Here is Volume I of our newsletter.  To make it easier to navigate through this long document, the different issues are color-coded (May, July, August, September, October, November, December)

Friends Of Virgin, Inc.
P.O. Box 790005
Virgin, Utah 84779-0005
www.friendsofvirgin.com

President: Lee Ballard	Treasurer: Sandra Grow
Secretary: Adele Pincock	Director: DRD Properties
Director: Linda Collet	Director: Jan Walker

Our Purpose:
To  promote the continued health, safety, security, beauty, and viability of the  town of Virgin, Utah, through the combined efforts and talents of the individuals and entities herein known as the Friends of Virgin.  Though the Friends of Virgin differ dramatically in viewpoint and political affiliation, they unite here to assist in informing and educating local residents and decision-makers; promoting openness in the town government and free access to its records; and encouraging public input as well as its serious consideration by officials.

Whenever possible the Friends of Virgin shall:  

•	promote open governmental practices;
•	promote adherence to state law by Virgin town officials and employees;
•	inform decision-makers about the desires of residents;
•	inform residents about the actions of decision-makers;
•	assist residents and decision-makers by researching key issues;
•	encourage equal treatment of all residents by decision-makers and employees;
•	encourage the adoption of Virgin’s own rules of procedure to clarify and tighten policies
•	support and assist in a thoughtful, educated reworking of Virgin’s General Plan;  
•	support and assist in examining and modifying Virgin’s Uniform Zoning Ordinance 

Issue 1; May 2002

Dear Virgin Residents,

Your Town Council is in the process of making important decisions for Virgin's future.  Hopefully, the following information will help you form opinions which you will then make known to your Town Council.

Virgin Town is proposing to annex 20,000 acres.  Although the Town Council voted against approval after much public comment at their last meeting, the annexation apparently will be reconsidered at their next meeting on May 16th.  Also, in spite of the fact that a new zone created for the annexed land was tabled specifically for two regular meeting cycles, it is scheduled for public hearing and thus presumably for approval by the Council on May 16th as well.  Residents have expressed many practical concerns. 

Ask yourself the following:

•	Will the annexation benefit all, or just a few property owners?
•	Are our fewer than 900 available water hookups even enough to provide for the 5000+ undeveloped acres already in Virgin?
•	Should we allow our limited hookups to be used up on development miles from our town center?
•	How much will the added infrastructure costs increase our taxes in the near and distant future?
•	Over 90% of Virgin is undeveloped land.  Shouldn’t we make sure we can successfully develop this before acquiring more to service?
•	What will be the costs, hidden and otherwise, of servicing and maintaining pipelines and pump stations?
•	What will be the costs of providing other town services to the large annexed area in future?
•	Does Virgin have the ability to maintain services to distant or high elevation property?  
•	How will it benefit the town to allow our culinary water shares to water the petitioner’s livestock?
•	Should our limited town monies go to maintain and improve annexed land instead of what is now Virgin?
•	Should we allow the petitioners to design the new zone designed for the expansion area which leaves the door open for some large and possibly noxious commercial concerns?
•	Roads in annexed land will become our responsibility.  Can we maintain and improve yet more steep and high maintenance roads than we already have acquired?
•	Have previous annexations helped us?  The town paid for pipe to run culinary up to the 101, and still nobody has hooked in!
•	everything including the right to choose their zone and determine their allowed uses?  
•	Should we allow an annexation which directly contradicts our General Plan?
•	How can we justify approving a “Watershed” annexation agreement that not only does not protect the Virgin River, but allows uses that would pollute it?

What can you do about it?

•	Speak directly to your mayor (Jay Lee) and Town Council Members (Ken Cornelius, Darcey Spendlove, Gary Wilcox, and Bill Johnson) before May 16th, ask them questions, and tell them how you feel.
•	Come to the public hearings at the Virgin Town Hall, May 16th beginning at 6:15p.m.
Read your public notices often.
DETAILS
Some of our decision makers are also petitioners for the annexation.  Utah state laws discourage officials from participating in decisions when there is a conflict of interest, but they don’t forbid it.
Over 90% of Virgin's acreage is currently undeveloped.  Why should we annex more undeveloped land when we may not have the water to fully develop what we already have?  What if time comes to sell your undeveloped land in town and you find it has lost its value because there are no water hookups available?
There is no demonstrated need or justification for miles of water line that would only benefit a few.  The annexation clearly benefits the Petitioners by offering immediate water hookups which dramatically increase their property values.  The Petitioners propose a "Petitioner's Zoning" in this agreement (which allows them to use the land for almost anything they want!), but we feel they should follow our existing Town zoning laws like everyone else.
The Town doesn't know the costs of maintaining water infrastructure or how we will pay for it.  The Petitioners should present an engineering study to the Town that discloses the ongoing costs and lays out who is responsible for which costs, now and in the future.
The Town doesn't have a formal plan for the extension of Town services into undeveloped outlying areas, and we have no idea how much the added infrastructure will increase our taxes.

The Town needs are great and town monies are not.  Funds should be used on projects that benefit the Town as it stands now, like having a full time clerk in the office, repairing and paving existing and recently acquired roads, improving the entrance road to the Falls Park, providing fire protection and countless other important projects.

Petitioner's  agreement is based on a new zone which would allow many and varied uses not necessarily appropriate in Virgin. These uses include commercial farm businesses such as dairies, poultry raising, kennels, fur and fish farms, exotic animals, and many vague uses which might allow such things as feed lots and youth prisons. There are no limits to numbers of animals allowed.  “School” and “Park” are so vague that they could be interpreted to include criminal detention facilities, or Disneyland.  There is even a catch-all allowing the current or future planners and council to allow any uses they think are “in harmony” with the new zone.

Roads are an important concern all by themselves.  We annexed the road that leads up to Smith Mesa when LaVerkin dropped it, because they decided it was a liability, and too much of a drain on their funds to maintain.  Have we shown we can even take care of what we have?  What will happen when we are responsible for the roads that go up to and across Coalpits?  And those that crisscross the desert to the south of town?

Have annexations helped our town historically?  The town has already acquired a lot of undeveloped land in the recent past which could prove in the long run to be a burden.  Aside from the road up the mesa, Virgin paid in the neighborhood of $20,000 to provide pipe so that residents in the 101 area annexation could buy shares and hook into our culinary water.  The deadline to get the bargain price on hookups has now passed, and no one has hooked in.
The purpose of a General Plan is to ensure our officials base their decisions on what direction the town has decided it wants to go.  The proposed annexation conflicts in many ways with our Plan, which emphasizes careful and appropriate development of town services, tourism as our main commercial venture, growth from the center outwards, and open space protection.
HOW DO I STAY INFORMED?
•	Attend the public hearings scheduled for May 16th, beginning at 6:15 p.m. at the Virgin Town Hall located at 101 South Mill street.  This is where you will be given the opportunity to present your questions and concerns about the annexation and the new zone to your town officials.
•	Look at the Spectrum Classifieds where legal notices are posted.
•	Look at town office for special meeting postings.  Remember, some circumstances require only 24 hour notice.

Thank you for reading this information gathered by the Friends of Virgin.

Issue 2; July 2002
Inside this Newsletter
•	Who are the Friends of Virgin?
•	Meeting Watch
•	Opinion 
•	Happenings
Who are the Friends of Virgin?
At the beginning of the current  year, a handful of people residing in our corner of Southern Utah figuratively shook our heads and realized that the town of Virgin is on the brink of enormous change.  These people are varied; some were born here, while others have recently chosen Virgin as the perfect spot for their dream home. Some of us are dedicated to thoughtful commercial development, while others like our town just the way it is. These people began to talk to each other.  We began to talk to more and more others.  We started seeing more and more people at town meetings.  We began to hear lively, intelligent discourse in Council and Planning meetings. People started visiting each other and talking about town issues. We met people we had only heard of before.  
We found we liked the change from our old apathetic ways, and decided that we wanted to maintain our participation.  In spite of our varied perspectives, we all feel a desire, even a duty, to monitor in some degree the planning of the growth of Virgin.  We decided that the best  way to ensure our continued participation would be to formalize our group.   This would allow us to raise money for such things as this newsletter and to work together to educate ourselves. Beyond this paragraph is printed our purpose, about which we 
feel very strongly.  We are dedicated to avoiding extreme political positions so as to make ourselves useful to the majority.

FOV Newsletter
This edition of our newsletter is free.  A time may come in future when our newsletter will be provided only to FOV members.  
In a way, this is the second edition of our newsletter, because our group gathered forces a few weeks ago to produce a letter of concerns about the Virgin Watershed Addition Annexation.  We would ultimately like to send out a monthly edition.  
It is hoped that this newsletter will be useful to everyone who lives in the area.  It is intended to be mainly informational.  The FOV is varied in membership and thus will rarely voice a single opinion on an issue.  Instead we will defend the rights of members and the public to speak freely and offer as much education on issues as possible.  All political comment beyond strict reporting will be clearly labeled as opinion. 
meeting watch

Planning & Zoning, June 6:  

Renewal of Zion River Resort’s license was recommended for approval.

Sandra Grow, who had met the requirements to be put on the agenda but was left off, nevertheless presented a petition to the council that was signed by 96 adult Virgin residents opposing large youth treatment facilities in town.

A small subdivision waiver for Liahona Academy, a residential treatment facility for 45 or more troubled 14 to 17-year-old boys, was recommended.  Requested building and conditional use permits were not recommended because the necessary paperwork was not provided.  The Academy has changed its proposed location from the lot next to Casey Chivers on the west side of town to a lot located on the east end of town on property adjacent to Jack Clifton’s.

Ken Cornelius’ subdivision was tabled.

Items from the floor included discussion of the Liahona Academy, town fee and agenda policies, and the role of the Planning Commission.

