| Profile Update: 02/02/2002 | |
| Different Systems from
Rivals by: freshwsthomas (28/M) |
Written before 01/16/2002 |
| Updated: 01/20/2002 01/28/2002 02/09/2002 | |
| In USA it's illegal of a company to take actions in the market to control the industry. A company should let other companies operate with business in the industry. This doesn't include giving confidential data to other companies. The temporary only company should give protocol to let products from other companies to run together. For car industry, the protocol is the roads for cars to run. The temporary only company doesn't need to give data how its car engines operate. For telephone industry, the protocol is the signal connection. The temporary only company doesn't need to give data how its telephone circuitry operate. For personal computer industry, It seems complicated, but I have a simple solution. Let PCOSMHS = personal computer operating system with maybe a distinguished hardware structure The protocol is network connection and signals, and the file formats for data, webpage and media files including .txt, .pdf, .doc, .htm, .wav, .mp3, .bmp, .jpg, vidio string, etc. ... and they need to be compatible among different PCOSMHS's. They should be forced to be released at any change. Program files .exe and .dll vary a lot with systems and they don't need to be compatible among different PCOSMHS's. The content don't need to be forced to be released and the companies or programmers can choose to keep confidential or release to any extent they like. In this industry structure with companies each with a different PCOSMHS, Microsoft doesn't need to be forced to give its confidential documents how its operating system operates because each company can make its own decisions for customers and its system development in competition. The only Microsoft has to do is to give data, webpage and media file formats and network transmission protocol to let different PCOSMHS's from different companies run together through network or optical disks and the problem is solved.
|
|
| About the Lawsuit Procedures by: freshwsthomas (28/M) |
01/16/02 04:15 am Msg: 1674 of 1680 |
|
I am happy that the Judge has decided to hear the public before late
January. Let ECEAPCCA = Electrical and Computer Engineers with specific field mainly in Assembly language Programing and about CPU(central processing unit) structure and Computer Archetecture I suggest both sides of the lawyers, the justice lawyers for the states and the defendant lawyers for Micorsoft, take sufficient ECEAPCCA's as assistants into the court every time and the jury composed with enough ECEAPCCA's. Before the formal court begins next time, the ECEAPCCA's learn and read about the antitrust laws against monopoly, and the Judge and the lawyers learn and practice to write basic assembly languge programs. The computer structure levels: |
|
|
|
Some peripherals link to the mother board dirctly without the linking of a
card, and a lot of parts of application programs don't drive the devices
but directly link to the operating system extensively Only lawsuits on the operating system level help to solve the problem. Lawsuits on other levels (for example, browsers of the Application Program level) don't help about the problem whichever side wins of Microsoft or [another company(e.g. Netscape) or a state]. The problem is mainly around personal computer operating system which tells the hardware what to do in sequences, and assembly language operates the hardware directly, so people writing programs in assembly language and understanding computer structrues best understand what data Microsoft should disclose all the time to keep justice against monopoly and what data should be held in Microsoft to keep the intelligence rights. ECEAPCCA's also know what commercial actions of Microsoft are really important about suspect monopoly. |
| Difinitions in the Laws by: freshwsthomas (28/M) |
01/17/02 05:16 am Msg: 1679 of 1680 |
| What is 'abusing its monopoly status'? It reads vague. In laws there should be concrete definitions on actions which belong to monopoly abuse. http://biz.yahoo.com/ts/020111/valley_020011.html >The private suits arose after the U.S. government filed an antitrust suit against Microsoft in 1998 for abusing its monopoly status in the software market. Some suits were dismissed, because consumers were found not to have standing, having only gotten the software when they bought a PC. |
|
| Home |