih sound very fine, it is true, but prove
absolutely nothing in historical and political questions.
"Justice", "humanity", "freedom", etc., may
demand this or that a thousand times over; but if the thing is impossible
it does not take place and in spite of everything remaains an "empty
figment of a dream". The pan-Slavists' illusions ought to have
understood that all pious wishes and beautiful dreams are of no avail
against the iron reality, adn that their policy at any time was no more
the "policy of revolution" than was that of the French Republic.
Nevertheless, today, in January 1849, they still come to us with the same
old phrases, in the content of whcih Western Europe has been disillusioned
by the bloodiest counter-revolution!
Just a word about "universal fraternal union of
peoples" and the drawing of "boundaries established by the
sovereign will of the peoples themselves on the basis of their national
characteristics". The United States and Mexico are two republics, in
both of which the people is sovereign.
How did it happen that over Texas a war broke out
between these two republics, whcih, according to the moral theory,
ought to have been "fraternally united" and "federated",
and that, owing to "geographical, commercial and strategical
necessities", the "sovereign will" of the American people,
supported by the bravery of the American volunteers, shifted theboundaries
drawn by nature some hundreds of miles further south? And will Bakunin
accuse the Americans of a "war of conquest", which, although it
deals with a severe blow to his theory based on "justice and humanity",
was nevertheless waged wholly and solely in the interest of civilization?
Or is it perhaps unfortunate that splendid California has been taken away
from the lazy Mexicans, who could not do anything with it? That the
energetic yankees by rapid exploitation of the California gold mines will
increase the means of circulation, in a few years will concentrate a dense
population and extensive trade at the most suitable places on the coast of
the Pacific Ocean, create large cities, open up communications by
steamship, contruct a railway from New York to San Francisco, for the
first time really open the Pacific Ocean to civilization, and for the
third time in history give the world trade a new direction? The "independence"
of a few Spanish Californians and Texans may suffer because of it, in some
places "justice" and other moral principles may be violated; but
what does that amtter to such facts of world-historic significance?
Reply of Engels
in the New Renana Gazette, n. 222, of 02.15.1848 - periodical
established by him and Karl Marx - to Apelo to the Slavs, of
Bakunin, where this claims for the friendship between the peoples and the
respect to the borders of the States. Integral text can be
accessed in http://csf.colorado.edu/psn/marx/Archive/1848-NRZ/nrz60.html |
|
. |
|