Town Council, June 20:  A public hearing was held regarding the town’s 2002-2003 fiscal year budget.  Comments were brief.  Resolution #2002-06-20 to adopt the 2002-2003 fiscal year budget was approved unanimously.

A public hearing regarding the Southwest Mosquito Abatement & Control District was held.  The chemical Agnique is nontoxic and maintains ‘farmer-friendly’ water.  Malathion will be used very sparingly.  The cost will be between $1.30 and $1.40 per $100,000 on the value of your house each year.

Uniform Zoning Ordinance Amendment #2002-06-20 removing  a default zone for annexed properties and bringing them in as stipulated by Utah State Code 10-9-406 was approved unanimously.

Zion River Resort’s license renewal was approved.

At the invitation of the mayor,  Sandra Grow re-presented the petition opposing large scale youth homes in Virgin and made a statement reminding the council of potential harm and danger that occur regularly in youth homes across the state.

Mayor Lee stated that some residents had told him they wanted to rescind their signatures on the above-mentioned petition.  He read a letter from Mildred Heaton (his mother) and another from Joel Haws (town employee).  He mentioned two other names.

Alice Leavitt was invited by the mayor to speak.  She asked some questions about meeting procedure and commented on youth homes.

The discussion surrounding approval of a small subdivision waiver for Liahona Academy was somewhat contradictory.  Lenny Brinkerhoff, Virgin’s Zoning Administrator, was present and provided some insight about the town’s subdivision ordinances; but there were many questions about their legality, and the town remains without legal counsel.  Some were concerned that Liahona Academy was not being held to the same standards as other small subdivision waiver applicants.  Following this discussion, Mayor Lee made a motion to approve the 1-lot subdivision for Liahona Academy.  Although Gary Wilcox seconded the motion, it was denied by a majority vote:  Ken Cornelius, Darcey Spendlove, and Bill Johnson voted against the motion; Jay Lee and Gary Wilcox did not vote.  Immediately following this vote Mayor Lee made a motion the subdivision be tabled which passed with a majority vote. 
OPINION
Should Virgin approve permits for large  “Residential Treatment Facilities”?
First, we should find answers to the following questions: 
Does our zoning ordinance require what is minimally necessary to ensure the safety of the townspeople and the patients? 
Does our permit procedure help to weed out applicants who are unqualified to treat troubled patients? 
How could our town benefit from an enterprise whose large income will not be taxed by the town?
How would such a facility be provided with the police and fire protection necessary for its own and the townspeople’s safety?
A large commercial residential facility to house troubled teenage boys is currently proposed.  Why does our Planning Commission want to waive the usual subdivision requirements for an enterprise of this magnitude?
The current proposal is for a 7,100 square foot rectangular building beside Highway 9 which would probably have a tall chain-link fence around it.  Would such a sight deter tourists from stopping in our town?  Would it block our beautiful views?
Someday the state will require us to have city sewers at our great expense and possibly with a short grace period.  How much sooner will this happen if we increase our population in great chunks the way a large commercial live-in facility would?
Under what category of our commercial zone could a residential troubled youth treatment facility be considered to fall?  Here are the conditional uses listed in our commercial zone description:
Chapter 20-3: Conditional Uses:
  1.  Hotels and Motels.
  2.  Business and technical schools and studios for photography, art, music, and dance.
  3.  Carpenter shops, electrical, plumbing, heating, and air conditioning shops, and furniture upholstering shops, provided all uses shall be within an enclosed building.
  4.  Automobile repair and storage including paint, body and fender, brake, muffler, and transmission work, etc., provided uses shall be conducted within an enclosed and adequately ventilated building.
  5.  Public utilities and essential services
6.  Service stations with or without car wash. 
  7.  Planned Unit Development.
  8.  Automobile sales or service.
  9.  Car washes.
  10.  Restaurants with outside eating areas.
  11.  Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the conditional uses. 
  12.  Other uses similar to the above recommended by the Virgin Town Board to be in harmony with the character and intent of this zone.”  
The role of the Planning Commission is crucial, since, according to our Zoning Ordinance (8-6)  “In recommending approval of any conditional use. the Virgin Town Planning and Zoning Commission shall impose such regulations and conditions as are necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, to accomplish the purposes of the Virgin Town Master Plan and this Zoning Ordinance, and to contribute to the general well-being of the community.  If an applicant meets those conditions imposed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of a conditional use permit by the Town Board, subject to the conditions so imposed.”
HAPPENINGS
The famous Virgin 4th of July celebration actually begins at 8 pm on the 3rd, with a dance in the park.  Here is the schedule for Thursday:
7:30 AM:  FLAG RAISING
8  AM:  BREAKFAST
9 AM:  CHILD’S PARADE
10 AM:  SKEET SHOOT
12:30 PM:  DUCK RACE (Falls Park)
6 PM:  POTLUCK DINNER
7 PM: AUCTION
Other events of the day:
face painting & quilt raffle! greased pig chases & lawnmower races! cotton candy and inflatable slides! dunk the mayor or your favorite councilperson!  and horseshoes! 
There are quilt raffle tickets and lists at all the businesses and posting places in town to sign up for a potluck dish, but chicken and taters are free!
The auction promises to be really fantastic.  A partial list of the incredibly generous donors and the donated items can be seen at the end of the newsletter..  
Contact the FOV If you would like to get on (or off!) our mailing list please send a note to Friends of Virgin; PO Box 790005; Virgin, Utah  84779-0005 or email us at friendsofvirgin@yahoo.com. Our purpose may be viewed at our website, www.friendsofvirgin.com 
prizes and auction items (partial List):
•	Stout's Appliance and Carpet: 13” color television
•	Coral Canyons: (2) golf passes
•	Oasis Hotel Casino: one deluxe room for two nights
•	Fae Ellsworth: one hour massage
•	Sky Mountain Golf Course (1) 18 hole w/cart golf pass
•	Dr. Tebbs Chiropractic: one free adjustment or $25 off visit
•	Walmart- Washington City : 5 gallon gas can, flashlight, tent, two sleeping bags
•	Intermountain Farmers:  $50 gift certificate
•	Mean Bean:  Coffee beans 
•	Stout's Home Furnishings (1) banana chair
•	Elements:  rug; $30 value
•	Southern Utah Plumbing & Mechanical:  Faucet, value $150
•	Hurricane Equipment Rentals: $50 rental
•	Sparkle Plenty: $25 carpet cleaning
•	Regalo Beads:  gift certificate
•	Southern Utah Plumbing & Mechanical:  picnic ice chest
•	Virgin Goods:  gift certificates and more
•	Ace hardware: (2) spiderman fishing poles

•	Maxout Fitness: one month membership

•	Dairy Queen: (5) small blizzards & 8” frozen cake

•	Ballard’s Nursery:  (4) books

•	Tom's Clip Shop: 1 hair cut

•	3-H Landscape Products: (2) ceramic frogs

•		Back street tees (4) 	tee shirts

•		Traditions Books, Hair, 	and Crafts:  ceramic 	doll

•		Kmart: (4) nylon 	folding chairs $35 	value

•	State Street Salon:  Biolage shampoo and conditioner

•	Oversons Farm Center (1) model Case backhoe

•	Anderson Lumber (Hurricane): water jug

•	Parts Plus:  one case 10w30 motor oil

Issue 3; August 2002
Thoughts and Questions			
Many Virgin residents have lived here for a long time, managing to muddle along without really getting to know many neighbors. This is something which hopefully is beginning to change for the better.
This positive change is in part due to the consideration of some large proposals by our town government. On asking around, we found that many people simply didn't know what projects had been proposed, though almost all had strong opinions about the direction Virgin should be going. We spoke our own opinions to some, and urged many to speak theirs aloud. Some people were willing and some were not, fearing the wrath of others. This is strange and upsetting. Don't we have to trust in and exercise our freedom to speak in order for our society to operate properly? Conflicts of opinion are not to be avoided. They are to be sought out! They are to be cultivated! Not only because these differences make life interesting, but also because their resolution is the avenue to the very best decision we can make. When those on one side of a question have to address the concerns of those on the other, the final decision is based on much more thorough thought and research. Can this be bad? 
Another thing: some people seem to look at political debate as a personal attack. In spite of the fact that some TV campaign ads might suggest the two are related, we trust that we are all above that sort of muddy thought and poor behavior. It should be stimulating, and sometimes even fun. The idea that one could lose a friend by disagreeing on a political issue seems ridiculous, and we can't agree with our friends on everything!
A couple of months ago a group of landowners and residents formalized plans to incorporate as a group called the Friends of Virgin. As a group, we thought, we might allay some of the fears people have about speaking out. And we could raise funds to pay for newsletters and educational materials. We had no idea of the reaction we would get. We have been approached by lots of people, many wanting to join or support us, almost all commending our efforts and appreciating our information. But we also hear murmurs from some who seem suspicious, as though we were hiding our real purpose, that suddenly one day we might tear off our masks and reveal the dread faces of...... whom? We don't know! Help us figure it out, please! We have posted our mission statement on the internet at www.friendsofvirgin.com. We have sent out newsletters to inform residents who can't come to meetings about important happenings. We will sometimes allow a member or an expert in some field or other to write a piece in our newsletter (clearly separate from the factual reporting). But we cannot and will not take a position as to the particular degree or type of development that should happen in Virgin. We will not because we are dedicated to helping the town hear and find a resolution to all concerns. We cannot because our visions of Virgin's future conflict, even on our Board of Directors! Thus, it would be difficult and inaccurate to categorize us politically.
Virgin is going to change. We have a great resource here in the concerns and ideas of the residents. We ask that that resource be freely given by the people and that it be used to its fullest potential by our government, because that exchange will lead us to the fairest future.

Meeting Watch

Planning and Zoning, July 11.  Sue Kroll’s application for a Conditional Use Permit, Home Occupation Permit and Business License for Virgin Bath Works (homemade soap) was considered.  Only the conditions required in the ordinance were imposed.  The CUP and business license were approved unanimously for recommendation to Town Council.  The Home Occupation Permit was approved for recommendation providing Sue obtain the signatures of all property owners who share her property lines informing them of her proposed business.

