Next: Finding m and n
Up: Pythagorean Triples, etc.
Previous: Pythagorean Triples, etc.
Contents
This section in pdf form. triples2.pdf
If
is a positive integer solution to the equation
|
(1) |
then
is a Pythagorean triple. If
, and
have no
common divisors greater than
, then
is a primitive
Pythagorean triple (PPT). Similarly, if
where
is a PPT then
is primitive. In the
following list only the second triangle is not primitive.
-
-
-
-
-
Clearly, if
divides any two of
,
and
it divides all three. And if
then
. That is, for a positive integer
, if
is a Pythagorean triple then so is
. Hence,
to find all Pythagorean triples, it's sufficient to find all
primitive Pythagorean triples.
Let
, and
be relatively prime positive integers such
that
. Set
reduced to
lowest terms, That is,
. From the triangle inequality
. Then
|
(2) |
Squaring both sides of (2) and multiplying through by
we get
which, after canceling and rearranging terms, becomes
|
(3) |
There are two cases, either
and
are of opposite parity, or
they or both odd. Since
, they can not both be
even.
Case 1.
and
of opposite parity, i.e.,
. So 2 divides b since
is odd. From equation (2),
divides
.
Since
then
, therefore
also
divides
. And since
,
divides
. Therefore
. Then
and from (2) |
(4) |
Case 2.
and
both odd, i.e.,
. So 2 divides
. Then by the same process
as in the first case we have
|
(5) |
The parametric equations in (4) and (5) appear
to be different but they generate the same solutions. To show
this, let
and
Then
, and
. Substituting those values for
and
into (5) we get
and |
(6) |
where
,
, and
and
are of opposite parity.
Therefore (6), with the labels for a and b interchanged,
is identical to (4). Thus since
, as in (4), is a
primitive Pythagorean triple, we can say that
is a
primitive pythagorean triple if and only if there exists relatively
prime, positive integers
and
,
, such that
and
. And
is a Pythagorean triple if and only if
and
where
is a positive integer.
Alternatively,
is a Pythagorean triple if and only if
there exists relatively prime, positive integers
and
,
,
such that
and
Another Method (using Gaussian Integers).
Let
|
(7) |
where
, and
are pairwise, relatively prime, positive
integers. Let
and
, where
.
Then
and
are Gaussian Integers, and
is the
conjugate of
. Note that
and |
(8) |
Since
then
. Hence each of
and
is a square. That is, there exists integers
and
such that
and
. So, from equation
(8),
Since
is a positive integer,
and
must be positive
integers,
. And since
,
and
must be
relatively prime and of opposite parity.
Equation (8) illustrates a method for finding primitive
Pythagorean triangles where the hypotenuse is to a power. We have
the identity,
|
(9) |
The absolute values are necessary since the terms on the left,
depending on
, may, or may not, be positive.
Example
Let
, and
. Then, from equation (9), we
have,
Still another method -- the difference method.
Let
be a primitive Pythagorean triple. Without loss of
generality, let
be odd. Equation (7) can be written
as,
Set
and
. Thus,
and |
(10) |
Since
is primitive,
. This
implies that each of
and
is a square. So, since any
odd positive integer greater than 1 can be written as the difference
of two positive integer squares, there exists positive integers
and
,
, such that
and
. Hence,
from equation (10),
And, since
,
and
must be relatively prime and
of opposite parity.
Equation (10) illustrates an efficient method for finding
primitive Pythagorean triples where the odd leg is to a power. We
have the identity,
|
(11) |
Example
Let
, and
. Then, from equation (11), we
have,
Next: Finding m and n
Up: Pythagorean Triples, etc.
Previous: Pythagorean Triples, etc.
Contents
f. barnes
2008-04-29