poems by tom miller
i hate poetry
i hate most poetryno-- strike that--
i hate it all!
now, dont get me wrong,
i hate my stuff too, but
its the masters that really
stink.
you know, yeats, kipling,
poe, frost, carver, hughes, id
mention the girls, but
id have to hold my nose,
and cross my legs tightly,
then theres bukowski.
hes got some readable junk,
but poems? would i call them
that? no, i dont think so. they
dont rhyme, and they stink.
yada yada DRINK yada yada
WHORE yada yada HORSES
yada yada KILL MYSELF,
well, you got your death. now,
shut up already. jesus.
and i hate the small press, and
those pompous editors-- theyre
so fucking jaded, the lot of them.
last shit i sent out, i got a note
back with a lecture about my
cover letter being a xerox form,
kind of like the rejections i
receive over and over again in love,
and i wanna just shout, "shit, man,
are you publishing poetry or
cover letters?" its all a big
circle jerk anyway. i dont think
poetry as an art is valid. seems to
me that any simpleton can
fashion a few words
into stanzas and bitch,
complain, or just rant.
Most poetry books are
a waste of paper. ive seen
poems that use ten words
on a whole page with some
profound idea like how real
the taste of an apple is, or
how river-like her eyes were,
and i just want to eat shit
when i read it. and whats worse,
nobody reads poetry. in fact,
a knitting seminar would probably
draw a better crowd than any
poetry reading i can think of.
we poets are just lying to
ourselves. the joke is over. folks
are figuring it all out-- poetry in
the renaissance was held in high
regard, until people began to discover
it was all bad, and silly, and a waste
of time, and over the course of time,
the poetry audience
dropped, like lemmings, off a cliff
they didnt want to spend time
pouring over complicated metaphor
and simile and linguistic tinker--
it just didnt make any sense-- but
now theres plain spoken clear poetry
coming off the beat era, poetry that doesnt
rhyme, it just sounds like talk. theres
nothing poetic to it. theres no way to win.
the great poets were freaky people and
shitty writers. their work is endearing because
their persona is peculiar, but thats all.
okay,
so you think im a misogynist.
fine. ill talk about the women. oats
sucks. plath sucks. dickinson,
moore, stein, lyfshin, and ginsberg,
sucks sucks sucks sucks sucks.
yes, i consider ginsberg to be
a lady poet. dont you? and his
scribblings are too bogged down
in political blah blah, and have about
as much passion as a cow farting
into the ozone layer. plus, he had big
ugly frog lips. from the romantics,
to the symbolists, to the twentieth
century, there has been nothing
but aimless musings about trees,
people, oceans, emotions, and
shit like that. id rather go to
disney world and ride
dumbo thirty times in a row.
well, there.
ive said it.
poetry is bad.
all of it.
mine included.
well, no.
not really.
actually, some of it is very good.
no, im kidding.
its all bad