Kenny Cornelius appeared before the commission for their recommendation and review of a Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat for his proposed subdivision, Virgin Acres.  After some discussion of the proposal it was determined some steps in the subdivision process had not been completed.  A majority vote approved the Concept Plan on the condition Kenny obtain updated info from Utah Power, notify the commission of the total acreage being considered for the project, and notify all property owners within 500 feet of the proposed project.  Commission Chair, Allen Lee, said he would complete the Report of Finding on the Concept Plan.

Casey Chivers proposed Virgin Town adopt an ordinance that imposes restrictions and precautions when considering the installation of youth homes.  His suggestions included 24-hour licensed security, police protection for the facility and the town, spot inspections and tight perimeter security.  Sandra Grow presented the commission with four more signatures of people opposing youth homes in Virgin.  Councilman Gary Wilcox inquired if Virgin currently has an ordinance governing youth homes.  Since such an ordinance does not exist, Allen Lee responded that concerns are addressed when placing the conditions on a Conditional Use Permit.  It was suggested a new ordinance specific to youth homes be created.

Town Council, July 18.  As only Mayor Jay Lee and councilmen Bill Johnson and Gary Wilcox were in attendance the Mayor announced at the beginning of the meeting that any action would require a unanimous vote by the three of them.

Sue Kroll had obtained the necessary signatures and her Conditional Use Permit, Home Occupation Permit and Business License were approved unanimously.

Derek Spendlove appeared before the Council for their approval of a 1-lot Subdivision recommended by Planning Commission.  The Council agreed to except Derek from a rule in the subdivision ordinance stating a piece of land cannot be subdivided more than twice within three years.  During the course of this discussion Russ Gallian, present as the town’s temporary attorney, discovered the council has not been properly enforcing a section of the subdivision ordinance requiring paved roads.  He advised the council to enforce the ordinance provision or change it.  Derek’s subdivision was tabled so Derek could obtain an easement to the property and the Town Council could reconsider the pavement portion of the ordinance. 

Derek asked if it would be possible to get a permit to live temporarily in the trailer on his brother's adjoining lot while he builds, but was referred to an ordinance prohibiting temporary trailers in Virgin.

Liahona Academy was represented by its attorney, Chris Edwards, who presented a Concept Plan for the proposed facility and asked the council to approve a 1-lot subdivision waiver, recommended by Planning Commission.  Chris informed the council the Academy was under contract with Walking X Ranches until the permits are given; that requirements for a building permit will be met by next month and that UDOT has granted permission for access off the highway. Mayor Lee asked Bill Johnson if he would vote to approve, Bill said he would not.  Then the mayor made a motion to table the issue which was seconded by Gary, but the the motion failed as Bill voted no.

 Planning & Zoning meeting; August 1: At the last minute, all of the Liahona Academy items were removed from the agenda. Minutes were approved with minor changes. Ken Cornelius had made quite a bit of progress through the preliminary plat checklist required for his subdivision but was still short a few items. Chairman Allen Lee and the board agreed to hold a special meeting to allow Kenny to complete the checklist and get their recommendation. Mayor Jay Lee suggested they have the special meeting far enough ahead that whatever is approved could be put on the agenda for fianl approval at the Town Council meeting on August 15th. Thus the commissioners decided on Monday, August 12th, at 6pm. This meeting will address K. Cornelius' subdivision if he is ready. In the only item from the floor, Allen Lee suggested the recommendation of Dale Huntsman's kennel license be addressed at that time as well, to which Dale's agent in the matter, Herb Frost, agreed. Then, the meeting was adjourned.
Coming Up:
At the Planning Commissiuon meeting on August 1, we were told that the Liahona Academy items had been postponed since they had not quite completed all of their requirements.  They will presumably be on the agenda of the September Planning and Zoning meeting (9/5/02).  Their requests include consideration of a final subdivision plat, a building permit, a conditional use permit, and a business license. 

Town Meeting Schedule:
•	August 22nd, 2002 (Thursday):  7:00 p.m.:  Special Meeting, Town Council;  (one lot subdivision for Derek Spendlove)
•	·	September 5th, 2002 (Thursday):  6:30 p.m.:  Work Meeting, Planning and Zoning.  7:00 p.m.:  Regular Meeting, Planning and Zoning
•	·	September 19th, 2002 (Thursday):  6:30 p.m.:  Work Meeting, Town Council.  7:00 p.m.:  Regular Meeting, Town Council

Close to Home
Some locals have noticed what seem like abuses of the BLM quarry out beyond the Sheep Bridge.  There are not enough rangers to properly monitor what happens at all of the public quarries, and many tons of flagstone are trucked out of state from this one.  Therefore, any of you who suspect anything improper can help by calling the BLM office at 688-3200.

History
The following week from 1894 is taken from the diary of my great-grandfather Charles Workman. He and his wife Josephine were the first schoolteachers in Virgin. During the week before this entry they lost one of their five small children who died from a fever that they only knew then as “the summer complaint”. Each of the five children is buried in the Virgin graveyard. Through all their losses they persevered, as did all the early inhabitants of Virgin. I didn’t know what the heck lucerne was until I looked it up. It’s the old English word for alfalfa.

-J. Walker 

August 10th- Clear and quite warm. Bro. Richard G. Lambert from Salt Lake City preached in the meeting house this evening. 100% sunshine.

August 11th- Clear, a little warmer than yesterday. 100% sunshine. I have been up to Spendlove's to see the school supplies that just arrived. Helped our folks to put some apples out to dry

August 12th- Sunday -- Clear and warm. 98% sunshine. We attended S.S. and meeting. Brother Lewellen Harris preached

August 13th- A few clouds -- still warm - 80% sunshine. Have been working at the store and watering for Bro. Anderson 

August 14th- Cloudy and an occasional sprinkle of rain. 5% sunshine. Josephine made some jelly and bottled some tomatoes this morning. We have been visiting up at Nephi's this afternoon. Got some lumber to make a porch of.

August 15th- Clear and quite warm. 97% sunshine. Third crop of lucerne being cut. Some cane ripening. Bartlett pears ripe. Father got a letter from Jacob in Arizona. He is there helping to run the mail.

August 16th- Cloudy - Heavy thunder and lightening this morning, with some rain. 40% sunshine. .13 in. rain.

August 17th- Cloudy - Wind and rain this afternoon. 60% sunshine. Amos and wife moved from Kolob today.

August 18th- Clear and quite warm. 98% sunshine. I bought a turning lathe of Joel Eagar. $10.

August 19th- Sunday - Josephine's birthday, 23rd. Cloudy in the afternoon, quite warm, 70% sunshine. Hattie, Zannie, Leo, Rennie, Ellis and Charlie, Josephine's brothers and sisters, came this morning to spend her birthday with her. Her Pa sent her a black alpaca dress for a birthday present, and I got her a sewing machine, cost $25.

Aunt Miriam’s Virgin Stew 

Mix: Equal parts Tolerance, Respect, and Kindness
Add: A large amount of Concern for the Future 
Stir In: A Healthy Dose of Skepticism for the Powers that Be
Simmer Well.
Serve with Generous Quantities of Civic Pride 
Garnish With Friendship, Service and Communication
Serves About 384

Issue 4; September 2002
Inside:
•	Meeting Watch
•	opinion
•	survey

Our Purpose:

To  promote the continued health, safety, security, beauty, and viability of the  town of Virgin, Utah, through the combined efforts and talents of the individuals and entities herein known as the Friends of Virgin.  Though the Friends of Virgin differ dramatically in viewpoint and political affiliation, they unite here to assist in informing and educating local residents and decision-makers; promoting openness in the town government and free access to its records; and encouraging public input as well as its serious consideration by officials.

Board of Directors:
Lee Ballard, president
Adele Pincock, secretary
Sandra Grow, treasurer
Linda Collet, director
DRD Properties, director
Jan Walker, director
Meeting Watch
[editorial comments bracketed]

Town Council, 8/15/02: 

