2.6. The written assurance (commitment) that E.S.O. never maintained
up today
As told before there was already an utmost authority of the E.S.O.,
who acknowledged in written the dramatic situation of the case “Palma” and the
tort he was suffering. He expressed an undisputed official regret and assured action for a remedy, apart of the fact of letting ESO pay to Palma most
indemnities of the Organisation, following his loss of concerned employment.
This person was Mr. GERHARD
BACHMANN (Acting Head on 1995), who covered for tens of years, previously, the
function of Head of Administration at E.S.O., i.e. held a position with an equivalent
power of DECISION of the Director General, on his behalf.
Mr. BACHMANN was already very sick, when he wrote his commitment
for the Organisation, and died unfortunately before of any possible agreement
with Palma, on how that assurance of the Organisation, “in blank” to act in
his favour for a possible remedy to him, could be physically implemented for
closing finally in good order his whole case.
After Bachmann’s death, the new Head of the Administration was
Mr. N. König.
This guy unfortunately, instead of maintaining
a decisional independence for the acts of the Administration at E.S.O., as well
as Bachmann did, and to advise the Director General in such a way (since the
function of the Head of the Administration is the only one subject to the control
of the National Ministers of the E.S.O. after the Director General), left anything
totally in the hands of the Director General, Mr. Riccardo Giacconi.
Mr. Riccardo Giacconi, who seemed to have a very dirty conscience
in the case Palma (having denied him even a demanded private personal audience by the middle July 1995 for a report against his delinquent management,
what he also discovered by he himself when he fired Mr. Buschmeier by 25.7.1995…too
late for Mr. Palma), moreover a Mr. Giacconi, who seemed of better thinking
of his future Nobel Prize rather of a JUSTICE and of a LAW at E.S.O., disregarded
any Palma’s Appeal and any previous commitment of Mr. Bachmann, compelling Palma
to a record of Complaints at the I.L.O. Administrative Tribunal (actually 34+2
versus E.S.O. and 4 v. the CERN).
The synthetic conclusion of this section is that since the 28.7.1995
and up today the E.S.O./Mr. Bachmann commitment “in blank” of “acting in favour
of Palma” was never maintained and the case is still open for a Justice and
for adequate remedies.
I report, here, as a testimony for the world-wide Public Opinion,
the main “scanned” document of that commitment dated 28.7.1995 (CLICK HERE OR ON THE UNDERMENTIONED DOCUMENT IN Standard PICTURE). This argument will be also re-presented and re-discussed for its
juridical aspects, as soon as the SECTION of the I.L.O. Administrative Tribunal
will be published.
Since the 28.7.1995
and following Bachmann’s death, I, Mr. Palma, never saw one action E.S.O. made
in my favour. On contrary, I was forced, even though regretfully, to submit
about 40 Lawsuits to the Tribunal against the Organisation.
It would be time
that finally somebody fulfils that ASSURANCE.