     Only the Mayor and two board members, Bill Johnson and Gary Wilcox were present; thus no action could be taken without a unanimous vote. 
     Herb Basso from the St. George Recreation Dept. spoke about planning for future recreation. He said that we need to know what the community wants and how they value recreation in their lives. He talked about strategies for providing great recreational facilities and programs for little or no cost, including BLM deals, grant writing, volunteerism, and fee-based 
plans. Mayor Lee passed around a 'Virgin Town BLM General Plan Outline' which he said was drawn up a couple of years ago and updated in February of 2001. [This plan, which seems to include Mosquito Cove and other lands outside of town boundaries, should be available at the Town Office]. 
     An amendment was discussed which would allow the development of private water resources in the town limits. Councilman Wilcox expressed concern as to who would be responsible for upkeep and maintenance of such systems, and the board unanimously tabled the issue to allow for research and rewriting of the amendment.   
     A discussion followed on a proposal to rescind Resolution #95-4-20, which states that Virgin cannot sell water hookups outside town limits. Planning Commissioner Allen Lee explained that he had been approached by developers who wished to build an "Indian Cultural Center" on Allen's property along the river below Mosquito Cove. Allen said the Washington County Water Conservancy District had told him they would be willing to sell the necessary water directly, routing the water through Virgin Town lines. He also said that they would prefer for Virgin to provide the necessary hookups; the developers would extend the line and Virgin would be responsible to maintain the systems. The monthly fee would, naturally, be larger for those outside of town than for residents. Gary Wilcox said he would first want to see a written promise from the WCWCD that they would replace all the hookups Virgin sells outside of town with hookups for use within our boundaries. A motion was made to table the issue, but died without a unanimous vote [if it were rescinded, would Virgin have to sell to anybody who wanted one? As one member asked, would we have to hire another maintenance worker to work outside our town?]. 
     Next was a proposal to rescind Resolution #2002-08-15A, which allows owner-builders to live on-site in a temporary trailer. The board agreed to do away with the resolution, but Bill Johnson wanted to make sure that tough restrictions were put on the trailer hookups and that the time limit was clearly laid out and strictly enforced. It was also suggested that a deposit be made to the town to cover removal expenses of the trailer if the owner should default on the terms. A long motion including these conditions was made and passed unanimously. 
     There was then a discussion about appointing new Building Inspectors for the town.  It was agreed that the two who cover LaVerkin could be put under contract.  John Grow said he could easily be certified and was interested in doing inspections.  
     The Mayor opened a discussion on special meetings. Those Council members and Planning Commission members that were present, and the Zoning Administrator, all took part. He suggested a fee for special meetings, and there was a proposal to disallow them altogether, except in very rare circumstances. There was also talk of providing materials for meetings a certain number of days ahead to the members so as to reduce confusion in formal meetings [hip, hip, hooray!]. 
     Lee Ballard got up to ask about procuring a Virgin Town business license for the Friends of Virgin, Incorporated, a Utah non-profit corporation. She stated that they had originally applied in Hurricane because the agent's office happens to be there, and because Virgin apparently has no provision to license non-profit corporations without physical existence in Virgin. Mayor Lee said the group would have to clearly state with their name that the Town of Virgin does not endorse them. She asked for direction. Larry Amodt suggested she provide the corporation's articles and by-laws and the town would let her know what was required [one attorney we consulted says that according to the Virgin application form we do not need a license]. 
     Derek Spendlove came up and asked if the board were ready to approve his subdivision. However, since he was not on the agenda, no action could be taken. The board had a discussion and agreed that, since it may not have been Derek's fault he was not on the agenda, they would hold a special meeting to approve his subdivision. Because of the fact that in an earlier item, the board had agreed to limit or eliminate special meetings, they laughingly announced that there would be no more special meetings after next Thursday. Derek's will be the only item on the special meeting agenda. 
     Adele Pincock got up and asked what the town intends to do about the situation at the Falcon Ridge Ranch. She noted that, according to state law R501-1-3, the license allowing the facility to operate under its director, Randy Reber, is automatically void when there is a change of management.  Since Mr. Reber left the home some time ago and was the only licensed manager,  Adele asked that the town consider revoking the Conditional Use Permit given Mr. Reber last winter.  Councilman Wilcox said he had spoken to an unnamed source who said the State was giving the home 60 days.  Mayor Lee said Falcon Ridge Ranch would be on next month's Planning and Zoning agenda. 

Special Town Council, 8/27/02 :  [the special meeting planned for 8/22 was rescheduled to this date] Mayor Lee and Councilmembers Wilcox, Spendlove, and Johnson approved a Small Subdivision Waiver for Derek Spendlove.

Coming Up

     At the Planning Commission meeting on August 1, we were told that the Liahona Academy items had been postponed because they had not quite completed all of their requirements. They very likely will be on the agenda for the September 5th Planning & Zoning meeting. Their requests include consideration of a final subdivision plat, a building permit, a conditional use permit, and a business license.   If they are successful they could try to get final approval at the September Town Council on 19th. 

September Meetings
Planning & Zoning:  9/5/02, work meeting,6:30pm; regular,7:00 pm.
Town Council:  9/19/02, work meeting, 6:30 pm; regular, 7:00 pm.

OPINION
Permitting Residential Treatment Facilities  
      The Town of Virgin has existed for generations as a residential and agricultural oasis.  Our Uniform Zoning Ordinance has served us well enough in the past.  However, as more and more developers approach our Planning Commission with larger and larger proposals, the rules which protect our scenic beauty, our health and safety, and our quality of life inevitably must become more complex.  Certain uses, especially large commercial enterprises which influence their surrounding communities more drastically than homes, might be considered appropriate only in some areas or under certain circumstances.  For example, the Residential Treatment Facility (7,100 square feet, housing 45 or more troubled boys) which has been proposed just upriver from the RV Park, would  be larger by far than any other enterprise in our town.  It is essential to our future that we, as a town, educate ourselves adequately that we may anticipate the consequences of whatever sorts of commercial growth we decide to permit.  
     Our zoning ordinance is really not up to the task of ensuring the well-being of the town, the residents, the inmates, and the management of such a facility.   There have been discussions in meetings and comments from experts which suggest our zone descriptions are badly in need of a complete rehash.  One approach to the problem might be to slow or stop giving permits on large projects until we have brought our ordinance up to date.  
     Failing that, we have another control over just what sorts of enterprises move into Virgin:  the Conditional Use.    The Utah League of Cities and Towns offers guidelines to our decision-makers in the consideration of any conditional use.    A ULCT handout, Standards for Granting Conditional Uses, suggests our planners address the following concerns (among others) in their deliberations: 
•	the safety of people and property, 
•	the health and sanitation of the community 
•	the quality of the zone
•	the aesthetics of the proposal
•	the proposal’s compatibility with the General Plan
•	appropriate input from local residence
     This is right in line with our own ordinance which says that the role of our Planning Commission in considering conditional uses is “...to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, to accomplish the purposes of the Virgin Town Master Plan and this Zoning Ordinance, and to contribute to the general well-being of the community...”
     It seems a little strange that officials should even consider permitting a residential treatment facility here, since it is not listed in our commercial zone description and is not remotely similar to any that are listed (a quote from a ULTC handout on conditional uses reads: “Is this use listed as a Conditional Use for this zone in the Zoning Ordinance?  If not, it cannot be considered.  The Planning Commission nor the Board of Adjustments is empowered to decide what uses are conditional.”)       
     A petition expressing concern at permitting a large Youth Treatment Center within the populated area of our town was recently presented at Town Hall.  It included signatures from over 100 voters in Virgin, an overwhelming statement since only 135 voted in the last election.  Since our officials are encouraged to gather input from residents before granting a conditional use permit, we feel it appropriate to help provide some ideas on how some of the enormous concerns of the people might be mitigated.   We have done a great deal of research and are providing below a short list of sample conditions for youth Treatment Facilities and some questions to think about.  Please consider any gathering of input to be a crucial opportunity for you to participate in the building of a healthy, responsible future for your town.  
   We are determined to be optimistic about the treatment of children, the safety of surrounding towns, and the integrity of staff and management in Utah’s many Youth Residential Treatment Facilities.  Some of these youth programs have changed the lives of troubled kids for the better.  The problem is that we tend to find a single child’s sad experience of abuse to be completely insupportable, even though balanced by another child's success.   As is our duty in dealing with any aspect of child protection, we must err on the side of caution in regulating  this type of  enterprise; its combined nature of profitability and confidentiality leaves our children and our communities frighteningly vulnerable.  Our research tells us that the state laws and licensing procedures are barely a starting point in the responsible control of these homes, and that those who enforce regulations have extremely heavy case loads.  Thus, a large part of the responsibility to keep the students and communities safe falls on the entity which approves the permit, in the form of thoughtful conditions or, better yet, specific guidelines adopted as part of the zoning ordinance.  State law assumes standards and criteria within the zone description and every entity, from the town of Virgin to the county of  Salt Lake, would do well to incorporate such ordinances.  
     Most of the following conditions are modeled after those adopted in Rich County, Utah (another rural area which has recieved applications for troubled youth facilities), and some are rephrased from other local entities.  This is a small sample; many places where problems have occeurred due to these homes have lengthy ordinances governing them.  Please consider the examples and comments.   You may then decide to do any of the following:  contact FOV members with questions or requests for info; use the thoughts provoked here to form an opinion which you may take to your planners and councilors; bring the page with you to this month’s Planning & Zoning meeting and voice your opinion there; write your own letter to the Town Council; write down your responses and send the page to FOV, Inc.. (Box 790005, Virgin,  Utah, 84779-0005); send your answers (by item number) to our email address (friends@friendsofvirgin.com); and/or pass your newsletter on to a household member or neighbor who may want to do one of the above.  

A)  Some might say a moratorium on conditional commercial uses would be in order while a suddenly growing town adopts appropriate standards.  What do you think?       __________________________  
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________

_____1) The facility shall maintain at all times a current valid business license issued by the town of Virgin.
_____2) The facility shall comply with all requirements of the State of Utah for teacher certification, counselor licensing, therapist licensing, medical facilities, supervision requirements, core standards and any and all other requirements imposed upon the facility by the state of Utah.  Failure to comply shall be cause for permit termination.[though very minimal, Utah State Licensing requirements for these facilities are sometimes not met by operating homes which may mean the children enrolled are at serious risk]
_____ 3) The facility shall at all times abide by and be in compliance with state and local health regulations as well as state and local fire regulations, and provide proof of compliance for public inspection at the site.[especially when a residential home is located in the river bottom, compliance with health regulations is essential to the purity of our river.  Also, some of these facilities have been known to neglect the health and safety of the students]
_____4) The facility shall at all times comply with and provide proof of compliance for public spot inspections at the site.[in the event of a disruptive incident or reports of violations, homes should be immediately investigated to protect the children]
_____5) The facility shall maintain and show proof of liability insurance to protect the general public, the staff , and the students from damages resulting from negligent or criminal acts of the facility, its employees or students.[Virgin could be held liable for abuse or neglect of the students or damages to residents in some cases]
_____6) The officers and managers of the facility shall immediately report to the Washington County Sheriff any activity of student or staff constituting a Class B Misdemeanor or greater.  [Many normally reportable incidents in local youth homes statistically go unreported, which is why there are few crime statistics involving them]
_____7) Should any student be convicted of a second degree felony or greater while enrolled, the facility will immediately terminate the enrollment of that student.  [Some homes have been found to house violent students in spite of advertising to the contrary.  This puts the other students as well as the townspeople at higher risk]
_____8) The facility shall not admit any student arrested for a crime of violence or sexual assault regardless of adjudication outcome or plea agreement.  [Perpetrators of such crimes are sometimes offered time in these homes as a last-chance alternative to adjudication...]
_____9) Prior to the issuance of a conditional use permit, the facility shall indemnify the public against any loss or damage arising as a result of facility operation by depositing with the town a cash bond in the amount of  [suggested minimum:  one million dollars].  [Washington County Planner’s office suggests a healthy bond requirement for treatment facilities, and with income of  $3,000 to $9,000 per month, per child, these homes can certainly afford it]
_____10) Should any unlawful activity occur at the facility, the town shall immediately revoke the conditional use permit and business license.
_____11) Current numbered case histories of all inmates shall be maintained and available for public review at the Virgin Town Office.
_____12) Background checks on any staff or management who spend time alone with minors must go back at least 10 years [the children are trapped with the staff, out of the public eye;  we must do all we can to ensure the integrity of the caretakers]
_____13) Any facility housing more than 12 youth must be a lockdown facility. [There could but be  difficulty in controlling more than 12 enrollees, most or all involuntarily held, with no locks]
_____14) Any facility housing more than 6 youth must be located a minimum of one mile from any residence or residential zone. [Proximity of large commercial youth reform facilities to our small town neighborhoods seems aesthetically and practically inappropriate].
_____15) Any costs for police or rescue services arising as a result of acts of facility students, staff, or management, regardless of whether such acts are intentional or criminal, shall be the responsibility of the permittee(s). [A single escape from a local facility resulted in a cost of over $70,000  for police/ search services not to the facility, but to  Washington County; how many of those can Virgin afford?]
_____16) Any violation of these conditions shall be cause for permit termination.  [A facility granted a permit last winter in Virgin has had 'incidents', and a court order says the permittee is no longer allowed on the premises; yet we are currently allowing it to continue operation]
B)  There are many other possible conditions (we have found pages and pages of them in use in Utah)  which could help us to ensure safety and security.  If you have an idea for a rule which would mitigate a concern of yours, please share it:  _____________________________________________________ 
_______________________________________________________________________________

History
     Below is another excerpt from the diary of Charles Workman.  He and his wife Josephine were the first schoolteachers in Virgin.

SEPTEMBER 1894 

2- Sunday. Cloudy morning. Clear P.M., 85% sunshine. 
We attended S.S. and meeting. Bro. Edward H. Snow was at meeting, spoke. 
3- My birthday. I am 24 years old today. Born 1870. Bro. E. H. Snow spoke this evening on democracy. Bro. 
Humphries and I elected by the Demo. Club to attend the County Dem. Convention. 
4- Attended meeting of the store Directors. Dividends of 10% declared. 
5- My wife and I go to St. George. 
6 & 7- Attend Teachers Examination, got average of 88%. 
8- Attend Demo. County Convention. 

Issue 5; October 2002
Meeting Watch
[editorial comments italicized in brackets]
Planning & Zoning, 9/5/02:  Members present: Chairman Allen Lee, Sean Amodt, Mike Crawford, and Larry Amodt.  
	After approving minutes from August’s meeting, Stan Allen, current director of Falcon Ridge Ranch, asked to increase the number of adolescents allowed under the Conditional Use Permit granted to Randy Reber last winter.  He explained that the home’s state license is now conditional (a recent state inspection having found 15 violations) and will remain so until October 31, by which time the home must come into compliance with regulations.     Commissioner Mike Crawford said, perhaps rather than talk about expanding the facility, the Town should review the home's business license and conditional use permit because of the problems they have had.  Vern Charland, president of Falcon Ridge Ranch, said that there have been no charges filed.  He said some girls had been removed from the facility because their parents got nervous over allegations made against the former director.  The item was unanimously tabled until November.  
	Sun Hawk Academy was removed from the agenda.
	Vince Blackmore was present to request the Commercial Building Permit  for Liahona Academy, a residential treatment center for adolescents (RTC).  Subject to the granting of the conditional use permit, the recommendation to approve was successful at a vote of 3-1 (A. Lee: aye; S. Amodt: aye; L. Amodt: aye; M. Crawford: nay).
	Next, Chris Edwards, attorney for and partner in Liahona Academy requested a Conditional Use Permit.  He said there is no express use for "Youth Home" in Virgin's Commercial Zone, but  compared the treatment center to "Business or technical schools", and said they were “similar”.   The home would be built big enough for 48 adolescents. M. Crawford said he didn’t see where a Residential Treatment Center fits anywhere in the zone description.   Chris Edwards said, “The difficulty you have is you've already allowed one...”
	Crawford said that the Board’s job on this issue is to consider the safety of people, property, community health and sanitation, zone quality, aesthetics,  compliance with the General Plan, and appropriate input from local residents.  He said that a major part of this town does not want this facility here.     
	Chairman Lee said, “We can’t turn it down just because we don’t like it...” and asked for ideas for conditions.  
	Crawford asked whether it has even yet been determined that this RTC fits into our commercial zone.
	Then some questions were taken from the audience.  July 2002 complaints against the current Liahona facility were discussed (a resident referred to public records showing that only one of the staff members had passed required background check; that nine youth had been found in the home licensed for six; and that three teens were spending nights at a private residence with an unlicensed adult); a suggestion to take time to discuss and ponder the proposal was made; and concern over the lack of a fence around the facility was expressed [fire code prohibits locking the adolescents inside the facility].  A. Lee suggested one condition:  the installation of a block wall on J. Clifton’s side of the facility.  The sample conditions from the FOV newsletter were discussed at length.  Sheriff Judy Randall spoke about enormous expenses incurred by runaways from youth programs.  Clay AhQuin offered to make the state regulations available.      
	A resident suggested a review of public information available about the currently operating Liahona facility, and asked why we'd want to allow the owners to run a home for 48 youth, when they have not been able to stay within the rules for six, thus far.
	When asked about the lack of required background checks, C. Edwards said that that was the State’s error and that,  “...now we’re in full compliance.” [three days following this meeting, licensing agent Suzanne Chavira said background checks were still not all complete]
	Russ Gallian, town attorney in the Liahona matter, supplied a list of conditions which included compliance with the state regulations, installation of a wall on the east border, double-checks of fireflows and septic system adequacy (confirming maximum number of occupants allowed), maintenance of liability insurance, and payment of search and rescue costs if required by the county, and approval of their small subdivision waiver.
	Gallian then instructed the commission to make a finding as part of their motion of how the use is similar to those listed; he suggested they might compare the facility to business or technical school, restaurant, or hotel.  He continued, “that’s a judgment call that you need to make... to say that it's in harmony with the intent of the ordinance and the Master Plan of the city.  So, in voting for that, you would need to make that motion, that you feel it fits that exception category, because it is not specifically listed."
	Bill Johnson asked what the facility is actually called; the response was, the home is licensed as a Residential Treatment Facility. [the facility is clearly not licensed as a school]
	Mike Crawford made a motion that the Board deny the C.U. Permit  because “I feel it is not in harmony with the character and intent of the zone. ... I don’t see where this is a benefit to the town or to anyone, except the people who want to build it.”  The motion died for lack of a second.
	Sean Amodt then made another motion:  “Our commercial zoning ordinance under conditional uses... I see that this will fit under... in parts, either 1,2,and 3; and especially under number 12, 'other uses similar to the above recommended by the Virgin Town Planning & Zoning Commission and approved by the Town Board to be in harmony with the character and intent of this zone .....’ The motion for the CUP has conditions...”  He then listed the conditions R. Gallian listed above [it was a little confusing for us, too...]  
	Allen Lee seconded the motion. 
	Larry Amodt made a statement before his vote.  He said that if turned down the applicants would “...probably pursue this in other means.  Since I don't think that I should be the one... putting the Town of Virgin in a position to be involved in some kind of a great litigation and at great expense, I'm going to vote yes on this, and then I'm going to allow those elected officials who apparently have the trust and confidence of the public to make that decision; if they decide to force us into some type of a litigation situation, then it’s up to them.  So I vote aye."  [we don't feel that fear of litigation is an appropriate reason to permit an unlisted use; nor that an applicant who threatens it should be granted anything.  Also, Attorney Russ Gallian warned the Board of no such likelihood, advising them they must formally justify granting any unlisted use]
	The vote was 3-1 in favor (A. Lee:  Aye ; S. Amodt: Aye; L. Amodt: Aye; M. Crawford:  No); the motion passed.
	The Commission granted recommendations for approval of  Ken Cornelius’ preliminary plat, Dale Huntsman’s and Gail Drennan’s kennel licenses, Lee Ballard’s and Mike Crawford’s Conditional Use Permit renewals.  Discussion resulted in the Friends of Virgin being informed that they require no licensure by the Town.

Town Council, 9/19/02:
	Members present:  Mayor Jay Lee and Councilors Gary Wilcox, Darcey Spendlove, Bill Johnson, and Ken Cornelius.
	The council unanimously approved Dale Huntsman’s kennel license for six months on condition he keeps the dogs leashed when out of his yard.
	 Prior to consideration of the Liahona Academy items (small subdivision waiver, building permit, conditional use permit and business license), J. Lee announced that “Items from the Floor” had been removed from the agenda because it had been abused and public comment had no place in a town council meeting.
	Chris Edwards began addressing the subdivision waiver when J. Lee declared that he has a conflict of interest in the Liahona Academy.  Edwards said that the mayor’s conflict is “just that he formerly owned the property.” [as of the date of this meeting, J. Lee and G. Barrick were still the recorded property owners]
	It was unclear whether all subdivision waiver requirements had been met including a complete review of the concept plan and submission of an accurate flood plain map.  After discussion, J. Lee made a motion to approve the waiver; second by G. Wilcox.  The vote was 4-1 in favor (J. Lee: Aye; Wilcox: Aye; Cornelius: Aye; Johnson: No; Spendlove: aye); the motion passed.
	Liahona applicants requested a permit to build a facility for 48 boys plus staff.  The initial septic design was approved by the state health department for only 40 occupants.  A new design has been drafted but is yet unapproved.  J. Lee made a motion to approve a building permit contingent upon the issuance of a conditional use permit and business license, verification of the flood plain, submission of a redesigned septic system accommodating 56 people, and fire marshal approval of fire flow and sprinkler adequacy.  Second by Wilcox.  The vote was 4-1 in favor ( J.Lee: aye; Wilcox: aye; Cornelius: aye; Spendlove: aye; Johnson: no).
	Discussion moved on to the Conditional Use Permit, and R. Gallian advised that such can be approved if the Town Council finds the use to be in harmony with and similar to other uses listed in Virgin’s Commercial Zone description.  B. Johnson stated that Residential Treatment Centers are unique and therefore are not similar to any permitted or conditional uses in the commercial zone.  He said that RTCs are not advised by our General Plan, which encourages open space and limited growth and discourages any sort of commercial development near the flood plain. He moved to deny the conditional use permit; second by K. Cornelius (Johnson: aye; Cornelius: aye); motion failed.	Edwards stated a precedent had been set by the Council because they granted a permit to  Falcon Ridge Ranch.  Gallian advised council members they must consider a precedent but are under no obligation to approve one. 
	R. Gallian proposed a motion to approve a CUP for Liahona subject to requirements being met on the building permit; that they meet and maintain all state licensing requirements; build an 8 foot solid block wall at the east boundary to shield the residential neighbor; an additional 8 foot wall around the remainder of the perimeter; get and maintain
liability insurance in the amount of  at least one million dollars;  agree to pay for search and rescue on runaways if required by the Washington County Sheriff’s office; that there be no state referred or adjudicated kids; that there be lighting for the yard of the project and parking lot with low level directed down lighting (high pressure sodium lighting); they will keep a record of the reason each child is there by category and that will be made available for inspection by the town;  that they will report any violation of their CUP including any incidents violations of licensing requirements or incidents of  violence or criminal behavior by consumers; that they be limited to 48 young men and staff.
	J. Lee made the suggested motion; it died.  Wilcox said he wasn’t ready to vote.  Cornelius made a motion to table the item.  It died.  
	During a lengthy discussion regarding conditions to be attached to the permit, Wilcox waffled on whether “Residential Treatment Center” meets the criteria of the Commercial Zone, and Spendlove asserted it did not.   Wilcox  finally said he’d like to get this over and done with  and J. Lee made the suggested motion again.  The vote was 3-2 in favor (J.Lee: aye; Wilcox: aye; Cornelius: no; Spendlove: aye; Johnson: no).
	J. Lee made a motion to approve the Liahona business license subject to the conditions raised in the earlier matters; second by Cornelius.  The vote was 4-1 in favor (J. Lee: Aye; Wilcox: Aye; Cornelius: Aye; Johnson: No; Spendlove: Aye); the motion passed.
	Ken Cornelius’ preliminary plat of Virgin Acres was approved.
	The council approved two renewals of conditional use permits, one to Lee Ballard for apartments, the other to Mike Crawford for Virgin River Rustics.
	There was discussion about appointing a new Planning Commission member but it was decided the Commission would remain as is for now.

Planning & Zoning, 10/3/02:  Members present: Chairman Allen Lee, Sean Amodt, Marsha Rasmussen, and Larry Amodt.  
	After approving September’s minutes, the Board unanimously  recommended to approve renewal of Michael Lau’s business license for Zion Canyon Transportation.  The Board then unanimously recommended approval of Ken Cornelius’s  final plat, with conditions of bonding approval by the Council and clarification of the city street standards.  A discussion about ordinances regulating adolescent RTCs ensued.  It was suggested that a committee be formed to work on the ordinance.  Sheriff Judy Randall agreed to sit on the committee.  It was also decided that next week’s water bill to the townspeople will accompany a request for input from residents on the subject of these treatment centers. [We should reward our officials for asking for our input by giving it to them!  Please send in your comments]
	A new ordinance was to be discussed relating to businesses containing explicit sexual material, but Lenny Brinkerhoff was not there to present her information, and the item was tabled.

Upcoming  Meetings:
Town Council:  10/17/02, work meeting, 6:30 pm; regular, 7:00 pm.
Planning & Zoning:  11/702, work meeting, 6:30 pm; regular, 7:00 pm.

OPINION
Liahona Academy Appeal:
	Some of you may have been surprised to hear that the Friends of Virgin, Inc. are appealing a recent decision of the Virgin Town Council. On September 19th the Council voted 3-2 in favor of granting permits to Liahona Academy for building a 7,100 square foot commercial RTC to house teenage boys who may have behavioral or substance abuse problems.  Members of FOV who have done much research are concerned about the safety of occupants and surrounding residents, the cleanliness of the nearby Virgin River, the infrastructure costs and possible liabilities to the town, the aesthetics of the facility, the adherence to zoning ordinance by officials, and the democratic rights of the townspeople (over 100 voting residents have signed a petition asking that the Town deny such a project; only 135 voted in the last election).  Part of our stated purpose is to promote the health, safety, security, beauty, and viability of Virgin, and to remind officials to adhere to the law and to consider public input in their decisions. Thus, we have no choice but to object to the Council’s approval of the Liahona project.
	The first step in the appeal is to ask the Virgin Town Board of Adjustments to reverse the  Council’s decision.  The Board of Adjustments is seldom called upon in Virgin but it plays a very important role in the government of our town.  The BOA meets publicly.  Their job is to hear and decide variances, special exceptions from the zoning ordinance, questions regarding non-conforming uses, and, as in this case, appeals from zoning decisions applying the zoning ordinance.  They have the power to overturn or modify any zoning decision of the Town Council.  The chairman of the  BOA may administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses.  The BOA, upon notice, is to schedule a reasonable date to hear the appeal, giving appropriate public notice of the meeting.  When an appeal is made to this board, all associated development activities by interested parties must cease if such cessation will cause no imminent peril to life or property.  Please look for a notice in the Town Hall or Post Office if you would like to attend the hearing. For more information on the BOA or the appeal, contact us via email.
What do the Friends REALLY think about growth?
	The directors of the Friends of Virgin, to our surprise, have lately heard others telling how we would like Virgin to grow.  Since we have never made a statement about this as a group,  we are a bit puzzled as to where these ‘opinions’ are coming from.  In any case, we asked each to write a very short version of our hopes for the future here. 
Jan Walker:  “Virgin sits in an incomparably beautiful valley. I would like to see the new homes and businesses that will come here respect the high desert and not attempt to make it a tortured fake New England landscape. I want to always see masses of cottonwoods like we have now and open fields for horses and kids and new businesses that enjoy the small town flavor and want to preserve it. It would be great to have a sort of town center with small hotels and cafés and stores. What we have here is fragile. La Verkin used to be attractive, so did Los Angeles.”  
Sandra Grow:  “I have been in the construction business for the past 22 years.  I am not “anti-growth”.  Growth is what keeps me in business and in a job.  But I do believe in controlled growth and quality growth.  Many towns have adopted this way of thinking and it is a success all over the country.  Virgin is a wonderful place to live and I think that we should keep it that way.  We can achieve this by controlling types of  growth  and by maintaining the quality, friendliness, and esthetics of the building that does happen here.   We should stay within the themes of the town:  residential, tourist, and agricultural.”
DRD Properties South:  “Any new development, commercial or residential, should be of high quality and blend in with the surrounding landscape and scenery. There is a need for residential rental units to accommodate area seasonal workers and Zion Park employees. Soft commercial development, meaning small in size and beneficial to locals and area visitors, such as lodging facilities, a mercantile shop, furniture building enterprise or eating establishments are desirable. “
Lee Ballard:  “We need to hang on to our freedom in land use.  Newcomers shouldn’t change the rules for natives; none of this, ‘your cows have got to go’ stuff.  They should, however, be allowed to rely on the developmental intent of a town where they buy and build.  To live in town we sacrifice some freedoms for conveniences, including the freedom to build a chemical weapons plant or a prison near a home.  Tourism and recreation, by their own necessity, safeguard our natural attractions.  Whether we draw the line this side of noxious land uses will determine if Virgin remains a good place to live.”
Adele Pincock:  “New businesses should serve the locals and entice travelers. Any commercial venture that doesn't meet some need for residents here and along the corridor should not be allowed. A cafe, spa, bookstore or recreation resource center are some examples I would consider appropriate. I also support low impact residential development.  Any development, regardless of type, should be regulated to ensure building style and materials complement our environment and protect the beauty that brought the builder to the area in the first place. Residents and visitors should always be able to enjoy the quiet yet majestic magnitude the surrounding desert and mountains provide.” 
Linda Collet:  “Shopping in Virgin:  After leaving the Post Office I could get a haircut at the salon on the corner.  Shopping for a birthday gift would be easy with several shops nearby.  A leisurely cup of coffee and a snack with a friend at the cafe would be a pleasant way to spend some time.  I need to reserve a room for some out of town friends at the inn near the river and  I’ll make dinner reservations while I’m there.  Can’t forget those tax forms from my accountant and drop off my ideas for that chair at the cabinet shop.  One more stop and I’m through.  Now, what did I need besides bread and cheese at the market?  Shopping in a small town is so pleasant and convenient.” 
 
History
	Here is another excerpt from the diary of Charles Workman.  He and his wife Josephine were the first schoolteachers in Virgin.
Fall1894 

Sunday and Monday- Conference. Bro. F. M. Lyman present. Had a good time. 	
Tuesday- Attend Court (2 District -- Bartcly Judge). 
Wednesday- Return home with Jos. Atkin. Clear but very windy. 95% sunshine. F-- S-- and E-- H-- each fined $25 and costs for fornication. 
Thursday- Clear and cool, 100% sunshine. J. A. S. convicted of adultery at St. George. 
Friday- Frost this morning, bit some melon and sweet potato leaves. S-- was sentenced to 1 1/2 years in the Pen. 
Saturday- Clear and cool - almost to the freezing point. 100% sunshine. Cut my lucerne.

November 2002

inside:
•	Meeting Watch
•	Opinion 	
•	Miscellany
•	History

Friends Of Virgin, Inc.
P.O. Box 790005
Virgin, Utah 84779-0005
www.friendsofvirgin.com
If you wish to be removed from our email list please send a message to friends@friendsofvirgin.com.

Our Purpose:
To  promote the continued health, safety, security, beauty, and viability of the  town of Virgin, Utah, through the combined efforts and talents of the individuals and entities herein known as the Friends of Virgin.  Though the Friends of Virgin differ dramatically in viewpoint and political affiliation, they unite here to assist in informing and educating local residents and decision-makers; promoting openness in the town government and free access to its records; and encouraging public input as well as its serious consideration by officials.

Board of Directors:
Lee Ballard, president
Adele Pincock, secretary
Sandra Grow, treasurer
Linda Collet, director
DRD Properties South, director
Jan Walker, director

Meeting Watch
[editorial comments italicized in brackets]

Town Council,10/17/02:  
	Members Gary Wilcox, Ken Cornelius, Darcey Spendlove, Bill Johnson and Jay Lee present.  Attorney Russ Gallian informed the council that when approving a conditional use permit (CUP) council members must “spell out” the reasons for their action in the motion to approve.  Since a CUP was approved for Liahona Academy at September’s meeting, the council should have presented written findings for the record as is required in chapter 8, section 7 of Virgin’s Zoning Ordinance.  Jay Lee moved to have Gallian complete an appendage to September’s minutes listing reasons for granting a CUP to Liahona Academy.  Second by D. Spendlove; ayes unanimous.  A motion was then made to approve September’s minutes; ayes unanimous.
	Washington County Sheriff Judy Randall was present to address the written threats received by a town council member and his wife.  She said three separate letters were mailed which makes this a federal offense; and if more than one person is involved, conspiracy charges would be considered.  Randall said the letters are in the lab being analyzed for fingerprints and that there are some “decent leads.”  [Anyone with information, please contact the County Sheriff]
	Other business included the approval of a kennel license for Gail Drennan and approval of Michael Lau’s business license to operate a 24-hour taxi service. 
	Curt Ludvigson of the Rural Water Association (RWA) was present to inform the council and public about services available to members of the RWA.  Virgin Town is a member of this non-profit organization, which is funded by membership dues and state and federal grants.  Dues enable the Association to provide services including training, technical assistance and advice on water systems, and on obtaining funding and grants.  Mr. Ludvigson then described a “resurrected” law pertaining to water rights.  He advised that a town or individual with unused water rights must file a non-use application with the state in order to protect those rights.  Per Attorney Gallian, our drainage is already over-appropriated; therefore any unused water right is lost for good unless a non-use application is filed.  In this way, municipalities can actually “bank” unused water rights in perpetuity for future growth.  Jay Lee moved that Gary Wilcox follow up with RWA Utah on non-use applications for the town.  Second by D. Spendlove; ayes unanimous. [For additional information about the RWA and non-use applications, call them at 801-756-5123]
	Next, R. Gallian told the council of a rule of law requiring a Resolution Establishing Pending Ordinance Doctrine when current zoning rules come under review.  Since the Planning Commission is working on a new ordinance regarding Residential Treatment Centers (RTC), a resolution must be adopted.  The resolution notifies any applicants for an RTC that current zoning is under review and they would be subject to the new laws.  It then directs the Planning Commission to begin work on the ordinance.  Gallian’s original draft referred to the facilities as “Adult or Youth Drug Treatment Centers.”  This language was amended to “Adult or Youth Residential Treatment Center.” B. Johnson moved to approve the resolution with the amended language.  Second by G. Wilcox; ayes unanimous.  
	K. Cornelius then presented the final plat of Virgin Acres Phase I for approval.  Most discussion centered on the paving and street requirements in the zoning ordinance.  Cornelius protested the paving requirement, saying the council has set a precedent for non-compliance by not requiring other recent sub-dividers to deal with roads according to ordinance.  He said he had intended to present meeting minutes to support his claim, but when he visited the Town Office to review them they were locked up in the filing cabinets, and the key was not in the office.  R. Gallian stated to the council that if they are not enforcing the ordinance consistently, they are breaking the law.  Even though the ordinance includes a provision allowing the council to make exceptions, he recommended the ordinance be either revised or enforced as is.  Sean Amodt stated the Planning Commission intends to modify the paving part of the ordinance.  After more discussion (bringing existing roads up to code, road base v. black top, rights-of-way, curb and gutter), Jay Lee moved to approve the final plat conditional on completion of an engineering and legal review, and a final decision on paving. 
	After the vote, the council changed gears and discussed appointments to Virgin Town Board of Adjustment (BOA).  Jay Lee referred to Section 3-1 of the zoning ordinance which states one member of the Planning Commission shall be a member of the BOA.  Stating that there is a current vacancy on the Board, J. Lee moved to appoint Allen Lee as representative from P&Z to make it a “legal board.”  The motion died.  In the ensuing discussion, R. Gallian gave his opinion that the Virgin Board of Adjustment will not hear the appeal of the Liahona Academy CU Permit filed over a month ago by FOVI [we find this curious].  The issue of appointments was tabled until another meeting.   Then, the meeting was adjourned.

“Don’t be afraid to fight for your rights; George Washington wasn’t and even the British like him now.”  Ethel Merman

Planning & Zoning, 11/7/02:  Members present: Chairman Allen Lee, Sean Amodt, Mike Crawford, Marsha Rasmussen, and Larry Amodt.  
	After approving minutes from October’s meeting, William Adams asked the town to allow a boundary change between two lots in Desert Garden Estates.  The change, which could have been done without going through any town procedure, allow the Adams’ to have a back yard while leaving plenty of buildable space on the other lot.  Mr. Adams said he preferred to get the town’s approval before making the change.  The commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the change.
	The commissioners then voted unanimously to recommend renewal of two Conditional Use Permits for Commercial Business Licenses.  The first was Mary Lou White’s, for her trailer park; the second for Budd Lee & Sons.
	There was then discussion of our subdivision ordinance.  Lenny Brinkerhoff, Zoning Administrater, and Commissioner Sean Amodt proposed combining two previous amendments into one and adding a paragraph distinguishing between a “subdivision” and a “division of land”.	There was talk of further categorizing “subdivision” into three types of usage:  residential, non-residential/agricultural, and commercial/industrial.  This way, different checklists could be generated for applicants depending on the type of use proposed, streamlining and clarifying the process.  It was mentioned that our subdivision ordinance books are not all up to date, and suggested that the ordinances all be entered into the computer to make updating easier.
	S. Amodt then explained that new state law effective by the end of 2002 requires all municipalities to have adopted a comprehensive annexation policy before any new lands can be annexed.  The policy would begin with a map showing possible future expansion areas, boundaries being negotiated by adjoining entities to leave no unclaimed areas in between, reducing future confusion. The policy would define which services the Town would provide to newly annexed land.  By the new law, the timeline for an annexation will extend a minimum of five months.  L. Brinkerhoff said that we also must have our maps and policy registered with the County.  A map drawn for the Virgin Watershed Addition Annexation was put up and boundaries which had been suggested last spring pointed out.  It was decided that Sean Amodt, Mike Crawford, and Marcia Rasmussen would work on the policy plan and return with a draft to the next meeting.   Since hearings for it have already been scheduled, time is very short;  there may have to be a special Planning meeting called to work on the plan if it is to be ready for the posted public hearings on December 5th and 19th.  Mike Crawford moved to table the issue until the next meeting or a special meeting.  Ayes unanimous.   [not much notice, but please be ready to make your recommendations at the public hearings in person or in writing]
	Chairman Allen Lee opened a discussion about writing an ordinance to address Residential Treatment Facilities.  He noted that very few residents had responded to the request for comments in the last town newsletter.  S. Amodt handed out a list of a few regulatory guidelines from nearby towns, there was some discussion, and attendees were called upon to make comments.  A list of volunteers for a committee to work on the ordinance and report back to the Planners was read.  The committee will consist of the following:  Sean Amodt, Bill Johnson, Dawn Amodt, Adele Pincock, Andrhea Winder, John Grow, Lee Ballard, and Heather Brinkerhoff.  Sheriff Judy Randall, who volunteered last month to help on the committee, and Stan Allen, current director of Falcon Ridge Ranch, were listed as consultants.  [please make comments and get them to committee members as soon as you can; the group will do its job most effectively with plenty of input from area residents] 
	In an item from the floor, Mayor Jay Lee said the Town may be in a good position to qualify for a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG).  He mentioned possible facilities such as a senior citizen’s center and a fire station, and suggested we all consider what projects would be most beneficial for the Town and bring our considered ideas and proposals to  public hearings for the issue on December 5th and 19th.  
        In the only other item from the floor, Lee Ballard asked if Virgin has a “sister city”.  Since no one seemed to know the answer, she agreed to look into the ULCT program, which helps larger cities provide donated equipment to smaller ones.  The meeting was adjourned.	

“Stand with anybody that stands right while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong.”  Abraham Lincoln

Upcoming  Meetings:
Town Council & Public Hearing: 11/21/02, work meeting, 6:30 pm; CDBG hearing 6:45 pm; regular, 7:00 pm.
Planning & Zoning Special Meeting to work on Annexation Policy Plan;  date unknown; look for a 24 hour notice!
Planning & Zoning and Public Hearings:  12/5/02, work meeting, 6:30 pm; Annexation Policy hearing, 6:45; regular, 7:00 pm.
Town Council:  12/19/02, work meeting, 6:30 pm; Annexation Policy hearing, 6:45; regular, 7:00 pm.

“Better to face a danger once than to always be in fear.”  English proverb

OPINION
	First, we would like to thank all of you who have offered us help and support over the last few weeks.  
	Our board members were deeply shocked to learn that someone has stooped to making personal threats against members of our community, purportedly due to political 
disagreement.  Such behavior is despicable, and is directly contrary to the principles which the Friends of Virgin uphold.   Though we believe our purpose and our track record to make the point quite clearly, we want to reiterate that we strongly advocate against any smearing of the line between political belief and personal feelings.  It is our first wish that whomever is responsible will come forward and apologize, as such tactics only promote dissension in our potentially ideal small community.  Barring that, we fervently hope for the guilty party to be speedily found and punished.
	We are distressed by the downward progression over the last few months of that agenda essential, “Items from the Floor”.  In December of 2001the agenda put a time limit of three minutes per speaker on this traditional part of the meeting, where concerns voiced in an orderly fashion by the attending public could be addressed by the councilmembers.  Lately, this part of the agenda has been one of the most interesting and educative.  It is impressive how many residents have begun to study their Virgin Zoning Ordinance and Utah statute, as well as track down public records and research issues, theoretically affording the opportunity for highly effective deliberations.   On the agenda for Town Council of May 2002, the limit per individual went to one minute; and on this September 19th,  “Items from the Floor” was missing from the agenda altogether.  We were told at that night’s meeting, which addressed sensitive issues, that public comment had no place in these meetings, and anyone who spoke from the audience would be escorted out of the building by the sheriff, now in attendance at every council meeting.  In October's Town Newsletter we are informed that, though there will be provision for it on the agenda, “items from the floor” will no longer be taken from the floor, but must be submitted in writing days before the meeting.  We are informed that dissension is discouraged, that "the floor should not be used as a gripe session", and that comments "should be kept positive”.  The FOV believe that our civil rights include the opportunity for contradictory opinions to be voiced.  In the past few months we have not seen any meeting attendee or debate become rude or belligerent.  We have seen almost exclusively polite exchanges of considered thought, and highly pertinent information. Differences of opinion are the basis of our democratic governmental system, and should be gladly utilized to lead us to the best final decisions.  Furthermore, if we aren’t freely given the opportunity to voice our concerns, how can our elected officials know how to represent us?
	
“Dare to do your duty always; this is the height of true valor.”  Simmons (American Clergyman 1798-1856)

Miscellany	 		
	Three cheers for the St. George City Council.  With the help of KCEC, Charter Communications, and area students, the Council’s bi-monthly meetings will now be broadcast live, allowing residents to stay up to date while luxuriating on the couch at home!  
	“Half of the misery in the world comes of want of courage to speak and hear the truth plainly, and in a spirit of love.”  Harriet Beecher Stowe
History
	Don’t miss the unusual map printed on the outer page of this newsletter; it was drawn by Evan Lee from his memory of the way Virgin looked in its earliest days.  So many of the same families are still here; don’t be surprised to find your own last name on the map.  Evan S. Lee was the first Mayor of Virgin.  [SORRY, GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN E-VERSION]

“Men are never so likely to settle a question rightly as when they discuss it freely.”  Thomas Macaulay

December 2002
Volume I, issue 7
Friends Of Virgin, Inc.
P.O. Box 790005
Virgin, Utah 84779-0005
www.friendsofvirgin.com
If you wish to be removed from our email list please send a message to friends@friendsofvirgin.com.
Our Purpose:
To  promote the continued health, safety, security, beauty, and viability of the  town of Virgin, Utah, through the combined efforts and talents of the individuals and entities herein known as the Friends of Virgin.  Though the Friends of Virgin differ dramatically in viewpoint and political affiliation, they unite here to assist in informing and educating local residents and decision-makers; promoting openness in the town government and free access to its records; and encouraging public input as well as its serious consideration by officials.
Board of Directors:
Lee Ballard, president
Adele Pincock, secretary
Sandra Grow, treasurer
Linda Collet, director
DRD Properties South, director
Jan Walker, director
FOV NEWS						We are very pleased to announce that, at least for this month, Virgin Town has put us out of the Meeting Watch business.  Recently the town newsletter added a new feature:  a detailed report of each town meeting.  It has improved each month to the point that our old Meeting Watch section has become redundant, so we will now touch only on those topics which interest us most, leaving the rest to Virgin Town.  Three cheers for those who work hard on our town newsletter!
	We are going to take advantage of this opportunity to do a shorter-than-usual newsletter this month.  This will save us a little money and give us more time to work on our personal comments on two issues about which our town boards have asked for input.  The deadline for input on the new draft of our Annexation Policy Plan (see details below and on our website) is December 18th, and the Youth Residential Treatment Center ordinance committee would like to receive as much input as possible over the next few weeks.  
	At the November Town Council meeting Town Attorney Russ Gallian presented his written findings for the Liahona Academy Conditional Use Permit (CUP) which would allow a 48-youth residential treatment center to be built east of the RV park on Highway 9.  Findings are required by ordinance on CUPs to formally represent the opinion of the council, and explain how and why councilmembers believe the proposed use fits into our zoning ordinance.  Since no such justifications had been included in the minutes from September’s TC meeting where the council voted to approve the use, this was proposed as a way to validate the permit.  In November the council voted unanimously to table the approval of these findings, leaving the applicants without a completed permit.   Since the permit must be valid before it can be legally challenged, the FOVI appeal of this permit is still up in the air. 
	The new Residential Treatment Center ordinance committee appointed by the Planning Commission last month met twice in November.  Adele Pincock was chosen to chair the committee, and the first meeting was a productive brainstorming session.  At last Thursday’s epic Planning and Zoning meeting Adele Pincock reported that the committee will post public notices of future meetings; the public is encouraged to attend or give their input to committee members.  Although Planning Commission member Sean Amodt (who is on the RTC committee as well) questioned  the purpose of the committee and even made a motion to disband it, Planning  Chairman Allen Lee asked the committee to continue to gather information and input to help planners write a solid RTC ordinance.  Look for a meeting notice in the post office; the committee will probably meet around December 18th.  		The public spoke long and well about the proposed Annexation Policy Plan at the hearing last Thursday.  We were glad to see that residents have obviously put some thought into this since it may guide us a long way into our future growth.  The Planning Commission has asked that townspeople provide input in writing on the policy plan before December 19th.  It is very important people respond to this request!  When planners received no input whatsoever on a proposed youth home ordinance a few weeks ago it was stated that “silence is agreement”.  According to new state law effective by the end of 2002 all municipalities are required to have adopted a comprehensive annexation policy before any new lands can be annexed. The policy would begin with a map showing possible future expansion areas, boundaries being negotiated by adjoining entities to try to leave no unclaimed areas in between, reducing future confusion.  It would define which services the Town would provide to newly annexed land; it should estimate and consider actual costs of infrastructure and weigh those against benefits of expanding in certain areas.  Sean Amodt, Mike Crawford, and Marcia Rasmussen are working on the policy plan and will present a draft to the next P&Z meeting.  Since they will need to actually draft the plan by then, time is extremely short.  Their decisions could affect Virgin's future for decades to come; since this plan will govern how all annexations are handled in future, the specifics of the policy should be very carefully thought out to see that it ensures the welfare of our community.  This should be seen as a great opportunity since some or all of residents' concerns could be addressed by our policy plan, theoretically allowing townspeople to rest in the knowledge that future annexations will not have a negative impact on our taxes, economic viability, property values, or quality of life.  	
	
How can we stay informed? Attend the public hearings scheduled in January and possibly even December at the Virgin Town 

Friends of Virgin, Inc.
PO Box 790005
Virgin, Utah  84779-0005

Hall located at 101 South Mill street. This is where everyone will be given the opportunity to present questions and concerns about the annexation policy plan to town officials. Though we certainly hope our officials will give this process more time, it is even possible a final plan will be brought to a vote at the January 17th Council meeting.  Look at the Spectrum Classifieds where legal notices are posted. Look at town or post offices for special meeting postings.  For more information, check our website or talk to a FOV member; we will be providing statute and guidelines for the new law, as well as a list of possible concerns, very soon.  		One last bit of news worth mentioning:  the Town Council held a closed meeting on November 26th to address an item called “Auditor’s Progress of Findings”.  Rumor has it another closed meeting may be scheduled in the near future.  State law allows our officials to close discussions only under certain circumstances, such as when they must hold strategy sessions to discuss  the following:  personal issues of individuals; collective bargaining; pending or reasonably imminent litigation; the purchase, exchange, sale, or lease of real property; deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; or investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.  We must confess we are curious; what are they talking about???  
We wish the merriest holidays ever to you all!
HISTORY
Some Facts About Virgin City
by Evan S. Lee
	Virgin was settled in the spring of 1857 by Johnson, Workman, Haslam, Bradshaw and others. They called it Virgin City after the Virgin River. The river was clear and never runs it banks like it does today.
	In 1861 it rained for 40 days.
	Sixtus Johnson was the first Postmaster in Virgin.
	Lewis Brewer did not know how to read until he read the Book of Mormon.
	William Wright came to Virgin in 1862. Him and others formed a herd of cattle and called it the Kolob Herd.
	Bp. Parker's wife was a midwife and delivered over 300 babies in Virgin. 
	The Virgin Church building was built in 1866.  The floor joists were made out of pine logs hued on one side and they still stand for in the 1940s we had to block some of them up to level the floor.
	In 1860 a big school house was built on the Southwest corner of the square. The present school was built in 1874-75. The basement was used for a tithing cellar.
	In 1907 they struck oil and by 1909 there were wells drilled everywhere. Virgin was a tent city?
	In 1930 we put the city irrigation water into town and put the lights in. Up until 1930 we hauled water from the river in a barrel on a sled.
	I was the first mayor.
This information was taken from a document written by Evan S. Lee and is in the possession of Sharon Lee.